What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lynch officially on the block (1 Viewer)

Buffalo wants a 3rd, that's been the price all along. If they don't get it, they keep their 24 year old power back who has 2 years left on his very affordable contract. Buddy Nix isn't ######ed, he knows Buffalo has a ton of needs, but the chances that a 4th or 5th rounder fill one of them are slim.

It's been said that Buffalo would also make the deal for a player & a low round pick. They have major needs at OT & OLB. The Bills brass is rumored to like Green Bay's OLB Brad Jones, who doesn't start for the Packers, but would start for sure in Buffalo. Jones & a 6th would be a done deal IMO.

Green Bay could get Fred Jackson for a 4th, that move actually makes the most sense for both teams.

 
Cawbird said:
I'll go against the grain here (GB), and throw out these teams:

1. Houston - depth behind Foster and above Slaton For the love of god no

2. NE - Green-Ellis is the only one really worth anything right now. Sign Lynch to a multi-year contract. Possible

3. Phi - They need depth behind McCoy, and it appears that they could be strong all season long. Make a run for it this year.

4. SD - Someone to help until Matthews is completely healthy and let Matthews come back slowly.

5. Tampa - Caddy just isn't cutting it and I think Lynch would fit well with the system and they already went to a youth movement. Lynch still has a lot of time left and you don't know what you have with Huggins or Blount.
Possible
 
I still think the Bills are holding out hope that they get an offer that blows them away, but I'm not sure that they will get one.Maroney got traded last week for 4th round pick and a swap of 6th round picks. Is Lynch worth way more than Maroney at this point?
For sure he is worth more than Maroney.
Career ypc:Maroney 4.1, Lynch 4.0Seems pretty even to me . . .
Usually love your stuff Yudkin. This one not so much. Patriots have had one of the best offenses in the league since Lynch & Maroney came into the league. The Bills have been remarkably inept during that span. Maroney got to take handoffs from Tom Brady, (and one year of Matt Cassel.) Lynch has had JP Losman, Trent Edwards, Brian Brohm and Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB. Not even an apples to oranges comparison. I think this Lynch to GB trade might actually happen. Thompson has long been a fan of Lynch, and he's certainly shown a propensity for sticking with "his guys". He gave Koren Robinson another shot etc. Also Aaron Rodgers played with Lynch in 2004 at Cal. I don't think Thompson would part with a 2nd, but a 3rd seems a likely compromise. Lynch is also under contract in 2011 for 1.14 Million.
Well, there is no question the price IS right. 1.14 mil for a starting RB is as good as you're gonna get.even if he has off field issues, the investment isnt overly much.I'd like to see this deal get done.
 
Sammy Traveller said:
Lynch is not going anywhere. Seems to be another hamhanded attempt by the Bills to shop out a player they were overpaying.
How do you overpay a player still on an original rookie contract?
 
Cawbird said:
5. Tampa - Caddy just isn't cutting it and I think Lynch would fit well with the system and they already went to a youth movement. Lynch still has a lot of time left and you don't know what you have with Huggins or Blount.
As a Lynch owner I'd like to see him moved, but I doubt it will happen. If it does, Tampe is intriguing. If its done now, he would have one extra week to learn the playbook with TB on bye this week. Other places that might be a good fit:

1. Miami: good for the 'Phins with Ronnie and Ricky getting older (how much tyopunger is Lynch?) but bad for FF this year.

2. Seattle: Forsett is just OK, and Leon is not coming off of Spedial Teams barring injury to Forsett.

3. Washington: Portis is old.

4. New England: Would he be the starter here or law firm?

Everywhere else would be FF hell. On second thought, maybe he's better off starting in Buffalo.

 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem.

Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.

 
I would like to see him on the Rams. We need options and we need to trade Jackson at some point when he still has any value. If we could work a deal for Lynch, then turn Jackson for picks to further build our offensive line we could once again be approaching mediocrity.

 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
:shrug: I've never totally understood the burning passion to run Marshawn Lynch out of town. Was he worth a 1st round pick? No, but that's water under the bridge. He's a perfectly serviceable RB who would serve as a great complement to Spiller if we had anybody to block for either of them, which of coruse we don't. And I know he may not be a model citizen, but come on.
 
I think if he is traded it is only to the Pack. I still think the trade almost makes too much sense not to happen.From Bills perspective- they are 0-3 and clearly won't make the playoffs this year with the mess they have QB- Fred Jackson has proven he can do a good job with an expanded role- they are heavily invested in Spiller and his role will only increase as the season proceeds- Lynch's value is a lot higher right now than it was at the beginning of the yearFor Packs perspective- the Pack are Super Bowl contenders this year and are woefully thin at RB- Lynch could be more than just a rental for them. He could be their lead back for years to come.- Lynch has a low salary - The organization has always liked Lynch and would have drafted him in the first roundI don't see how the Pack don't offer at least a 2nd round pick for a running back who could be their guy for the next 5 or so years.
Teddy T would not offer a second round pick for AP let alone Lynch. Packers will never pay up with Teddy at the helm
 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
:shrug: I've never totally understood the burning passion to run Marshawn Lynch out of town. Was he worth a 1st round pick? No, but that's water under the bridge. He's a perfectly serviceable RB who would serve as a great complement to Spiller if we had anybody to block for either of them, which of coruse we don't. And I know he may not be a model citizen, but come on.
Dead on Ivan. Runs hard, has fun. Think what he could do with an O-line. Averaged 4 Yards a carry since he got here.
 
I think if he is traded it is only to the Pack. I still think the trade almost makes too much sense not to happen.From Bills perspective- they are 0-3 and clearly won't make the playoffs this year with the mess they have QB- Fred Jackson has proven he can do a good job with an expanded role- they are heavily invested in Spiller and his role will only increase as the season proceeds- Lynch's value is a lot higher right now than it was at the beginning of the yearFor Packs perspective- the Pack are Super Bowl contenders this year and are woefully thin at RB- Lynch could be more than just a rental for them. He could be their lead back for years to come.- Lynch has a low salary - The organization has always liked Lynch and would have drafted him in the first roundI don't see how the Pack don't offer at least a 2nd round pick for a running back who could be their guy for the next 5 or so years.
Teddy T would not offer a second round pick for AP let alone Lynch. Packers will never pay up with Teddy at the helm
Critics also said he never would trade up in the draft. Then he did, first for Jeremy Thompson (now retired due to injury) then he overpaid NE (in terms of NFL pick valuation charts) for the ability to move up and draft Clay Matthews. He sent pics 41+73+83 for 26 and 162 overall net loss of 162.5 draft valuation points or the equivalent of pick 86. They also said Thompson would never sign a Free Agent. Then he signed Ryan Pickett, and Charles Woodson and Brandon Chillar. Bottom line is when Thompson sees somebody that he really wants, he goes and gets that guy. Yes, he prefers to develop players through the draft, but its pretty hard to argue with the team he has assembled at this point. Back on topic. Thompson has long been a fan of Lynch. The Packers have made at least two inquiries before Grant got hurt into the availability of Lynch. Each time they were rebuffed by the Bills. I suspect Lynch will be in GB sooner rather than later. The Packers will need a running game this season, and Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn aren't good enough to provide one. Nance and Starks are wildcards at this point. Only the Packers know what they have there.
 
I think if he is traded it is only to the Pack. I still think the trade almost makes too much sense not to happen.From Bills perspective- they are 0-3 and clearly won't make the playoffs this year with the mess they have QB- Fred Jackson has proven he can do a good job with an expanded role- they are heavily invested in Spiller and his role will only increase as the season proceeds- Lynch's value is a lot higher right now than it was at the beginning of the yearFor Packs perspective- the Pack are Super Bowl contenders this year and are woefully thin at RB- Lynch could be more than just a rental for them. He could be their lead back for years to come.- Lynch has a low salary - The organization has always liked Lynch and would have drafted him in the first roundI don't see how the Pack don't offer at least a 2nd round pick for a running back who could be their guy for the next 5 or so years.
Teddy T would not offer a second round pick for AP let alone Lynch. Packers will never pay up with Teddy at the helm
From your lips to God's ears! <--- Vikings fan
 
Cawbird said:
2. NE - Green-Ellis is the only one really worth anything right now. Sign Lynch to a multi-year contract.
Very little chance they trade him to a division foe like the Patriots.
 
The real question is what Buffalo wants in return. A package similar to the Maroney trade would probably get him out. I think Buffalo is S-O-L if they think they're getting even a 3rd from GB.
They wouldn't give up a 3rd round pick for a guy who would be their main running back for possibly 5 years?They wouldn't give up a 3rd round pick for a guy who is underpaid and has proven himself to be a capable NFL workhorse when they are woefully thin at RB and they are Super Bowl contenders?Please!!!! I guarantee you the Pack would give up a 3rd round pick for Lynch. Probably more.
They wouldn't trade a 3rd for a guy that is a personal conduct policy infraction away from a suspension? They wouldn't trade a third for a guy that has been outplayed in his short career by Fred Jackson?This is exactly like the Maroney situation. Like Maroney, Lynch has NOT lived up to his pedigree. Lynch has been on the bench because his played justified it. The Bills didn't go draft Spiller because they thought they had their RB for the next 5 years on the roster already.At this point I wouldn't guarantee that Lynch produces more than Grant did in that offense.Could this deal happen? Sure. But I think some here are overestimating his value significantly.
 
OK, Dan Snyder might, but probably not anyone else.
Hmmmm.... serious question, pardon my ignorance on this.... Washington needs a back. Now. Does Lynch not fit their scheme? I am guessing not since I don't see Washington being bantied as a likely destination.
 
They wouldn't trade a 3rd for a guy that is a personal conduct policy infraction away from a suspension? They wouldn't trade a third for a guy that has been outplayed in his short career by Fred Jackson?This is exactly like the Maroney situation. Like Maroney, Lynch has NOT lived up to his pedigree. Lynch has been on the bench because his played justified it. The Bills didn't go draft Spiller because they thought they had their RB for the next 5 years on the roster already.At this point I wouldn't guarantee that Lynch produces more than Grant did in that offense.Could this deal happen? Sure. But I think some here are overestimating his value significantly.
Respectfully, I suspect most people would be pretty excited to have a RB that produced like Grant.
 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d

 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d
the ground game was "a positive". a positive 15 yards or so.

i'd say this quote means next to nothing in regards to them getting or not getting lynch.

 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d
Not saying that this is evidence FOR GB being interested, but I don't think it's evidence AGAINST them being interested either. Negotiating 101 is not showing your hand. If GB is in talks for Lynch, McCarthy saying, "Our ground game stunk and we really really need RB help," would up the price Buffalo would expect.
 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d
GET ER DONE!!!

 
My only question is ,If Greenbay wants him, what exactly are they waiting for? I don't think this is going to happen or it would of already.

 
My only question is ,If Greenbay wants him, what exactly are they waiting for? I don't think this is going to happen or it would of already.
According to the report last week by Packer beat writer Bob McGinn, the Packers are waiting for Nix to return one of their many phone calls, the first of which was made last spring prior to the draft, and the most recent a couple weeks ago. In each case, Nix has had one of his assistants call the Packers to tell them that Lynch is not available.
 
I'm not sure the Bills would accept a 3rd rounder from GB. If they would it would be done IMO.

The problem is from their perspective is that not all 3rd round picks are created equal. Everyone knows GB is good so it is safe to say they will be picking late in the round. So a 3rd rounder from GB is barely better than a 4th rounder from a team like Tampa and a second rounder from the Pack isn't much better than a 3rd rounder from Tampa.

 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d
No offense to B Jackson but he looked like he had no business playing NFL football last night. he was timid and scared to get hit.
 
This is exactly like the Maroney situation. Like Maroney, Lynch has NOT lived up to his pedigree. Lynch has been on the bench because his played justified it. The Bills didn't go draft Spiller because they thought they had their RB for the next 5 years on the roster already.At this point I wouldn't guarantee that Lynch produces more than Grant did in that offense.Could this deal happen? Sure. But I think some here are overestimating his value significantly.
:goodposting: For all the folks that hate the Maroney comparison, I'm wondering why, if Lynch is so much better, then why was he outplayed by Jackson? Why was Spiller drafted? And most to the point, why is he on the trade block at age 24?
 
This is exactly like the Maroney situation. Like Maroney, Lynch has NOT lived up to his pedigree. Lynch has been on the bench because his played justified it. The Bills didn't go draft Spiller because they thought they had their RB for the next 5 years on the roster already.At this point I wouldn't guarantee that Lynch produces more than Grant did in that offense.Could this deal happen? Sure. But I think some here are overestimating his value significantly.
:goodposting: For all the folks that hate the Maroney comparison, I'm wondering why, if Lynch is so much better, then why was he outplayed by Jackson? Why was Spiller drafted? And most to the point, why is he on the trade block at age 24?
better by default..Maroney is bad, don't know how many times I have to say it. It's apparent that some have not seen him run.
 
Mike McCarthy Expresses Confidence In RB's Brandon Jackson, John Kuhn

According to Lori Nickel of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, coach Mike McCarthy expressed confidence in running backs Brandon Jackson and John Kuhn after Monday's loss to the Bears. He called the Packers ground game "a positive" after the loss. Green Bay doesn't usually panic or overpay for free agents, but we still wouldn't rule out a move or two to address the position at some point this season. Jackson is averaging just 2.9 yards on 36 carries.

Read more: http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-...l#ixzz10s8RRC8d
No offense to B Jackson but he looked like he had no business playing NFL football last night. he was timid and scared to get hit.
I'm sure he wouldn't be offended by this, so you're safe.
 
This is exactly like the Maroney situation. Like Maroney, Lynch has NOT lived up to his pedigree. Lynch has been on the bench because his played justified it. The Bills didn't go draft Spiller because they thought they had their RB for the next 5 years on the roster already.At this point I wouldn't guarantee that Lynch produces more than Grant did in that offense.Could this deal happen? Sure. But I think some here are overestimating his value significantly.
:hophead: For all the folks that hate the Maroney comparison, I'm wondering why, if Lynch is so much better, then why was he outplayed by Jackson? Why was Spiller drafted? And most to the point, why is he on the trade block at age 24?
I personally am not big fan of Lynch but he is better than Maroney. I think his relationship in Buffalo has been soured by his off the field issues, he only lost the feature role after his 4 game suspension last year and during that suspension Jackson played like a man possessed. Lynch has proven over the course of 2 seasons that he can be the lead back of team and do so somewhat respectably. Is he better than Grant? Maybe a little but he is about the same IMO. Maroney on the other hand had a chance to become the lead back in NE but due to numerous injuries and ineffectiveness was never able to seize the opportunity.I believe Buffalo when they say they aren't in any hurry to trade Lynch. They aren't looking to dump him but it looks like they will listen to other teams now. I think Buffalo's price from GB would be a second round pick. Like I mentioned earlier in this thread a third rounder from GB probably isn't enough because GB will likely be good this year and their 3rd round pick would be too late in the 3rd round. From GB's perspective getting Lynch would not be a rental. If they wanted a rental they could go after Fred Jackson or Jerome Harrison. But for a rental I doubt they would give up more than 4 rounder, if that. But Lynch is a guy the people in GB have always liked and if they think he can be the answer to the running back situation for 5 years then IMO not trading a LATE 2nd rounder for him would be a mistake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
:hophead: If they can shore up that offensive line and develop a passing game Lynch/Spiller could be a sweet combo!
 
I think if he is traded it is only to the Pack.

I still think the trade almost makes too much sense not to happen.

From Bills perspective

- they are 0-3 and clearly won't make the playoffs this year with the mess they have QB

- Fred Jackson has proven he can do a good job with an expanded role

- they are heavily invested in Spiller and his role will only increase as the season proceeds

- Lynch's value is a lot higher right now than it was at the beginning of the year

For Packs perspective

- the Pack are Super Bowl contenders this year and are woefully thin at RB

- Lynch could be more than just a rental for them. He could be their lead back for years to come.

- Lynch has a low salary

- The organization has always liked Lynch and would have drafted in the first round

I don't see how the Pack don't offer at least a 2nd round pick for a running back who could be their guy for the next 5 or so years.
A 2nd round pick is a really really high pick. 2nd round picks are the core of your team. You get low 1st round talent guys for 1/4 the price. I've seen a few times where the Pats said they like 2nd round picks more then 1st round picks. 1st round picks are a huge investment. 2nd round picks are 1/4 the price and comparable talent. I just don't see them burning a 2nd for a backup RB. Like I said in my last post, if Lynch is so good why did they burn a 1st drafting Spiller? If Lynch was a 2nd round RB talent, they wouldn't have drafted Spiller. The Bills should have dealt Lynch BEFORE the draft. Because now they have basically said Lynch isn't a good NFL starting RB and now they have no leverage. And you still think they can get a 2nd? No way.
Then maybe they can give them a 1st instead ... since they like their 2nds better. I'm sure the Bills wouldn't mind
 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
:thumbup: I've never totally understood the burning passion to run Marshawn Lynch out of town. Was he worth a 1st round pick? No, but that's water under the bridge. He's a perfectly serviceable RB who would serve as a great complement to Spiller if we had anybody to block for either of them, which of coruse we don't. And I know he may not be a model citizen, but come on.
Dead on Ivan. Runs hard, has fun. Think what he could do with an O-line. Averaged 4 Yards a carry since he got here.
I agree with all of you guys. I have always been a Lynch fan, and I think he's really underrated in the league. If they can't get at least a 3rd I'd be disappointed in trading him. On the other hand, I do like watching him run, and would enjoy seeing what he can do on a good team.
 
Buffalo wants a 3rd, that's been the price all along. If they don't get it, they keep their 24 year old power back who has 2 years left on his very affordable contract. Buddy Nix isn't ######ed, he knows Buffalo has a ton of needs, but the chances that a 4th or 5th rounder fill one of them are slim.It's been said that Buffalo would also make the deal for a player & a low round pick. They have major needs at OT & OLB. The Bills brass is rumored to like Green Bay's OLB Brad Jones, who doesn't start for the Packers, but would start for sure in Buffalo. Jones & a 6th would be a done deal IMO.Green Bay could get Fred Jackson for a 4th, that move actually makes the most sense for both teams.
Only, Jones does start for Green Bay. He was scratched last night so Zombo got the start.
 
Cawbird said:
2. NE - Green-Ellis is the only one really worth anything right now. Sign Lynch to a multi-year contract.
Very little chance they trade him to a division foe like the Patriots.
:thumbup: I think that line of thinking is reserved for teams who view themselves as contenders.
*lol* No kidding. The Bills are not exactly in a position to be picky. They need to deal him to whoever gives the best offer. The Bills are 3-5 years away from making the playoffs let alone a SB.
 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
It is not realistic to keep all 3 players. This Buffalo team has some holes to fill in their lineup. If they can get a player (specifically an O-Lineman) or a decent draft pick, I think they need to do it.
 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
It is not realistic to keep all 3 players. This Buffalo team has some holes to fill in their lineup. If they can get a player (specifically an O-Lineman) or a decent draft pick, I think they need to do it.
He is stunting spillers growth, damnit! :wub:
 
As a Bills fan, I really would like to keep Lynch. I love Freddy Jackson, but hes 30. A young 30, but 30 anyway. Marshawn has looked really good this year. I would love the Lynch/ Spiller tandem. Just not sure if he is a Nix/ Gailey guy.
It is not realistic to keep all 3 players. This Buffalo team has some holes to fill in their lineup. If they can get a player (specifically an O-Lineman) or a decent draft pick, I think they need to do it.
Giving away an asset doesn't help them rebuild. Also, maybe they don't view spiller as either an every down back right now ... or ever
 
The bottom line is this.

The Bills aren't trying to dump Lynch. He is young, he is not overpaid and he has more value looking forward than Jackson. However, the Bills need help in a lot of areas and certainly could get by with a combo of Spiller and Jackson.

The Pack need a RB not just for this year but for the future as well. They could get a depth guy this year and draft one next year or they could trade for Lynch who they like and he could be their back for 5 years and would help them make a run at a Super Bowl this year.

I think the Pack are the only team that are serious enough about getting a running back to offer enough to get the Bills to trade Lynch.

Cut to the chase. Lynch for Packs 2nd Rounder (which will be a late 2nd rounder). Makes sense for both teams for all the reasons I mentioned before. Now make it happen. There will be some in both camps that would be against this trade and that is how you know it's a fair trade.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Buffalo wants a 3rd, that's been the price all along. If they don't get it, they keep their 24 year old power back who has 2 years left on his very affordable contract. Buddy Nix isn't ######ed, he knows Buffalo has a ton of needs, but the chances that a 4th or 5th rounder fill one of them are slim.It's been said that Buffalo would also make the deal for a player & a low round pick. They have major needs at OT & OLB. The Bills brass is rumored to like Green Bay's OLB Brad Jones, who doesn't start for the Packers, but would start for sure in Buffalo. Jones & a 6th would be a done deal IMO.Green Bay could get Fred Jackson for a 4th, that move actually makes the most sense for both teams.
Your post makes a lot of sense. I disagree a bit though because I don't think all 3rd rounders are created equal. The Pack's 3nd round pick next year might be the one right before the Bills 4th rounder. That is why I think they may want a 2nd Rounder from GB. It could be a conditional pick. For instance, the Pack could say it will be a second rounder unless they miss the playoffs in which case it becomes a third rounder.Jackson would be a decent shortterm fix in GB and that could happen but the Packers brass actually likes Lynch a lot and unlike Jackson he wouldn't just be a one or two year rental. A late second round pick for a guy you see as your running back for the forseeable future isn't out of line in my books.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
munygon2 said:
Tat said:
bump to Fred Jackson owners if a team makes anoffer on Lynch?
I'm not familiar with F. Jackson's situation other than he hasn't done much this year. How does his value increase if Lynch is gone? Would he split carries with Spiller?
If Lynch leaves Buffalo, Jackson would only get about 30% of the carries...Spiller is just too good to keep on the sidelines plus he's already a better blocker than Jackson is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still think the Bills are holding out hope that they get an offer that blows them away, but I'm not sure that they will get one.Maroney got traded last week for 4th round pick and a swap of 6th round picks. Is Lynch worth way more than Maroney at this point?
Lynch is 3 times the back Maroney is. Put Lynch on a team with a solid offense and you will see him put up Pro Bowl numbers. Few fans outside of Buffalo realize how good this guy is. He could start over at least 1/3 of the starting RBs in the NFL today.
 
Is there any chance the Packers aren't just waiting out Starks' return from the PUP list to see what they have between him and Nance?

 
Is there any chance the Packers aren't just waiting out Starks' return from the PUP list to see what they have between him and Nance?
Much better chance that they simply are not going to trade for Lynch and this is media hype/fantasy wet dreams.
 
munygon2 said:
Tat said:
bump to Fred Jackson owners if a team makes anoffer on Lynch?
I'm not familiar with F. Jackson's situation other than he hasn't done much this year. How does his value increase if Lynch is gone? Would he split carries with Spiller?
...Spiller is just too good to keep on the sidelines plus he's already a better blocker than Jackson is.
:lmao: http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...cks-Fitzpatrick

There was another play he was called on to pass block, which was even worse.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top