What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mark Ingram new knee surgery (1 Viewer)

New Orleans hid a partial micro fracture on Marques colston a couple off seasons ago. I'm not saying, just saying...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
 
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
 
Not a good start to a career, methinks. But there is still plenty of time to rehab it before camp even begins, so I'm not as concerned (being an Ingram

owner in a couple of leagues).

 
'Warpig said:
total. freaking. bust.
This is just silly. Because he has AKS he's a bust. It's just a routine, non threatening surgery. And don't say that he had a bad year last year. He did very well in his opportunities despite being in the worst position possible to succeed, as Sean Payton admitted.
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
So since he is being reasonable and not making sensational claims and comments he must be biased?
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.

Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
So since he is being reasonable and not making sensational claims and comments he must be biased?
This part screams frustration and an Ingram owner...thought that was clear to see.
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
& Trent, so get with that
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
& Trent, so get with that
You own a broken RB and a Brown RB? Ouch. Trent may be good but he is a Brown now. Weeden or Colt at QB and no WRs worth a damn, this is gonna be yet another mess for Cleveland. Cleveland in a sense of the town for sports has a jinx on it of some sort. Lets not get started on the Ingram mess, knee has issues and team is in a hail storm. You may need to look elsewhere for runners.So get with that!
 
'Shawnky said:
'moderated said:
'Shawnky said:
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.

Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
Trent's surgery kept him from drills at the combine. I don't see the difference, but I'm not a player basher. Some of you guys should do everyone a favor and stay away.
u own ingram, we get it
So since he is being reasonable and not making sensational claims and comments he must be biased?
This part screams frustration and an Ingram owner...thought that was clear to see.
Has it ever crossed your mind that perhaps it is frustration because a lot of people come here for information which they plan to use to help them make decisions. It can certainly be frustrating to have to weed through all of the pissing matches to actually get to the real information that will help you. That has nothing to do with being an owner of a guy. About 90% of the pissing in the pool includes some version of "you must be a player X owner."
 
Has it ever crossed your mind that perhaps it is frustration because a lot of people come here for information which they plan to use to help them make decisions. It can certainly be frustrating to have to weed through all of the pissing matches to actually get to the real information that will help you. That has nothing to do with being an owner of a guy. About 90% of the pissing in the pool includes some version of "you must be a player X owner."
this ffs. the you must own him argument is woat bad and completely useless.
 
Wouldn't say he's a bust just yet, but I'm glad to be rid of him in the two leagues where I had him. The injury issues are a concern. I also don't think he looked as good in the NFL last year as I thought he would based on his collegiate performances.

 
Too early to give up entirely but I'm very concerned. Injuries plus underwhelming early performances is not what I expected.

 
I thought he made some pretty nice runs honestly
When he was healthy I thought he looked pretty good. It's certainly way to early to give up on him. If you're an owner you should hold as the buying price is going to be at rock bottom and nobody is going to give you squat for him.
 
'benson_will_lead_the_way said:
You care waaay too much about a message board. How are your stats from your last pickup basketball game? :popcorn:
The only stat I keep in pick up basketball is wins... 7 in a row 2 nights ago. All other stats are meaningless as W's are the only thing that keeps you on the court!
 
Too early to give up on him. Not too early to be a bit worried.

I would not just trade him for "anything of value" though.

 
Some of you guys deserve to be flagged for piling on.

FORGET THE BUST/KNEE DEBATE... that doesn't matter.

WHAT MATTERS: Can He Be Acquired for a discount? How would you nay-sayers value him today? Do you really think we've seen all that Ingram has to offer in the NFL? My thought is...he's pretty good even w/ bad knees. We haven't seen his ceiling yet. I live in Portland and the Blazers got a few good years out of Brandon Roy's knees.

I'm willing to gamble on him.

The owner in my league has:

Jahvid Best injury concerns

Fred Jackson injury concerns

Mark Ingram #1 overall 2011 draft.

Reggie Bush best RB on his team so far.

Ryan Grant which team?

Ricky Williams Retired

Danny Woodhead. backup

and the 1.04 and 1.06 picks.

 
I guess I shouldn't draft Trent since he just had the same procedure.
No he didn't.Trent has a minor cleanup that barely kept him out at all. Ingram had a procedure that is keeping him out of action a minimum of 6 weeks. Also as someone posted earlier there were rumors of a degenerative knee condition with Ingram.
IIRC he hurt it bad and missed quite a few games his junior season, though it could have been his sophomore. I'm getting old.Ingram's knee was a known concern heading into the draft. IMO this is a bad sign and needs to be monitored closely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of you guys deserve to be flagged for piling on. FORGET THE BUST/KNEE DEBATE... that doesn't matter. WHAT MATTERS: Can He Be Acquired for a discount?
He can be acquired at a discount because Sproles and PT are still there. They both signed a 4 year contract last year. You will get what you pay for at a discount.
 
He played 10 games last and touched the ball less than 150 times, I would puke if I was am Ingram owner. Bump sporles
sproles role is pretty well defined, i think. i'd bump thomas and maybe even ivory (who could be fantasy relevant again this year).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought he made some pretty nice runs honestly
When he was healthy I thought he looked pretty good. It's certainly way to early to give up on him. If you're an owner you should hold as the buying price is going to be at rock bottom and nobody is going to give you squat for him.
This is the strategy if you are an owner. My opinion was that he looked more ordinary than expected. Sproles stole the show away from him and honestly Thomas looked better than he did in their opportunities. I am not too worried about the surgery, I am more worried that he didn't look as good as he should have.
 
I've read on twitter that gene brammel speculated the other day on the audible that Ingram had a micro fracture

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Much too early to call him a bust. Concerned? Absolutely. But a bust? Naaaa.

A really good buy low at this point.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top