McNabb gets such a bum rap. He's certainly not the most accurate, but he's a heck of a good QB and both those WRs would get big bumps IMO.From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps
McNabb gets such a bum rap. He's certainly not the most accurate, but he's a heck of a good QB and both those WRs would get big bumps IMO.From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps
Rams sideline reporterThis is interesting to me. Seems like a quick dispute for a rumor that isn't very old. Who is Brian Stull?Donovan McNabb-QB-Eagles Mar. 24 - 4:18 pm et Brian Stull of ESPN 101 disputes a rumor that the Rams have traded the No. 33 pick to Philadelphia in exchange for Donovan McNabb.Stull calls the rumor, which originated from a New York radio station, "incorrect, or at least premature." However, Philadelphia station 97.5 has also apparently gone public with the report, although we're unable to confirm it. Acquiring McNabb would presumably take St. Louis out of the running for Sam Bradford. McNabb, entering his age-34 season, would also require a multi-year extension, in addition to the premium draft choice.
Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
You just answered your own question. If Wash love Bradford and they want to make sure they get him, they trade up so that a team can't jump in front of them.Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
2 to 4?As a Steven Jackson owner, I'd be ecstatic with this trade.I'd think his TD opportunities would increase by at least double.

He said at least!2 to 4?As a Steven Jackson owner, I'd be ecstatic with this trade.
I'd think his TD opportunities would increase by at least double.![]()

I agree that the Skins would be an unlikely team to trade up unless they are worried that the Browns are trying to get ahead of them to take Bradford and even then the new regime probably values having picks unlike the Skins of the past that traded all their picks. The money involved may prevent a team from making a move, but Holmgren and the Browns might just be desperate enough for a QB to make it happen.Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
WRONGOther teams have been entertaining them with offersBIG DIFFERENCE"entertaining offers for all three quarterbacks"
Actually it would be 4 to 8.My point was that I think the Rams' trips to the red zone would increase dramatically (which, now that I think about it, is a pretty obvious statement2 to 4?As a Steven Jackson owner, I'd be ecstatic with this trade.I'd think his TD opportunities would increase by at least double.![]()
).From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps
That's in about 3 minutes. Might know something soon.From PFT User Comments:"If you want to hear something... Sal Pal is breaking Eagles News at 4:45pm on 97.5 the fanatic.com"
I don't think teams pre-emptively trade up. Let me know if you have evidence of the contrary.You just answered your own question. If Wash love Bradford and they want to make sure they get him, they trade up so that a team can't jump in front of them.Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
There is a ton of evidence of that. Teams have made trades to move up 1 spot before.I don't think teams pre-emptively trade up. Let me know if you have evidence of the contrary.You just answered your own question. If Wash love Bradford and they want to make sure they get him, they trade up so that a team can't jump in front of them.Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
The Eagles did it last year because there were rumors of the NYG trying to trade up to get Maclin.There is a ton of evidence of that. Teams have made trades to move up 1 spot before.I don't think teams pre-emptively trade up. Let me know if you have evidence of the contrary.You just answered your own question. If Wash love Bradford and they want to make sure they get him, they trade up so that a team can't jump in front of them.Why would the skins trade up? If StL doesn't take Bradford, the Lions or TB aren't likely too as they both have young QBs already. So I can't see either of them taking him. So he would likely fall to the skins anyways. Now Clev is another story.I would think the Rams might then try to trade the #1 to the Skins or Browns or somebody that wants Bradford and get back a 2nd to replace the one they traded for McNabb and still get a good player in the top 10. Could work out great for them if they could pull it off.
McNabb rumours 1 for 2 or 0 for 2?I thought he was going to the 49ers.
Sal says nothin yet besides lots of talks in Orlando. Rams, maybe Raiders, maybe Seattle.That's in about 3 minutes. Might know something soon.From PFT User Comments:"If you want to hear something... Sal Pal is breaking Eagles News at 4:45pm on 97.5 the fanatic.com"
Browns trade up for Bradford? That would make meIf this is true this seems like a deal where everybody wins.

I would say it looks like there's nothing to Sal's report that he has breaking news. He sucks.Lehigh98 said:"He has not been traded yet"Listening to 97.5 now, Sal Pal is on.Just talking about who they've spoke with and trade rumors.Looks like nothing to it right now per Sal Pal.
If there is no breaking news, what's he gonna do, make some up?Paolantonio hardly breaking news.![]()
From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps

Well, he said he had breaking news. His exact words.If there is no breaking news, what's he gonna do, make some up?Paolantonio hardly breaking news.![]()
McNabb is the John Stockton of the NFL.From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps![]()
Still 29 more teams he could be traded to.McNabb rumours 1 for 2 or 0 for 2?I thought he was going to the 49ers.
Well, that's a team I wouldn't have thought of.Sal says nothin yet besides lots of talks in Orlando. Rams, maybe Raiders, maybe Seattle.That's in about 3 minutes. Might know something soon.From PFT User Comments:
"If you want to hear something... Sal Pal is breaking Eagles News at 4:45pm on 97.5 the fanatic.com"
That and the season ticket thing.I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder![]()
How low of a 1st rounder would you take?I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder :(
That was for the 2.06, so while I would be equally as livid with the 2.01, I wouldn't have to give up my tix.That and the season ticket thing.I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder :(
I would need multiple picks, unless it was a top 10 pick in the 1st round.I love "5"How low of a 1st rounder would you take?I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder :(

Would Cle. trade us their #1 this year, #2 this year and a #2 next year?Browns trade up for Bradford? That would make me :(If this is true this seems like a deal where everybody wins.
Funny... I almost threw up in my mouth when I heard this trade story was erroneous.I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder :(
At least the Utah fanbase appreciated him...the grass ain't always greener. McNabb is a better man than me; I would have found my first oppy out of town and signed with an NFC East team, just to shove it up your arses two times a year.McNabb is the John Stockton of the NFL.:(From the passes bouncing at their feet?If true, I think Avery and L.Robinson should get HUGE bumps
no way the vikes could get him for that imo, they would want at the very least our first rounderIf this becomes true I think the Vikings will be kicking themselfs for not getting involved in this situation and letting Favre lull them into doing nothing. Waiting on a 40 year old QB to deceide what he wants to do when a proven winner at 33 years old that has full knowledge of your offense is available for a 2nd and probably a 4th or 5th because your 2nd is so low is carzy to me. Donovan has 4 or 5 good years left. I know there has been alot of bashing of him, but the guy wins games and gets his team to the playoffs. Thats all you can hope for, a shot in the playoffs and hope your uber stud RB doesn't fumble every other drive.
Me too. I can't wait for McNabb to be traded so all of the Eagles fans who have no clue how good they've had it for the past decade can watch a borderline-bad team for the next decade while they try and find another franchise QB.Funny... I almost threw up in my mouth when I heard this trade story was erroneous.I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder![]()
I fear that'sMe too. I can't wait for McNabb to be traded so all of the Eagles fans who have no clue how good they've had it for the past decade can watch a borderline-bad team for the next decade while they try and find another franchise QB.Funny... I almost threw up in my mouth when I heard this trade story was erroneous.I'm going to throw up in my mouth if all we get for 5 is a 2nd rounder![]()
I'm stunned at how many of my fellow Eagles fans just assume Kolb will be BETTER than a guy that's been as successful as McNabb has been. It astounds me. No sense of historical context IMHO.