Mike Anderson's Production (1 Viewer)

[Moldy Potato]

Do you guys see him coming back to do much of anything at all? His limited action last week (in spite of his two TDs) and his mere 8 carries this week have been very disturbing. Do you see him getting more opportunities than someone like, let's say, Ryan Moats?

 

[Ozymandias]

Well, Tatum Bell averaged almost 4 yards a carry; Anderson less than 3 yds.On the other hand, Dayne had a fumble, and Shanny HATES fumblers.So I see Anderson getting some goal line opportunities against the Bills.

 

[19891]

Do you guys see him coming back to do much of anything at all?

His limited action last week (in spite of his two TDs) and his mere 8 carries this week have been very disturbing.

Do you see him getting more opportunities than someone like, let's say, Ryan Moats?

It depends on what you consider "opportunities." Goal line opportunities - Moats < Anderson

More carries - Moats > Anderson

That is how I see it.

Git R Done

 

[Dynasty]

Mike Anderson became a major, unpredictable, pain in the ### just in time for the playoffs.

 

[pgreenfan]

Mike Anderson became a major, unpredictable, pain in the ### just in time for the playoffs.

 

[Banger]

This has been the only game of the year that I can remember that Bell had such a disparity in terms of runs compared to MA (2:1). Who knows what it really means though, knowing Shanny it could be a one game phenomena based on the defense they were facing and he liked Bells quickness over MA's power. Just when you think you have the backfield figured out another monkey wrench is thrown in.If you look at MA's ypc over the last 5 games its been 3.8, 4.3, 2.8, 2.8, 2.6 not exactly what you want heading into the playoffs.

 

[P Boy]

BAL's run D dictated how Shanahan used his RBs. Geez - Plummer threw the ball 33 times. That's an anomoly. The opposing D is going to determine which RB Shanahan relies on. If DEN can power through teams - which seems to be Shanahan's preference, Anderson gets the most work. If power won't work, like against BAL's front 7, then he'll go with speed.

 

[salmonstud]

I've played M.A. 4x this season and got burned 3 times. When I don't start him...he rumbles for a buck 20 & 1-2 td's. I own Bell...and I've gotten burned when I start him as well. Until one of those guys breaks a leg....I won't start the other. I remember the good ole Denver backfield days.....ahhhh.....the memories.

 

[zamboni]

BAL's run D dictated how Shanahan used his RBs.  Geez - Plummer threw the ball 33 times.  That's an anomoly.  The opposing D is going to determine which RB Shanahan relies on.  If DEN can power through teams - which seems to be Shanahan's preference, Anderson gets the most work.  If power won't work, like against BAL's front 7, then he'll go with speed.

So do you think the team goes back to Anderson being the main guy against a soft Buffalo defense?

 

[P Boy]

So do you think the team goes back to Anderson being the main guy against a soft Buffalo defense?

That's what I would speculate. With Shanahan, who knows, but he seems to want to limit Bell's workload, so I would guess Anderson gets the lion's share next week - especially on a Sat night in BUF.

 

[lionsroar]

I remember reading a post on here hours before gametime that alluded to the fact that Bell would be utilized more in this game against Baltimore. NFL Network reported maybe, not sure.

 

[dudaman]

I've played M.A. 4x this season and got burned 3 times. When I don't start him...he rumbles for a buck 20 & 1-2 td's. I own Bell...and I've gotten burned when I start him as well. Until one of those guys breaks a leg....I won't start the other. I remember the good ole Denver backfield days.....ahhhh.....the memories.

So do us a favor and don't start M.A. this week. I need some production out of him.Thanks.

 

[hawaiiankrush]

I remember reading a post on here hours before gametime that alluded to the fact that Bell would be utilized more in this game against Baltimore. NFL Network reported maybe, not sure.

Yeah, and I read that Shanahan said he would not use 3 RBs this week (figured Dayne was the odd man out). Shanny is not reliable when making comments about his team.

 

[Pole Cat]

My revolving door of RB2s is spinning out of control. Anderson, G.Jones, Parker. Like the original poster, I'm considering dropping one of them for Moats. Although, he only got 11 ####### carries. And it's not like Andy Reid is any more dependable than skeletor. You do have to like Moats' match up against St. Louis.

 

[weasel3515]

BAL's run D dictated how Shanahan used his RBs.  Geez - Plummer threw the ball 33 times.  That's an anomoly.  The opposing D is going to determine which RB Shanahan relies on.  If DEN can power through teams - which seems to be Shanahan's preference, Anderson gets the most work.  If power won't work, like against BAL's front 7, then he'll go with speed.

So do you think the team goes back to Anderson being the main guy against a soft Buffalo defense?

Sure, that's why Bell got more than twice as many carries, because Shanny wants to limit his carries? I predicted Bell would take over this week and it looks like the more sage (not Rosenfels) advice. I would advise anyone who has Anderson to use any other options if possible.

 

[P Boy]

Sure, that's why Bell got more than twice as many carries, because Shanny wants to limit his carries? I predicted Bell would take over this week and it looks like the more sage (not Rosenfels) advice. I would advise anyone who has Anderson to use any other options if possible.

Last time I saw, 16 carries was hardly a heavy load for a featured RB. I think 15-16 carries is the maximum extent that Shanahan wants to extend Bell.

 

[Pnishthm]

The problem here is Shanny. I believe one other time this season Bell outcarried Anderson by a good bit and the following week, Anderson had over 20 carries while Bell barely played. You just never know. Anderson could come out next week and go for 24/120/2. With and early injury to D. McAllister and the latest by B. Westbrook, I have no choice but to go with Anderson (along with Gado) and hope for the best.

 

[weasel3515]

The problem here is Shanny. I believe one other time this season Bell outcarried Anderson by a good bit and the following week, Anderson had over 20 carries while Bell barely played. You just never know. Anderson could come out next week and go for 24/120/2. With and early injury to D. McAllister and the latest by B. Westbrook, I have no choice but to go with Anderson (along with Gado) and hope for the best.

Same boat here as I have Gado (thank God!). But if you play Anderson you are really hoping. He screwed me out of a division title two weeks ago and nearly got me knocked out of the playoffs yesterday.

 

[moleculo]

SSOG - anything to add?Hello?

 

[CalBear]

BAL's run D dictated how Shanahan used his RBs. Geez - Plummer threw the ball 33 times. That's an anomoly. The opposing D is going to determine which RB Shanahan relies on. If DEN can power through teams - which seems to be Shanahan's preference, Anderson gets the most work. If power won't work, like against BAL's front 7, then he'll go with speed.

So do you think the team goes back to Anderson being the main guy against a soft Buffalo defense?

Sure, that's why Bell got more than twice as many carries, because Shanny wants to limit his carries? I predicted Bell would take over this week and it looks like the more sage (not Rosenfels) advice. I would advise anyone who has Anderson to use any other options if possible.

Before you break your arm patting yourself on the back, let's point out that you predicted 150 yards and two TDs for Bell, so you were only off by 20 fantasy points.

 

[weasel3515]

BAL's run D dictated how Shanahan used his RBs.  Geez - Plummer threw the ball 33 times.  That's an anomoly.  The opposing D is going to determine which RB Shanahan relies on.  If DEN can power through teams - which seems to be Shanahan's preference, Anderson gets the most work.  If power won't work, like against BAL's front 7, then he'll go with speed.

So do you think the team goes back to Anderson being the main guy against a soft Buffalo defense?

Sure, that's why Bell got more than twice as many carries, because Shanny wants to limit his carries? I predicted Bell would take over this week and it looks like the more sage (not Rosenfels) advice. I would advise anyone who has Anderson to use any other options if possible.

Before you break your arm patting yourself on the back, let's point out that you predicted 150 yards and two TDs for Bell, so you were only off by 20 fantasy points.

A VERY good point. The thing I (and I think most Anderson owners are concerned about) is how Bell is supplanting Anderson.

 

[The_Man]

Did anyone watch this game yesterday? The Denver offense stunk and I think Shanny's to blame.In previous weeks, the Broncos had been very effective using MA as the hammer, then sprinkling in Bell as the change of pace guy, and the both of them helping set up effective play action.Then yesterday, they start off giving Bell all the carries, he gets nothing, MA comes in for limited snaps and never gets the opportunity to get a rhythm going or to deliver much punishment to the D, and the Denver passing game struggles. Meanwhile a Ravens D that gave up 155 yards rushing to DDavis last week at home, holds the entire Denver team under 100.Broncos stole that win and casting Bell in the role of feature back caused their offense to totally malfunction. It will be very interesting to see what they do next week.

 

[Dolfan]

Did anyone watch this game yesterday? The Denver offense stunk and I think Shanny's to blame.

In previous weeks, the Broncos had been very effective using MA as the hammer, then sprinkling in Bell as the change of pace guy, and the both of them helping set up effective play action.

Then yesterday, they start off giving Bell all the carries, he gets nothing, MA comes in for limited snaps and never gets the opportunity to get a rhythm going or to deliver much punishment to the D, and the Denver passing game struggles. Meanwhile a Ravens D that gave up 155 yards rushing to DDavis last week at home, holds the entire Denver team under 100.

Broncos stole that win and casting Bell in the role of feature back caused their offense to totally malfunction. It will be very interesting to see what they do next week.

I agree with the man here...I can't see how either back can be expected to get into a rhythm with the way Shannahan is using them. He doesn't even bother letting them alternate series anymore! Anderson will get a carry on 1st down - pick up 3 yards, and then Bell will be in there on 2nd down. Then Bell gets the carry on 2nd down and gains 3 yards -- and stays in for 3rd down! Then they pass for a 1st down and maybe Bell stays in and gets another run for 8 yards. Then on 2nd and 2 Anderson comes in and runs for 8 yards. Then on 1st down, it's back to Bell

There seems to be absolutely no rhyme or reason to any of it. Really weird.

 

[weasel3515]

The same thing is happening in Detroit. What is up with these coaches? What ever happened to sticking with your stud until he falls over? I think this is causing a lot of consternation in the world of fantasy football. Shame on these coaches.

 

[Righetti]

I agree with the man here...

I can't see how either back can be expected to get into a rhythm with the way Shannahan is using them. He doesn't even bother letting them alternate series anymore! Anderson will get a carry on 1st down - pick up 3 yards, and then Bell will be in there on 2nd down. Then Bell gets the carry on 2nd down and gains 3 yards -- and stays in for 3rd down! Then they pass for a 1st down and maybe Bell stays in and gets another run for 8 yards. Then on 2nd and 2 Anderson comes in and runs for 8 yards. Then on 1st down, it's back to Bell

There seems to be absolutely no rhyme or reason to any of it. Really weird.

there is truth to this.. but it happens the other way just as often (Bell gets a couple of carries and then they bring in MA for the next few).. I know many MA owners have gotten burned late in the year and more Bell owners got burned by drafting him in the first place. Truth is that Shanahan has gone from the ultimate 1 lead-back coach to the ultimate RBBC coach in a matter of about 12 months

 

[salmonstud]

I've played M.A. 4x this season and got burned 3 times.  When I don't start him...he rumbles for a buck 20 & 1-2 td's.  I own Bell...and I've gotten burned when I start him as well.  Until one of those guys breaks a leg....I won't start the other.  I remember the good ole Denver backfield days.....ahhhh.....the memories.

So do us a favor and don't start M.A. this week. I need some production out of him.Thanks.

Funny stuff. C.Houston will get the rock over Mike Anderson or Bell for my team if I advance to the next round of the playoffs. I'm done with Den RB's for this year.

 

[Banger]

Did anyone watch this game yesterday? The Denver offense stunk and I think Shanny's to blame.

In previous weeks, the Broncos had been very effective using MA as the hammer, then sprinkling in Bell as the change of pace guy, and the both of them helping set up effective play action.

Then yesterday, they start off giving Bell all the carries, he gets nothing, MA comes in for limited snaps and never gets the opportunity to get a rhythm going or to deliver much punishment to the D, and the Denver passing game struggles. Meanwhile a Ravens D that gave up 155 yards rushing to DDavis last week at home, holds the entire Denver team under 100.

Broncos stole that win and casting Bell in the role of feature back caused their offense to totally malfunction. It will be very interesting to see what they do next week.

I agree with the man here...I can't see how either back can be expected to get into a rhythm with the way Shannahan is using them. He doesn't even bother letting them alternate series anymore! Anderson will get a carry on 1st down - pick up 3 yards, and then Bell will be in there on 2nd down. Then Bell gets the carry on 2nd down and gains 3 yards -- and stays in for 3rd down! Then they pass for a 1st down and maybe Bell stays in and gets another run for 8 yards. Then on 2nd and 2 Anderson comes in and runs for 8 yards. Then on 1st down, it's back to Bell

There seems to be absolutely no rhyme or reason to any of it. Really weird.

I agree totally and I'm sure the rb's feel the same way. I noticed yesterday after a 3rd and 9 play in the 4th qtr they ran Bell and he picked up 18 yards and a 1st down. He gets up all pumped and looks over the sidelines and kind of shakes his head and holds up his hands as if the to say "cmon, cmon give me another carry". He then leaves the field for Dayne. You could tell that Bell was feeling it and wanted to try and get a rhythm but Shanny has other plans....

 

[Pnishthm]

I can't see how either back can be expected to get into a rhythm with the way Shannahan is using them. He doesn't even bother letting them alternate series anymore! Anderson will get a carry on 1st down - pick up 3 yards, and then Bell will be in there on 2nd down. Then Bell gets the carry on 2nd down and gains 3 yards -- and stays in for 3rd down! Then they pass for a 1st down and maybe Bell stays in and gets another run for 8 yards. Then on 2nd and 2 Anderson comes in and runs for 8 yards. Then on 1st down, it's back to Bell

There seems to be absolutely no rhyme or reason to any of it. Really weird.

Another strange thing I noticed is how they will use Bell some times in short yardage. You'd think they'd at least bring in Anderson in those situations.

 

[unipanthers]

The bottom line is stay away from the Broncos RB's with Rat manning the ship. He will just screw you with his complete lack of logic in who he plays game to game or series to series. I agree that his running backs are solid, but I think this completely arbitrary revolving door will come back to haunt the Broncos in the form of inconsistent play at the RB position.

 

[lionsroar]

Did anyone watch this game yesterday? The Denver offense stunk and I think Shanny's to blame.

In previous weeks, the Broncos had been very effective using MA as the hammer, then sprinkling in Bell as the change of pace guy, and the both of them helping set up effective play action.

Then yesterday, they start off giving Bell all the carries, he gets nothing, MA comes in for limited snaps and never gets the opportunity to get a rhythm going or to deliver much punishment to the D, and the Denver passing game struggles. Meanwhile a Ravens D that gave up 155 yards rushing to DDavis last week at home, holds the entire Denver team under 100.

Broncos stole that win and casting Bell in the role of feature back caused their offense to totally malfunction. It will be very interesting to see what they do next week.

I agree with the man here...I can't see how either back can be expected to get into a rhythm with the way Shannahan is using them. He doesn't even bother letting them alternate series anymore! Anderson will get a carry on 1st down - pick up 3 yards, and then Bell will be in there on 2nd down. Then Bell gets the carry on 2nd down and gains 3 yards -- and stays in for 3rd down! Then they pass for a 1st down and maybe Bell stays in and gets another run for 8 yards. Then on 2nd and 2 Anderson comes in and runs for 8 yards. Then on 1st down, it's back to Bell

There seems to be absolutely no rhyme or reason to any of it. Really weird.

I agree totally and I'm sure the rb's feel the same way. I noticed yesterday after a 3rd and 9 play in the 4th qtr they ran Bell and he picked up 18 yards and a 1st down. He gets up all pumped and looks over the sidelines and kind of shakes his head and holds up his hands as if the to say "cmon, cmon give me another carry". He then leaves the field for Dayne. You could tell that Bell was feeling it and wanted to try and get a rhythm but Shanny has other plans....

I agree as well. Shanny out-foxes himself sometimes.

 

[malice]

If you notice, the only games where DEN's backfield has been a mess were the games that defenses keyed on- and had success at- stopping the run. If the matchup is tight vs. the run, odds are the backup back will have a better day stats-wise since the defense will have success early and Shanahan will change it up to try and get a spark. Then he sticks with the guy who works (Dayne/Bell).So if the matchup is against a team who is average/below average vs. the run, MA is a decent start. He gets the goal line carries, and if he has success early, he will continue on to have a good game. Shanahan does seem to have set MA's limit at 20-21 carries a game so the odds are more against an explosive statline, but a consistent one is likely (80 yds+ a TD)..The next two games are vs. BUF and OAK- two teams in the bottom 1/4 of the league vs. the run. I see no reason for him to not have success early and continue on to decent stats for the day. Week 17 vs. SD though is likely a sit-him game- not only because they'll need him for the playoffs, but SD will likely stuff the run anyway.

 

[Mystery Achiever]

i was fortunate to have him in for the three touch down gaem. but i agree with others that he's too unpredictable now. so now that corey dillon seems to be healthy and somwhat predictable again, i don't think i'll me playing anderson anymore...though may have to if edge sits.

 

[lionsroar]

If you notice, the only games where DEN's backfield has been a mess were the games that defenses keyed on- and had success at- stopping the run. If the matchup is tight vs. the run, odds are the backup back will have a better day stats-wise since the defense will have success early and Shanahan will change it up to try and get a spark. Then he sticks with the guy who works (Dayne/Bell).

So if the matchup is against a team who is average/below average vs. the run, MA is a decent start. He gets the goal line carries, and if he has success early, he will continue on to have a good game. Shanahan does seem to have set MA's limit at 20-21 carries a game so the odds are more against an explosive statline, but a consistent one is likely (80 yds+ a TD)..

The next two games are vs. BUF and OAK- two teams in the bottom 1/4 of the league vs. the run. I see no reason for him to not have success early and continue on to decent stats for the day. Week 17 vs. SD though is likely a sit-him game- not only because they'll need him for the playoffs, but SD will likely stuff the run anyway.

I would like to try to keep this thread alive because I have to make a big decision this week on him. I like your prospective on this topic and I would like to here some people elaborate. Do people run out and pick up a "Ryan Moats, because he's playing in a rbbc against St. Louis" this week. I want to have all the information available before I make a playoff decision of this magnitude...

 

[Rushmore]

If you notice, the only games where DEN's backfield has been a mess were the games that defenses keyed on- and had success at- stopping the run.  If the matchup is tight vs. the run, odds are the backup back will have a better day stats-wise since the defense will have success early and Shanahan will change it up to try and get a spark.  Then he sticks with the guy who works (Dayne/Bell).

So if the matchup is against a team who is average/below average vs. the run, MA is a decent start.  He gets the goal line carries, and if he has success early, he will continue on to have a good game.  Shanahan does seem to have set MA's limit at 20-21 carries a game so the odds are more against an explosive statline, but a consistent one is likely (80 yds+ a TD)..

The next two games are vs. BUF and OAK- two teams in the bottom 1/4 of the league vs. the run.  I see no reason for him to not have success early and continue on to decent stats for the day.  Week 17 vs. SD though is likely a sit-him game- not only because they'll need him for the playoffs, but SD will likely stuff the run anyway.

I would like to try to keep this thread alive because I have to make a big decision this week on him. I like your prospective on this topic and I would like to here some people elaborate. Do people run out and pick up a "Ryan Moats, because he's playing in a rbbc against St. Louis" this week. I want to have all the information available before I make a playoff decision of this magnitude...

I'm in a similar boat, but regardless of what anyone says (including Shanny), it will be anyone's guess. I think Anderson and Bell will both have pretty good stats, but both are obviously a risky start at this point.

 

[weasel3515]

How frustrating is Anderson? I am contemplating S.Davis if Foster is indeed hurt or even part-time player Greg Jones. That's pathetic.

 

[weasel3515]

A few weeks ago I was looking at these matchups and salivating...Anderson at BuffaloS.Davis at New OrleansK.Jones against CincinnatiG. Jones against San FranciscoNow the moisture on my shirt is from tears...

 

[coachjim]

I am starting LJ and Portis and using either Gado, FWP or MA as my flex. I at first went with MA because of the matchup but the more I think about it I am going to go with Gado. He at least is the real only option for the Pack in running the ball. Even though Favre is having an awful year I don't see the Ravens putting 7-8 in the box against him.

 

[Pnishthm]

Here's something that just came to mind... we know Shanny wants to limit Bell's touches to say 12-15 a game. Maybe if Shanny has a gameplan where he plans on passing a good bit more than usual, then he will leave Bell in for the majority of the game knowing that even if Bell recieves most of the carries that day, he still won't surpass his limit because the gameplan that particular week calls for more passing. Don't know if this makes sense or not, but it was just a thought.

 

[weasel3515]

Here's something that just came to mind... we know Shanny wants to limit Bell's touches to say 12-15 a game. Maybe if Shanny has a gameplan where he plans on passing a good bit more than usual, then he will leave Bell in for the majority of the game knowing that even if Bell recieves most of the carries that day, he still won't surpass his limit because the gameplan that particular week calls for more passing. Don't know if this makes sense or not, but it was just a thought.

Actually I think that is a good analysis. Kudos!

 

[weasel3515]

I am starting LJ and Portis and using either Gado, FWP or MA as my flex. I at first went with MA because of the matchup but the more I think about it I am going to go with Gado. He at least is the real only option for the Pack in running the ball. Even though Favre is having an awful year I don't see the Ravens putting 7-8 in the box against him.

Unfortunately I have Gado also and NEED to start someone else, hence possibly Anderson.

 

[Football Menace]

Where's PonyBoy or SSOG? I'd like to hear what's being said in Denver. Someone on the board reported before the game last week that Bell would see more action, but they never mentioned the reason. I'd like to hear the reason. Is it because MA is wearing out? Is it because they want to keep MA fresh for the playoffs? Is it because MA sucks? What?

 

[moleculo]

If you notice, the only games where DEN's backfield has been a mess were the games that defenses keyed on- and had success at- stopping the run. If the matchup is tight vs. the run, odds are the backup back will have a better day stats-wise since the defense will have success early and Shanahan will change it up to try and get a spark. Then he sticks with the guy who works (Dayne/Bell).

So if the matchup is against a team who is average/below average vs. the run, MA is a decent start. He gets the goal line carries, and if he has success early, he will continue on to have a good game. Shanahan does seem to have set MA's limit at 20-21 carries a game so the odds are more against an explosive statline, but a consistent one is likely (80 yds+ a TD)..

The next two games are vs. BUF and OAK- two teams in the bottom 1/4 of the league vs. the run. I see no reason for him to not have success early and continue on to decent stats for the day. Week 17 vs. SD though is likely a sit-him game- not only because they'll need him for the playoffs, but SD will likely stuff the run anyway.

 

[Raiders Fan]

The only thing that sticks in my head is shanny wanting Bell to carry it more.. This was the news leading up.

Dec. 6, 2005 - 9:32 am et According to the Denver Post, RB Tatum Bell may be in line for additional carries if he can stay healthy."We like what he does," coach Mike Shanahan said. "But he has to stay healthy." It'll be interesting to see if the Broncos ruin everyone's fantasy value by rotating three running backs again this week.

Then he backed it up with..

Dec. 9, 2005 - 10:00 am et Coach Mike Shanahan indicated yesterday that the Broncos will not be using a three-headed monster at running back again this week.

Then this result..

Tatum Bell had 16 carries for 63 yards in week 14. He added two catches for 16 yards.For the first time all season, Bell was the primary carrier. Mike Anderson only had eight carries, a trend that should continue.

Well lets see.. Bell did get the bulk of the work and nothing I have seen said he got hurt.. I predict he gets 20+ carries this week. He could be in line for a big game..

 

[Football Menace]

The only thing that sticks in my head is shanny wanting Bell to carry it more.. This was the news leading up.

Dec. 6, 2005 - 9:32 am et 

According to the Denver Post, RB Tatum Bell may be in line for additional carries if he can stay healthy.

"We like what he does," coach Mike Shanahan said. "But he has to stay healthy." It'll be interesting to see if the Broncos ruin everyone's fantasy value by rotating three running backs again this week.

Then he backed it up with..

Dec. 9, 2005 - 10:00 am et 

Coach Mike Shanahan indicated yesterday that the Broncos will not be using a three-headed monster at running back again this week.

Then this result..

Tatum Bell had 16 carries for 63 yards in week 14. He added two catches for 16 yards.

For the first time all season, Bell was the primary carrier. Mike Anderson only had eight carries, a trend that should continue.

Well lets see.. Bell did get the bulk of the work and nothing I have seen said he got hurt.. I predict he gets 20+ carries this week. He could be in line for a big game..

But why switch from Anderson? Did he give a reason? When Anderson gets 20+ carries, he get 100+ yards. Seems like that is pretty successful.

 

[Raiders Fan]

The only thing that sticks in my head is shanny wanting Bell to carry it more.. This was the news leading up.

Dec. 6, 2005 - 9:32 am et 

According to the Denver Post, RB Tatum Bell may be in line for additional carries if he can stay healthy.

"We like what he does," coach Mike Shanahan said. "But he has to stay healthy." It'll be interesting to see if the Broncos ruin everyone's fantasy value by rotating three running backs again this week.

Then he backed it up with..

Dec. 9, 2005 - 10:00 am et 

Coach Mike Shanahan indicated yesterday that the Broncos will not be using a three-headed monster at running back again this week.

Then this result..

Tatum Bell had 16 carries for 63 yards in week 14. He added two catches for 16 yards.

For the first time all season, Bell was the primary carrier. Mike Anderson only had eight carries, a trend that should continue.

Well lets see.. Bell did get the bulk of the work and nothing I have seen said he got hurt.. I predict he gets 20+ carries this week. He could be in line for a big game..

But why switch from Anderson? Did he give a reason? When Anderson gets 20+ carries, he get 100+ yards. Seems like that is pretty successful.

Obviously he sees something in Bell to get them going more.. Anderson hasn't been doing much lately and I guess he is frustrated. I still wouldn't expect Anderson to do much unless you hear news that will leas to 20+ carries. He could get 15 this week given the opponent. I still like Bell to get 20 against Buffalo.

 

[P Boy]

Where's PonyBoy or SSOG?

I thought I posted earlier in this thread. Maybe that was my evil twin...In any case, there is no leaking of any evidence as to whom the favored RB will be on SAT night out of Dove Valley right now.With BUF being such a poor run D, and with the game being in BUF on Sat. night, I'd expect Anderson to be the go-to guy, but against a D that is giving up 140+ ypg rushing against a team that is gaining 155+ ypg rushing, both Bell & Anderson might be decent starts - Plummer, R Smith, & any other receivers that you might have are most likley the guys to sit. I could see Plummer at 22 throws or less while the running game gets 40+ carries.

 

[heckmanm]

A few weeks ago I was looking at these matchups and salivating...

Anderson at Buffalo

S.Davis at New Orleans

K.Jones against Cincinnati

G. Jones against San Francisco

Now the moisture on my shirt is from tears...

Tell it, brother. Here are my RB options heading into the Playoffs:- Jordan (with Tui or Walter @QB, how about 10-man fronts?)

- Anderson/Bell ('nuff said)

- Foster (finally gets the starting job, gets nicked up)

- Houston (maybe my best option???)

Like you, a couple weeks ago I was feeling great about this bunch. Now?

 

[Football Menace]

The only thing that sticks in my head is shanny wanting Bell to carry it more.. This was the news leading up.

Dec. 6, 2005 - 9:32 am et 

According to the Denver Post, RB Tatum Bell may be in line for additional carries if he can stay healthy.

"We like what he does," coach Mike Shanahan said. "But he has to stay healthy." It'll be interesting to see if the Broncos ruin everyone's fantasy value by rotating three running backs again this week.

Then he backed it up with..

Dec. 9, 2005 - 10:00 am et 

Coach Mike Shanahan indicated yesterday that the Broncos will not be using a three-headed monster at running back again this week.

Then this result..

Tatum Bell had 16 carries for 63 yards in week 14. He added two catches for 16 yards.

For the first time all season, Bell was the primary carrier. Mike Anderson only had eight carries, a trend that should continue.

Well lets see.. Bell did get the bulk of the work and nothing I have seen said he got hurt.. I predict he gets 20+ carries this week. He could be in line for a big game..

But why switch from Anderson? Did he give a reason? When Anderson gets 20+ carries, he get 100+ yards. Seems like that is pretty successful.

Obviously he sees something in Bell to get them going more.. Anderson hasn't been doing much lately and I guess he is frustrated. I still wouldn't expect Anderson to do much unless you hear news that will leas to 20+ carries. He could get 15 this week given the opponent. I still like Bell to get 20 against Buffalo.

In the last 3 weeks Anderson has touched the ball a grand total of 35 times. One of those touches went for a 66 yard TD and another for a short TD. In Bell's last 35 touches, he has a long play of 18 yards with 0 TDs. I'm not a coach, but I just don't see a reason for a switch.

 

[sdsjr3]

Where's PonyBoy or SSOG?

I thought I posted earlier in this thread. Maybe that was my evil twin...In any case, there is no leaking of any evidence as to whom the favored RB will be on SAT night out of Dove Valley right now.

With BUF being such a poor run D, and with the game being in BUF on Sat. night, I'd expect Anderson to be the go-to guy, but against a D that is giving up 140+ ypg rushing against a team that is gaining 155+ ypg rushing, both Bell & Anderson might be decent starts - Plummer, R Smith, & any other receivers that you might have are most likley the guys to sit. I could see Plummer at 22 throws or less while the running game gets 40+ carries.

I was thinking the same thing. As of now, I'm leaning toward starting Anderson and putting Bell in as my Flex option. Like you said, against Buffalo, BOTH could have good games. Heck all you need is a goal to go at the 1 or 2 and Anderson should score and then there's always the possibility that Bells breaks a long one. The odds of BOTH happening in the same game aren't bad against a run D like the Bills.

 

[lionsroar]

I will definitely be checking the weather reports as well. Come on Cold, wind, snow...