Ok, Maurice Drew is short 5'7" we all know that, but he's 207 lbs. The guy is built like a brick (you know what) house, he got thighs like tree trunks, he's not a small man, and after Reggie Bush probably one of the fastest and most elusive backs in the draft. I'm constantly hearing he's too small to play every down, but is he really that much smaller than the other top RBs coming out other than LenDale White? And I don't agree with the Darren Sproles comparisons I've been reading, Sproles may be 5'7" also but he only weighs 180lbs. What does it matter at the RB position if the guy is 5'7" or 5'9"? Look at the other RBs in the draft, Drew actually weights more than some of them. Guys like Bush, Williams, Calhoun, Harrison, Washington, Andre Hall and Henderson are all slightly taller (an inch or two) and most of them weigh a little less than Drew does. So my questions are: with the skills Drew has displayed why are so many people knocking him because he's giving away a couple inches compared to everyone else? Am I wrong in thinking that of all the positions, height matters the least for RBs? I think if Drew lands in the right situation (Indy comes to mind) that he can be more than just a 3rd down back or kick returner. Realistically he won't be a 25-30 carry RB every week, but I can see him getting 15-20 touches a game.