McNabb with Westbrook Out (1 Viewer)

[bocksheesh]

Trying to assess the impact on McNabb of Westbrook's injury. Does it bring his numbers down or have no affect on McNabb just like the rest of his mediocre receiving corp?

 

[Holy Schneikes]

I would guess the overall effectiveness of the offense will go down, which would cause McNabb's numbers to go down.

 

[scratcher]

Don't count Westbrook out already, he could be back by the Chi game

 

[Texican]

Don't count Westbrook out already, he could be back by the Chi game

Exactly. Who says he's out?

 

[drew726]

Buckhalter emulates Westbrook pretty well. Obviously he's not as his level, but if Westbrook is an A, Buckhalter is a B.

 

[David Yudkin]

McNabb playing, Westbrook not playing:

2007

@ NYG 138/0

2006

GB 288/2

2004

BAL 219/1

2003

@ ATL 312/1

 

[glumpy]

McNabb playing, Westbrook not playing:2007@ NYG 138/02006GB 288/22004BAL 219/12003@ ATL 312/1

Good stuff.

 

[travdogg]

McNabb playing, Westbrook not playing:2007@ NYG 138/02006GB 288/22004BAL 219/12003@ ATL 312/1

Good stuff.

So basically McNabb isn't really any different?The Giants game almost has to be thrown out because that was the fluky Winston Justice game.The other games all look pretty good.

 

[renesauz]

McNabb takes a small hit. Overall offensive efficiancy goes down a bit without Westbrook. McNabb's numbers may or may not go down, depending on the nature of the opponent.

Against a team like Chicago, I'd say his numbers take a small hit. Efficiency will go down, but Philly's defense s likely to throttle Chicago, so Philly stays conservative with a lead.

Against a tougher team (Giants/GB/Dallas types) McNabb would throw even more then normal, and make up for lack of efficiancy with more attempts. Philly has not had good success against good teams without Westbrook, but McNabb has continued to produce decent fantasy numbers.

 

[Judge Smails]

McNabb playing, Westbrook not playing:2007@ NYG 138/02006GB 288/22004BAL 219/12003@ ATL 312/1

Yud's just spits the truth! Still payin' him props for the Priest/LJ analysis...