i voted other but i really think its a little bit of all three. addidtion by subtracting gado who they were done with. while doing that they get a more talented back up who can help on special teams returning kicks and punts. hoping to catch a little ligtining in the bottle if green would go down and moving forward to the future.IMO even after watching the HOU pre-season games Morency is the more talented of Gado/Lundy/Morencybut who knows maybe we are all just missing the boat on Noah HerronI voted other because all of the above wasn't an option.
I like this analysis.. my only problem with your assessment of Gado having a hard time learning the system can also apply to Morency learning the same offense. If Kubiak was unhappy with him in Houston, will he really be any better running under the same conditions in Green Bay.. I own Morency and have hopes for him but I am obvioulsy a bit unsure about it.Gado is a straight ahead power back and was having trouble learning the system and reading the defense. Great power back though.Mourency is fast and has been learning the system but with Dayne they have 3 solid one-cut backs but no one for short yardage / goal line.Ron Wolf stated a few months back that Green was the only Green Bay back that had the speed and cut capability to fit thenew system. Davenport and Gato were bad fits. He didn't say anything about Herron.Bottom Line: The Packers needed someone to backup Green, provide a change of pace, and give him a breather.Both teams met their imediate needs with this trade.
I guess that whatever nuances(sp) separate what Kubiak wants versus whatever Green Bay wants matter as to why there is a difference in what they seek. Green Bay's system comes by way of Atlanta where Dunn and his quickness kept Duckett on the bench and eventually traded, while in Denver Portis is the only true speed back that has been given the full job.I like this analysis.. my only problem with your assessment of Gado having a hard time learning the system can also apply to Morency learning the same offense. If Kubiak was unhappy with him in Houston, will he really be any better running under the same conditions in Green Bay.. I own Morency and have hopes for him but I am obvioulsy a bit unsure about it.Gado is a straight ahead power back and was having trouble learning the system and reading the defense. Great power back though.Mourency is fast and has been learning the system but with Dayne they have 3 solid one-cut backs but no one for short yardage / goal line.Ron Wolf stated a few months back that Green was the only Green Bay back that had the speed and cut capability to fit thenew system. Davenport and Gato were bad fits. He didn't say anything about Herron.Bottom Line: The Packers needed someone to backup Green, provide a change of pace, and give him a breather.Both teams met their imediate needs with this trade.
interesting... I really like Morency's chances in GreenBay but am just not 100% sold on Gado's in Houston... I really liked Samkon last year and the power zone game can only fit him better than the one that depends on quickness and speed.. He is very raw and I sometimes believe that the less they give him to think about, the better off he is.I guess that whatever nuances(sp) separate what Kubiak wants versus whatever Green Bay wants matter as to why there is a difference in what they seek. Green Bay's system comes by way of Atlanta where Dunn and his quickness kept Duckett on the bench and eventually traded, while in Denver Portis is the only true speed back that has been given the full job.
More than likely HOU will be in a better position to draft APete...Besides, Morency looked VERY GOOD last night...Other - A. Peterson's gatorade caddy. GB moved on him early because it takes time to learn how to keep the stuff from freezing.
I doubt Green comes back for more that 2-3 games this year. I think he's toast. Morency is the future there. He has some improvements to make, without a doubt. But he looks like a guy who could become a solid NFL RB.Morency looked solid last nite. he has good burst, he looked quick, ran with some authority. he's not going to Pro Bowls anytime soon but he sure looked like a guy that could fill in for Green and the offense wouldn't miss a beat.he looked quicker to hit the hole than Green has this year.. he looked to have some "exciteability" to his legs.that goal-line stand at the end can more be blamed on the Packer line.. which isn't built for straight ahead mauling. they might have problems with that sorta situation all year long.
Morency is a capable starting RB in the NFL for sure.Can we all agree Ahman Green is one of the NFL's top injury risks?If Ahman goes down this year I dont think GB will draft a RB in the 07 draft because Morency will rip it up (as good as O-Line allows him)If Ahman stays healthy all season, GB will draft a RB in 07 and Morency will be lost in the depth chart which I find to be a sad situation for someone who has taken advantage of all of his opportunities.
HammyWhat was wrong with Ahman last night anyway?
Fixed2 Hammy'sWhat was wrong with Ahman last night anyway?
Not in this case, though. Gado is a thinker, and this offense needs someone who reacts, not thinks. Gado is definately a system RB, like the one he was in last year. He just didnt fit into this offense GB has now. Morency looked good, and his two turnovers (the pick was his fault) were due to rawness more than anything.I like this analysis.. my only problem with your assessment of Gado having a hard time learning the system can also apply to Morency learning the same offense.
I disagree about the INT. No reason for Favre to throw the heater when Morency was only a few yards away from him. It could've been caught but Favre put way too much zip on that pass unnecessarily in my opinion.Not in this case, though. Gado is a thinker, and this offense needs someone who reacts, not thinks. Gado is definately a system RB, like the one he was in last year. He just didnt fit into this offense GB has now. Morency looked good, and his two turnovers (the pick was his fault) were due to rawness more than anything.I like this analysis.. my only problem with your assessment of Gado having a hard time learning the system can also apply to Morency learning the same offense.
If Ahman goes down this year I dont think GB will draft a RB in the 07 draft because Morency will rip it up (as good as O-Line allows him)
As a Morency owner (and not a Green owner), I hope you're right.That said....switz said:I doubt Green comes back for more that 2-3 games this year. I think he's toast.
I thought they were grooming Miree to be the new fullback? If Ahman is not around next year they will still draft a RB. The round they choose one, though, will be directly correlated with how they feel about Morency.If Ahman goes down this year I dont think GB will draft a RB in the 07 draft because Morency will rip it up (as good as O-Line allows him)so they can trot out Morency, Herron and............... nobody??? they won't have a FB next year after they waive Henderson. i don't think it'd be prudent to have 2 rb's on the roster.if the past couple years have taught the organization anything it's that you can never have too many rb's on the roster. look at last year... they lost Green, Davenport, Fisher, Walter Williams, Henderson for a time and even Gado got hurt at the end of the year.call me crazy but i think they'll pick one up for sure. maybe one via draft and a FA depending on Green's health the remainder of the season.
Interesting ...Any word out of GB today about whether Green will be back next week?anybody else believe that the hamstring injuries can be related to the Quad injury he suffered last year.. contrasting muscles may lead to over-under compensation
McCarthy did not have an update on injured running back Ahman Green's status this week. Green has two tender hamstrings.Any new news on Green ?