17seconds
root of all aliai
sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
http://www.thesamecinemaeverynight.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/wire_ziggy.jpgMalacca
Well that's stupid.Someone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
The guy had microsoft flight simulator x. It contains most of the world's airports. It's not like he was programming the software, Now if he had a lot of saves flying into an unusual airport near the plane's disappearance, that might be something.Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Pilot's Simulator 'Contains Five Practice Runways near Indian Ocean'
I'm assuming, maybe wrongly, that a flight simulator would be used for "practice" by pilots. If that's the case it makes sense to have it know locations where a plane might be able to make an emergency landing.Investigators who examined the simulator belonging to Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, pilot of the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, are said to have found several runways near the Indian Ocean.
The home-made simulator of the pilot has been loaded with runways of at least five airports in and around the Indian Ocean, where the search for the vanished Boeing 777 is gaining momentum.
"The simulation programmes are based on runways at the Male International Airport in Maldives, an airport owned by the United States (Diego Garcia), and three other runways in India and Sri Lanka, all have runway lengths of 1,000 metres," an unidentified investigation source told local Malay daily Berita Harian.
It is. The U.S. has re-positioned at one of its planes to Perth. The Australians are in charge of searching the lower arc.The closest long runway on the known turnaround path was Pulau Langkawi
It was pinging for several hours after lost radar contact
The satellite arcs are known to the south, so...
why isn't the Indian Ocean west of Australia being searched?
No chance that is the plane, intact, in the jungle. imoI threw together a quick comparison of plane from reddit and the 777-200 from blueprints.com.
The wing sweep looks different. But, it may be because the plane in the picture is pitch to the right a little.
It's flying over it.No chance that is the plane, intact, in the jungle. imoI threw together a quick comparison of plane from reddit and the 777-200 from blueprints.com.
The wing sweep looks different. But, it may be because the plane in the picture is pitch to the right a little.
It's flying over it.No chance that is the plane, intact, in the jungle. imoI threw together a quick comparison of plane from reddit and the 777-200 from blueprints.com.
The wing sweep looks different. But, it may be because the plane in the picture is pitch to the right a little.
I could see the Malaysian government discounting it for the same reason. "guys, we're looking for a crashed plane, not a 777 flying above the treetops in Bangladesh"Also means the chance of a, non-crew member, terrorist taking control of the plane is out.So, if the reports are true that the new flight path was programmed into the system 12 minutes before the final sign-off, that would seem to change things - in terms of turning towards an airport because of an emergency.
I wonder how valid this is. Everything about the pings and the arcs and when comm was shut down (before or after last pilot chatter) seems to be so unreliable. What is absolute certainty and how do you know it's that?So, if the reports are true that the new flight path was programmed into the system 12 minutes before the final sign-off, that would seem to
change things - in terms of turning towards an airport because of an emergency.
Oh, I'm sure one of the stewardi came out and said:All I can say is that if the pilots got knocked out by smoke and the passengers in the back were still awake as that plane was going out to sea, that is an awful way to go. It's torture.
I'd put it as less reliable than the radar data, more reliable than the satellite "pings"I wonder how valid this is. Everything about the pings and the arcs and when comm was shut down (before or after last pilot chatter) seems to be so unreliable. What is absolute certainty and how do you know it's that?So, if the reports are true that the new flight path was programmed into the system 12 minutes before the final sign-off, that would seem to
change things - in terms of turning towards an airport because of an emergency.
Unless the copilot was a hostage.Also means the chance of a, non-crew member, terrorist taking control of the plane is out.So, if the reports are true that the new flight path was programmed into the system 12 minutes before the final sign-off, that would seem to change things - in terms of turning towards an airport because of an emergency.
is that an airline blogs term?"stewardi?"
Should probably repost that every 6-8 posts.sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
More than one stewardess is a stewardi. I thought everyone knew that."stewardi?"
Except that when the computer was reprogrammed nothing was wrong yet. The cockpit communicated with ATC after the settings were changed.Should probably repost that every 6-8 posts.sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
I think Putin has his hands full with the Crimea.Anyone brought up gremlins yet?
According to NBC sources, correct? Has this been verified or independently confirmed?Except that when the computer was reprogrammed nothing was wrong yet. The cockpit communicated with ATC after the settings were changed.Should probably repost that every 6-8 posts.sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
I checked in there, and all I could find were threads about the various potential radiuses of where the missing flight might be.is that an airline blogs term?"stewardi?"
Or maybe even radii.I checked in there, and all I could find were threads about the various potential radiuses of where the missing flight might be.is that an airline blogs term?"stewardi?"
The Malaysia Airlines flight that vanished nearly two weeks ago was already 12 minutes into its diverted course when the plane's co-pilot calmly told air traffic controllers that things were "all right," former FAA spokesman Scott Brenner said Tuesday on "The Kelly File."
At 1:19 p.m. on March 8, 12 minutes after the plane had changed course to the west, co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid gave a routine "All right, good night" in his final radio call.
No, it took two years to recover the black box. They knew where it was on day 5 or 6.With the Air France flight, did they have a better idea of where it went down? That took several years to find.
The search space possibillities are so large it could be a lot longer before they find it, if ever (though it sounds like this is a far more massive, concerted international search effort).
Welcome to the party, pal!Or maybe even radii.I checked in there, and all I could find were threads about the various potential radiuses of where the missing flight might be.is that an airline blogs term?"stewardi?"
Been posted 35 times. Doesn't jive with the fact that the "goodnight" call happened after the left turn had begun.
The plural of stewardess is stewardice.More than one stewardess is a stewardi. I thought everyone knew that."stewardi?"![]()
That's true; IF the timing on all these things is incontrovertible. But given all the back and forth and snippets which came out at one time or another, I am not so sure the timeline can be conclusively proved.Been posted 35 times. Doesn't jive with the fact that the "goodnight" call happened after the left turn had begun.
I've verified *and* confirmed itAccording to NBC sources, correct? Has this been verified or independently confirmed?Except that when the computer was reprogrammed nothing was wrong yet. The cockpit communicated with ATC after the settings were changed.Should probably repost that every 6-8 posts.sweetSomeone mentioned that this should be re-posted multiple times throughout the day.
There doesn't seem to be anyone disputing the turn came after sign off.
Agreed, everything depends on the information that comes out, which is changing almost daily. As things currently stand though, the fire theory wouldn't make sense.That's true; IF the timing on all these things is incontrovertible. But given all the back and forth and snippets which came out at one time or another, I am not so sure the timeline can be conclusively proved.Been posted 35 times. Doesn't jive with the fact that the "goodnight" call happened after the left turn had begun.
A pair of them is menage a troisThe plural of stewardess is stewardice.More than one stewardess is a stewardi. I thought everyone knew that."stewardi?"![]()
Was his name Greg?I was just reading that the co-pilot used to work with the DHARMA Initiative. Anyone else see that?
Pretty sure it was.Was his name Greg?I was just reading that the co-pilot used to work with the DHARMA Initiative. Anyone else see that?
Was that picture taken with night vision goggles?=136355057&filters[recent]=1&sort=1&o=0]I threw together a quick comparison of plane from reddit and the 777-200 from blueprints.com.
The wing sweep looks different. But, it may be because the plane in the picture is pitch to the right a little.
Maybe they saw a squirrel, that #### happens to my dogs all the time.Maybe the pilots are really nice guys and offered to take all the passengers on a free trip around the world.
That certainly has the first Occam's Razor feel to me given the reliable evidence that's out there.