What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (14 Viewers)

chadfordinsider Chad FordDeal: Bucks get Beno, Stephen Jackson 9 & 19. Bobcats get pick 7 & Maggette. Kings get 10 & John Salmons.
So the Kings are taking on money, trading down, and giving away the only thing resembling a PG on the roster? Fantastic move.edit:
@WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski Here's one thing I'm double checking again: Salmons' inclusion in the deal. Hold tight. Getting conflicting info from sources on him
Makes a lot more sense if they are merely unloading Beno's deal and not taking on Salmons.
Salmons is an ok player, but not someone that helps the Kings at wing. Assuming Thornton is back, there is zero need for a guy like Salmons, imo. I really hope this was a move to dump salary (Beno's) and the Kings/Petrie have their guy locked in at #10 or are nowtrying to move #10 for a vet PG at this time.
 
'Juxtatarot said:
Salmons is an ok player, but not someone that helps the Kings at wing. Assuming Thornton is back, there is zero need for a guy like Salmons, imo. I really hope this was a move to dump salary (Beno's) and the Kings/Petrie have their guy locked in at #10 or are nowtrying to move #10 for a vet PG at this time.
Salmons makes more money for more years than Beno. Not a dump.
Yeah, I know... that's why my post was in reference to the deal making more sense if Salmons isn't included and it was a dump of Beno's salary.ETA: All of that was quoted above my comments in my post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Juxtatarot said:
Salmons is an ok player, but not someone that helps the Kings at wing. Assuming Thornton is back, there is zero need for a guy like Salmons, imo. I really hope this was a move to dump salary (Beno's) and the Kings/Petrie have their guy locked in at #10 or are nowtrying to move #10 for a vet PG at this time.
Salmons makes more money for more years than Beno. Not a dump.
Yeah, I know... that's why my post was in reference to the deal making more sense if Salmons isn't included and it was a dump of Beno's salary.
Right...figured that out after posting.
 
'Juxtatarot said:
Salmons is an ok player, but not someone that helps the Kings at wing. Assuming Thornton is back, there is zero need for a guy like Salmons, imo. I really hope this was a move to dump salary (Beno's) and the Kings/Petrie have their guy locked in at #10 or are nowtrying to move #10 for a vet PG at this time.
Salmons makes more money for more years than Beno. Not a dump.
Yeah, I know... that's why my post was in reference to the deal making more sense if Salmons isn't included and it was a dump of Beno's salary.
Right...figured that out after posting.
No worries. Plus, it sounds like the Kings are actually getting Salmons in this deal. Ugh.We need at least 5 more mediocre wings on the Kings.
 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
A deal for Tony Parker? LOL. We Kings fans gotta hope something is in the works.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
A deal for Tony Parker? LOL. We Kings fans gotta hope something is in the works.
Probasketballdraft@Probballdraft ProbasketballdraftSacramento not done dealing. Look for them to deal 10 & salmons for tony Parker and Richard Jefferson
 
Here are the contracts:

Jackson: Two years, over $19 million, all guaranteed.

Salmons: Four years, $31 million, over $24 million guaranteed.

Maggette: Two years, over $21 million, all gauranteed.

 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
A deal for Tony Parker? LOL. We Kings fans gotta hope something is in the works.
Probasketballdraft@Probballdraft ProbasketballdraftSacramento not done dealing. Look for them to deal 10 & salmons for tony Parker and Richard Jefferson
What does Jefferson's contract look like?Anyway, I thought acquiring Salmons might be a move to build up for a deal to get Parker. But it seems far-fetched to me as well.
 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
A deal for Tony Parker? LOL. We Kings fans gotta hope something is in the works.
Probasketballdraft@Probballdraft ProbasketballdraftSacramento not done dealing. Look for them to deal 10 & salmons for tony Parker and Richard Jefferson
What does Jefferson's contract look like?Anyway, I thought acquiring Salmons might be a move to build up for a deal to get Parker. But it seems far-fetched to me as well.
RJ is getting 9 mill next year, 10 mill the year after, and has a player option for 11 mill after that. Oof
 
'Juxtatarot said:
Salmons is an ok player, but not someone that helps the Kings at wing. Assuming Thornton is back, there is zero need for a guy like Salmons, imo. I really hope this was a move to dump salary (Beno's) and the Kings/Petrie have their guy locked in at #10 or are nowtrying to move #10 for a vet PG at this time.
Salmons makes more money for more years than Beno. Not a dump.
Yeah, I know... that's why my post was in reference to the deal making more sense if Salmons isn't included and it was a dump of Beno's salary.
Right...figured that out after posting.
No worries. Plus, it sounds like the Kings are actually getting Salmons in this deal. Ugh.We need at least 5 more mediocre wings on the Kings.
Prelude to a Tyreke deal?
 
Why are the Kings doing that deal?
To meet the NBA's minimum salary cap requirements? They did the same thing earlier this season when they traded for Marquis Daniels.It's also possible that they've got no use for Udrih and whatever player they're targeting at 7 will be there at 10. :shrug:
They're taking on a lot more money in this deal than in the Daniels trade, and Salmons is the exact opposite of the player they have been trying to acquire (defenders, distributors, 3 pt shooters). If there's no secondary deal in place, this one is just baffling
A deal for Tony Parker? LOL. We Kings fans gotta hope something is in the works.
Probasketballdraft@Probballdraft ProbasketballdraftSacramento not done dealing. Look for them to deal 10 & salmons for tony Parker and Richard Jefferson
What does Jefferson's contract look like?Anyway, I thought acquiring Salmons might be a move to build up for a deal to get Parker. But it seems far-fetched to me as well.
RJ is getting 9 mill next year, 10 mill the year after, and has a player option for 11 mill after that. Oof
That's a nasty contract. Yikes. But maybe the Maloofs can stomach it in order to land Parker?
 
Jefferson has one of the worst contracts in the league. Totally useless player.

SA could have wash their hands of him, but likely asked him (was scheduled for $15 mil this past year in last year of deal) to opt out last year in order to get a longer agreement in place. So instead of his $15 mil expiring being an asset this past year, they're again saddled with a piss poor player with a terrible contract. Jefferson should be playing a Juwan Howard / Luke Walton role already.

I think it'd be a miracle to get rid of his contract.

 
Jordan getting two in the top 10 is a nice move for him. Knight and Thompson, for example, to go with magnette is a reasonable haul.

 
Jefferson is no better then the third or fourth best player on the team. Hes no awful. But he is severely overpaid.
Duncan, Parker, Manu, Hill, Neal, Blair, Splitter -- I'd take each and every one of them over Jefferson.If you want to consider contracts, Bonner too.There's a reason SA (the most respected scouting team in the league IMHO) wants to rid of him. Puzzling that a team that rarely makes bad choices, goofed up this bad on this one. They extended the Jefferson problem when they simply could have been rid of him by now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cavs have a trade exception that would adsorb Jefferson. And he is a vet that could help the locker room

Any chance the kings send the 10 and Jefferson to Cleveland for a 2nd?

That means the kings basically sent beno and their pick for aalmons and Tony Parker, which isn't the worst haul ever.

 
The cavs have a trade exception that would adsorb Jefferson. And he is a vet that could help the locker room Any chance the kings send the 10 and Jefferson to Cleveland for a 2nd? That means the kings basically sent beno and their pick for aalmons and Tony Parker, which isn't the worst haul ever.
:confused: The Kings now have Jefferson? And Parker? And still had the 10 in the process? (Thought the whole point of getting Parker was parting with #10?)I firmly believe Jefferson is useless, right now @ 31 years old. Can't imagine him in 3 years when his contract is up. Such an ugly ugly contract. Unless Jerome James and his contract are coming through the door, I want no part of Jefferson at all.If he's useless for a contender (I'll call the Spurs that though realistically that window is now shut), what value does he have for a lesser team??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jefferson is an instant upgrade at the 3 for the kings. I like, don't love the deal. The starting lineup at least looks NBA worthy now.

 
jefferson is an instant upgrade at the 3 for the kings. I like, don't love the deal. The starting lineup at least looks NBA worthy now.
Give me Caspi, Greene, Garcia or slide Salmons to the 3 before I take on Jefferson's contract.Jefferson is one of the worst starting 3's in the league.
But would you rather have Parker at PG with Jefferson at SF or Beno at PG with Casspi/Greene/Garcia at SF?
 
Disregard my post about the 10 pick and Cavs...i Was not tjhinknig straight. Sorry.

The Jefferson hate is :lmao: THe guy is very overpaid. But he's not horrible. He shot 44% from 3 this season and doesn't turn the ball over. You aren't winning a title with Jefferson as your best player, but he's certainly a better player then he's being talked about as in this thread. If he was making half as much money no one would say a thing. Toss in that NO ONE is signing in Sacramento as a FA any time soon and you're left with either drafting more young guys that never develop or taking on a veteran who can shoot a little, won't turn the ball over, and won't do something stupid.

 
jefferson is an instant upgrade at the 3 for the kings. I like, don't love the deal. The starting lineup at least looks NBA worthy now.
Give me Caspi, Greene, Garcia or slide Salmons to the 3 before I take on Jefferson's contract.Jefferson is one of the worst starting 3's in the league.
But would you rather have Parker at PG with Jefferson at SF or Beno at PG with Casspi/Greene/Garcia at SF?
I'd probably go Jimmer, Kemba, or traded 10 for straight for George Hill before I took traded 10 & took on Jefferson.Parker/Jefferson for 10/Salmons is reasonable I suppose. Wouldn't be my first choice.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top