What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mendenhall (1 Viewer)

Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation. Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it. Carry on.
 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it. Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it. Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Not an Ingram thread, so I'll pass on that. I don't think he was messed with. He was by far the best RB on his roster and the news out of PITT was that they were stoked to have him back. I don't know what went on behind the scenes, but I know one of the 5 best organizations in football didn't spite this guy at the detriment of the team.He has a track record based on touch totals. Like others have said - we'll see, in regards to the O-line vs Mendy, chicken or the egg argument.
 
I know one of the 5 best organizations in football didn't spite this guy at the detriment of the team.
Mendenhall aside, I'm just not getting this vibe from the Steelers today. I'm not sure if it was the change in Rooneys catching up with them or if it's just a normal ebb and flow thing but they feel like an organization that's slipping to me.If they pull a rabbit out of the hat for 2014 with their salary cap issues and aging defense I'll be really impressed.
 
This is sort of a pointless argument until it's seen what team he lands with. Any team that does is likely looking for a starter or upgrade there, and I fully believe Mendenhall has the ability to win the starting job on a team in that situation.

 
Mendenhall, a cheap FA, and a udfa pick would cost roughly 5mil for an entire rb depth chart. I don't buy the argument that he'd cost to much to play for any team either.

 
if it's just a normal ebb and flow thing but they feel like an organization that's slipping to me.If they pull a rabbit out of the hat for 2014 with their salary cap issues and aging defense I'll be really impressed.
They do look to be slipping because of the age thing. But the already revamped the entire front 3 on defense and remained #1 overall in the league and #1 vs the pass. That's while missing big chunks from Harrison, Woodley and Polamalu. So I don't think it would be a "rabbit out of the hat" to see players with several years learning in the system to make big leaps.
 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it. Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Ok, that's the second time... at first I thought it was a typo, but you do realize that the word you are looking for is "worst", not "worse", right?Not that this post warrants it, but to address the 1200/10 that you stated, you are falling into the SP trap of only looking at aggregate numbers. Mendenhall did nothing but lumber for 4 ypc for a #### ton of carries to get to 1200/10. The only significant statistical difference between Ingram and Mendenhall is that Ingram has never gotten close to 200 carries while Mendenhall has gotten over 300 in a season before.People think you just plug him into a lineup and 1200/10 just happens, but no, he's going to be in a RBBC most likely and he'll be doing good to hit 200 carries. I'll be shocked if he achieves over 800 yards on the ground this year.Personally, I think you give Ingram 200 carries and he'll earn more carries. You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
 
Situation matters a lot more than silly parallels are and anecdotal stories.
I think people are only trying to point out that RBs that were at one time worthy of being first round picks in the NFL will likely get a second chance somewhere even if they washed out with the team that drafted them.That's all (imo) that these Lynch, Benson, Thomas Jones parallels are attempting to show. Anyone thinking that no NFL team is going to give Medndenhall a chance at a starting spot is being shortsighted. Whether you think he'll do anything with that chance depends on how good you think Mendenhall is, and how good his future situation will be.
Had a typo of my own there. Meant to say "and". Anyway, I think it is easy to throw out names of 1st round picks who had slow starts, but put it together later. I'm sure the list is MUCH longer of first round picks that fizzled out. As far as production per touch, Mendenhall hasn't been relevant for 3 years. Unless he finds a team that's willing to give him 250+ touches, he's not going to be worth his draft pick. There will be plenty of people chasing his previous totals that will bump his ADP up if it looks like there's a chance he could emerge as the starter for his team. If he gets himself into a true competition, I'm all about drafting the other guy late. At this point, I really think Mendenhall is an average NFL back, so it shouldn't be hard to beat him in a fair competition. And I don't mean average starter, but average RB.
Situation deosn't matter nearly as much as you think. In just about every case, Thomas Jones, Ced Benson, McGahee, Moreno, Lynch, Henry they all went to a crap situation and had to bide their time as they were only signed for depth. Lynch was really the only exception to that and most still felt he was on a bad team. He had 2 good games for the Seahawks and that thunderous run in the playoffs the year they traded for him but still no one paid him any mind the next year in drafts because of the poor state of the offense. No one is looking for an RB1 here, just to pick up on some undervalued assets. EBF is onto something with this, theyre all former 1st rounders that washed out with their first team, but he's going about it all wrong paying rb2 prices.
If situation doesn't matter then why did LT go from 3.3 ypc on SD to 4.1 ypc on the Jets a year later? Situation certainly does matter and it matters way more than the SP realizes. However, I agree that Lynch's situation didn't get much better in the year he was traded, and it showed. His ypc wasn't great. But he was still talented and so they gave him the ball. He ran hard. He didn't dance in the backfield and over use the spin move like someone else.But let's quickly debunk the idea that all those first rounders disappointed on their first team and then dazzled while in "crap" situations:

-Thomas Jones went from crappy Arizona and Tampa teams (where he never got more than 138 carries) to a decent Chicago team (where he averaged 19 rushes per game for 3 years) to a great Jets rushing offense and his stats went accordingly. He was also signed to be the guy his first year, then they drafted Benson.

-As for Benson, all he had to do was get his head on straight (or straight enough). He blew it in Chicago (although never got 200 carries) and found a team dedicated to the run and earned his way on a 1 year contract.

-Moreno is still on the team that drafted him. I got him for free this year so I'd like to see him do well, but his production per touch was not actually very impressive. His name doesn't belong on this list.

-Travis Henry was always productive when given a chance (aside from his rookie year - a rough 3.4 ypc). He was just a headcase and got booted out of Buffalo when McGahee made him redundant. As soon as he got a chance on Tennessee (a very solid running team at the time), he was good again.

-McGahee did about as good as Henry did in Buffalo, then had a nice backup season behind Ray Rice (everyone's ypc on that team blew up one year, even FB McClain), then he benefited from a nice situation in Denver.

None of these guys regressed like Mendenhall did from season 2 to seasons 3 and 4 (I'll give season 5 a pass due to the ACL). Also, I'm not seeing a single case of a guy going from a good situation (like Mendenhall had in his 3 years of heavy usage in the well above average Pit offense) to a worse situation. So I've got to strongly disagree. Situation does matter. If Mendenhall goes to Atlanta and only has the way over hyped, below average runner Quizz to fight for carries, then by all means, buy. He won't do much more than 2012 Turner, but 250 carries in that offense - it won't matter if you're average. The stats will come. But if he goes to KC to split with Charles or maybe Arizona, then stay away. He clearly doesn't have what it takes to produce on his own.

 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?

 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?
Tomlinson?
 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?
I understand the point you're trying to make, I think; that YPC is a raw stat and we need context - I agree. But is adnvanced per touch metrics are bad too. EBF made a solid point - it's been a while since we've seen this guy at full strength, and maybe that is lingering on our minds - but he hasn't looked very good for a long while, either. The good thing about the conversation is that we'll get to find out what the rest of the NFL thinks of him, whether he can earn a job, and what can he do with it.

 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation. Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall.
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it. Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Ok, that's the second time... at first I thought it was a typo, but you do realize that the word you are looking for is "worst", not "worse", right?Not that this post warrants it, but to address the 1200/10 that you stated, you are falling into the SP trap of only looking at aggregate numbers. Mendenhall did nothing but lumber for 4 ypc for a #### ton of carries to get to 1200/10. The only significant statistical difference between Ingram and Mendenhall is that Ingram has never gotten close to 200 carries while Mendenhall has gotten over 300 in a season before.People think you just plug him into a lineup and 1200/10 just happens, but no, he's going to be in a RBBC most likely and he'll be doing good to hit 200 carries. I'll be shocked if he achieves over 800 yards on the ground this year.Personally, I think you give Ingram 200 carries and he'll earn more carries. You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
If I cared I would have taken my post to an editor but thanks. Mendenhall is a free agent and he can land in a great situation that favors him, you can only imagine he would. As soon as that happen his market value will sky rocket because he'll be all the "experts" sleeper. Then it will be "he's the new Michael Turner" blah blah blah... Talent wise I see a 5'10, 225 pound rb with elite speed and agility that can catch. He's been productive in college and in the pro's. If you value carries or talent there's reason to like both. There's is nothing else I can measure to analyze my drafpicks. I don't mention things like vision unless I get confirmation that he has 20/20 from a eye doctor. And I'm not chasing numbers, I'm looking for undervalued talent in good situations and don't mind paying for the upside. I'm not bothering to mention things like Big Bens suspension/injuries or the Steelers line getting worse over the years that could have lead to his "regression." Ingram won't see 200 carries, Mendenhall might. That ends that discussion to me without measuring athleticism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
Yep.He's not a bad back. Just disappointing compared to the back that he should be given his physical skillset.If a team sinks significant resources into him they will get a modest ROI, but will likely wind up regretting the deal sooner rather than later from a cap perspective.As to his fantasy value...sure he's worth a shot at the right price. Who isn't? Just depends on his cost as to whether it's worth it or not.As many have said, the landing spot determines the short term value. Long term, I think he's a guy that teams will view as upgradeable if the opportunity arises.
 
You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
Yep.He's not a bad back. Just disappointing compared to the back that he should be given his physical skillset.If a team sinks significant resources into him they will get a modest ROI, but will likely wind up regretting the deal sooner rather than later from a cap perspective.As to his fantasy value...sure he's worth a shot at the right price. Who isn't? Just depends on his cost as to whether it's worth it or not.As many have said, the landing spot determines the short term value. Long term, I think he's a guy that teams will view as upgradeable if the opportunity arises.
I disagree with this. Mendenhall is a legit three down back who played on a teams with some of the worst O-lines in the league. Add to that, this season with injury and falling out of favor and you have a guy who's likely undervalued. As a Steeler fan, I really hope he comes back to the team. He's much better than anyone else they have.
 
You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
Yep.He's not a bad back. Just disappointing compared to the back that he should be given his physical skillset.If a team sinks significant resources into him they will get a modest ROI, but will likely wind up regretting the deal sooner rather than later from a cap perspective.As to his fantasy value...sure he's worth a shot at the right price. Who isn't? Just depends on his cost as to whether it's worth it or not.As many have said, the landing spot determines the short term value. Long term, I think he's a guy that teams will view as upgradeable if the opportunity arises.
I disagree with this. Mendenhall is a legit three down back who played on a teams with some of the worst O-lines in the league. Add to that, this season with injury and falling out of favor and you have a guy who's likely undervalued. As a Steeler fan, I really hope he comes back to the team. He's much better than anyone else they have.
Might also lose you top WR also yikes!
 
You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
Yep.He's not a bad back. Just disappointing compared to the back that he should be given his physical skillset.If a team sinks significant resources into him they will get a modest ROI, but will likely wind up regretting the deal sooner rather than later from a cap perspective.As to his fantasy value...sure he's worth a shot at the right price. Who isn't? Just depends on his cost as to whether it's worth it or not.As many have said, the landing spot determines the short term value. Long term, I think he's a guy that teams will view as upgradeable if the opportunity arises.
I disagree with this. Mendenhall is a legit three down back who played on a teams with some of the worst O-lines in the league. Add to that, this season with injury and falling out of favor and you have a guy who's likely undervalued. As a Steeler fan, I really hope he comes back to the team. He's much better than anyone else they have.
Might also lose you top WR also yikes!
Yeah, they have some tough decisions to make and little cap space in which to make them.
 
Jones and Benson didn't have a 1000+ yard season until they had changed teams, so of course they couldn't "re-establish dynasty RB1 value." They never had it in the first place. Jones didn't have a 1000+ yard season until his sixth year in the NFL.
That wasn't the point I was making. We can use "establish" where applicable.
He's no worse than Benson, and Benson had 1109 carries and 4176 rushing yards combined in four seasons after leaving the Bears as a forgotten man at 25 years old (the same age as Mendenhall).
On how many teams would Benson start? On how many teams would he be the best option by such a wide margin that he is essentially a 3 down back? Being "no worse" than Cedric Benson is not much of a claim, when it comes to dynasty value.

A lot of people think he sucks and that he was only relevant because of the volume he received. The first thing I'd point out is that you don't get 200+ carries for three seasons in a row in the NFL if you suck. There's too much competition for places.
Who has said suck? I have seen average used a lot, which is my opinion of him. Have any per/touch metric that suggests otherwise?

The second thing I'd point out is that this widespread belief that he's garbage is the very reason why he's such a good value play.
Not really with you, here.

I was around on these boards when all of those guys were considered worthless busts. This is just history repeating itself. Same phenomenon. Different name.
And where does Shonn Greene fit in here? Or Felix Jones? Or Beanie Wells? Or Donald Brown? Or Knowshon Moreno? Or Joseph Addai?

You've been a big time Ingram supporter in other threads. And here you're talking down a guy who was just as good in college, was a higher draft pick, has better speed at the same weight, was more productive in his first two seasons, and has a higher career YPC. I'd take a step back and reconsider that for a minute.
Ingram hasn't had the opportunity that Mendenhall has. And if you're familiar with my stance on Ingram, you should be familiar with my stance on his YPC. Ingram has better vision, is quicker, and, in my opinion, a better football player.
You're insane if you think Ingram is quicker and a better player than Mendenhall. You're probably trying to validate your dynasty pick in Ingram. Fail
 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?
:rolleyes: Haha, yeah, you're struggling here. Tomlinson had a three year pattern of really good, incredible, average. Mendenhall now has a four year pattern of really good, average, average, meh. Great comparison, guy. So through 5 years, he's had one good season despite the fact that he's been given every opportunity to succeed on a team that, as a whole, has been very successful. In his five years, the Steelers haven't had a losing record. They are 53-27 in the regular season and 5-2 in the playoffs. If you want to blame the o-line, use that as an excuse, but Dywer had as many 100-yard games this year in just a few starts as Mendenhall did in his last full season.YPC isn't the whole story, but it tells the tale of Mendenhall pretty well. A guy who got a first round pick's workload and did a 4th round pick's job with it. And that's why he won't be back in Pit. They've already got a couple average backs on the cheap who won't have bad attitudes or tweet idiotic things.

 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  

Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it.

Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Ok, that's the second time... at first I thought it was a typo, but you do realize that the word you are looking for is "worst", not "worse", right?Not that this post warrants it, but to address the 1200/10 that you stated, you are falling into the SP trap of only looking at aggregate numbers. Mendenhall did nothing but lumber for 4 ypc for a #### ton of carries to get to 1200/10. The only significant statistical difference between Ingram and Mendenhall is that Ingram has never gotten close to 200 carries while Mendenhall has gotten over 300 in a season before.

People think you just plug him into a lineup and 1200/10 just happens, but no, he's going to be in a RBBC most likely and he'll be doing good to hit 200 carries. I'll be shocked if he achieves over 800 yards on the ground this year.

Personally, I think you give Ingram 200 carries and he'll earn more carries. You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
If I cared I would have taken my post to an editor but thanks. Mendenhall is a free agent and he can land in a great situation that favors him, you can only imagine he would. As soon as that happen his market value will sky rocket because he'll be all the "experts" sleeper. Then it will be "he's the new Michael Turner" blah blah blah... 

Talent wise I see a 5'10, 225 pound rb with elite speed and agility that can catch. He's been productive in college and in the pro's. If you value carries or talent there's reason to like both. There's is nothing else I can measure to analyze my drafpicks. I don't mention things like vision unless I get confirmation that he has 20/20 from a eye doctor. And I'm not chasing numbers, I'm looking for undervalued talent in good situations and don't mind paying for the upside. 

I'm not bothering to mention things like Big Bens suspension/injuries or the Steelers line getting worse over the years that could have lead to his "regression." Ingram won't see 200 carries, Mendenhall might. That ends that discussion to me without measuring athleticism.
Excuse me for trying to help you sound less ignorant. It will help you make points better if you sound like you've at least got a GED. However, nothing is going to save you from quotes like the 20/20 vision bit. Classic. I'm not going to hit ignore because I disagree with you, but just so I don't accidentally mistake you later for someone who has some semblance of a clue as to what he is talking about.
 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  

Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it.

Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Ok, that's the second time... at first I thought it was a typo, but you do realize that the word you are looking for is "worst", not "worse", right?Not that this post warrants it, but to address the 1200/10 that you stated, you are falling into the SP trap of only looking at aggregate numbers. Mendenhall did nothing but lumber for 4 ypc for a #### ton of carries to get to 1200/10. The only significant statistical difference between Ingram and Mendenhall is that Ingram has never gotten close to 200 carries while Mendenhall has gotten over 300 in a season before.

People think you just plug him into a lineup and 1200/10 just happens, but no, he's going to be in a RBBC most likely and he'll be doing good to hit 200 carries. I'll be shocked if he achieves over 800 yards on the ground this year.

Personally, I think you give Ingram 200 carries and he'll earn more carries. You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
If I cared I would have taken my post to an editor but thanks. Mendenhall is a free agent and he can land in a great situation that favors him, you can only imagine he would. As soon as that happen his market value will sky rocket because he'll be all the "experts" sleeper. Then it will be "he's the new Michael Turner" blah blah blah... 

Talent wise I see a 5'10, 225 pound rb with elite speed and agility that can catch. He's been productive in college and in the pro's. If you value carries or talent there's reason to like both. There's is nothing else I can measure to analyze my drafpicks. I don't mention things like vision unless I get confirmation that he has 20/20 from a eye doctor. And I'm not chasing numbers, I'm looking for undervalued talent in good situations and don't mind paying for the upside. 

I'm not bothering to mention things like Big Bens suspension/injuries or the Steelers line getting worse over the years that could have lead to his "regression." Ingram won't see 200 carries, Mendenhall might. That ends that discussion to me without measuring athleticism.
Excuse me for trying to help you sound less ignorant. It will help you make points better if you sound like you've at least got a GED. However, nothing is going to save you from quotes like the 20/20 vision bit. Classic. I'm not going to hit ignore because I disagree with you, but just so I don't accidentally mistake you later for someone who has some semblance of a clue as to what he is talking about.
I said thank you. You really altered my life by catching a grammatical error on a fantasy football forum that I made. I don't know where I would be without you!That line was a comment on cliches that are dumb to me. I have no clue how to tell if Mendenhall can see better than Ingram. Now that I would appreciate if you helped me with.

 
'ShaHBucks said:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  

Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
Likely to get 1,200/10? You got great value in the 7th, then! One of the most physically gifted backs in the league likely to get 1,200/10+? How was he not a 2nd rounder? And Mark Ingram is only okay because of the team he plays on? Easy to say, so I shouldn't be surprised that so many people say it.

Carry on.
Ingram has been the worse back on his own team for two years straight. Never even had a 100 yard rushing game to his credit but you doubt someone that has a track record as a starter of exactly what I stated, 1200 total and 10 TD's. What am I missing? I was surprised he even came back to play giving he was in a contract year. I'd be pissed to if I sacrificed my future only to be dicked with.
Ok, that's the second time... at first I thought it was a typo, but you do realize that the word you are looking for is "worst", not "worse", right?Not that this post warrants it, but to address the 1200/10 that you stated, you are falling into the SP trap of only looking at aggregate numbers. Mendenhall did nothing but lumber for 4 ypc for a #### ton of carries to get to 1200/10. The only significant statistical difference between Ingram and Mendenhall is that Ingram has never gotten close to 200 carries while Mendenhall has gotten over 300 in a season before.

People think you just plug him into a lineup and 1200/10 just happens, but no, he's going to be in a RBBC most likely and he'll be doing good to hit 200 carries. I'll be shocked if he achieves over 800 yards on the ground this year.

Personally, I think you give Ingram 200 carries and he'll earn more carries. You give Mendenhall 200 carries and he'll show you why the Steelers let him walk.
If I cared I would have taken my post to an editor but thanks. Mendenhall is a free agent and he can land in a great situation that favors him, you can only imagine he would. As soon as that happen his market value will sky rocket because he'll be all the "experts" sleeper. Then it will be "he's the new Michael Turner" blah blah blah... 

Talent wise I see a 5'10, 225 pound rb with elite speed and agility that can catch. He's been productive in college and in the pro's. If you value carries or talent there's reason to like both. There's is nothing else I can measure to analyze my drafpicks. I don't mention things like vision unless I get confirmation that he has 20/20 from a eye doctor. And I'm not chasing numbers, I'm looking for undervalued talent in good situations and don't mind paying for the upside. 

I'm not bothering to mention things like Big Bens suspension/injuries or the Steelers line getting worse over the years that could have lead to his "regression." Ingram won't see 200 carries, Mendenhall might. That ends that discussion to me without measuring athleticism.
Excuse me for trying to help you sound less ignorant. It will help you make points better if you sound like you've at least got a GED. However, nothing is going to save you from quotes like the 20/20 vision bit. Classic. I'm not going to hit ignore because I disagree with you, but just so I don't accidentally mistake you later for someone who has some semblance of a clue as to what he is talking about.
I said thank you. You really altered my life by catching a grammatical error on a fantasy football forum that I made. I don't know where I would be without you!That line was a comment on cliches that are dumb to me. I have no clue how to tell if Mendenhall can see better than Ingram. Now that I would appreciate if you helped me with.
When people talk about a RB's vision, it's not his commenting on his ability to actually see clearly, it's his ability to "see the field". In other words, his ability to find the proper hole to run through, anticipate a defender closing a hole and cutting away from him, seeing the proper angle to take to beat a defender, "knowing" whether to bounce outside or cut upfield.For an example; Shonn Greene has terrible vision - he's always running into the back of his linemen, or towards a hole that's about to close.

 
When people talk about a RB's vision, it's not his commenting on his ability to actually see clearly, it's his ability to "see the field". In other words, his ability to find the proper hole to run through, anticipate a defender closing a hole and cutting away from him, seeing the proper angle to take to beat a defender, "knowing" whether to bounce outside or cut upfield.



For an example; Shonn Greene has terrible vision - he's always running into the back of his linemen, or towards a hole that's about to close.
Maybe he has excellent vision but lacks the speed to get there in time.
 
When people talk about a RB's vision, it's not his commenting on his ability to actually see clearly, it's his ability to "see the field". In other words, his ability to find the proper hole to run through, anticipate a defender closing a hole and cutting away from him, seeing the proper angle to take to beat a defender, "knowing" whether to bounce outside or cut upfield.



For an example; Shonn Greene has terrible vision - he's always running into the back of his linemen, or towards a hole that's about to close.
Maybe he has excellent vision but lacks the speed to get there in time.
He actually has pretty decent speed for a back his size. I watch every Jets game so I notice that he almost always seems to make the wrong decision about which way to cut. The years he performed well was when the o-line was much better and he had big holes to run through - once he had to do somethings on his own he was far less effective.I do admit that it's not all that easy to tell which RBs have elite level vision and which have below average vision - and perhaps its more "after the fact" analysis, but overtime it's something that can be determined to some extent.

 
Excuse me for trying to help you sound less ignorant. It will help you make points better if you sound like you've at least got a GED. However, nothing is going to save you from quotes like the 20/20 vision bit. Classic. I'm not going to hit ignore because I disagree with you, but just so I don't accidentally mistake you later for someone who has some semblance of a clue as to what he is talking about.
I said thank you. You really altered my life by catching a grammatical error on a fantasy football forum that I made. I don't know where I would be without you!That line was a comment on cliches that are dumb to me. I have no clue how to tell if Mendenhall can see better than Ingram. Now that I would appreciate if you helped me with.
When people talk about a RB's vision, it's not his commenting on his ability to actually see clearly, it's his ability to "see the field". In other words, his ability to find the proper hole to run through, anticipate a defender closing a hole and cutting away from him, seeing the proper angle to take to beat a defender, "knowing" whether to bounce outside or cut upfield.For an example; Shonn Greene has terrible vision - he's always running into the back of his linemen, or towards a hole that's about to close.
Damn - why did you have to spoil it and tell him what most people mean when they are talking about vision? :kicksrock: I was hoping to bring it up in the future and get more great comments about 20/20 and seeing an eye doctor.
 
Curious to see what kind of contract Mendy is able to land. I think if a team committs guranteed $$ to him more than just this season, that would say a lot. That being said, cant wait for Free Agency !!!

 
You're insane if you think Ingram is quicker and a better player than Mendenhall. You're probably trying to validate your dynasty pick in Ingram. Fail
Just won the only league in which I currently own Ingram. BradyCharlesSpillerMurrayDezNicksWallaceCobbGrahamAnd Ingram. Fail.But it's thought processes like this that made it possible, really, so thank you. Got Spiller and Dez really cheap because I felt their talent was much more than their market value and their owners gave in to the bust talk. I have a feeling Ingram will be rewarding me too - we'll see. But the more "Ingram sux LOL lmao YPC " talk, the less have I have to invest. So proceed.
 
Curious to see what kind of contract Mendy is able to land. I think if a team committs guranteed $$ to him more than just this season, that would say a lot. That being said, cant wait for Free Agency !!!
Me too. I am guessing something like Michael Bush got, maybe a bit more. $11M/3 Year, 5 garunteed?
 
You're insane if you think Ingram is quicker and a better player than Mendenhall. You're probably trying to validate your dynasty pick in Ingram. Fail
Just won the only league in which I currently own Ingram. Brady

Charles

Spiller

Murray

Dez

Nicks

Wallace

Cobb

Graham

And Ingram. Fail.

But it's thought processes like this that made it possible, really, so thank you. Got Spiller and Dez really cheap because I felt their talent was much more than their market value and their owners gave in to the bust talk. I have a feeling Ingram will be rewarding me too - we'll see. But the more "Ingram sux LOL lmao YPC " talk, the less have I have to invest. So proceed.
Yes, please proceed Governor. :hophead:
 
Excuse me for trying to help you sound less ignorant. It will help you make points better if you sound like you've at least got a GED. However, nothing is going to save you from quotes like the 20/20 vision bit. Classic. I'm not going to hit ignore because I disagree with you, but just so I don't accidentally mistake you later for someone who has some semblance of a clue as to what he is talking about.
I said thank you. You really altered my life by catching a grammatical error on a fantasy football forum that I made. I don't know where I would be without you!That line was a comment on cliches that are dumb to me. I have no clue how to tell if Mendenhall can see better than Ingram. Now that I would appreciate if you helped me with.
When people talk about a RB's vision, it's not his commenting on his ability to actually see clearly, it's his ability to "see the field". In other words, his ability to find the proper hole to run through, anticipate a defender closing a hole and cutting away from him, seeing the proper angle to take to beat a defender, "knowing" whether to bounce outside or cut upfield.For an example; Shonn Greene has terrible vision - he's always running into the back of his linemen, or towards a hole that's about to close.
Damn - why did you have to spoil it and tell him what most people mean when they are talking about vision? :kicksrock: I was hoping to bring it up in the future and get more great comments about 20/20 and seeing an eye doctor.
Yep. This coulda been a classic. Damn it. :P
 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?
To be fair, the above "bum" also AVERAGED 15 TD per season over the highlighted stretch, as well as AVERAGED 73 receptions for over 500 additional yards a year.Mendy hasn't had 15 TDs in a single season, nor did he have 73 CAREER receptions until last year.

The above "bum" had only 1 winning season in those 4 years, while Mendy was on a team with a winning record each of his first 4 years.

Aside from that, spot on comparison....

 
speculating his value is rather meaningless without knowing where he lands. The Jets letting Green walk and signing Mendy is completely different from the Chargers bringing him in to compete with Mathews. There are a few teams that he could come in and be an immediate upgrade, but few of them, maybe just the Falcons and Bengals, have "Upgrade at RB" on the top of their to do list. I don't see a second Lynch situation.
:goodposting: Ironically one of the best places he could land is with the team he will be leaving...
Agreed. From what I have read Mendenhall may be best suited to a zone blocking scheme which the Steelers are now moving to because of the new personnel they have on the offensive line, namely Pouncey and DeCastro have the quickness to make the scheme more effective than what they had before.So it really makes me wonder why the Steelers would not keep Mendenhall for how he fits what they are planning to do. The ZBS has helped average talent at RB have very good seasonsm for example in Houstson and Denver.This tells me that they do not view Mendenhall as worth the money he will be asking for, will any other team see him differently? I think Mendenhall could have a very good season if he signed with Atlanta or maybe Green Bay. Teams who have potent passing offenses and will allow Mendenhall to run against 6-7 man fronts. Most other destinations I see him in a 50/50 time share with the guy(s)they already have.
 
Without looking... whose first four years are these?

339 carries, 3.65 average

372 carries, 4.52 average

313 carries, 5.26 average

339 carries, 3.94 average

Based on the conversation here, he's obviously a high-volume, compiler bum that lost his ability to run the ball after his third year in the league. But which bum is he?
Any RB who can earn over 300 carries a season is far from a bum. Mendenhall did so once. I do not see any merit in the comparison.
 
So it really makes me wonder why the Steelers would not keep Mendenhall for how he fits what they are planning to do.
He has no heart.At this point he is a distraction. Recall his team suspension and crazy tweets, and know their relationship is now irreconcilable.
By no heart do you mean he was capable of running better than he was but did not do so because he was in a contract year and avoiding injury?I have not ever considered Mendenhall a great RB, but what we saw from him in 2012 is not likely his best effort.I also think the Steelers have other priorities for their cap space. It was a bit surprising when they drafted Mendenhall at the time they did as I recall, most thought the Steelers should be working on their offensive line with that 1st round pick when they drafted him. The linemen picks came in years following. Now that more pieces of the puzzle are in place they cannot afford him, or do not see him as worth the contract he is asking.In the end I could see him back with the Steelers if there are no other suitors based on statements from the front office. I thought they left that window open, but I haven't been following the situation enough to know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
That's my whole problem with Mendenhall. He isn't gifted at all. He's just another guy and with the stink of last year and his whining, I don't see a team letting him start. I wouldn't mind getting him cheap but the guy who owns him always seems to think he's actually good.
 
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  

Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
That's my whole problem with Mendenhall. He isn't gifted at all. He's just another guy and with the stink of last year and his whining, I don't see a team letting him start. I wouldn't mind getting him cheap but the guy who owns him always seems to think he's actually good.
:rolleyes:
 
Mendenhall is one of the most physically gifted backs in the league. If you don't think so then name a few backs his size that can match his speed , power, agility, and hands at his age. And he proved it on the field as well. If he goes to a team that marries one RB he's arguably a first round pick and he'll likely get 1200+ yards and 10+ TD's. A team like GB, ATL, Ari, or the Jets would be perfect. I just landed him in the 7th round of a dynasty startup right after Ballard and Quiz Rogers lmao. Now im just waiting for his talent to meet a good situation.  

Mark Ingram is the worse back on his own team. He's only ok because of the team he plays for and not because he's overly gifted  No way he should be mentioned with a proven commodity like Mendenhall. 
That's my whole problem with Mendenhall. He isn't gifted at all. He's just another guy and with the stink of last year and his whining, I don't see a team letting him start. I wouldn't mind getting him cheap but the guy who owns him always seems to think he's actually good.
:rolleyes:
Be honest, watch him and Ivory on film and tell me that Mendenhall is more talented.Guys with way more talent:

Rice

Foster

Richardson

McCoy

Martin

Peterson

Lynch

Charles

Spiller

Forte

McFadden

Ridley

Mathews (health and heart is another question)

David Wilson

MJD

Chris Johnson

Sproles

Stewart

Bush

Gore

Ben Tate

Guys with more talent

Stephen Jackson

Fred Jackson

Bryce Brown

Robert Turbin

Bradshaw

Deangelo Williams

Vereen

Pierce

Ivory

So, how is he an elite talent again?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top