You're underestimating Wiggins moops.For the next 5 years, Love >>>>>>> Wiggins
That's why you make the trade
All of themWhich teams are we rooting for next year?Sad to read on nba.com that good ole former Laker Michael Cooper has tongue cancer. Thankfully it was caught early!
Their offer is Faried, Chandler, and something else. It's a terrible offer, but it keeps getting mentioned for some reason. It's behind the Cavs good offer, the Golden State good offer, the Bulls offer, the Celtics offer, and even the Cavs non-Wiggins offer. All rumored of course, but if you believe the reports that's where it stands.reading Nuggets were involved in Love deals. Wtf can they offer that is even close to Wiggins?
Gibson, butler, and some other stuff.What's the rumored Bulls offer?
Agree. But love is the better choice for the next 2 years, which I think is important.You're underestimating Wiggins moops.For the next 5 years, Love >>>>>>> Wiggins
That's why you make the trade
I don't disagree. That said, the wolves aren't trading the next decade of Kevin Love because they don't have that. They have the next year, which is obviously a lot less valuable. The suitors have a different angle - that they will be able to keep him a while.Gunz always overrates young unknown talent.
What are the odds that Wiggins is ever better than Love is right now? 10%?
I think Wiggins has a chance to be very good, even a multiple All Star, but Love is great right now. AND young.
The only way this should be a debate is if Love were 30 or 31. Otherwise this is dumb.
You have out Abe'd Abe with this one.<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Good Posting Judge" data-cid="17025345" data-time="1406073307"><p><p><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Notorious T.R.E." data-cid="17025325" data-time="1406073048"><p> Your face is more rhesus monkey-like.
Or maybe they do sign Wiggins so his salary counts in the trade?If the Wolves want to send Kevin Martin out with Love, the Cavs would need to include both Waiters and Thompson so you can cross that one off for sure. If they want to send the Cavs Barea then either Waiters OR Thompson would have to be included. Don't see that happening either, but maybe that happens in lieu of a #1 going Minnesota's way?
Can't be determined until the trade deadline hits in February.Which teams are we rooting for next year?Sad to read on nba.com that good ole former Laker Michael Cooper has tongue cancer. Thankfully it was caught early!
I'd go a lot higher than 10%. Take a look through the 1.1s over the last 20 years and you'll agree. Especially if you eliminate the weak draft years like 2005, 2006 and 2013 where someone defaulted to 1.1 because 2014 obviously doesn't fall into that category. I count six guys in the last 20 years who have a good case that they were better at some point than Love is right now (or clearly will be in the case of Davis). So that's 30% even before you eliminate the weak drafts.Gunz always overrates young unknown talent.
What are the odds that Wiggins is ever better than Love is right now? 10%?
I think Wiggins has a chance to be very good, even a multiple All Star, but Love is great right now. AND young.
The only way this should be a debate is if Love were 30 or 31. Otherwise this is dumb.
My understanding is that most GMs take August off for vacation anyway. Maybe they come to a deal in principle, but it will probably be a quiet month.Or maybe they do sign Wiggins so his salary counts in the trade?Waiting 30 days after signing Wiggins shouldn't be a deal breaker, unless the Cavs are nervous that another team would come up with a better offer while they wait.If the Wolves want to send Kevin Martin out with Love, the Cavs would need to include both Waiters and Thompson so you can cross that one off for sure. If they want to send the Cavs Barea then either Waiters OR Thompson would have to be included. Don't see that happening either, but maybe that happens in lieu of a #1 going Minnesota's way?
Agree with this. Plus, even if he's only 75% as "good" as Love, there's a decent chance his skill set will compliment this particular team better than Love's. And there's also the cap/luxury tax flexibility Wiggins is giving them. Lots of people are just looking at Love's fantasy numbers and oversimplifying this.I'd go a lot higher than 10%. Take a look through the 1.1s over the last 20 years and you'll agree. Especially if you eliminate the weak draft years like 2005, 2006 and 2013 where someone defaulted to 1.1 because 2014 obviously doesn't fall into that category. I count six guys in the last 20 years who have a good case that they were better at some point than Love is right now (or clearly will be in the case of Davis). So that's 30% even before you eliminate the weak drafts.Gunz always overrates young unknown talent.
What are the odds that Wiggins is ever better than Love is right now? 10%?
I think Wiggins has a chance to be very good, even a multiple All Star, but Love is great right now. AND young.
The only way this should be a debate is if Love were 30 or 31. Otherwise this is dumb.
As much as people like to criticize NBA scouts and the draft and call the whole thing a crapshoot, they fact is that they're right a lot more often than not. They've been hyping Wiggins as the next big thing for a year and a half now, chances are pretty good that he'll be an all-star within a few years and they're definitely higher than 10% that he'll be a first team all-NBA candidate.
I was going to say something similar. Plus you have cheap control of the guy. Bennett is coloring a lot of the analysis when #1 picks are about as sure a thing's as there are in the NBA. I'm sure there's some stat-head blog out there that is making the case that a cost controlled Wiggins is worth more than a max-contract Love.I'd go a lot higher than 10%. Take a look through the 1.1s over the last 20 years and you'll agree. Especially if you eliminate the weak draft years like 2005, 2006 and 2013 where someone defaulted to 1.1 because 2014 obviously doesn't fall into that category. I count six guys in the last 20 years who have a good case that they were better at some point than Love is right now (or clearly will be in the case of Davis). So that's 30% even before you eliminate the weak drafts.Gunz always overrates young unknown talent.
What are the odds that Wiggins is ever better than Love is right now? 10%?
I think Wiggins has a chance to be very good, even a multiple All Star, but Love is great right now. AND young.
The only way this should be a debate is if Love were 30 or 31. Otherwise this is dumb.
As much as people like to criticize NBA scouts and the draft and call the whole thing a crapshoot, they fact is that they're right a lot more often than not. They've been hyping Wiggins as the next big thing for a year and a half now, chances are pretty good that he'll be an all-star within a few years and they're definitely higher than 10% that he'll be a first team all-NBA candidate.
Going back to 2000 the only ones I see that have been clearly better at some point than Love is right now are Lebron, Dwight, maybe Rose for one year (?) and that's it. Blake and Davis could get there but aren't now. Way more busts there. Kenyon, Kwame, Bargnani, Oden, Bennett. Bogut, Wall and Irving aren't going to reach Love's level either.Here's the list of 1.1.s. In a strong draft year you're basically getting a guaranteed all-star. Also remember that Durant was 1.2 in 2007 and was basically the Andrew Wiggins of that draft with Embiid playing the Oden role.
And it isn't necessarily the Wolves management making the shots. Love has some say since at the very least, he needs to opt in for a second year. If he really wants, he can force his way to Cleveland.Not a jinx here, it's not the Cavs management calling the shots here to get Love, it's King James, and the T Wolves will get a Kings Ransom for JamesNice jinx, jinxieTheir getting ready to give the T Wolves a whole lot more then Wiggins, Flip Saunders will be hero when this deal is doneCavs just traded a 2nd rounder and a million bucks to Utah for 3 non-guaranteed contracts. Either this is getting close or the Cavs are taking a page from Houston's GMing manual.
That's still more than double what you said ... and that's with you choosing pretty much the worst possible cutoff with 2000. Go back 5 more years and you throw Iverson and Duncan into the mix. Go back another 10 years beyond my arbitrary 20 year cutoff and you add Webber, Shaq, David Robinson, Ewing and Olajuwon. You also have to include Davis, even though he's not quite there yet there's not a single person who watches the league closely who'd prefer Love to Davis going forward.Going back to 2000 the only ones I see that have been clearly better at some point than Love is right now are Lebron, Dwight, maybe Rose for one year (?) and that's it. Blake and Davis could get there but aren't now.Way more busts there. Kenyon, Kwame, Bargnani, Oden, Bennett. Bogut, Wall and Irving aren't going to reach Love's level either.Here's the list of 1.1.s. In a strong draft year you're basically getting a guaranteed all-star. Also remember that Durant was 1.2 in 2007 and was basically the Andrew Wiggins of that draft with Embiid playing the Oden role.
So 21% with an outside chance of 35%? Still doesn't change my point at all.
No.Will Cleveland have the space to sign Love next year outright anyway?
No. They'd essentially have to make a similar trade to what they are now offering to clear cap space.Will Cleveland have the space to sign Love next year outright anyway?
Welcome to the thread!Will Cleveland have the space to sign Love next year outright anyway?
It's not just that Wiggins may be good, it's that he already does one thing (wing defender) at an insanely high level, a level that will make him worth more than his contract is worth. It's not like Bennett from last year when everyone was questioning what he did well.I'm not saying I'd keep Wiggins over Love (although I'm kind of talking myself into it), just saying that the idea that there's a much better chance that he reaches or exceeds Love's current level than you suggested.
This is a debate because Love plays only one side of the floor and Wiggins has the potential to be a two way beast.Gunz always overrates young unknown talent.
What are the odds that Wiggins is ever better than Love is right now? 10%?
I think Wiggins has a chance to be very good, even a multiple All Star, but Love is great right now. AND young.
The only way this should be a debate is if Love were 30 or 31. Otherwise this is dumb.
It isn't quite the same in the sense that Boozer was a RFA so they were trying to do what the Rockets did with Parsons this year. Problem with Boozer was he promised beforehand and reneged.Can one of you meatheads explain Love's current contract and fill me in on how the Cavs can't get 'Boozered' in this whole deal. This is the part that is making me very nervous.
la veeLove is an ok defender, tried defending this before, but say la vee.
la veeLove is an ok defender, tried defending this before, but say la vee.

I agree with pretty much everything you are saying, though I think the question is more.....how likely is it that Wiggins becomes a 10-win player in the next 3 years?That's still more than double what you said ... and that's with you choosing pretty much the worst possible cutoff with 2000. Go back 5 more years and you throw Iverson and Duncan into the mix. Go back another 10 years beyond my arbitrary 20 year cutoff and you add Webber, Shaq, David Robinson, Ewing and Olajuwon. You also have to include Davis, even though he's not quite there yet there's not a single person who watches the league closely who'd prefer Love to Davis going forward.Going back to 2000 the only ones I see that have been clearly better at some point than Love is right now are Lebron, Dwight, maybe Rose for one year (?) and that's it. Blake and Davis could get there but aren't now.Way more busts there. Kenyon, Kwame, Bargnani, Oden, Bennett. Bogut, Wall and Irving aren't going to reach Love's level either.Here's the list of 1.1.s. In a strong draft year you're basically getting a guaranteed all-star. Also remember that Durant was 1.2 in 2007 and was basically the Andrew Wiggins of that draft with Embiid playing the Oden role.
So 21% with an outside chance of 35%? Still doesn't change my point at all.
Plus you'll notice the the busts mostly come from weak draft classes. 2014 was not a weak draft class.
I'm not saying I'd keep Wiggins over Love (although I'm kind of talking myself into it), just saying that the idea that there's a much better chance that he reaches or exceeds Love's current level than you suggested.
Thanks. Makes me feel a little better but Love bolting in 2 yrs still has me uneasy about this trade. I guess an NBA title in the next 2 years would cure that real fast though.It isn't quite the same in the sense that Boozer was a RFA so they were trying to do what the Rockets did with Parsons this year. Problem with Boozer was he promised beforehand and reneged.Can one of you meatheads explain Love's current contract and fill me in on how the Cavs can't get 'Boozered' in this whole deal. This is the part that is making me very nervous.
As far as Love, he can't do an extend and trade b/c of his Early Termination Option. But my understanding is that he can renounce this, essentially optioning in to the 2nd year. This makes the most sense b/c it gives him the same length of LeBron's contract. Only problem is that he is making 16.7 million in his 2nd year. So he'd probably leave a few million on the table for flexibility.
As far as getting screwed over, I think the Cavs could work on an extension whenever they want. There is no guarantee but usually a player's word is pretty good especially when LeBron is on the team. There have only been 2 extend and trades (Melo and Garnett) so most trades that occur like this have some risk. I can't think of anyone who promised to resign and didn't but I'm also not sure how many promised. Biggest name was probably Chris Paul.
Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
They are at the cap limit. Are you talking about a different trade they could make?Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
True but LeBron is only signed for 2 more years. Everyone assumes it is for the new TV deal but he could just as well leave. I doubt he does but I wouldn't worry about it too much. LeBron is a good recruiter and people will want to play with him regardless. Besides, isn't Durant up in two years?Thanks. Makes me feel a little better but Love bolting in 2 yrs still has me uneasy about this trade. I guess an NBA title in the next 2 years would cure that real fast though.
Adding Love will move them towards the tax and apron whereas with Wiggins they'll likely still have a full MLE to use next year.They are at the cap limit. Are you talking about a different trade they could make?Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
They won't have much cap space with Wiggins though, correct. Irving's 30% contract (since odds are he'll be voted into the All-Star game) with Lebron basically eat up whatever space they'd have anyway.Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
Right. So it's wiggins plus a mid level guy. I think people are thinking there's all this cap room if they don't get level.The only way they get love is via trade because then they can sign him over the cap level.Adding Love will move them towards the tax and apron whereas with Wiggins they'll likely still have a full MLE to use next year.They are at the cap limit. Are you talking about a different trade they could make?Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
I'm talking about future seasons, on the assumption that Love would get a max-ish deal from Cleveland.They are at the cap limit. Are you talking about a different trade they could make?Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
The deal isn't one for one. The Cavs are also dumping Bennett's guaranteed deal...based on what we saw last year, he's going to be overpaid on his rookie deal. So make it full analysis...the cap space difference isn't as big as you are saying.Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
Bennett is going to develop into a solid rotation big. Probably as soon as this year.The deal isn't one for one. The Cavs are also dumping Bennett's guaranteed deal...based on what we saw last year, he's going to be overpaid on his rookie deal. So make it full analysis...the cap space difference isn't as big as you are saying.Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
Good point. Like I said I was talking down the road beyond this season and next, but yeah. It's not one for one and you can't evaluate it without considering what else gets moved/dumped.The deal isn't one for one. The Cavs are also dumping Bennett's guaranteed deal...based on what we saw last year, he's going to be overpaid on his rookie deal. So make it full analysis...the cap space difference isn't as big as you are saying.Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.
Well Bennett is still rather cheap. So if he puts together any semblance of a solid season, even on the #1 pick scale, it is still cheaper than an open market guy.The deal isn't one for one. The Cavs are also dumping Bennett's guaranteed deal...based on what we saw last year, he's going to be overpaid on his rookie deal. So make it full analysis...the cap space difference isn't as big as you are saying.Not just Wiggins vs Love over the next 2-4 seasons. Wiggins plus whoever they could add with the extra cap space vs Love.Is Love worse at defending than Wiggins is on the offensive side of the court? He can't shoot. He can attack, sure, but that's Lebron and Kyrie's job.
I guess the more important question is if there us any chance Wiggins is better than Love in the next 2-4 seasons. When Lebron is 35 this won't likely matter as much.
Also I bet LeBron's still a top 5 player in the league at age 35. There's so much more to his game than athleticism. Did you read that Windhorst thing about his memory at ESPN today? Frightening.