I understand what you're saying. Certainly a fine line here. I think he could have built his own legacy in Chicago whether he "surpassed" Jordan or not (I don't think he ever will regardless of where he goes or how many titles he wins), but it's going to be different in Miami.
And he had a chance to build his legacy in NJ/NY/CHI/LA... but to tag along with 2 other All-Stars will surely diminish everything he and his "camp" has worked for thus far.
Like if he joins the Bulls he won't end up playing with 2 other All Stars as they win 65+ games.However, to those saying Wade won't hurt James legacy I don't get it. James has the ability to be the greatest player to ever play the game. Yes, if he joins the Heat he will probably win multiple titles and be Hall of Famer. But Kobe has 5 rings to Jordan's 6 and no one is making the claim he is near MJ's legacy. Pippen has 6 rings and most argue he doesn't belong in the top 50. The problem for LeBron is the chances he is seen as the GOAT could be diminished if he is winning titles with Wade being seen as an equal or even worse the better player when it matters most.
No player has been more worried from the age of 18 on to be the GOAT more than Kobe Bryant. There is no way Kobe at the same age would have joined the Heat. He would pick his best situation to win while he was the elite player on that team. He wants to be the elite player winning the title because nothing in this sport adds more to your legacy.
So it isn't a case of how many All Stars a team has, the Bulls or Heat both have a great chance at 3 All Stars for the foreseeable future if James joins their team. The difference is that Wade can challenge James as the best player on his own team. Unless Rose improves by leaps and bounds this year, I don't see the Bulls ever having a player near the level of James.
Right or wrong. This is how we view things.