Hu-Tang Clan
Footballguy
It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
No it's not. They're 1-4 and look horrible on offense so it's not really effective at all.LOL. What you really mean is "jfc, how can I get fantasy points in a time share". It's effective in real lifeIt's so ridiculous. How can anyone on offense get in any sort of rhythm with constantly rotating so many players (both RB's and WR's)?Three runs by three different backs? JFC.
Woah!It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
That's not what he's saying.It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
Atl oline has been playing very well all year. Not getting enough credit.Man he's got some big lanes to run through
They'll be exhausted just from running onto and off the field.It's so ridiculous. How can anyone on offense get in any sort of rhythm with constantly rotating so many players (both RB's and WR's)?Three runs by three different backs? JFC.
Correct. Timeshare is for the most part ineffective because you are taking out your best players and inserting backups.No it's not. They're 1-4 and look horrible on offense so it's not really effective at all.LOL. What you really mean is "jfc, how can I get fantasy points in a time share". It's effective in real lifeIt's so ridiculous. How can anyone on offense get in any sort of rhythm with constantly rotating so many players (both RB's and WR's)?Three runs by three different backs? JFC.
And they're 29th in rushing yards and 28th in ypc entering this game.No it's not. They're 1-4 and look horrible on offense so it's not really effective at all.LOL. What you really mean is "jfc, how can I get fantasy points in a time share". It's effective in real lifeIt's so ridiculous. How can anyone on offense get in any sort of rhythm with constantly rotating so many players (both RB's and WR's)?Three runs by three different backs? JFC.
It was three an out. That is not effective.LOL. What you really mean is "jfc, how can I get fantasy points in a time share". It's effective in real lifeIt's so ridiculous. How can anyone on offense get in any sort of rhythm with constantly rotating so many players (both RB's and WR's)?Three runs by three different backs? JFC.
Unless you happen to playing him in three leaguesYou know what really sucks? Ryan will get charged with a fumble without ever touching the ball.
 
 UNfortunately for Ryan owners, yesDoes Ryan get credit for that fumble even though he never touched ball?
UNfortunately for Ryan owners, yesDoes Ryan get credit for that fumble even though he never touched ball?

Who else to charge it to though? Technically, the center never possesses the ball either.Yahoo just assigned the fumble to Ryan. Stupid, it never got to him.
But at least the QB touched and threw it. It technically was intercepted before completion.Who else to charge it to though? Technically, the center never possesses the ball either.It's like charging the QB for an interception when it hits the WR chest high between the numbers and pops up in the air for a pick.Yahoo just assigned the fumble to Ryan. Stupid, it never got to him.
Yeah, not sure if I've ever seen a C charged with a fumble. Except one time when Casey Rabach caught a deflected pass, started to run with it, and fumbled.FTR...that is ALWAYS charged to the QB.
Right because a C can not actually "possess" the ball seeing that the play doesn't start until he snaps it.FTR...that is ALWAYS charged to the QB.
He's not saying it's going to be a run 8/10 times they have Ingram in? If not, what is he saying then?That's not what he's saying.It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
Hint: Ingram doesn't touch the ball every down he's in the gameHe's not saying it's going to be a run 8/10 times they have Ingram in? If not, what is he saying then?That's not what he's saying.It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
Again, the bolded. The point being that that QBs get charged with a lot of turnovers that aren't remotely their fault. For fantasy purposes, they also get a lot of points for things they don't do...like when a receiver breaks a sure tackle and gets an extra 20 yards.But at least the QB touched and threw it. It technically was intercepted before completion.Who else to charge it to though? Technically, the center never possesses the ball either.It's like charging the QB for an interception when it hits the WR chest high between the numbers and pops up in the air for a pick.Yahoo just assigned the fumble to Ryan. Stupid, it never got to him.
Well, yeah, that is what he's saying. But you tried to use Ingram's rush attempts and receptions as evidence of that, which isn't the right way to calculate that percentage because you're missing all the other plays with Ingram on the field.He's not saying it's going to be a run 8/10 times they have Ingram in? If not, what is he saying then?That's not what he's saying.It's 76 runs and 24 receptions on 100 touches so far this year so pretty good guess.Is there a bigger tell in the NFL than NO bringing Ingram in? It must be like 80% run.
