What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Matt Leinart Released. (1 Viewer)

GordonGekko said:
It speaks volumes that the Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers
Look, I have no long lost love for Matt Leinart. But he's a young QB who has only been with one team and might be useful to some other team for the long haul down the road. If he fails at destination #2, then I think you can have a better feel of what he can and can't do.

Let me fix this

The Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers ... but it's not a huge surprise since A) It's late in the preseason and most QB situations on most teams, barring injury, are set B) No one wants to trade for his contract C) Teams may want to see how he feels about being a backup before acquiring him and D) Why pay compensation for a player that you know will probably be cut anyway?

This is one of the things that I dislike about fantasy football, that's its so easy for many to love or hate a player simply because it's trendy to do so.

Will this kid end up as another Peyton Manning? Probably not. But if he ends up with the career upside of a Jason Garrett for another team, would that be so bad?

Leinart currently has no FF value, that doesn't mean he has no real NFL value.
:confused: Sometimes Fantasy perspective becomes a tunnel that some cannot break out of.
That may not be entirely true about the contract. Rookie contracts run fairly cheap and they are about to enter into an uncapped year. Heck the Giants just traded for Sage Rosenfels. It does speak volumes that no one wanted him. Doesn't mean he won't end up getting a chance I just think most teams know by now what he is.

 
Profootballtalk: Leinart to Houston?

Peter King floats possibility of Leinart in Houston

Posted by Evan Silva on September 4, 2010 4:00 PM ET

Sports Illustrated's Peter King, with whom Mike Florio will presumably share "the big-boy table" at halftime of today's Notre Dame-Purdue game, interestingly floated on Twitter Saturday the notion of waived quarterback Matt Leinart resurfacing in Houston.

The presumption, to this point, has been that Leinart's obvious landing spot is Seattle. The Seahawks left the door open for that possibility by releasing J.P. Losman on Saturday. Pete Carroll's club has just two quarterbacks on the 53-man roster -- Matt Hasselbeck and Charlie Whitehurst.

But the Texans also have just two QBs, having waived John David Booty. Their backup, Dan Orlovsky, is also coming off a forgettable effort in Houston's preseason finale.

The starters in both locales, Matt Schaub and Hasselbeck, are not considered to be among the NFL's most durable quarterbacks.

Nobody wanted to trade for him, but perhaps there will be a market for Leinart's services, after all.

 
Maybe he's not a Homgren/Mangini guy, but Cleveland looks to have one of the worst, if not the worst, QB situations in the league - depending on how you feel about Colt McCoy. They haven't been mentioned at all, so I guess they're not interested, but maybe they should be? What's the downside for them signing him for league minimum?Similarly with Jacksonville - probably not a Del Rio type of guy either I suppose.
Interesting that CLE has one of the worst QB situations in the league--but the starting QB in AZ is someone CLE discarded (possibly ironic?). I'm not arguing with you... Delhomme and Wallace are sad alternatives... just pointing it out... Just a guess but I can see OAK being all over Leinhart.You would hope that getting cut would be a wake up call for him--but I'm betting similar to BMW it will take a while (a couple years) for it to sink in that just because he was all that and a bag of chips in college (when he had a great supporting cast)...his BMOC status from USC doesn't mean crappo in the NFL.The list of players who came out of USC and were the suck in the NFL because they were lazy, undisicplined primma donnas who learned nothing in college continues to grow. I think that speaks volumes about the type of coach PC was/is.
 
GordonGekko said:
It speaks volumes that the Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers
Look, I have no long lost love for Matt Leinart. But he's a young QB who has only been with one team and might be useful to some other team for the long haul down the road. If he fails at destination #2, then I think you can have a better feel of what he can and can't do.

Let me fix this

The Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers ... but it's not a huge surprise since A) It's late in the preseason and most QB situations on most teams, barring injury, are set B) No one wants to trade for his contract C) Teams may want to see how he feels about being a backup before acquiring him and D) Why pay compensation for a player that you know will probably be cut anyway?

This is one of the things that I dislike about fantasy football, that's its so easy for many to love or hate a player simply because it's trendy to do so.

Will this kid end up as another Peyton Manning? Probably not. But if he ends up with the career upside of a Jason Garrett for another team, would that be so bad?

Leinart currently has no FF value, that doesn't mean he has no real NFL value.
:goodposting: Sometimes Fantasy perspective becomes a tunnel that some cannot break out of.
That may not be entirely true about the contract. Rookie contracts run fairly cheap and they are about to enter into an uncapped year. Heck the Giants just traded for Sage Rosenfels. It does speak volumes that no one wanted him. Doesn't mean he won't end up getting a chance I just think most teams know by now what he is.
Leinart is owed 7+ mill next year, which, if they play, will have a cap. I certainly don't think the salary is the ONLY issue, but no one was going to take it on.
 
Just a guess but I can see OAK being all over Leinhart.
Al Davis was a Leinart guy, but he saw in person Leinart lay an egg vs. the Raiders last summer, and Grad and Boller have both looked better than Leinart this summer, playing with backups. I woiuldn't rule it out totally, but it would really surprise me.
 
GordonGekko said:
This is one of the things that I dislike about fantasy football, that's its so easy for many to love or hate a player simply because it's trendy to do so.
Have you ever seen him play? All it takes is one game. Really.
 
Wonder if Pete's working the phones to get him to Seattle. If he can reform Mike Williams, maybe he can do it with Leinart. Hasselback's not getting any younger.
Not if he wants to keep his HC job long term. Pretty boy is a waste of time.
The key here is that Leinart wouldn't be going in as the starter. If he flops again, Carroll's tested a former first rounder at a low price and dumped him without losing anything. If he reforms him then he's a hero. I see no particular downside, so I'd also find Carroll's disinterest/inaction to be very telling as well.
Kinda like my Plunkett analogy. Plunkett goes to O-town as a backup to Pastorini and Dan gets hurt and put on the IR. Plunkett takes full advantage and the rest is history. Am I saying that the Seahawks take a chance and Leinart leads the team to the promised land, No. I do believe that it isn't out of the question if he is realizes that this could be his last chance.
My memory is somewhat dim on this, but I don't think Plunkett showed lack of ability at New England. I think he got injured almost immediately. So it's not the greatest analogy. Perhaps here's a better one- Tommy Maddox was a top 10 pick by the Broncos, and couldn't make it on the field. Works as an insurance salesman, signs with the XFL, goes to the Steelers and actually has a pretty good year.
Actually, he was drafted 25th overall, but yeah, your point still stands.
 
I think he's had plenty of chances to show something, anything and for whatever reason hasn't been able to impress his coaches enough and they decided to go in another direction. That's the NFL. Maybe this will be a wakeup call for him and he can contribute to the next team he's on.

 
This is shocking!!!

Good fit Minnesota? B/U Old man River?
It is shocking actually. 2 months ago if you would have said that Matt Leinart is just going to be released 1 week before the season starts, everyone would have been shocked. Obviously things have regressed since then but still, things went sour REAL QUICK. I don't blame Arizona, in fact I applaud them. These guys all think it's their right to play in the NFL instead of a priviledge.
 
GordonGekko said:
Yeah, maybe he just can't play this game very well.
Well, maybe he can't. But it takes all kinds of players to have a winning team. Sure you need elite players, the ones that produce stats, the ones that FF owners love. But you also need glue guys, role players, specialists and sometimes warm bodies. Also, while unpleasant to think about, sometimes you just need cannon fodder ( I mean what you do think special teams players are? Guys who have to sacrifice their bodies to make the team and to accumulate the high impact/high speed injuries that the team wants to protect it's elite players from during the game) I can pick apart about 50 different things that I think were flaws in Drew Bledsoe's game. Esp towards the end of his career. But given an injury, he stepped up and helped his team win an important playoff game. No he wasn't the best QB by a large margin, but he had just enough to keep his team going. Frank Reich is no HOFer, but given a limited situation and dire consequences, he managed to pull off a miracle for one playoff game. Matt Leinart doesn't need to be a HOF to help a team win. Maybe his fate is to be a career backup and make one huge play in one game that saves a season. Look, again, I'm no Leinart apologist. I just find it baffling at those that seem to imply that Leinart is completely devoid of any NFL talent at all and any USC player must be corrupt and worthless. Can the guy, any guy, legitimately help your team in ANY WAY to win a football game. Sorry, I might be the only one who thinks this way, because maybe Leinart is a punk or a loser or a crybaby, but whether or not I like a guy on a personal or perception level is simply a bonus on top of winning. When I played, I hated tons of my teammates, but the first question I asked myself is whether they could help me win or not. This kid got whacked at the end of the preseason, sorry if I think one should let some live artillery fall around him before they actually write him off a sissy looking to hide in a bunker.
Don't paint me as some clown that's willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater just because he didn't help my fantasy team.He has been in the league for a while, showed that he feels entitled, thinks he should be a starter, and can't move an offense that lit it up last year. His supposed college strengths, accuracy and leadership, never appeared here, and there has been pretty much nothing to suggest he can win games as a starter. And really, that's what we're talking about here: can he win games at QB? You want to suggest he can be a nice backup? Great. But the fact is, if he goes anywhere, he's a story, a potential distraction, and thinks he should be handed a starting job by someone else. You get less headaches, and probably more team-first attitude, from almost any other backup out there. If he gets a complete attitude change, gets humbled, and his work ethic improves, could he turn things around? Sure, why not? QBs without great physical traits have been successful. But why should we care about this one? Because he was a big deal in college? What gives people a hint that he WILL turn things around? All we have heard this summer is "I played better than DA, Whiz doesn't like me". Me, Me, Me, I, I, I.
 
The list of players who came out of USC and were the suck in the NFL because they were lazy, undisicplined primma donnas who learned nothing in college continues to grow. I think that speaks volumes about the type of coach PC was/is.
Current disagree more. It's certainly true many of them haven't worked out. But to blame Carroll for this makes no sense. USC under his tenure was the best team in college football. It may have been, for a few years, the best team EVER in college football. He did what he was supposed to do: win. As a UCLA fan, I didn't like it, but I never saw the lack of discipline you're talking about. And Carroll always seemed like a very classy guy. And what about the defensive players? Plenty of them from the Carroll era have certainly excelled in the NFL.
 
GordonGekko said:
It speaks volumes that the Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers
Look, I have no long lost love for Matt Leinart. But he's a young QB who has only been with one team and might be useful to some other team for the long haul down the road. If he fails at destination #2, then I think you can have a better feel of what he can and can't do.

Let me fix this

The Cardinals were willing to give up Leinart for a seventh-round pick and found no takers ... but it's not a huge surprise since A) It's late in the preseason and most QB situations on most teams, barring injury, are set B) No one wants to trade for his contract C) Teams may want to see how he feels about being a backup before acquiring him and D) Why pay compensation for a player that you know will probably be cut anyway?

This is one of the things that I dislike about fantasy football, that's its so easy for many to love or hate a player simply because it's trendy to do so.

Will this kid end up as another Peyton Manning? Probably not. But if he ends up with the career upside of a Jason Garrett for another team, would that be so bad?

Leinart currently has no FF value, that doesn't mean he has no real NFL value.
inside of 4 years Lienert has gone from top QB draft pick heir apparent to less value than jim sorgi.

 
GordonGekko said:
Yeah, maybe he just can't play this game very well.
Well, maybe he can't. But it takes all kinds of players to have a winning team. Sure you need elite players, the ones that produce stats, the ones that FF owners love. But you also need glue guys, role players, specialists and sometimes warm bodies. Also, while unpleasant to think about, sometimes you just need cannon fodder ( I mean what you do think special teams players are? Guys who have to sacrifice their bodies to make the team and to accumulate the high impact/high speed injuries that the team wants to protect it's elite players from during the game) I can pick apart about 50 different things that I think were flaws in Drew Bledsoe's game. Esp towards the end of his career. But given an injury, he stepped up and helped his team win an important playoff game. No he wasn't the best QB by a large margin, but he had just enough to keep his team going. Frank Reich is no HOFer, but given a limited situation and dire consequences, he managed to pull off a miracle for one playoff game. Matt Leinart doesn't need to be a HOF to help a team win. Maybe his fate is to be a career backup and make one huge play in one game that saves a season. Look, again, I'm no Leinart apologist. I just find it baffling at those that seem to imply that Leinart is completely devoid of any NFL talent at all and any USC player must be corrupt and worthless. Can the guy, any guy, legitimately help your team in ANY WAY to win a football game. Sorry, I might be the only one who thinks this way, because maybe Leinart is a punk or a loser or a crybaby, but whether or not I like a guy on a personal or perception level is simply a bonus on top of winning. When I played, I hated tons of my teammates, but the first question I asked myself is whether they could help me win or not. This kid got whacked at the end of the preseason, sorry if I think one should let some live artillery fall around him before they actually write him off a sissy looking to hide in a bunker.
Other: he was a mediocre talent with no work ethic who survived at USC because of the superior talent around him. Now he is being exposed as a weak armed malcontent with the iq of a pez dispenser. But we all have value. I am sure he scores very good blow and with the ladies, but he's no quarterback.
 
Troy Smith is a better QBFA option than Leinhart.
I'd definitely have more interest in him. He's always been a guy that's an actual leader and doesn't just expect to have everything handed to him. I'm sure that he'd be more than willing to come in as the #2 as well, unlike Leinart. Kind of weird that he got cut though. I thought I remembered hearing that there were teams that inquired about trading for him earlier this year and that Baltimore turned them down. If so, Baltimore screwed up and screwed Smith over as well.I really hope the Bills give him a look and consider booting Fitzpatrick or Brohm for Smith.
 
When a team that wants to make the playoffs rolls with Derek Anderson, Max Hall, and John Skelton, I find it hard to believe anyone thinks all Leinart needs is a fresh start.
:X When you see what the Cards are left with, it makes you realize how bad Leinart really is.
Max Hall may be a major surprise in this league. I think the whole league missed out on him because of his size mainly, but to me he possesses the "it" factor. I'm excited to see him get a shot somewhere down the line and see what he does with it.ETA -- he's just about the same ht/wt as Drew Brees, 6'1" 210 lb. Not being 6'5" hasn't seemed to hurt Brees.
Drew Brees is also the most accurate passer in the NFL and has field vision that is near godlike. He forced himself into that to make up for his height problems and is very mobile. If Max works his ### off, he has a shot. I hope he does. I haven't seen him play yet though.
 
Raiders is the perfect spot. Matt whats to go somewhere he can start in the future, and that soupy guy is not very good.

Al likes these type of guys, so Oakland should be the top landing spot for the Leinart express.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raiders is the perfect spot. Matt whats to go somewhere he can start in the future, and that soupy guy is not very good.Al likes these type of guys, so Oakland should be the top landing spot for the Leinart express.
Leinart is pretty much the opposite of the kind of quarterbacks Al Davis goes for.
 
When a team that wants to make the playoffs rolls with Derek Anderson, Max Hall, and John Skelton, I find it hard to believe anyone thinks all Leinart needs is a fresh start.
:blackdot: When you see what the Cards are left with, it makes you realize how bad Leinart really is.
Max Hall may be a major surprise in this league. I think the whole league missed out on him because of his size mainly, but to me he possesses the "it" factor. I'm excited to see him get a shot somewhere down the line and see what he does with it.ETA -- he's just about the same ht/wt as Drew Brees, 6'1" 210 lb. Not being 6'5" hasn't seemed to hurt Brees.
Drew Brees is also the most accurate passer in the NFL and has field vision that is near godlike. He forced himself into that to make up for his height problems and is very mobile. If Max works his ### off, he has a shot. I hope he does. I haven't seen him play yet though.
He's the anti-Jamarcus. Obsessive.http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/...ll-bickley.html

"Sometimes, I'm a little over-competitive," Hall said. "At BYU, we had a third-down (competition) against the defense. If we didn't get it right, I wouldn't sleep that night. If something didn't go well at practice, I'd call up (former receiver) Austin Collie or (former tight end) Dennis Pitta at 10 o'clock at night, and say, 'Listen, we didn't connect on that route. Meet me at the field and let's work on it.'
 
I can't for the life of me understand why it isn't obvious to all that Leinart simply doesn't have the goods. It is obvious when you watch the guy play. He doesn't have the arm and clearly doesn't have it between the ears.

Furthermore, it is not uncommon. Many big time college QBs can't handle the pro game. Leinart is just another in a long list.

 
GordonGekko said:
Al Davis was a Leinart guy, but he saw in person Leinart lay an egg vs. the Raiders last summer, and Grad and Boller have both looked better than Leinart this summer, playing with backups. I woiuldn't rule it out totally, but it would really surprise me.
IMHO, the best spot for Leinart right now is a place that will help him be a better QB, if he gets that down, then the right opportunity will take care of itself. This was the mistake Jeff Garcia made for himself and didn't learn from it. Garcia wanted to be starter, even if it meant the Browns and Lions, teams that had problems all across the board from the personnel to the GM to the coach. If Garcia picked a place where he could learn to be a better QB ( i.e. if he started with the Eagles earlier or a stable WCO team, even as a backup) then another better opportunity might have opened up for him. You take your "second chance" to try to become a better player. You answer the question if it's the coaching or you. If you fail in two different locations, it's clear its probably not the coaching, it's probably you.
jeff garcia is about the worst analogy you could think of. he was a 3 time pro bowler that was developed by and earned the highest praise from bill walsh.
 
Davis is a Leinart guy?? Pretty sure they passed on him in the draft years ago. Leinart's a downgrade from Grad in Oakland IMO.

Leinart lacks the physical tools. Being Trent Edwards West wasn't going to help the Cards. Wasn't the present. Wasn't the future. Love the call by Whiz.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Phil McRevis said:
Phil believes that Leinart has the tools to start in this league. And If Phil is not mistaken, Leinart had better numbers in the preseason than Anderson. Anderson has been in the league for a while now and with the exception of one good season which really consisted of nothing more than a hot first half, he's done nothing.He'll be back in the league and starting before the midway point of next year.
Where? It's not so much about supplanting a starter, but being better than a backup? I can't think of many teams that would prefer Leinart to their backup, much less their starter.
 
It'll be interesting to here about why he really was cut. The stories will be coming out from the local media on a daily basis I'm sure. IMHO, it wasn't his performance on the field. Max Hall clearly outplayed everybody(although mostly against 3rd and 4th teamers.) Anderson outplayed Leinart, but the margin wasn't enormous. Apparently Matt was a primadonna in the locker room, even though he had never accomplished anything on the field which obviously didn't bode well for his ability to lead.

IMHO, the most important factor for Matt when choosing his next team(if he has choices) is pass blocking. He's not mobile/athletic enough to succeed on a poor pass blocking team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Leinart needs some cash I'm sure VY would pay him a few bucks to go pick his Heisman up from Reggie's house.

When he's done maybe he can be the #3 in Tennessee and learn how to play quarterback.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet said:
ft_ball_fn said:
The list of players who came out of USC and were the suck in the NFL because they were lazy, undisicplined primma donnas who learned nothing in college continues to grow. I think that speaks volumes about the type of coach PC was/is.
Current disagree more. It's certainly true many of them haven't worked out. But to blame Carroll for this makes no sense. USC under his tenure was the best team in college football. It may have been, for a few years, the best team EVER in college football. He did what he was supposed to do: win. As a UCLA fan, I didn't like it, but I never saw the lack of discipline you're talking about. And Carroll always seemed like a very classy guy. And what about the defensive players? Plenty of them from the Carroll era have certainly excelled in the NFL.
I don't disagree with you that USC was dominant in college football. However saying its due to Carroll's coaching is somewhat laughable to me. USC annually has among the best recruiting classes in the nation... stacking 4 and 5 star recruits 2-3 deep at each position. Carroll would have to be a horrendous coach to NOT win with the talent he had at USC. I've never read anything about Carroll running a disicplined program.... infact being a Detroit homer I read tons of things that were just the opposite-->Mike Williams... tons of articles out there that he skipped USC practices and when he was there didn't participate or try hard--but on gameday he was still the starter--never faced any consequences for loafing/skipping out-- as long as he put up the numbers (based just on raw talent and supporting cast)... Carroll never said a word. Read similar things about Leinhart--that he was all ego at USC and felt he owned the campus (probably did too)... that he wasn't a hard worker and had success just based on the aweseome talent around him. Same things about LenWhale White--who signed with TEN and immediately drove up the stock of Krispy Kreme (along with Mike Williams). How's Dwayne Jarrett working out in CAR? Picking things up quickly--great work ethic? Just way too many recent examples of key players from USC offense coming into the NFL and thinking they will be handed a job and not have to work/practice to be good... that they'll get by on talent alone. That's what they learned in college. I agree defense seems to be a different story... still doesn't discount it happened with the offense and IMO (especially with star players) that's Carroll's influence (or he's ultimately responsible for it). As far as being a class act... in addition to stars who are struggling.. isn't USC facing NCAA sanctions related to when Carroll was the coach? I'm fuzzy on details because I'll admit I'm not a Carroll fan... but its intertesting he jumps ship when the sanctions are about to hit and leaves the program hanging. That's class.
 
It'll be interesting to here about why he really was cut. The stories will be coming out from the local media on a daily basis I'm sure. IMHO, it wasn't his performance on the field. Max Hall clearly outplayed everybody(although mostly against 3rd and 4th teamers.) Anderson outplayed Leinart, but the margin wasn't enormous. Apparently Matt was a primadonna in the locker room, even though he had never accomplished anything on the field which obviously didn't bode well for his ability to lead.IMHO, the most important factor for Matt when choosing his next team(if he has choices) is pass blocking. He's not mobile/athletic enough to succeed on a poor pass blocking team.
:popcorn: Reason for cut: Risk>Reward. He's already complained in the media about being the potential backup. Then Max Hall has outperformed him (and DA) all camp/preseason, showing better command in as a rookie than Leinart has in 3+ years in the system. Matt wasn't going to see a dime of the $10+ mil next year (so he wasn't the future here), DA's played no worse than Matt (and therefore wasn't the present)Matt's preseason performance wasn't awful. It wasn't impressive (constant dump offs, happy feet & won't consistently stay in the pocket). He's just not a starting quality QB (doesn't have the physical tools). He's Trent Edwards West, but Whiz realized now what Buffalo's been unable to --- that they aren't starting QB's that are going to take you anywhere soon.He may have a future as a backup QB (if he gets over the nonsense that he's a starter). At some point he'll realize that AZ was his first chance and best chance at success at the NFL level (as is the case most of the time with these high picks). I don't personally think it would have mattered (as Hall is the better QB right now -- whether anyone agrees/disagrees with Whiz's thoughts), but crying in the media sealed his fate in AZ. That move could actually turn off future suitors as well.I'm just real happy Whiz made the move because Max was the best in camp & best in the preseason. There aren't a lot of coaches out there with the balls to make this move. (Giving your backup QB spot to an undrafted rookie QB).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pete Carroll and the Seahawks just made the no-brainer move and claimed off waivers:Zak Robinson.
Lots of talk that he'll be sent to the PS and the Leinart rumors can continue. However, I just don't see it (leinart). PC has repeatedly shown that being a Trojan isn't a free pass in Seattle (Mays, LoJack, White) and there's simply no reason after the Whitehurst trade for him to be interested at all in another backup with no upside to be behind an aging fan favorite.
 
Pete Carroll and the Seahawks just made the no-brainer move and claimed off waivers:Zak Robinson.
Lots of talk that he'll be sent to the PS and the Leinart rumors can continue. However, I just don't see it (leinart). PC has repeatedly shown that being a Trojan isn't a free pass in Seattle (Mays, LoJack, White) and there's simply no reason after the Whitehurst trade for him to be interested at all in another backup with no upside to be behind an aging fan favorite.
After the Whitehurst trade, picking up Leinart is a story/hassle/controversy I think Carroll would be smart to avoid. Who needs endless speculation about people second-guessing the CW deal as the season is about to start? Hass is the guy this year, they don't need the backup QB spot to be a major point of interest.
 
Pete Carroll and the Seahawks just made the no-brainer move and claimed off waivers:

Zak Robinson.
Lots of talk that he'll be sent to the PS and the Leinart rumors can continue. However, I just don't see it (leinart). PC has repeatedly shown that being a Trojan isn't a free pass in Seattle (Mays, LoJack, White) and there's simply no reason after the Whitehurst trade for him to be interested at all in another backup with no upside to be behind an aging fan favorite.
:D Seattle would look kind of silly if New England decided to re-claim him off waviers.
 
Pete Carroll and the Seahawks just made the no-brainer move and claimed off waivers:

Zak Robinson.
Lots of talk that he'll be sent to the PS and the Leinart rumors can continue. However, I just don't see it (leinart). PC has repeatedly shown that being a Trojan isn't a free pass in Seattle (Mays, LoJack, White) and there's simply no reason after the Whitehurst trade for him to be interested at all in another backup with no upside to be behind an aging fan favorite.
:lmao: Seattle would look kind of silly if New England decided to re-claim him off waviers.
Why? Zak would have to make the 53 man roster, and every team can lose a PS guy to someone that wants to activate him. Zak choosing Seattle's PS over the Pats' makes sense (assuming Pats wanted him on PS).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top