What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Missing Malaysian jet news (2 Viewers)

Interestingly a line drawn from the last known location through the Langkawi airport to the Maldives is a pretty darn straight line.
How would going all the way to the Maldives make sense in the pilot's theory above about the fire and trying to land at the closest runway? Not discounting, just trying to understand how both could be in play....
The pilots were overcome by smoke and the plane maintained the course heading past the airport...
Yeah- I looked at the map, and that makes a lot of sense.

Next question... would the plane descend over time on autopilot- the Maldives accounts say it was really low (they could make out the doors)- or would it maintain it's altitude until it ran out of fuel/power and then just fall?
Next next question... if the pilots had time to adjust the computer, wouldn't they also contact or send out an sos?

 
Ten days after Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished, Thailand said its military radar may have spotted the plane around the time it lost contact with air control, but added that it had not shared the information immediately because nobody specifically asked for it.
:lol: you have to ask the right question

 
Someone asked about the line from last known contact back towards KL or Palau Langkawi. There isn't anything that I could find, so I threw something together. According to Google Earth it is roughly 2700 miles to where the arc and flight path would intersect.

One thing I noticed doing this is the reports of the zig zag flight path seen here. (kind of crude, but you get the point) In order to get to Palau Langkawi, the plane would have had to travel South, then back Northeast to stay in Malaysian airspace. Could a fire or electrical failure have caused a gps error? Maybe the autopilot or pilots to made those changes in direction, thinking they were headed towards PL, but they actually had overshot it to the North?
All sensible. The plane obviously missed Langawi International.

The pic you "threw together" is sobering -- that area would be a damn hard place to plumb for a missing plane.

 
Interestingly a line drawn from the last known location through the Langkawi airport to the Maldives is a pretty darn straight line.
How would going all the way to the Maldives make sense in the pilot's theory above about the fire and trying to land at the closest runway? Not discounting, just trying to understand how both could be in play....
The pilots were overcome by smoke and the plane maintained the course heading past the airport...
Yeah- I looked at the map, and that makes a lot of sense.

Next question... would the plane descend over time on autopilot- the Maldives accounts say it was really low (they could make out the doors)- or would it maintain it's altitude until it ran out of fuel/power and then just fall?
Next next question... if the pilots had time to adjust the computer, wouldn't they also contact or send out an sos?
The mantra I have seen repeated by pilots on this issue is Aviate. Navigate. Communicate. Maybe they had time to aviate, and then to navigate, but not to communicate - particularly if communications were breaking down.

 
From the article:

Malaysia has listed the countries that it had appealed for assistance: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, China, Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and France.
What the...? Did they not ask us for our help?
I noticed that as well. We (U.S.) are apparently just throwing our help around willy-nilly
I bet we know where it is. But we're just waiting for someone to ask us. This makes the most sense.
Ten days after Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished, Thailand said its military radar may have spotted the plane around the time it lost contact with air control, but added that it had not shared the information immediately because nobody specifically asked for it.
:lol: you have to ask the right question
See. I knew it. Has anyone asked the United States yet?

 
Next next question... if the pilots had time to adjust the computer, wouldn't they also contact or send out an sos?
Could be a human error here. In my theory (FWIW), the fligth crew -- initially -- may have thought they had a relatively minor electrical fire (thinking "meh, a short to rewire" more than "Holy Kerrap! Plane's on fire!") to deal with. The pilot diverted to Langkawi International as a precutionary measure, but was hoping the issue could be fixed before too long, and the fligth could be rerouted back to Beijing if all ended up OK.

Kinda just spit-balling, but :shrug:

EDIT: riffing off of Sinn Fein's post # 2274, it's possible also that someone on the fligth crew -- the young copilot? -- might have started pulling breakers "too quickly", knocking out communications before the pilot could report the issue. Again, human error:

Pilot: I wanted to get someone on the radio, and now I can't. Wait for my mark next time before you start pulling breakers.

Co-pilot: I'm sorry, got ahead of myself ...

Pilot: Forget it -- just find that short!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ten days after Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished, Thailand said its military radar may have spotted the plane around the time it lost contact with air control, but added that it had not shared the information immediately because nobody specifically asked for it.
:lol: you have to ask the right question
WTF. You have to be kidding me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Next next question... if the pilots had time to adjust the computer, wouldn't they also contact or send out an sos?
Could be a human error here. In my theory (FWIW), the fligth crew -- initially -- may have thought they had a relatively minor electrical fire (thinking "meh, a short to rewire" more than "Holy Kerrap! Plane's on fire!") to deal with. The pilot diverted to Langkawi International as a precutionary measure, but was hoping the issue could be fixed before too long, and the fligth could be rerouted back to Beijing if all ended up OK.

Kinda just spit-balling, but :shrug:

EDIT: riffing off of Sinn Fein's post # 2274, it's possible also that someone on the fligth crew -- the young copilot? -- might have started pulling breakers "too quickly", knocking out communications before the pilot could report the issue. Again, human error:

Pilot: I wanted to get someone on the radio, and now I can't. Wait for my mark next time before you start pulling breakers.

Co-pilot: I'm sorry, got ahead of myself ...

Pilot: Forget it -- just find that short!
I don't think a pilot would ever view any kind of electrical (or any other kind of) fire as minor in flight. A fire, no matter how small, is a major deal that would warrant an immediate landing.

 
From the article:

Malaysia has listed the countries that it had appealed for assistance: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, China, Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and France.
What the...? Did they not ask us for our help?
I noticed that as well. We (U.S.) are apparently just throwing our help around willy-nilly
I bet we know where it is. But we're just waiting for someone to ask us. This makes the most sense.
Ten days after Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished, Thailand said its military radar may have spotted the plane around the time it lost contact with air control, but added that it had not shared the information immediately because nobody specifically asked for it.
:lol: you have to ask the right question
See. I knew it. Has anyone asked the United States yet?
Or Al Quaeda?

 
I don't think a pilot would ever view any kind of electrical (or any other kind of) fire as minor in flight. A fire, no matter how small, is a major deal that would warrant an immediate landing.
Thanks for the informed post. Do you think El Floppo's question in post #2770 necessarily needs to be accounted for?

f the pilots had time to adjust the computer, wouldn't they also contact or send out an SOS?


... or could it be attributable to a simple eff-up (e.g. someone pulling breakers too early, or some other protocol not being followed)?

 
New theory:

Confiscated by God to be the vessel that brings Fred Phelps home.

Laugh all you want, but if that plane shows up the same day that Phelps dies, I'll bet money with anyone (except Gobbler) that half of you #### your pants.

 
Even if the planes communications were knocked out, couldn't one of the pilots use their cell phones? Especially if they turned around and were somewhere over Malaysia. (no issue of roaming)

 
I don't think a pilot would ever view any kind of electrical (or any other kind of) fire as minor in flight. A fire, no matter how small, is a major deal that would warrant an immediate landing.
Another spitball: maybe the initial "something's wrong" indicator wasn't a "fire sensor". Maybe it was something less specific -- maybe something non-flight-esential was malfunctioning and someone started pulling breakers to analyze the problem.

That would require something making the pilot's "spidey sense" tingle, prompting him to re-program the flight to Langkawi Int'l. Maybe the scent of tire smoke preceeded the actual uber-thick choking smoke filling the cockpit?

 
Ten days after Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 vanished, Thailand said its military radar may have spotted the plane around the time it lost contact with air control, but added that it had not shared the information immediately because nobody specifically asked for it.
:lol: you have to ask the right question
WTF. You have to be kidding me.
Malaysian officials said early in the search that they suspected the plane backtracked and flew toward the Strait of Malacca, just west of Malaysia. But it took a week for them to confirm Malaysian military radar data that suggested that route. Thai military officials now say their own radar showed an unidentified plane, possibly Flight 370, flying toward the strait beginning minutes after the Malaysian jet's transponder signal was lost.

Air force spokesman Air Vice Marshal Montol Suchookorn said the Thai military doesn't know whether the plane it detected was Flight 370.

Thailand's failure to quickly share possible information about the plane may not substantially change what Malaysian officials now know, but it raises questions about the degree to which some countries are sharing their defense data.

Flight 370 took off from Kuala Lumpur at 12:40 a.m. Malaysian time March 8 and its transponder, which allows air traffic controllers to identify and track the airplane, ceased communicating at 1:20 a.m.

Montol said that at 1:28 a.m., Thai military radar "was able to detect a signal, which was not a normal signal, of a plane flying in the direction opposite from the MH370 plane," back toward Kuala Lumpur. The plane later turned right, toward Butterworth, a Malaysian city along the Malacca strait. The radar signal was infrequent and did not include any data such as the flight number.

When asked why it took so long to release the information, Montol said, "Because we did not pay any attention to it. The Royal Thai Air Force only looks after any threats against our country." He said the plane never entered Thai airspace and that Malaysia's initial request for information in the early days of the search was not specific.

"When they asked again and there was new information and assumptions from (Malaysian) Prime Minister Najib Razak, we took a look at our information again," Montol said. "It didn't take long for us to figure out, although it did take some experts to find out about it."
 
Is it possible that the satellite ping is incorrect? Aren't the Maldives basically in the middle of the circle provided by the satellite?

 
Is it possible that the satellite ping is incorrect? Aren't the Maldives basically in the middle of the circle provided by the satellite?
oh... right... those pings putting the plane on either of the two arcs.

how do those arcs jibe with the fire theory we've been tossing around?

 
if there were a fire, particularly a landing gear/tire fire, wouldn't the Maldivians have seen smoke as well when they spotted the plane?
Gear would've been retracted -- one idea (the Goodfellow analysis referenced upthread and linked in post #2712) is that the tire smoke filled the cockpit and cabin, but wasn't trailing from the plane.

I'm cool on this Maldives connection, though. Anything could've happened, I suppose .. but the Maldives seems way far west from where the plane should be.

 
Is it possible that the satellite ping is incorrect? Aren't the Maldives basically in the middle of the circle provided by the satellite?
The satellite provided an arc, not a circle.
Not exactly true - it was a conical radius from the satellite that gave us the arcs - the officials eliminated portions of the radius as out of the range where the plane could reasonably have expected to be at the time of the pings.

 
Interestingly a line drawn from the last known location through the Langkawi airport to the Maldives is a pretty darn straight line.
What am I missing? I thought the last known location was somewhere near the Andaman Islands? Isn't that where the Malaysian military said it had radar contact?
Also if it flew over Maldives then it ran out of fuel before reaching land, and went into the ocean. I could see that happening if it was a Payne Stewart situation, but if you believe the current theories that the change of course was deliberate, it makes the scenario more complicated. Somebody had a plan but it failed miserably or there was another course change from the plan due to a struggle or mechanical failure.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it possible that the satellite ping is incorrect? Aren't the Maldives basically in the middle of the circle provided by the satellite?
Dr. Detroit posted earlier (I thnik two pages back) that the satellite ping data shouldn't be considered as a sure-fire location finder.

But yes, the Maldives are far from both of the widely-piblished arcs.

 
From the article:

Malaysia has listed the countries that it had appealed for assistance: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, China, Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and France.
What the...? Did they not ask us for our help?
I noticed that as well. We (U.S.) are apparently just throwing our help around willy-nilly
Pfft. The aviation experts from Myanmar are the best out there. Who needs the US?

 
Even if the planes communications were knocked out, couldn't one of the pilots use their cell phones? Especially if they turned around and were somewhere over Malaysia. (no issue of roaming)
Only if they flew low and close enough to a cell phone tower
 
How do those arcs jibe with the fire theory we've been tossing around?
See my post #2761 above -- that's my attempt to jibe the Goodfellow "tire fire" theory with the location of the southern arc. Would've required one more (likely manual) turn south after the last known radar spotting.

 
Is it possible that the satellite ping is incorrect? Aren't the Maldives basically in the middle of the circle provided by the satellite?
The satellite provided an arc, not a circle.
Yes, I know. But a satellite provides a distance from itself to the object. That forms a circle on the globe. The 2 arcs were formed by calculating the last know point (Malaysian military radar ping on the west side of Malaysia) and the longest range the plane could travel with the fuel it had. The Maldives is toward the center of the 'circle' that the satelite can provide. In order for the arcs to be accurate AND the Maldives report to be accurate, the plane would have had to veer north or south from the Maldives to get back to the arc, no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Maldives is so far west that if the Air Malaysia flight really did make it out there, then the satellite ping data MUST be wrong or misinterpreted.

 
Can't we just ask Herve Villechaize where the plane is?
If only Herve Villechaize was still alive to point out its location....
Oh, for ##### sake.
Maybe we can get that Mexican midget from the Love Boat to point out where "de plane" is. LOL
I'll be recycling Keerock's 2 to 4 day-old material all week. Try the veal.
I fabricated that last one :D

 
Even if the planes communications were knocked out, couldn't one of the pilots use their cell phones? Especially if they turned around and were somewhere over Malaysia. (no issue of roaming)
Only if they flew low and close enough to a cell phone tower
How low would they need to be. Someone on this post said they were able to get a signal, but I don't remember the exact altitude. If they were turning around to land, they would have flown over the Malaysian Peninsula, not sure if there is a cell tower in that area.

 
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_South_Dakota_Learjet_crash

1980 Bo Rein crash

Robert Edward "Bo" Rein, a noted football coach for North Carolina State and then Louisiana State University (LSU) (where he had been hired only six weeks before) was flying with a pilot from Shreveport, Louisiana to Baton Rouge, Louisiana on January 10, 1980 in a Cessna 441 Conquest twin-turboprop, registered N441NC. The flight was supposed to last 40 minutes, but after flying east and climbing to avoid a thunderstorm, the plane lost contact with air traffic control and was seen on radar to climb to 40,000 feet (12,000 m).

The Conquest was eventually intercepted by two Michigan Air National Guard F-4C Phantoms from Seymour-Johnson AFBin Goldsboro, North Carolina, and a pair of F-106 Delta Dart interceptors from the 48th Fighter Interceptor Squadron atLangley AFB aircraft in Virginia.[8] When intercepted, the Cessna was over 1,000 miles (1,600 km) off course and flying at an altitude of 41,600 feet (12,700 m), 5,000 feet (1,500 m) higher than its maximum certified ceiling. The fighter pilots could not see anyone in the cockpit. The plane continued out over the Atlantic Ocean where it ran out of fuel, descended to 25,000 feet (7,600 m) and then entered a spin, crashing into the water.[9][10] The military pilots spotted some debris, but no wreckage was ever recovered. The bodies of Rein and pilot Lou Benscotter were never found. The most likely reason given was that the two men apparently lost consciousness due to slow depressurization of the cabin.[11]

-------------

Some interesting concepts here & potential similarities:

AutoPilot/Captain/FO/Someone climbed above the maximum certified ceiling. (confirmed?)
Crash left some debris, but no wreckage was ever found. (possible)

So, they were following this 1980 flight and never found any wreckage. If the same is true with this flight, the chances of ever finding anything are slim and none, and slim left town...

We may never have any answers, but (IMO) the most logical at this point is that any remains are at the bottom of the Indian Ocean...

Honestly, I'm not even sure that any other possibilities make any sense at this point... If it was a hijacking, it still is probably in the ocean... If it was a suicide, it probably is in the ocean... If it was mechanical, it probably is in the ocean... If zombies took over the plane, it probably is in the ocean...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Telegraph (UK) has a good one-stop page for following the latest developments. A lot of what's been discussed here over the last few pages is also linked through The Telegraph's "Malaysian Airlines MH370: live" site.

I was interested to see that the Australian "coast guard" (the Australian Maritime Safety Authority, or AMSA) is going to search the lower end of the southern arc starting today.

 
Even if the planes communications were knocked out, couldn't one of the pilots use their cell phones? Especially if they turned around and were somewhere over Malaysia. (no issue of roaming)
Only if they flew low and close enough to a cell phone tower
How low would they need to be. Someone on this post said they were able to get a signal, but I don't remember the exact altitude. If they were turning around to land, they would have flown over the Malaysian Peninsula, not sure if there is a cell tower in that area.
Just spitballing here, but if the plane was distressed, then I don't think reaching for a cell phone would have been high on the list of priorities.

It it went down as suggested, the pilots were focused on keeping the plane airborne, and then navigating to the nearest airport, and dealing with whatever emergency cropped up - getting on a cell phone never would have happened.

 
The Telegraph (UK) has a good one-stop page for following the latest developments. A lot of what's been discussed here over the last few pages is also linked through The Telegraph's "Malaysian Airlines MH370: live" site.

I was interested to see that the Australian "coast guard" (the Australian Maritime Safety Authority, or AMSA) is going to search the lower end of the southern arc starting today.
What's their hurry? :confused:

 
Satellite data suggests that the last "ping" was recieved from the flight somwhere close to the Maldives and the US naval base on Diego Garcia
give me a ping.. one ping only, please
How did you know he was going to go to starboard?
he performed a Malaysian Mayhem..

 
How long would debris from a crash float on the water? Would some things stay floating indefinitely, eventually being scattered by current, wind, etc?

 
Even if the planes communications were knocked out, couldn't one of the pilots use their cell phones? Especially if they turned around and were somewhere over Malaysia. (no issue of roaming)
Only if they flew low and close enough to a cell phone tower
How low would they need to be. Someone on this post said they were able to get a signal, but I don't remember the exact altitude. If they were turning around to land, they would have flown over the Malaysian Peninsula, not sure if there is a cell tower in that area.
I commented earlier - I've been able to make short calls in a prop plane going ~100 mph at about 5,000ft. I mentioned that the issue with calls is the speed you're traveling, not so much the altitude (at least to a point). I think anything below 10,000 ft would have no issues pinging a tower...maybe sending a text. Calls would drop too fast at airliner speed.

 
if the perps of this piracy were smart, they would scatter some debris (seat cushions, misc unidentifiable parts, etc) from another plane to call off the search..

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top