What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

McCarthy's impact on key Cowboys (1 Viewer)

Dak has missed the broad side of the barn his entire career.  I have yet to see an NFL coach game plan/account for that.
Well you threw out your credibility with that one. Dak was money year one, regressed in year two, and played (without whining) through the shoulder injury last year.  Blanket statements like yours are very uninformed statement. 🙄

 
Well you threw out your credibility with that one. Dak was money year one, regressed in year two, and played (without whining) through the shoulder injury last year.  Blanket statements like yours are very uninformed statement. 🙄
Nope.

Anyone watching the guy knows he throws a handful of "my highschool QB doesn't miss that bad" passes every game.

The wins come in games he makes other plays to overshadow them (he can make great plays/throws).  The close wins over bad teams come when he either makes a play late or the other team finds a way to lose it (ie the Lions this year).  The losses come in those where he doesn't.

When you say "money" - if you are talking FF, i am with you.. he is great FF.  If you mean "money" in real life - I would come right back at you with the "uninformed" line. 🙄

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He has the fourth highest completion percentage in NFL history.     Link

I'm pretty sure his receivers hands are smaller than the broad side of a barn.
That is fantastic.

And he still throws a handful of throws your highschool QB wouldnt miss each game.

eta - this stat lead Chad Pennington to greatness too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope.

Anyone watching the guy knows he throws a handful of "my highschool QB doesn't miss that bad" passes every game.

The wins come in games he makes other plays to overshadow them (he can make great plays/throws).  The close wins over bad teams come when he either makes a play late or the other team finds a way to lose it (ie the Lions this year).  The losses come in those where he doesn't.

When you say "money" - if you are talking FF, i am with you.. he is great FF.  If you mean "money" in real life - I would come right back at you with the "uninformed" line. 🙄
Re read, Bro. He was money year one, “in real life”. Again with your blanket statements, I’m done.

 
Re read, Bro. He was money year one, “in real life”. Again with your blanket statements, I’m done.
Disagree.. bro (I dont know how to use bro properly)?  Does "bro" contribute to the credibility of a post, bro?

Bro. He is still not a reliable passer.  He makes throws he cannot overcome against good teams.  

Bro.

 
He has the fourth highest completion percentage in NFL history.     Link

I'm pretty sure his receivers hands are smaller than the broad side of a barn.
Without bothering to find a link to the Buffalo game... I'll take the over on 5 barns missed.  Not hands, barns.

My memory counts a 1 yard screen pass to Zeke missed by roughly a barn.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disagree.. bro (I dont know how to use bro properly)?  Does "bro" contribute to the credibility of a post, bro?

Bro. He is still not a reliable passer.  He makes throws he cannot overcome against good teams.  

Bro.
You are using it just as expected considering your contribution to the discussion. Thanks, Jr.

 
@G-King

12 games over 300 yards in his 4 years.  2 of those games week 17. 16 games under 200 yards in 4 years.  One year over 23 TDs passing.

You favor his highlights, he is Steve young.  You favor his lowlights, he trails Marcus Mariota.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is fantastic.

And he still throws a handful of throws your highschool QB wouldnt miss each game.

eta - this stat lead Chad Pennington to greatness too.
I'm not here to defend Dak.  I don't think he is great.  But he is no where near as bad as you try to paint him out to be.  Take off your anti-Cowboy glasses and stop embarrassing yourself.

You said he "could not hit the broad side of a barn".  Having the fourth highest completion rate in the HISTORY of the NFL says you are a flat out wrong.  Does he miss throws?  Yes.  Does he airmail them sometimes?  Yes.  But every QB throws a handful of passes "that a high school QB wouldn't miss".  

We get it.  You don't like the Cowboys.  You don't like Dak.  But know when to stop.  

 
I'm not here to defend Dak.  I don't think he is great.  But he is no where near as bad as you try to paint him out to be.  Take off your anti-Cowboy glasses and stop embarrassing yourself.

You said he "could not hit the broad side of a barn".  Having the fourth highest completion rate in the HISTORY of the NFL says you are a flat out wrong.  Does he miss throws?  Yes.  Does he airmail them sometimes?  Yes.  But every QB throws a handful of passes "that a high school QB wouldn't miss".  

We get it.  You don't like the Cowboys.  You don't like Dak.  But know when to stop.  
I'm not trying to paint him as anything other than what he is.  He makes AWFUL throws (every game).  He makes great throws (some games).  He is not yet reliable.  Not every QB makes (misses the barn) those throws... thus his needing to improve as a passer.

And I do like Dak (for a minute there I was giving him all the credit in the world prior to crapping the bed the second half of the season).  I like the Cowboys more than I ever have.  Big fan of a lot of their players.

I think you want to make it about me.  This is the unfortunate common result of not being able to produce a defense of a position otherwise.  :shrug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not trying to paint him as anything other than what he is.  He makes AWFUL throws.  He makes good throws.  He is not yet reliable.  Not every QB makes (misses) those throws... thus his needing to improve as a passer.

And I do like Dak.  I like the Cowboys more than I ever have.

I think you want to make it about me while not knowing about me.  This is the unfortunate common result of not being able to produce a defense of a position.
I agree with your first statement.  He needs to be more reliable and needs to improve.

Perhaps I read your statements more literally than you intended them to be read.  A QB that can't hit the side of a barn or make throws a high school QB can make sounds like a gross exaggeration of Dak's faults.  

And, although I don't know much about you, I know that you pop up in discussions about the Cowboys more than most non-Cowboy fans.  99.9% of your comments are negative and derogatory in some fashion (perhaps that percentage is a slight exaggeration).  So it is very difficult to read your comments without seeing a bias or attempt to troll Cowboy fans.  

I do find it interesting that you say it is a result of not being able to produce a defense of a position when I linked to his percentage completion.  That directly counters your claim that he can't hit the side of a barn.  And your defense of your position is that you are sure that in a Buffalo game that you couldn't be bothered to look up, he missed at least five throws by a barn including a one yard pass.  Hmmmmm....

 
I agree with your first statement.  He needs to be more reliable and needs to improve.

Perhaps I read your statements more literally than you intended them to be read.  A QB that can't hit the side of a barn or make throws a high school QB can make sounds like a gross exaggeration of Dak's faults.  

And, although I don't know much about you, I know that you pop up in discussions about the Cowboys more than most non-Cowboy fans.  99.9% of your comments are negative and derogatory in some fashion (perhaps that percentage is a slight exaggeration).  So it is very difficult to read your comments without seeing a bias or attempt to troll Cowboy fans.  

I do find it interesting that you say it is a result of not being able to produce a defense of a position when I linked to his percentage completion.  That directly counters your claim that he can't hit the side of a barn.  And your defense of your position is that you are sure that in a Buffalo game that you couldn't be bothered to look up, he missed at least five throws by a barn including a one yard pass.  Hmmmmm....
I am told I am a hater in a lot of threads.  Or a fanboy in others.  Whatever - I am too old to have these emotional connections to kids playing football.  

I live in Texas and like it or not - see most every Cowboy game.

I am very obviously talking about the 3-5+ passes each game that you wonder what/who the target was.  Deep passes, screen passes, slants, fades, you name it.  The passes that flat out win/lose the game against better competition.  Just can't win against better teams with those mistakes.  Even if you have a link to Chad Pennington's completion %.

If this year is what you are happy with from Dak... I'd advise you to expect more 9-7/10-6 seasons where this impressive roster under achieves.

eta - imagine missing a 1 yard screen pass by 20 feet... while not being hit.  Missing so bad Zeke turns away to walk off field before the ball hits the ground.  Hmmmmm......

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And turning it back to McCarthy.

Do we give him credit for Favre and Rodgers?  Or would they be Favre and Rodgers without him... and will Dak be Dak with him?

 
Dak completed 65% of his passes and was 4th in yards/completion, 3rd in NY/A and 6th in ANY/A.  i.e. he was easily a top-10 QB this year by any reasonable measure and is not the Cowboys problem.

 
So few can play the role of NFL QB in the world that many teams would be happy to have Dak to work their offense with I think. By the time he hits age 30 in a few years, where many QBs blossom and he has more reps, experience, and the game slows down, etc...... If you don't have the patience for that, fine, and someone better may come along as an option, but I think there is plenty to work with here with Dak.

Rather have Dak leading the Cowboys than Babe Laufenberg.

 
all right boys its third and one on the giants 45 yard line there are four minutes left in the game and we need three to win it so what i want you to do is line up five wide and dax you throw it as far as you can so no one can catch it and then we will punt and lose zeke go get me a gatorade take that to the bank bromigos

 
And turning it back to McCarthy.

Do we give him credit for Favre and Rodgers?  Or would they be Favre and Rodgers without him... and will Dak be Dak with him?
McCarthy (and Tom Clements) has to get a large heaping pile of credit for the success of both Favre and Rodgers imo.  He repeatedly said his most important focus as head coach is to make the quarterback successful.  From the Bob McGinn piece in the Athletic (I believe I linked somewhere in here):

When McCarthy returned to the Packers in 2006 (he had been their quarterbacks coach in 1999 under Ray Rhodes) Brett Favre’s career was in disarray. The Packers had finished 4-12 in ’05, and Favre’s career-high total of 29 interceptions and 70.9 passer rating were part of the problem.

Immediately, Favre and McCarthy rekindled what had been a strong relationship, and under McCarthy’s firm but steady guidance Favre toned down his impulsiveness, relished a more check-with-me system at the line of scrimmage and posted his best passer rating (95.7) in 11 years as the Packers went 13-3 in 2007.

Few will remember the start of Rodgers’ career. Two years in, there were as many scouts who believed his career would be a bust as there were those who didn’t. He couldn’t have been less impressive.

When I asked Bill Walsh in a 2006 interview if he considered Rodgers, the former Cal quarterback, to be maxed out physically, he said, “That’s right. What you see is what you get. He doesn’t have a great (deal) more potential that doesn’t show. He was part of a system and real outstanding coach (Jeff Tedford) in college and all of that. I don’t know where it’s going to take him.”

McCarthy took a hands-on approach with the quarterback who he rated beneath Alex Smith during his one season as offensive coordinator in San Francisco. Rodgers made dramatic changes in his ball carriage and delivery, increased his arm strength and overall strength, learned about leadership and, by his fourth season, was ready to roll as Favre’s successor.
I agree with the comment that very few people other than Packers fans and NFL people remember the huge questions marks around Rodgers during his first few years with the Packers.  He hardly played, so there was almost no opportunity to evaluate him or have an informed opinion.  However, there was a ton of noise from the Packers camp and outsiders who were allowed access that Rodgers looked terrible those first few years in camp.  Then he made dramatic changes to his delivery and his approach to the game.  They decided what he learned at Cal was not going to cut it in the NFL, broke him down and completely changed the way he throws the ball.

 
McCarthy (and Tom Clements) has to get a large heaping pile of credit for the success of both Favre and Rodgers imo.  He repeatedly said his most important focus as head coach is to make the quarterback successful.  From the Bob McGinn piece in the Athletic (I believe I linked somewhere in here):

I agree with the comment that very few people other than Packers fans and NFL people remember the huge questions marks around Rodgers during his first few years with the Packers.  He hardly played, so there was almost no opportunity to evaluate him or have an informed opinion.  However, there was a ton of noise from the Packers camp and outsiders who were allowed access that Rodgers looked terrible those first few years in camp.  Then he made dramatic changes to his delivery and his approach to the game.  They decided what he learned at Cal was not going to cut it in the NFL, broke him down and completely changed the way he throws the ball.
I remember this well.

I remember the Packers working with a number of Q.b.'s during the Favre/Rodgers era.  Mark Brunell, Ty Detmer, Doug Pederson, Matt Hasselbeck, Matt Flynn, Aaron Brooks, Kurt Warner, Taysome Hill. They developed more talent in that 24 years than the Bears have in their entire history.  Many went on to moderate or fair success elsewhere because the Packers could not keep them all.  Many worked with Mccarthy as a Q.B. coach in his first stint or as head coach latter on.  He had few outright failures though, for instance Brian Brohm washed out quickly, so too Brent Hundley. The thing is he has some record of improving Q.B. play which goes beyond mere coincidence, particularly when we remember that both Favre and Rodgers were unwanted commodities at the beginnings of their careers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like how everyone who says he is behind the times and not innovative in the past missed the point where McCarthy kinda admitted that and over the last year has thrown himself into improving himself and has actively created a staff to research ways to make his play-calling more innovative/analytically driven. Assuming he's not blowing hot air (and kinda hard to say he is), the past Mike McCarthy isn't the same dude as current Mike McCarthy.
So he didn't do that while an actual coach so he could build a comeback story?

Anyone taking anything King says as important hadn't read many of his articles. He's an entertainer, knows next to nothing about much of anything.

 
voiceofunreason said:
So he didn't do that while an actual coach so he could build a comeback story?

Anyone taking anything King says as important hadn't read many of his articles. He's an entertainer, knows next to nothing about much of anything.
What in the world?

This isn't some opinion piece, he spent a few days in Wisconsin and interviewed him face to face! Obviously you didn't read the article.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Forget it. 
i missed it? hopefully it wasn't too bad. I do think the Rodgers vs. McCarthy thing is interesting, and who knows where the fault lies between the 2. I do find some of the stuff in this thread and the Cowboys thread interesting for McCarthy, so i am intrigued to see if he is much different or not next year.

Will be nice if coaches can self-evaluate and be self-aware enough to do that and make themselves better

 
great hire for Dallas. solid coach, knows his stuff. Dak is good, he's not great, he's never going to be great. there are plenty of good QBs who''ve played over the years some  who've won titles.Phil Simms, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Hostetler, Rich Gannon, Bledsoe. Point is, Dak can be good and still deliver the SB Titles. they have one of the best o-lines in football, a good defense, and a great RB who is awesome at receptions out of the backfield. what else could you want ! 

with Zeke, the 'Boys don't HAVE to pass, they've just need to run zeke 25+ times/gm , and that sets up the play action for bigtime strikes.

Dak is fine. They switched to a chuck-n-duck offense in 2019, got away from pounding  the rock, and it cost Garrett his job. but much of Dak's perceived failures fall sqaurely on Garrett's shoulders - he's just NOT a good HC.he probably won't ever get the HC opportunity again.He's OC material - maybe - but certainly not HC material.

 
Rodgers didn’t have very nice things to say about MM. He said MM had the worst football IQ of any coach he ever had. 
 

Is that true or is Rodger the biggest jerk in the NFL? Both can be true statements. 
I am not a Packers fan but I always thought MM was one of those coaches that did the least with the most. That playoff loss to Seattle was a prime example of it. I really don't consider him an upgrade over Garrett or most coaches for that matter.

 
Dinsy Ejotuz said:
Dak completed 65% of his passes and was 4th in yards/completion, 3rd in NY/A and 6th in ANY/A.  i.e. he was easily a top-10 QB this year by any reasonable measure and is not the Cowboys problem.
His full season stats are slightly misleading though.  If you look at his game by game performances, he had some crazy good games, and some clunkers.  I think the really good games make the low points undervalued when it's all averaged out.

 
I still think you pay Dak though, cuz he's pretty good, and could get more consistently good......hopefully.  I think it was a mistake to pay Zeke.

 
Richard and Kitna not being retained.

"David Moore of the Dallas Morning News reports the Cowboys will not retain DBs coach/passing-game coordinator Kris Richard.

It's been a rough start to 2020 for Richard, who in a matter of weeks has gone from being a head-coaching candidate with the Giants to out of a job entirely. The Cowboys are also moving on from QBs coach Jon Kitna as new coach Mike McCarthy plans to bring in his own staff. Richard, a six-year NFL vet who began his coaching career under Pete Carroll in Seattle, shouldn't be out of work for long. Perhaps he'd be a fit for the Vikings, who recently fired long-time defensive coordinator George Edwards. McCarthy is expected to tap Texas A&M's Maurice Linguist as his new secondary coach."

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top