What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New TimeWaster (1 Viewer)

As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?

ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
yeah there is an option, when you choose to have teams it is a radio button right below it that appears
 
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
Restart if you want to go random. If you want to assign teams, just list them out. I think that's a fair move too.
 
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
yeah there is an option, when you choose to have teams it is a radio button right below it that appears
I don't see it when creating a tournament. There is:Invite mode: Allow players to invite friends.Team Size: 3Tournament Type: Round Robinand when you select Round Robin, it opens:# of games you can be in at once
 
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
yeah there is an option, when you choose to have teams it is a radio button right below it that appears
I don't see it when creating a tournament. There is:Invite mode: Allow players to invite friends.Team Size: 3Tournament Type: Round Robinand when you select Round Robin, it opens:# of games you can be in at once
oops, dunno about tourney
 
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
Restart if you want to go random. If you want to assign teams, just list them out. I think that's a fair move too.
I suppose I could assign by ranking of the old tournament. Anyone who didn't play gets a 50/50 weighting.I still don't see the random option. I've seen it in individual team games, just can't find it in tournament setup. Since a bunch have already joined, I'll leave it the way it is.By the way, I was watching to see who would jump on BF's team first, and we have a winner. :bye:
 
As master of tournament, shouldn't I get settings to move people around? Or is that only if I haven't joined the tournament?ETA - I wanted to assign teams randomly at the start of the tournament, but I didn't see an option for that.
Restart if you want to go random. If you want to assign teams, just list them out. I think that's a fair move too.
I suppose I could assign by ranking of the old tournament. Anyone who didn't play gets a 50/50 weighting.I still don't see the random option. I've seen it in individual team games, just can't find it in tournament setup. Since a bunch have already joined, I'll leave it the way it is.By the way, I was watching to see who would jump on BF's team first, and we have a winner. :bye:
Since I beat him in the last tourney, I figured it would only be fair to allow him to glean some insight into my Sun-Tzu-esque strategery.
 
Looking forward to getting schooled by you field marshals. I'm trying to rack up experience in the multiplayers against random Polish citizens before this starts.

 
Here are the rankings from the old tourney (1 game still in progress):

BostonFred: 11-1

Gaspumper: 10-2

Humuna: 10-2

Jojo: 8-4

Enrico: 7-4 (1 game left)

Sidewinder: 7-4 (1 game left)

Guderian: 6-6

Tecumseh: 5-7

Dragons: 5-7

Scotty: 4-8

Overlord: 2-10

Tick: 2-10

Justin: 0-12

Teams would be:

A: Bostonfred, Justin

B: C: Gaspumper, Tick

C: Humuna, Overlord

D: B: Jojo, Scotty

E: Enrico, Tecumseh

F: Sidewinder, Dragons

Guderian and those who didn't play in the first tourney would be free agents.

ETA - way to go Gas on getting your team started off without instruction!

Let's let this tourney run the way it's setup, though. Full freedom to choose teams, even if that's to choose to base around the above list.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looking forward to getting schooled by you field marshals. I'm trying to rack up experience in the multiplayers against random Polish citizens before this starts.
Rumor has it that the Polish citizens are somewhat likely to cheat.
That definitely happened in my first game, which was on the East Asia map. Seem to have gotten a few groups of fair-minded Eastern Euros now, including a game I'm in the middle of on the Europe map. Do I get a special bonus if I hold their home country against them? :confused:
 
Looking forward to getting schooled by you field marshals. I'm trying to rack up experience in the multiplayers against random Polish citizens before this starts.
Rumor has it that the Polish citizens are somewhat likely to cheat.
That definitely happened in my first game, which was on the East Asia map. Seem to have gotten a few groups of fair-minded Eastern Euros now, including a game I'm in the middle of on the Europe map. Do I get a special bonus if I hold their home country against them? :confused:
I've seen Europe games where Poland received a greater bonus then usual. In that case, yes you do. ;p
 
Looking forward to getting schooled by you field marshals. I'm trying to rack up experience in the multiplayers against random Polish citizens before this starts.
Rumor has it that the Polish citizens are somewhat likely to cheat.
That definitely happened in my first game, which was on the East Asia map. Seem to have gotten a few groups of fair-minded Eastern Euros now, including a game I'm in the middle of on the Europe map. Do I get a special bonus if I hold their home country against them? :confused:
I invited you to a game which mirrors the settings from FBG Tourney 1.
 
Is it possible to just invite Aerial Assault to the original tournament, giving us all one more game against him?

 
Looking forward to getting schooled by you field marshals. I'm trying to rack up experience in the multiplayers against random Polish citizens before this starts.
Rumor has it that the Polish citizens are somewhat likely to cheat.
That definitely happened in my first game, which was on the East Asia map. Seem to have gotten a few groups of fair-minded Eastern Euros now, including a game I'm in the middle of on the Europe map. Do I get a special bonus if I hold their home country against them? :confused:
I invited you to a game which mirrors the settings from FBG Tourney 1.
K, thx, will join when I can.
 
Is it possible to just invite Aerial Assault to the original tournament, giving us all one more game against him?
I don't think you can add or delete players after it has started. Due to the rigid structure of most tournaments, it makes sense, but it'd be a nice feature for round robin tournaments.
 
Did this thing start yet? I'd play if people can handle some slow/non-existent play the next few days.
No, we have 10 that have joined. 3 players who have been active the past few days that haven't responded. I'd like to get 3 teams of 5, so you and 1 more would be great. Boot times are set very long, but I don't expect any FBG's will use them, especially over the next couple days.Check chat in the tournament, for suggestions on which team to join.
 
Here are the rankings from the old tourney (1 game still in progress):

BostonFred: 11-1

Gaspumper: 10-2

Humuna: 10-2

Jojo: 8-4

Enrico: 7-4 (1 game left)

Sidewinder: 7-4 (1 game left)

Guderian: 6-6

Tecumseh: 5-7

Dragons: 5-7

Scotty: 4-8

Overlord: 2-10

Tick: 2-10

Justin: 0-12

Teams would be:

A: Bostonfred, Justin

B: C: Gaspumper, Tick

C: Humuna, Overlord

D: B: Jojo, Scotty

E: Enrico, Tecumseh

F: Sidewinder, Dragons

Guderian and those who didn't play in the first tourney would be free agents.

ETA - way to go Gas on getting your team started off without instruction!

Let's let this tourney run the way it's setup, though. Full freedom to choose teams, even if that's to choose to base around the above list.
Wow, I thought 6-6 was terrible, but it wasn't that bad. I joined the team with Gaspumper and Tick. Gives us a high-middle-low player, should be fair.

 
Holy crap, I feel like I just beat bostonfred (not cause this guy was that good, as it turns out, but the arrogance).

http://www.warlight.net/App.aspx?GameID=1041168

Turn 18, he asked me if I was ready to surrender. A few more bad turns, and I would have considered it. But, I'm a spiteful ###.

ETA - I don't know if chat is available on histories, but it's worth reading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holy crap, I feel like I just beat bostonfred (not cause this guy was that good, as it turns out, but the arrogance).

http://www.warlight.net/App.aspx?GameID=1041168

Turn 18, he asked me if I was ready to surrender. A few more bad turns, and I would have considered it. But, I'm a spiteful ###.

ETA - I don't know if chat is available on histories, but it's worth reading.
Your income was pretty much always even or better than his - the fact that you kept expanding into Turkey while he moved into your center was huge. If he had sent one big army through the Baltics to show up on your other side, I'm guessing you would have resigned.
 
Holy crap, I feel like I just beat bostonfred (not cause this guy was that good, as it turns out, but the arrogance).

http://www.warlight.net/App.aspx?GameID=1041168

Turn 18, he asked me if I was ready to surrender. A few more bad turns, and I would have considered it. But, I'm a spiteful ###.

ETA - I don't know if chat is available on histories, but it's worth reading.
Your income was pretty much always even or better than his - the fact that you kept expanding into Turkey while he moved into your center was huge. If he had sent one big army through the Baltics to show up on your other side, I'm guessing you would have resigned.
Yeah, for some reason I thought he was earning 40+ when we met, but we were actually pretty even. I was stunned, because I thought I was behind and I had the perfect setup (had a little bit of bad luck taking some regions, but still pretty good overall). He just sent everything he had at me, didn't even bother to continue expanding. Had he been able to break one or two more regions, I would have resigned and I can't believe he backed off that rogue army inside my lines. Then when 'he' abandoned everything in the center, he had no chance.I didn't watch the history before posting the link, so I had thought he was stronger than me all along, until I raced up to Russia - then, when I kept not discovering him, I knew I had an edge - didn't realize how big it was until he immediately surrendered.

 
Holy crap, I feel like I just beat bostonfred (not cause this guy was that good, as it turns out, but the arrogance).

http://www.warlight.net/App.aspx?GameID=1041168

Turn 18, he asked me if I was ready to surrender. A few more bad turns, and I would have considered it. But, I'm a spiteful ###.

ETA - I don't know if chat is available on histories, but it's worth reading.
Your income was pretty much always even or better than his - the fact that you kept expanding into Turkey while he moved into your center was huge. If he had sent one big army through the Baltics to show up on your other side, I'm guessing you would have resigned.
I suppose I should apologize to BF. He has skill to back up his arrogance shtick. This guy was average, at best.
 
Any FBG's that want to play, my name over there is steelerbill. I am ok, beat the single player games and challenge 1. Played ch2 a few times and didn't get it done.Would like to play with guys from here, due to all the talk of multi-player games over there being rigged.later.
Send a PM to Dragons with your email address and I think he can get you into the team tournament he set up.
 
I really don't think it's arrogant for the best player on the board to announce to everyone that he thinks he's the best, then have a tournament to prove it, win the tournament, and beat both of the guys tied for second and third place while beating everyone else by at least three games. Note that I'm not necessarily talking about myself here - it could be anyone, really.

 
I really don't think it's arrogant for the best player on the board to announce to everyone that he thinks he's the best, then have a tournament to prove it, win the tournament, and beat both of the guys tied for second and third place while beating everyone else by at least three games. Note that I'm not necessarily talking about myself here - it could be anyone, really.
I'm pretty sure that's the epitome of arrogance. :lmao:
 
1 more and we can combine teams and start.

4 more and we've filled out the 18 seats. If anyone reading this thread does not have an invite to the Tourney, pm me your email address.

Also, is warlight alias jamkin an FBG?

 
Aerial, if you can decline tournament, then re-join on team E.

Next person to join, join team F and we'll start with 5 teams.

 
I can't seem to beat the Europe challenge levels. Have tried advancing through France and such, and also up through Scandanavia, but I get crushed hafway through. When should I use my 120 men reinforcements?

 
I can't seem to beat the Europe challenge levels. Have tried advancing through France and such, and also up through Scandanavia, but I get crushed hafway through. When should I use my 120 men reinforcements?
You should send them to Russia as soon as you get them. The AI is pretty predictable, you will run into a huge army in Southern France or Spain most games. Just concentrate your forces and hope he attacks you, meanwhile advance on other fronts and let the Soviets drain his forces.Also, in the beginning, consider sending one of your 50 army stacks or at least a couple of turns of reinforcements to the Soviets in Scandinavia, it will help them a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've played the Europe scenario twice. The first time, I sent nothing to Russia, but did attack his Norway so I could head off the Germans in Scandinavia while I did the march from France to Spain, Italy, Austria, Germany, Balkans, Bulgaria, etc. That took 25 turns... Russia headed me off a few times near the end.

The second time, I did the same thing, but I sent the third set of reinforcements to the Baltic states area since he was about to collapse. I did the same march through the map, but sent fewer forces to Spain. That took 20 turns. To me, this seems like the easiest setup since the first mission... maybe it just matches my style or something.

 
I can't seem to beat the Europe challenge levels. Have tried advancing through France and such, and also up through Scandanavia, but I get crushed hafway through. When should I use my 120 men reinforcements?
I've found a key to be to conservatively play cat and mouse with the enemy while holding on to Great Britain. Use the aircards wisely because depending on game flow, you might need to lift troops more than 3 times. Also, maintain a couple of very strong armies (e.g., 80+) so you can airlift your OWN troops from England (e.g.,) to your ally. This is the reason to be conservative early on, because you need to maintain strength to lend to your ally. If you too quickly engage the enemy fullscale then he'll pull out the stops and crush you.Finally, early on I sent many of my own troops (i.e.,the ones you get each turn) to the very top of Great Britain and then transfer them on the ground to my ally, and then he shifts them through his territories as he sees fit.Pretty easy once you have the strategy.The "crazy" challenge level, however, just seems goofy hard. I've come close to great power just once (out of probably 50 times). The problem is that that allies can donate troops against you, so you are at a HUGE disadvantage. And forget about it if early on one of the coalitions gets the strong upper hand on the other.On the upside, the "crazy" challenge typically crushes (me) so very quickly that I don't have a ton of time into each game before it is absolutely clear I have no prayer. It would be a lot more addictive if it allowed me to get much closer to attaining victory before dashing my hopes and dreams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "crazy" challenge level, however, just seems goofy hard. I've come close to great power just once (out of probably 50 times). The problem is that that allies can donate troops against you, so you are at a HUGE disadvantage. And forget about it if early on one of the coalitions gets the strong upper hand on the other.On the upside, the "crazy" challenge typically crushes (me) so very quickly that I don't have a ton of time into each game before it is absolutely clear I have no prayer. It would be a lot more addictive if it allowed me to get much closer to attaining victory before dashing my hopes and dreams.
I got addicted to the crazy challenge and eventually managed to beat it twice. Lots of luck involved, to win you pretty much have to avoid the computer for 5-6 turns to build up your power. And you have to gamble that this is going to happen and keep expanding rapidly. Any sort of drawn-out border skirmish is going to end your chances.I'd be impressed if anyone could beat it more than 10% of the time.
 
The "crazy" challenge level, however, just seems goofy hard. I've come close to great power just once (out of probably 50 times). The problem is that that allies can donate troops against you, so you are at a HUGE disadvantage. And forget about it if early on one of the coalitions gets the strong upper hand on the other.On the upside, the "crazy" challenge typically crushes (me) so very quickly that I don't have a ton of time into each game before it is absolutely clear I have no prayer. It would be a lot more addictive if it allowed me to get much closer to attaining victory before dashing my hopes and dreams.
I got addicted to the crazy challenge and eventually managed to beat it twice. Lots of luck involved, to win you pretty much have to avoid the computer for 5-6 turns to build up your power. And you have to gamble that this is going to happen and keep expanding rapidly. Any sort of drawn-out border skirmish is going to end your chances.I'd be impressed if anyone could beat it more than 10% of the time.
I tied the record on it (20 turns) and I don't think I could beat it more than 10% of the time. Good thing about it is, you can often just immediately restart. Your initial position isn't in Africa or Asia? Start over. Your initial position is next to two AIs? Start over. See 2 or more AIs on turn 2? Start over. Probably the heaviest luck element of all the challenges, including Challenge2/Insane.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top