Doctor Detroit
Please remove your headgear
Merrill Hodge likes the Saints
It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
As opposed to vomit and fear they might be shot at any moment?It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
We drink so we aren't afraid.As opposed to vomit and fear they might be shot at any moment?It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
I guess since we've never won a Super Bowl I wouldn't knowWe drink so we aren't afraid.As opposed to vomit and fear they might be shot at any moment?It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
And it's the out-of-towners who vomit. New Orleanians generally hold it in until the coma starts.
Hey, when it's dark all the time is it more depressing to stay at home in a tiny overpriced hovel, or pay $4 a gallon for gas and realize there's last call at 1:30 a.m.?I guess since we've never won a Super Bowl I wouldn't knowWe drink so we aren't afraid.As opposed to vomit and fear they might be shot at any moment?It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
And it's the out-of-towners who vomit. New Orleanians generally hold it in until the coma starts.
I like to go night skiing. You should try it sometime. Oh, wait.Hey, when it's dark all the time is it more depressing to stay at home in a tiny overpriced hovel, or pay $4 a gallon for gas and realize there's last call at 1:30 a.m.?I guess since we've never won a Super Bowl I wouldn't knowWe drink so we aren't afraid.As opposed to vomit and fear they might be shot at any moment?It's better when the drinker doesn't smell like Patchouli and depression.Your beer is awful, HAWX WIN 44-3!!111 BOOM!11You won't understand what reasonable is until your team wins the Super Bowl.At least do your part, reasonable Saints fan. I'll do mine.Guess.You guys think we can keep the bickering about this game in this thread?![]()
And it's the out-of-towners who vomit. New Orleanians generally hold it in until the coma starts.
We do that. That's when you're so drunk you accidentally slide down the Supreme Court steps and try not to spill any of your hand grenade, right?I like to go night skiing. You should try it sometime. Oh, wait.
Is that like milk steak? I love milk steak.Hey Saints fans, from reading all your posts in this awesome milk toast thread, it looks like you are pinning your hopes on the rushing of Mark Ingram. How do you feel about that? Which Mark Ingram are you going to get? Will he be souped up on Popeyes or will he look like the last two years?
Give me a milkshake any dayIs that like milk steak? I love milk steak.Hey Saints fans, from reading all your posts in this awesome milk toast thread, it looks like you are pinning your hopes on the rushing of Mark Ingram. How do you feel about that? Which Mark Ingram are you going to get? Will he be souped up on Popeyes or will he look like the last two years?
Isn't Popeye's like Taco Bell for fried chicken?SaintsInDome2006 said:There's a Popeye's in Renton off the 405.
After that you gotta go all the way to Tacoma.
How is this possible?
Yeah, I've never had Popeye's, but I'm more than happy with Ezell'sIsn't Popeye's like Taco Bell for fried chicken?SaintsInDome2006 said:There's a Popeye's in Renton off the 405.
After that you gotta go all the way to Tacoma.
How is this possible?
Not really seeing how we are missing out with that one.
Uh, no. At least not in Louisiana.Isn't Popeye's like Taco Bell for fried chicken?Not really seeing how we are missing out with that one.SaintsInDome2006 said:There's a Popeye's in Renton off the 405.
After that you gotta go all the way to Tacoma.
How is this possible?
In the future, all restaurants are Taco Bell.Isn't Popeye's like Taco Bell for fried chicken?SaintsInDome2006 said:There's a Popeye's in Renton off the 405.
After that you gotta go all the way to Tacoma.
How is this possible?
Not really seeing how we are missing out with that one.
Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that. He returned to action in week nine from injury and has gotten stronger every game. Had 6.4 ypc against Carolina in Carolina in the rain , 6.7 Ypc against Tampa Bay in the Dome and 5.4 YPC against the Eagles in Philly in the cold for 97 yards rushing. he also caught 3 passes in that Eagles game for 17 yards. The Saints will be a balanced offense anyway they won't put all their hopes on Mark Ingram.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
What other backs?Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
4.9 is a higher YPC than I thought he's have. Heck of a 78 carries this year for him.Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
For literary buffs, I like:Ingram the destroyer
Look at the game by game breakdown not the games when he was injured. Game 9 return from injury is when we all started seeing a noticeable change in Ingram . Believe me I was as big a Ingram doubter as there was on these boards. Check the Ingram thread. He has convinced me since week nine that he is running much different now and his injury is behind him. He runs angry now. He used to go down so easy before. Not these days.4.9 is a higher YPC than I thought he's have. Heck of a 78 carries this year for him.Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
The platoon of Saints running backs.What other backs?Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
Saints have been a RBBC team. They will be on Saturday as well. Ingram gets a bump in the load now because of PT being hurt. He has made that bump count so far. I think in some respects he is like Lynch. He is a back that gets stronger as the game goes on and benefits from a lot of carries to get a rhythm. PT is a back that can come in cold on any down and just do it. Not all backs run the same but in the end you can't argue with the results.4.9 is a higher YPC than I thought he's have. Heck of a 78 carries this year for him.Ingram has a higher YPC average than the other backs. Don't know if you knew that.Milk toast is good stuff. Anyways Saints, how do you feel about your season depending on Mark Ingram's underachieving?
You know you are damned good when the WSJ tries to take a stab. That article was red meat.Another reason why the Saints must not rely on a pass heavy attack even if it wasn't raining. Seattle defense relies on a brazen tactic of rampant contact and interference with WR's. A running game or at least a balanced offense will make them less able to accomplish this style of defense. More slant type routes with cuts will need to be called.
Wall Street Journal article on Seattle's secondary-http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303754404579310500005285822
I know it's easy to look to the big corners and their physical style of play and think that that is why the secondary gets things done. The real reason is Earl Thomas. He is the best player on that D and it's not even close IMO. Four seasons played. Three pro-bowls. Three All-pros. Wouldn't be surprised to see him get DPOY sooner than later.Seattle defense relies on a brazen tactic of rampant contact and interference with WR's.
Love Dilfer, what's goofy about him? And he didn't whine or put it in a pithy manner. He loves Seattle's D, particularly the secondary. They calculate, but predominantly they just play better man coverage than anyone else in the league. Browner was actually a week link in this regard, so the anecdote from the Colts game wasn't exactly a newsworthy item.Breesisdaman said:And what about Trent Dilfer who pretty much said the exact same thing? He's a goof too?You know you are damned good when the WSJ tries to take a stab. That article was red meat.Another reason why the Saints must not rely on a pass heavy attack even if it wasn't raining. Seattle defense relies on a brazen tactic of rampant contact and interference with WR's. A running game or at least a balanced offense will make them less able to accomplish this style of defense. More slant type routes with cuts will need to be called.
Wall Street Journal article on Seattle's secondary-http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303754404579310500005285822
I edited after you edited. Disregard. You meant good, you typed goof. I took the post down. Its gone now.Love Dilfer, what's goofy about him? And he didn't whine or put it in a pithy manner. He loves Seattle's D, particularly the secondary. They calculate, but predominantly they just play better man coverage than anyone else in the league. Browner was actually a week link in this regard, so the anecdote from the Colts game wasn't exactly a newsworthy item.Breesisdaman said:And what about Trent Dilfer who pretty much said the exact same thing? He's a goof too?You know you are damned good when the WSJ tries to take a stab. That article was red meat.Another reason why the Saints must not rely on a pass heavy attack even if it wasn't raining. Seattle defense relies on a brazen tactic of rampant contact and interference with WR's. A running game or at least a balanced offense will make them less able to accomplish this style of defense. More slant type routes with cuts will need to be called.
Wall Street Journal article on Seattle's secondary-http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303754404579310500005285822
ETA: You want to know who gets away with the most PI in the league? Physical WR's. Michael Irvin wishes he could play in today's NFL.
Every thread needs more ITS, but this thread has lots of ITS-like contributors, so I'm sure he's taken his talents elsewhere.This thread needs more from ImTheScientist
Hazards of typing on a phone. Sorry. Apparently I also fat fingered "weak".I edited after you edited. Disregard. You meant good, you typed goof. I took the post down. Its gone now.Love Dilfer, what's goofy about him? And he didn't whine or put it in a pithy manner. He loves Seattle's D, particularly the secondary. They calculate, but predominantly they just play better man coverage than anyone else in the league. Browner was actually a week link in this regard, so the anecdote from the Colts game wasn't exactly a newsworthy item.Breesisdaman said:And what about Trent Dilfer who pretty much said the exact same thing? He's a goof too?You know you are damned good when the WSJ tries to take a stab. That article was red meat.Another reason why the Saints must not rely on a pass heavy attack even if it wasn't raining. Seattle defense relies on a brazen tactic of rampant contact and interference with WR's. A running game or at least a balanced offense will make them less able to accomplish this style of defense. More slant type routes with cuts will need to be called.
Wall Street Journal article on Seattle's secondary-http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303754404579310500005285822
ETA: You want to know who gets away with the most PI in the league? Physical WR's. Michael Irvin wishes he could play in today's NFL.
I think all the Sherman hate is one of the most hilarious things to watch as haters sit and spin. Sherman is not only the best defensive back in the league, but a master manipulator. He's one of the brightest guys in the league, he's a Stanford guy not a NE Arkansas State guy and knows exactly what he's doing on and off the field.Richard Sherman amazingly lead the league in interceptions all while be the least targeted CB in the league. That is a mind blowing stat.
Brees and Wilson scheming to get on an amusement park ride.I think he crosses the line of sportsmanship with his mouth more often than I'd like. Yes, I realize that may seem hypocritical coming from me but I'm just an anonymous twit on the internet* not an ambassador of the team. That's what gets people riled up against him. I'm hoping he keeps this team first attitude and the fame doesn't turn him into another TO. A lot will be revealed when contract talks come up soon. *thank you Apple for autocorrecting the seldom used word "Internet" into interest.I think all the Sherman hate is one of the most hilarious things to watch as haters sit and spin. Sherman is not only the best defensive back in the league, but a master manipulator. He's one of the brightest guys in the league, he's a Stanford guy not a NE Arkansas State guy and knows exactly what he's doing on and off the field.Sherman said that at Stanford he was consumed with track because he had a legit shot at the Olympics as a triple jumper, that he learn the game of football as well as he would have liked. He said once he got to the NFL he realized that technique and positioning made him understand how to be elite, and he worked as hard as anyone to learn the nuances of the position. Anyone thinking this guy isn't a special talent or thinks he is a meathead, are extremely ignorant and should be ignored with prejudice.Richard Sherman amazingly lead the league in interceptions all while be the least targeted CB in the league. That is a mind blowing stat.![]()