Kev4029
Footballguy
That looks pretty much exactly what was proposed about a month ago. Nice job players association.Summary of deal:https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_JqVMjKAfLYNzU3YzVlNDAtMDBlOS00Y2UwLWE5ZTItM2RkZTdjN2FmMzI4
That looks pretty much exactly what was proposed about a month ago. Nice job players association.Summary of deal:https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_JqVMjKAfLYNzU3YzVlNDAtMDBlOS00Y2UwLWE5ZTItM2RkZTdjN2FmMzI4
Considering that the owners had threatened to cancel the season and/or reduce the offer (to 53-47), I'd say that the players association made some decent lemonade here.That looks pretty much exactly what was proposed about a month ago. Nice job players association.Summary of deal:https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_JqVMjKAfLYNzU3YzVlNDAtMDBlOS00Y2UwLWE5ZTItM2RkZTdjN2FmMzI4
Think the 6-year opt out is what put this over the top. If you can renegotiate in six years then missing a season's worth of pay was not going to happen.Considering that the owners had threatened to cancel the season and/or reduce the offer (to 53-47), I'd say that the players association made some decent lemonade here.That looks pretty much exactly what was proposed about a month ago. Nice job players association.Summary of deal:https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B_JqVMjKAfLYNzU3YzVlNDAtMDBlOS00Y2UwLWE5ZTItM2RkZTdjN2FmMzI4
Just one.So can you offer amnesty to just one player, or as many as you like? The Magic have a few guys they could clear off the books.
Guess Arenas is the obvious choice, but getting rid of Hedo would've been nice as well.Just one.So can you offer amnesty to just one player, or as many as you like? The Magic have a few guys they could clear off the books.
Maybe the Magic will be able to bring back Rashard Lewis.Guess Arenas is the obvious choice, but getting rid of Hedo would've been nice as well.Just one.So can you offer amnesty to just one player, or as many as you like? The Magic have a few guys they could clear off the books.

If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
More money to spend on defense lawyers for the rape trials.If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
They still get paid. Straight cash, homie.How does amnesty work, if say Nets use it on Outlaw which they will, does he get any of the remaining money and it just not count against nets cap or he gets nothing and is a fa
win for everyone thenThey still get paid. Straight cash, homie.How does amnesty work, if say Nets use it on Outlaw which they will, does he get any of the remaining money and it just not count against nets cap or he gets nothing and is a fa
Good move, IMO.Here's an article about it and the "bidding system" that will be implemented for amnestied players:http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-heat/sfl-miami-heat-nba-lockout-s112711,0,4202541.story
Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
I'm sure they'll stumble across a couple here and there, but the days of reeling off 2-3 in a row are, it appears, over. Players care about money, first and foremost. Very few players are going to take even 20% less to play for LA.Oh, and Phil's gone.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
Plus their uniforms were ugly, their coach is about to get fired, you're probably the 9th best program in the 5th best conference and USC looks great again.Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
They're going to find a way.Plus their uniforms were ugly, their coach is about to get fired, you're probably the 9th best program in the 5th best conference and USC looks great again.Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?
But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.
Yeah but we're divisional champions, and if we win on Friday we're headed to the Rose Bowl!Plus their uniforms were ugly, their coach is about to get fired, you're probably the 9th best program in the 5th best conference and USC looks great again.Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.

It'll be a victory for you guys if Oregon doesn't put 70 on you. It's possible.Yeah but we're divisional champions, and if we win on Friday we're headed to the Rose Bowl!Plus their uniforms were ugly, their coach is about to get fired, you're probably the 9th best program in the 5th best conference and USC looks great again.Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.![]()
They only put up 66 last year. I think that we can hold them to 65 this time around. IF we play hard on defense...It'll be a victory for you guys if Oregon doesn't put 70 on you. It's possible.Yeah but we're divisional champions, and if we win on Friday we're headed to the Rose Bowl!Plus their uniforms were ugly, their coach is about to get fired, you're probably the 9th best program in the 5th best conference and USC looks great again.Really? I know nothing about that.UCLA got raped 50-0 last night.Oh, I'm quite confident we'll find a way. The system might change, but everyone still wants to play for the Lakers (and that includes every player on whatever team you root for.)10 years from now you Laker haters will still be complaining that they get all the breaks, and we Laker fans will be celebrating at least a few more championships...'Good said:If I'm a Lakers fan, this is probably the least of my worries. Shame it won't be as easy to just throw money at roster problems anymore.'timschochet said:At first I thought that a shortened season would be a good thing for older teams like the Lakers. A smaller season should equal more rest for veterans, right?But now I think its the opposite. The problem is that they will be condensing 66 games into a time frame that normally would have around 53 games. That means an additional game per week.![]()
Terrible (asides from the gambling POV). I can't imagine how awful those 3rd games will be to watch.Every team will have one to three "back to back to back" games? Talk about squeezing these suckers in. Potential gamblers dream season.
World Peace at least offers some unintentional comedy. The other two are useless.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
Speaking of World Peace and comedy, did anyone else catch his Twitter feed on Thanksgiving day?World Peace at least offers some unintentional comedy. The other two are useless.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
Walton. MWP and Blake are overpaid but they've still got something to offer. Walton is done as an NBA player.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
If Luke retires, I would use it on Artest, then go after Tayshaun Prince to play SF. I don't think it would be smart to use it on Blake, even though he was terrible last year, his contract isn't bad and I have hopes for him outside of the triangle.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
I know Walton has talked about possibly retiring. Not sure how things will work under the new agreement, but maybe there is a possibility for a buyout of Walton before the season. He may be agreeable to something less than his full contract if he doesn't want to play anymore. I think the health is a huge concern for him and he'd consider a reduced sum. Especially after growing up watching the problems his dad had with the abuse he did to his body.Then they could use the exemption on MWP or Blake. In that case I would assume Blake would get cut. I think they can use the exepemtion again before next season on anyone that is under contract right now. MWP may get cut before next season.The one problem with them cutting these guys is they will have to fill that spot. It only makes sense to cut them if they can fill that spot with someone for the same $ or less. Spending more just rings up that luxury tax even more.Walton. MWP and Blake are overpaid but they've still got something to offer. Walton is done as an NBA player.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
I'd like to see what Ebanks could do at the 3. I don't imagine he'll be a plus offensively but I think he could really help out with D, quickness and hustle, which the Lakers badly need.I know Walton has talked about possibly retiring. Not sure how things will work under the new agreement, but maybe there is a possibility for a buyout of Walton before the season. He may be agreeable to something less than his full contract if he doesn't want to play anymore. I think the health is a huge concern for him and he'd consider a reduced sum. Especially after growing up watching the problems his dad had with the abuse he did to his body.Then they could use the exemption on MWP or Blake. In that case I would assume Blake would get cut. I think they can use the exepemtion again before next season on anyone that is under contract right now. MWP may get cut before next season.The one problem with them cutting these guys is they will have to fill that spot. It only makes sense to cut them if they can fill that spot with someone for the same $ or less. Spending more just rings up that luxury tax even more.Walton. MWP and Blake are overpaid but they've still got something to offer. Walton is done as an NBA player.So if you're the Lakers do you use the amnesty on Walton, World Peace, or Blake?
I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised? Are people planning on staying away and not watching on TV? Most people I talk to are happy they are getting underway and not all that concerned about the cancelled games. If fact I think most look at it as they wouldn't have been interested until Christmas anyway. Just wondering how people here feel / what they are hearing from others.i'M GOING ON STRIKE THIS SEASON. NO NBA FOR ME.
Keep in mind that Portland only has 1 major pro team (and no BCS conference school in town) but I get the feeling here people are just happy it is back and won't be too great of a % of people making an effort to ignore the NBA. Maybe because the Beavers and Ducks are not too interesting but I did not see a bump in interest in college ball during the lockout for those just wanting basketball. Personally I was hoping to see an extra couple games this year if the secondary market was down and having trouble to unload games but not sure that will happen here. Just not enough sports in town to be picky.I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised? Are people planning on staying away and not watching on TV? Most people I talk to are happy they are getting underway and not all that concerned about the cancelled games. If fact I think most look at it as they wouldn't have been interested until Christmas anyway. Just wondering how people here feel / what they are hearing from others.i'M GOING ON STRIKE THIS SEASON. NO NBA FOR ME.
I guess I'm indifferent. The NBA is just a blip on my radar screen until the NFL ends - way too many games. I think a 50 game season would be far more interesting but of course that wouldn't be financially feasilbe.I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised? Are people planning on staying away and not watching on TV? Most people I talk to are happy they are getting underway and not all that concerned about the cancelled games. If fact I think most look at it as they wouldn't have been interested until Christmas anyway. Just wondering how people here feel / what they are hearing from others.i'M GOING ON STRIKE THIS SEASON. NO NBA FOR ME.
It happens in every sport these days, just part of the business. I'll spend the same amount on the NBA this year as I did last year which is $0 (unless work happens to take me to a city with a team). I'd love to see a boycott of every teams first home game.I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised? Are people planning on staying away and not watching on TV? Most people I talk to are happy they are getting underway and not all that concerned about the cancelled games. If fact I think most look at it as they wouldn't have been interested until Christmas anyway. Just wondering how people here feel / what they are hearing from others.i'M GOING ON STRIKE THIS SEASON. NO NBA FOR ME.
I miss Laker games being on for sure. I'd imagine serious NBA fans missed it, most everybody else probably wouldn't have noticed until the NFL playoffs got down to just a couple of games.Swearing off a sport because the people who play it want to haggle about how they divide up the money is dumb. It's not some grand moral issue. It's just entertainment.I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised?
Me too - it would make it a hell of a lot easier to get Mavs tickets for opening night since I don't have season tickets anymore.'Cliff Clavin said:It happens in every sport these days, just part of the business. I'll spend the same amount on the NBA this year as I did last year which is $0 (unless work happens to take me to a city with a team). I'd love to see a boycott of every teams first home game.'This_Guy said:I'm really interested to hear how fans are feeling about the lock-out, shortened season, etc. Are a lot of fans that were big supports of the NBA now disenfranchised? Are people planning on staying away and not watching on TV? Most people I talk to are happy they are getting underway and not all that concerned about the cancelled games. If fact I think most look at it as they wouldn't have been interested until Christmas anyway. Just wondering how people here feel / what they are hearing from others.'Ballstein said:i'M GOING ON STRIKE THIS SEASON. NO NBA FOR ME.
agreed - I like the NBA and dont even start watching until X-mas....no foul hereCondensed FA-frenzy window, shortened season and more games per week. Can't wait.Stopping a season midway through like MLB is cause for a major backlash. Starting the NBA season six weeks late is nothing.
Seems weird to me to have a 2-1 team and then a 6-1 team from the same conference, especially since there's still a smattering of Eastern teams in the 10-1 to 20-1 range. Thinking the value, if there is any, is in the West. Nuggets maybe? Grizzlies? Thunder as the primary beneficiaries if the condensed schedule takes a toll on the older teams (Lakers and Mavs)?Odds to win 2012 NBA titleTeam OddsHeat 2-1Bulls 6-1Mavericks 7-1Thunder 7-1Lakers 7-1Celtics 10-1Spurs 20-1Magic 20-1Knicks 20-1Blazers 25-1Nuggets 30-1Grizzlies 30-1Hornets 40-1Hawks 50-1Clippers 50-176ers 60-1Nets 60-1Warriors 75-1Rockets 100-1Bucks 100-1Pacers 100-1Jazz 100-1Suns 100-1Kings 100-1Bobcats 100-1Wizards 100-1Cavaliers 100-1Pistons 200-1Raptors 200-1Wolves 200-1