You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?Please don't use the Pro Bowl as a method of trying to prove actual talent. Vick was a star in the NFL. He was a talented runner, a great improvisor and a poor passer.Joe Bryant said:How many Pro Bowl seasons has he had?JOk. Running Back then.Any evidence he can play QB?Why do people always mention WR when talking about Vick? Any evidence that he can play WR?I think he gets signed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB, not a full time QB.
Options would be where the WR depth is in question: Cleveland, San Fran, Jax, Tenn
JAbsolutely. Fans vote for the Pro Bowl participants. Romo made the Pro Bowl one year after playing less than half of a season.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?J
he did manage to win some games with a pretty weak cast around him. Wasn't his record as a starting QB pretty good?Please don't use the Pro Bowl as a method of trying to prove actual talent. Vick was a star in the NFL. He was a talented runner, a great improvisor and a poor passer.Joe Bryant said:How many Pro Bowl seasons has he had?JOk. Running Back then.Any evidence he can play QB?Why do people always mention WR when talking about Vick? Any evidence that he can play WR?I think he gets signed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB, not a full time QB.
Options would be where the WR depth is in question: Cleveland, San Fran, Jax, Tenn
No team woke up this morning and said "Wow, Vick's been reinstated, whay do you think we should do?" Teams have had an idea for a week at least that conditional reinstatement was coming this week. It's been a poorly kept secret, and has been reported by several outlets. Teams have done their homework, had their discussions, etc., and those who have decided they want him are ready to move. He will be signed by someone, if he's going to be signed by anyone, within a week or two. Camps are opening and they'll want him there for as many TC days as possible, preparing to play. If he's not signed within two weeks he'll not be signed (except by the UFL) at all.Any idea on timeframe for a team signing him? Is it possible that nobody will sign him?
Absolutely. Fans vote for the Pro Bowl participants. Romo made the Pro Bowl one year after playing less than half of a season.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?![]()
J
So Romo didn't show any evidence he could play QB either? Quick look at passer ratings through the start of last season: http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stor...x?story_id=2664 Ratings for every NFL quarterback who has recorded 1,500 career attempts
Unless he's running a reverse, I don't see how Vick would be effective as a wr, in the slot or on the outside. The wr position in the nfl is all about route running and being able to catch the ball in traffic, as everyone is fast. There's a reason you don't regularly see the top sprinters in the world starting at wr on nfl teams.You answered your own question as to both. Neither one of them is a very good passer, both both are incredibly talented players, therefore it is in a team's best interest to get them on the field. Vick's speed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB would be extremely dangerous if he even has only above average hands. Tebow's athleticism and size make him a good H-Back option.Fact of the matter is, I don't think there is any NFL team out there that wants him as a QB, but I think there are many that want him on their roster...and Mike no longer has the clout to demand to be played at his chosen position.That's a good question dgreen. I dunno why people do this. This exact thing came up for me Friday talking with a friend about Tim Tebow. People say he'll be an Hback. I ask, what exactly have you seen that shows he'd be a good Hback?Vick is a freakish athlete. But don't know that he'd make it as a WR.Why do people always mention WR when talking about Vick? Any evidence that he can play WR?I think he gets signed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB, not a full time QB.
Options would be where the WR depth is in question: Cleveland, San Fran, Jax, Tenn
J
RB I can agree with more than WR. He has shown the ability to run with the ball. More than that is needed to be a WR unless you are just throwing him some WR screens. But, we have no idea if he can run routes or catch well. Can he make a catch on the run? Can he go down low and snatch it before it hits the ground? Can he toe the sideline while holding onto the ball? Can he go up and make a catch above his head knowing he's about to be hit?PR may be a spot for him...assuming he can catch a punt with dudes bearing down on him. If not, then maybe KR.Ok. Running Back then.Why do people always mention WR when talking about Vick? Any evidence that he can play WR?I think he gets signed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB, not a full time QB.Options would be where the WR depth is in question: Cleveland, San Fran, Jax, Tenn
More than WR. He's not Joe Montana, but he's not Akili Smith either. He can play QB. But, part of his QB success is his ability as a runner. That threat allows him the chance to make some throws. People are way too down on his passing. There are about 100 QBs in the NFL. He belongs there somewhere.Any evidence he can play QB?
How long before the vastly under-rated Tim Couch is back in the league?Absolutely. Fans vote for the Pro Bowl participants. Romo made the Pro Bowl one year after playing less than half of a season.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?![]()
JSo Romo didn't show any evidence he could play QB either? Quick look at passer ratings through the start of last season: http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stor...x?story_id=2664 Ratings for every NFL quarterback who has recorded 1,500 career attempts
He's no Young or Manning. But higher than lots of pretty good QBs on that list like Ken Stabler, Kerry Collins and Ron Jaworski![]()
J
If he could pair that passer rating with run ability like Vick, pretty soon I'd think.JHow long before the vastly under-rated Tim Couch is back in the league?Absolutely. Fans vote for the Pro Bowl participants. Romo made the Pro Bowl one year after playing less than half of a season.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?![]()
JSo Romo didn't show any evidence he could play QB either? Quick look at passer ratings through the start of last season: http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stor...x?story_id=2664 Ratings for every NFL quarterback who has recorded 1,500 career attempts
He's no Young or Manning. But higher than lots of pretty good QBs on that list like Ken Stabler, Kerry Collins and Ron Jaworski![]()
J
On a related note, I was wondering if allowing him to play 2 preseason games was a way for the NFL to see exactly how the public would react. They can test the waters with those games before they make a final decision.I don't think so. The whole point of him being conditionally reinstated is so he can have the benefit of training camp and getting back in game form. Especially with the wild cat most likely in his future, any team that signs him will want preseason time spent on that with him. Waiting so they would avoid protesters is a pretty minor reason as compared to having him ready to play. Without the benefit of training camp, having been out of the league 2 years, there would really be no point in signing him at all. He'd be useless for 2009.And the protesters will be there regardless. No point in trying to sneak him in. With all the pub surrounding this, it wouldn't matter when he signs. There will be a PR hit for whoever signs him, they already know that, and so anyone making the decision to do so is already making the decision to live with whatever protests occur.IMO no team signs him til after the end of training camp when he can better sneak in under the radar w/ the protesters.
... well there's the question about whether or not he's even in shape to play. But I'm sure prision life keeps you in tip top shape.Ok. Running Back then.Any evidence he can play QB?Why do people always mention WR when talking about Vick? Any evidence that he can play WR?I think he gets signed as a slot receiver/wildcat QB, not a full time QB.Options would be where the WR depth is in question: Cleveland, San Fran, Jax, Tenn
I've wondered about that myself. A talented roster with no real solution at QB. Leftwich has a fatal flaw, imo (slow release) and McCown's gettting to the point where the yearly "he's better than you think" talk is falling on deaf ears.Vick isn't the perfect QB by any means, but I think he'd be TB's best option.What about Tampa? Vick-Ward-Bryant-Winslow
If MN signs him I be cancelling my season tickets to the Vikings. I think the PR issue is to big a thing for most teams to overcome. But we see.Minnesota. Favre will be done by Week 6.
I listened to an hour of fans calling in on ESPN980 today, and the backlash was mostly (I'd say at least 2/3) against Goodell for punishing excessively, micromanaging, and coming up with a reinstatement plan that makes little sense. It's hard to argue that "Unable to play first 2 preseasons games, then able to play the last 2, then unable to play the first 5-6 regular season games, then able to play" isn't dumb.I don't think this was the backlash you were referring too, but I think there'll be more "let him play now if someone signs him" backlash than "don't let him play again".Just as Roger Goodell and the various employees at the NFL offices in New York City must be bracing themselves for the inevitable backlash tomorrow.
Why?If MN signs him I be cancelling my season tickets to the Vikings.Minnesota. Favre will be done by Week 6.
Super Bowl rings have a way of clouding good judgment.By the way, Vicks career passing % is 53.8% and his YPA is 6.7.Eli Manning? 55.9% and 6.4. Not a lot of difference. With no threat to run at all.Yet Eli is about to sign one of the richest contracts ever.
You are absolutely right there is no difference between these two.They could be twins.By the way, Vicks career passing % is 53.8% and his YPA is 6.7.Eli Manning? 55.9% and 6.4. Not a lot of difference. With no threat to run at all.Yet Eli is about to sign one of the richest contracts ever.
Roy Williams made 5 pro bowls and he provided plenty of evidence to show he cant play the safety position.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?J
I agree. And the Manning name too I guess.Super Bowl rings have a way of clouding good judgment.By the way, Vicks career passing % is 53.8% and his YPA is 6.7.Eli Manning? 55.9% and 6.4. Not a lot of difference. With no threat to run at all.Yet Eli is about to sign one of the richest contracts ever.
That doesn't count. You have to be really horrible to not make the Pro Bowl as a Cowboy, or really a player in the NFC East.Roy Williams made 5 pro bowls and he provided plenty of evidence to show he cant play the safety position.You're saying a guy can make three pro bowls as a QB and not show any evidence that he can play QB?J
Agreed that this is minor...most people are ready to give him another shot. There are some dog lovers out there that will never forgive, but for the most part polls I've seen are in his favor from a PR perspective.4. The potential PR backlash. I think this is a minor consideration, personally, but it does need to be considered. If the team wins, fans will come.
oofBuffalo.They already grabbed T.O. and reports from fans at the first days of camp are that Trent Edwards has not looked good.
Posted by Mike Florio on July 27, 2009 6:07 PM ET
We think that today's events should cause every team to revisit the question of whether they wish to pursue quarterback Mike Vick.
Even if said teams already have decided to take a pass, his conditional reinstatement significantly alters the aroma surrounding Vick, compelling prudent teams to conduct an objective assessment of whether he fits their short-term and/or long-term plans.
That said, plenty likely will come to the conclusion that they're not interested. But some that might have not been interested could end up becoming very interested, given the dramatic change in the circumstances.
One team that is expected to remain not interested is one of the teams that had to deal with him twice per year.
Per Darin Gantt of the Rock Hill Herald, the Carolina Panthers aren't interested.
"For the record, you can cross the Panthers off the list," Gantt writes. "There are those here who influence football decisions who -- even when Vick was still playing well -- thought that he was one of the most talented running backs in the league."
I also think the protestors could actually help Vick and the team that signs him. Animal right's protestors have a knack for making people hate them. If the NFL and the team that signs him keep playing the narrative that Goodell began today (what he did was horrible, but we're trying to help a young man turn his life around, etc), the protestors could absolutely make Vick seem to be more of a sympathetic figure.Agreed that this is minor...most people are ready to give him another shot. There are some dog lovers out there that will never forgive, but for the most part polls I've seen are in his favor from a PR perspective.4. The potential PR backlash. I think this is a minor consideration, personally, but it does need to be considered. If the team wins, fans will come.
He would be better then your QB , what's his name ...........................Trent Edwards.The guy who cant get it more then 5 yards down the field .Please no... It would really be tough to boycott my favorite team.Buffalo.They already grabbed T.O. and reports from fans at the first days of camp are that Trent Edwards has not looked good.
We'll see what happens in NYC at NFL HQ's tomorrow - it may take until later in the week for a big protest, but I imagine that there'll be some hysterics tomorrow, too. Note that I agree with some of the other posters that the extreme 'animal rights' folks tend to become repulsive in their protests, so the fact that there will be some hysterical protests may not be a bad thing for the Vick camp (look at how ridiculous/over the top these PETA people are, etc...).I listened to an hour of fans calling in on ESPN980 today, and the backlash was mostly (I'd say at least 2/3) against Goodell for punishing excessively, micromanaging, and coming up with a reinstatement plan that makes little sense. It's hard to argue that "Unable to play first 2 preseasons games, then able to play the last 2, then unable to play the first 5-6 regular season games, then able to play" isn't dumb.I don't think this was the backlash you were referring too, but I think there'll be more "let him play now if someone signs him" backlash than "don't let him play again".Just as Roger Goodell and the various employees at the NFL offices in New York City must be bracing themselves for the inevitable backlash tomorrow.
The Humane Society, the ASPCA and even PETA have surprisingly been pretty supportive of Vick. I don't know why b/c Vick sure didn't show any mercy or give any 2nd chances to those dogs. Count me in the Vick-is-lower-than-whale-barf column.I'm rooting for him to break his neck.We'll see what happens in NYC at NFL HQ's tomorrow - it may take until later in the week for a big protest, but I imagine that there'll be some hysterics tomorrow, too. Note that I agree with some of the other posters that the extreme 'animal rights' folks tend to become repulsive in their protests, so the fact that there will be some hysterical protests may not be a bad thing for the Vick camp (look at how ridiculous/over the top these PETA people are, etc...).I listened to an hour of fans calling in on ESPN980 today, and the backlash was mostly (I'd say at least 2/3) against Goodell for punishing excessively, micromanaging, and coming up with a reinstatement plan that makes little sense. It's hard to argue that "Unable to play first 2 preseasons games, then able to play the last 2, then unable to play the first 5-6 regular season games, then able to play" isn't dumb.I don't think this was the backlash you were referring too, but I think there'll be more "let him play now if someone signs him" backlash than "don't let him play again".Just as Roger Goodell and the various employees at the NFL offices in New York City must be bracing themselves for the inevitable backlash tomorrow.
I think the notion that there won't be a popular outcry at this conditional re-instatement is a little too optimistic, however. There are lots of dog lovers nationwide who consider Vick lower than whale barf on the bottom of the ocean, and a good sized number of them live in NYC (which is one of the largest urban areas in the US, after all).
My .02.
If you're going to be a tool can you at least be an entertaining one?TIAScooby Doo said:Yeah Vick makes plays - slamming dogs heads into the ground, electrocuting dogs, shooting dogs, drowning dogs and fighting dogs to their deaths - nice plays.
this statement shows your by far a sicker human being then Vick.One of the most truly pathetic lines i've ever read on this board and i'd hope you get at least a temporary vacation for it.I'm rooting for him to break his neck.![]()