Mike Wallace trades (1 Viewer)

[JPeso]

I think Wallace is worth the Sun, the Earth, the Moon and at least 6 stars!!!WTH are you poeple smokin, Buy low sell high.A lot of "Sharks" are missing the oppertunity to get the most they every will for Wallace.

My best offer for Wallace is the 1.11 pick, you think I should sell and pick up either Bradford, Clausen or Gresham and hope they aren't busts?

1.11 is a bit too low unless you need QB or TE but I also don't think you'll be able to trade Wallace for the guy you would have wanted at 1.11 after the draft. That's based on my feeling that the Steelers take a WR early in the draft so if I'm wrong Wallace holds a lot more value.

Agreed.

 

[identikit]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

 

[Invictus~Bronte]

Put me in the camp who says the Wallace owners are way overvaluing here. I'm not saying the guy will be a bust, but turning down 1st-round picks??

I don't think this year's class is that good, unless the Wallace owner can trade for a spot to net a Demaryius Thomas, Sam Bradford, or Jahvid Best type I don't see the players available as being any more valuable than Wallace.

This is about right as of today. Where some of the rooks shake out may change. Right now Wallace is already the best WR on his team and will only improve. The same can't be said of many Vets and rooks going for more

 

[squistion]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

I agree, as I also have him there or thereabouts the 1.06. He was touted as a sleeper pick before Holmes left with the expectations he would eventually replace the aging Ward. I still seem him longterm as an eventual starter irrespective of who they take in the draft.

 

[LBH]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

 

[hostile]

Today I have been offered:

1) "i want him. wat do u want from my team?", which sounds good, until you look at his roster. Moreno is the only guy worth having and he said Moreno ain't leaving...

2) 1.01, 2.10 for Mike Wallace, 1.03, 3.03 - effectively I get the 1.01 for 1.03/Wallace. No thanks.

 

[The Real Yoda]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

Add another one to that side!

 

[Avery]

Today I have been offered:1) "i want him. wat do u want from my team?", which sounds good, until you look at his roster. Moreno is the only guy worth having and he said Moreno ain't leaving...2) 1.01, 2.10 for Mike Wallace, 1.03, 3.03 - effectively I get the 1.01 for 1.03/Wallace. No thanks.

I dunno.It likely looks like Bryant vs. Wallace + Matthews or SpillerGenerally speaking, I believe that the guys who walks away with the best player in a deal came out best so I guess it depends on what you think of Bryant. I think I'd ask a a player back but would lean towards making the deal.

 

[LBH]

Today I have been offered:1) "i want him. wat do u want from my team?", which sounds good, until you look at his roster. Moreno is the only guy worth having and he said Moreno ain't leaving...2) 1.01, 2.10 for Mike Wallace, 1.03, 3.03 - effectively I get the 1.01 for 1.03/Wallace. No thanks.

I dunno.It likely looks like Bryant vs. Wallace + Matthews or SpillerGenerally speaking, I believe that the guys who walks away with the best player in a deal came out best so I guess it depends on what you think of Bryant. I think I'd ask a a player back but would lean towards making the deal.

id prefer Wallace/1.03 pretty easily, especially without knowing how the draft will unfold

 

[JohnnyU]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

Would you give a 1.6 for Wallace? I don't know too many that would.

 

[JohnnyU]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

Eddie Royal looked good too, but I like Wallace as long as they don't draft a true WR #1.

 

[Malabar]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

Eddie Royal looked good too, but I like Wallace as long as they don't draft a true WR #1.

I dont believe Wallace is a true #1, so Steelers will need to get one this year or next.

 

[LBH]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

Eddie Royal looked good too, but I like Wallace as long as they don't draft a true WR #1.

Nobody was more wrong about Royal last year than me. I aquired him in almost every league i was in, but overall im usually pretty good about pickin em and i love Wallace with the new oppurtunity. I think even if they draft a WR in the first couple of rounds that reciever will most likely take over for Ward when he hangs them up and not start over Wallace. Just my opinion, obviously

 

[cstu]

Today I have been offered:

1) "i want him. wat do u want from my team?", which sounds good, until you look at his roster. Moreno is the only guy worth having and he said Moreno ain't leaving...

2) 1.01, 2.10 for Mike Wallace, 1.03, 3.03 - effectively I get the 1.01 for 1.03/Wallace. No thanks.

Time will tell, but I think you're going to regret that.

 

[aaawall91]

Put me in the camp who says the Wallace owners are way overvaluing here. I'm not saying the guy will be a bust, but turning down 1st-round picks??

I don't think this year's class is that good, unless the Wallace owner can trade for a spot to net a Demaryius Thomas, Sam Bradford, or Jahvid Best type I don't see the players available as being any more valuable than Wallace.

This is about right as of today. Where some of the rooks shake out may change. Right now Wallace is already the best WR on his team and will only improve. The same can't be said of many Vets and rooks going for more

Wallace best WR on his team? In what aspect? I guess you don't take in to account the almost 60 more receptions and 400+ yards Hines Ward had on top of Wallace's numbers.And yes he may improve, but improving in the NFL doesn't always translate to improving fantasy football numbers.

 

[Cassius]

just sent Wallace packing...

gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pick

got 1.06 this year!

OFFICIAL SHARKEveryone else take notice. This is how you're supposed to be doing it.

 

[moderated]

Early season Overvalued award goes to mike Wallace.

Gl to him now that he won't be covered by safeties or #3 corners

 

[Jersey35]

In my cap-driven dynasty league, I offered:

P.Manning $78

for

M.Wallace $13 & M.Sanchez $4

He's thinking about it right now, but I have a feeling that he will probably just tell me he wants to wait to "see what happens". I'm mostly just interested in moving Manning to one of the few guys in the league that can afford his salary - and hoping to get something with a bit of potential in return.

 

[mjr]

I don't think Wallace is a buy or sell player right now. He's a hold. For what he's fetching in trades at this point you're likely to end up with someone with a future just as unpredictable or even less certain. Most of us who have Wallace have already taken that risk when we picked him up for cheap last season.

So I'm holding. If he busts, I really haven't lost much. If he explodes, I can get much better than what people are offering for him now.

 

[Pack43]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

 

[Cybergeek]

I don't think Wallace is a buy or sell player right now. He's a hold. For what he's fetching in trades at this point you're likely to end up with someone with a future just as unpredictable or even less certain. Most of us who have Wallace have already taken that risk when we picked him up for cheap last season. So I'm holding. If he busts, I really haven't lost much. If he explodes, I can get much better than what people are offering for him now.

I'm being offered 1.04 or a 2011 1st round pick that may turn out to be top 5 and 2.09 this year. This is a contract, salary cap league and I have Wallace signed at the league minimum for 4 seasons which increases his value. I'm still of the mindset to hold on to him, but am still tempted. Unless some miracle occurs and Dez Bryant is passed over with the top 3 picks, 1.04 will be a running back. I need Wallace as my WR3 more than picking a rookie who may take a couple of years to develope into a solid fantasy producer.

 

[cstu]

I don't think Wallace is a buy or sell player right now. He's a hold. For what he's fetching in trades at this point you're likely to end up with someone with a future just as unpredictable or even less certain. Most of us who have Wallace have already taken that risk when we picked him up for cheap last season. So I'm holding. If he busts, I really haven't lost much. If he explodes, I can get much better than what people are offering for him now.

I'm being offered 1.04 or a 2011 1st round pick that may turn out to be top 5 and 2.09 this year. This is a contract, salary cap league and I have Wallace signed at the league minimum for 4 seasons which increases his value. I'm still of the mindset to hold on to him, but am still tempted. Unless some miracle occurs and Dez Bryant is passed over with the top 3 picks, 1.04 will be a running back. I need Wallace as my WR3 more than picking a rookie who may take a couple of years to develope into a solid fantasy producer.

You could parlay the 1.04 into a better WR than Wallace.

 

[Invictus~Bronte]

Early season Overvalued award goes to mike Wallace.

Gl to him now that he won't be covered by safeties or #3 corners

He'll be be better then Holmes. Book it.

 

[Invictus~Bronte]

Put me in the camp who says the Wallace owners are way overvaluing here. I'm not saying the guy will be a bust, but turning down 1st-round picks??

I don't think this year's class is that good, unless the Wallace owner can trade for a spot to net a Demaryius Thomas, Sam Bradford, or Jahvid Best type I don't see the players available as being any more valuable than Wallace.

This is about right as of today. Where some of the rooks shake out may change. Right now Wallace is already the best WR on his team and will only improve. The same can't be said of many Vets and rooks going for more

Wallace best WR on his team? In what aspect? I guess you don't take in to account the almost 60 more receptions and 400+ yards Hines Ward had on top of Wallace's numbers.And yes he may improve, but improving in the NFL doesn't always translate to improving fantasy football numbers.

I know exactly who he plays with. And I know right now he has alot more to offer then Ward does at this stage of their careers.

 

[Cybergeek]

I don't think Wallace is a buy or sell player right now. He's a hold. For what he's fetching in trades at this point you're likely to end up with someone with a future just as unpredictable or even less certain. Most of us who have Wallace have already taken that risk when we picked him up for cheap last season. So I'm holding. If he busts, I really haven't lost much. If he explodes, I can get much better than what people are offering for him now.

I'm being offered 1.04 or a 2011 1st round pick that may turn out to be top 5 and 2.09 this year. This is a contract, salary cap league and I have Wallace signed at the league minimum for 4 seasons which increases his value. I'm still of the mindset to hold on to him, but am still tempted. Unless some miracle occurs and Dez Bryant is passed over with the top 3 picks, 1.04 will be a running back. I need Wallace as my WR3 more than picking a rookie who may take a couple of years to develope into a solid fantasy producer.

You could parlay the 1.04 into a better WR than Wallace.

Do you mean by selecting a rookie receiver or in trade for a veteran?

 

[Cassius]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

OFFICIAL SHARK

 

[aaawall91]

Put me in the camp who says the Wallace owners are way overvaluing here. I'm not saying the guy will be a bust, but turning down 1st-round picks??

I don't think this year's class is that good, unless the Wallace owner can trade for a spot to net a Demaryius Thomas, Sam Bradford, or Jahvid Best type I don't see the players available as being any more valuable than Wallace.

This is about right as of today. Where some of the rooks shake out may change. Right now Wallace is already the best WR on his team and will only improve. The same can't be said of many Vets and rooks going for more

Wallace best WR on his team? In what aspect? I guess you don't take in to account the almost 60 more receptions and 400+ yards Hines Ward had on top of Wallace's numbers.And yes he may improve, but improving in the NFL doesn't always translate to improving fantasy football numbers.

I know exactly who he plays with. And I know right now he has alot more to offer then Ward does at this stage of their careers.

I will concede that Wallace may be able to run the deep routes and catch it better there, but that's not Hine's role. Ward is by far a better WR numbers aside. He is a better leader and a better blocker. and bring in the numbers that prove Ward can still play, he was a 1000+ yard receiver and had 394 of those yards after the catch. Ward isn't flashy, but he gets it done. Ward as of Dec. 15th was 26th all time in receiving yards...and last year was his second best year in terms of yards...Not claiming Ward is in his prime, but he is still the Steelers best WR.

 

[Multiple Scores]

Not claiming Ward is in his prime, but he is still the Steelers best WR.

In my opinion In your opinion

 

[loose circuits]

I just don't know how anyone that watched Mike Wallace last season doesn't love his upside in a starting role. The guy can flat out make plays. I'm not selling yet as I still think he can increase in value

 

[Pack43]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

OFFICIAL SHARK

Think this was a good trade for both teams. Team giving Jennings was very strong at WR.

 

[Multiple Scores]

I just don't know how anyone that watched Mike Wallace last season doesn't love his upside in a starting role. The guy can flat out make plays. I'm not selling yet as I still think he can increase in value

The way he played made me think of Chad Johnson and I'm a huge Chad Johnson fan.

 

[Multiple Scores]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

OFFICIAL SHARK

Think this was a good trade for both teams. Team giving Jennings was very strong at WR.

If this was a NO PPR league then the person getting Jennings got hosed. In a PPR it looks close and I'm being nice.

 

[Pack43]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

OFFICIAL SHARK

Think this was a good trade for both teams. Team giving Jennings was very strong at WR.

If this was a NO PPR league then the person getting Jennings got hosed. In a PPR it looks close and I'm being nice.

Appreciate that. It is PPR.

 

[Multiple Scores]

Gave: Wallace + 1.04

Got: Jennings

OFFICIAL SHARK

Think this was a good trade for both teams. Team giving Jennings was very strong at WR.

If this was a NO PPR league then the person getting Jennings got hosed. In a PPR it looks close and I'm being nice.

Appreciate that. It is PPR.

PPR seems fine and I don't play PPR so what the hell do i know, you know. I asked a couple guys I know who play PPR and they said they liked the Jennings side so good job.

 

[Pack43]

If this was a NO PPR league then the person getting Jennings got hosed. In a PPR it looks close and I'm being nice.

Appreciate that. It is PPR.

PPR seems fine and I don't play PPR so what the hell do i know, you know. I asked a couple guys I know who play PPR and they said they liked the Jennings side so good job.

Like I said, I think it's pretty even. I made the offer looking to upgrade a starter. Still really like Wallace's upside and am holding him in another league.

 

[loose circuits]

I just don't know how anyone that watched Mike Wallace last season doesn't love his upside in a starting role. The guy can flat out make plays. I'm not selling yet as I still think he can increase in value

The way he played made me think of Chad Johnson and I'm a huge Chad Johnson fan.

without the diva.

 

[Maroney=Speed]

Just received a offer of 1.01 and Mike Wallace for B.Marshall.

Whata guys think?

 

[thevidon]

Just received a offer of 1.01 and Mike Wallace for B.Marshall.Whata guys think?

Take it. Grab either Bryant or Matthews with the 1.1 depending on if you need WR or RB help. Great value for Marshall.

 

[identikit]

Just received a offer of 1.01 and Mike Wallace for B.Marshall.Whata guys think?

Take it. Grab either Bryant or Matthews with the 1.1 depending on if you need WR or RB help. Great value for Marshall.

Consider yourself

 

[NickRocks]

I don't think Wallace is a buy or sell player right now. He's a hold. For what he's fetching in trades at this point you're likely to end up with someone with a future just as unpredictable or even less certain. Most of us who have Wallace have already taken that risk when we picked him up for cheap last season. So I'm holding. If he busts, I really haven't lost much. If he explodes, I can get much better than what people are offering for him now.

I'm being offered 1.04 or a 2011 1st round pick that may turn out to be top 5 and 2.09 this year. This is a contract, salary cap league and I have Wallace signed at the league minimum for 4 seasons which increases his value. I'm still of the mindset to hold on to him, but am still tempted. Unless some miracle occurs and Dez Bryant is passed over with the top 3 picks, 1.04 will be a running back. I need Wallace as my WR3 more than picking a rookie who may take a couple of years to develop into a solid fantasy producer.

You could parlay the 1.04 into a better WR than Wallace.

Do you mean by selecting a rookie receiver or in trade for a veteran?

Or you could possibly use the #4 to move further up?But, you'd be crazy not to accept that! Way to much value and options opening up with that move...

 

[destro]

Another Wallace/Jennings trade:

I was offered Wallace and MSW for Jennings, non-PPR.

I was burned by the Holmes trade and could maybe use some depth at WR, but I still don't think I like it.

 

[SSOG]

I just don't know how anyone that watched Mike Wallace last season doesn't love his upside in a starting role. The guy can flat out make plays. I'm not selling yet as I still think he can increase in value

The way he played made me think of Chad Johnson and I'm a huge Chad Johnson fan.

without the diva.

Ochocinco's not a diva, he's a clown. There's a difference.We don't know if Wallace is a diva yet, to be honest. #3 WRs don't get to show their inner diva unless their name is Freddie Mitchell. Remember, there was once a time when Terrell freaking Owens wasn't viewed as a diva, too.

 

[Couch Potato]

In PPR dynasty I was offered for Wallace by different owners:

1) 2012 1st round pick expected to be in the 1.08-1.12 range and QB Dixon. Declined.

2) Antonio Bryant. Declined.

3) Mark Sanchez and Ted Ginn. I have not yet replied. Update: Declined w/this reply -- Right now I'm ranking Wallace at about dynasty WR20-25 based on clear starting opportunity, Ward being 34, and Holmes' previous ranking (WR12) as his ceiling. Fantasy starter material. I don't see Sanchez as better than a fantasy backup. Ginn doesn't impact the offer at all. Thanks.

OK, some more recent offers I've received for Wallace:4) Brian Westbrook, 2010 pick 2.12, 2011 2nd rounder (I estimate to be 2.06-2.09). Declined.

5) Mark Sanchez, 2010 pick 2.03 (#15 overall). Declined.

6) Justin Fargas (his drop), 2011 1st rounder (I estimate to be 1.06-1.09). Declined.

7) Matthew Stafford, Nate Washington, and 2010 pick 2.03 (#15 overall) for Wallace. ACCEPTED. Unlike my feelings about Sanchez, I think Stafford may be a starting fantasy QB before long. The 2010 pick 2.03 in this rather deep draft is also IMO about equivalent to 1.10 in most years. Hopefully I make a good pick, and this trade will represent good value for Wallace.

 

[SSOG]

OK, some more recent offers I've received for Wallace:

4) Brian Westbrook, 2010 pick 2.12, 2011 2nd rounder (I estimate to be 2.06-2.09). Declined.

5) Mark Sanchez, 2010 pick 2.03 (#15 overall). Declined.

6) Justin Fargas (his drop), 2011 1st rounder (I estimate to be 1.06-1.09). Declined.

7) Matthew Stafford, Nate Washington, and 2010 pick 2.03 (#15 overall) for Wallace. ACCEPTED. Unlike my feelings about Sanchez, I think Stafford may be a starting fantasy QB before long. The 2010 pick 2.03 in this rather deep draft is also IMO about equivalent to 1.10 in most years. Hopefully I make a good pick, and this trade will represent good value for Wallace.

I would have taken any of the last three offers, but I can understand someone being gun-shy about Sanchez (I actually prefer him to Stafford, to be honest). I think the 2011 1st rounder probably was the best deal, though- especially depending on if there's a lockout, and how your league handles it. If the doors are closed in 2011, then that pick comes due in 2012, in what will probably be the deepest fantasy draft in dynasty history.

 

[KellysHeroes]

just sent Wallace packing...gave up Wallace and 2011 3rd round pickgot 1.06 this year!

I know I'm in the minority here, but this is where I see Wallace's value is (1.6), based on this year's rookie draft.

im with you. I dont know what people were watching last year but Wallace looked really good to me. Guy has elite speed, good hands, can run pretty good routes for a rookie, has a solid QB, and a QB that isnt afraid to throw it to him in key situations. I think people are underestimating the impact Wallace will have in 2010

Eddie Royal looked good too, but I like Wallace as long as they don't draft a true WR #1.

Nobody was more wrong about Royal last year than me. I aquired him in almost every league i was in, but overall im usually pretty good about pickin em and i love Wallace with the new oppurtunity. I think even if they draft a WR in the first couple of rounds that reciever will most likely take over for Ward when he hangs them up and not start over Wallace. Just my opinion, obviously

I was with you with royal, but he may have his chance... even if they do draft Dez; Eddie should still be the #1 for the 1st part of the yr. Can't blame Orton for leaning on Marshall all year like he did, I would lean on him too.

 

[hostile]

Gave: Gates/1.03/Wallace

Received: Austin/V Davis