Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Not for nothing, but what does that look really get you? I realize that it didn't happen this way, but if DAL didn't spike the ball, ran their regular offense with a minute to go, and scored a game winning TD as time expires, Rodgers "look" would have been on the sidelines and the Packers would be home watching this week. This is not a knock on Rodgers, as that was an incredible play, but better coaching and Rodgers never would have had a chance to make that throw.
And if Rodgers had thrown the one ball 2 feet further to the outside Davante catches it rather than an INT and likely even scores there.
My point was not to nit pick very play in the game. Rodgers could have had the look and was close to potentially losing as a spectator on the sideline.
Not to bad, looks like 11 hours on Waze so it will probably take us 10 or less from Houston.
I pointed to one play that has nothing to do with Rodgers that could have led to him not having a chance to be a super hero.But that's exactly what you did!!
I disagree. I think a 34 to 24 final score is about right this game, for whoever wins. Everyone's expecting this big shoot out and I'm not so sure it's going to end up as close or as high scoring as people think. O/U is 60 last I saw. I would probably take the under. There's obviously a very good argument to say it'll be a track meet; both teams averaging well over 30 points per game lately.
Certainly anything is possible, but in 9 games this season at home, the Falcons averaged 35 ppg. GB in the regular season was the 31st ranked pass defense and allowed more passing yards than the Packers generated. In the playoffs, they have been 60 passing yards per game WORSE than in the regular season.I wouldn't say I would be shocked if Atlanta was held to 24 points, but I would be really surprised if there were. On paper, this has the makings of a 41-38 game and whoever scores last wins.
Yeah...wouldn't have much confidence with still dinged up Cobb, Janis. Allison, and Davis.
Just absolutely no breaks this year. Some years are like that. Seems impossible the Packers can be competitive, but they were massively banged up in the earlier game against them and went toe to toe, so who knows.
From what I am hearing, which is not much outside of what everyone knows right now, maybe an extra tid bit that you didn't know, probably not:
That's because Anarchy99 is posting in there. Chances are you hit 30 pages before kickoff. He's as bad as I am with the statistics
Clearly a lot more history between the Steelers and the Patriots. Can anyone remember the last big Falcons / Packers game?
It was in jest. I even changed it to further poke fun at myself and to not come across as a jerk. We can have fun at each other next week in the GB vs NE Super Bowl Thread
The last big Falcons/Packers game was about 10 weeks ago... wasn't a lot at stake but it was quite the game
Nope. Stay in our thread please. Love what you bring to that thread (I have a stats background).
You get a "like" for using Waze, most people I speak to have no clue what it is. I think its the best free GPS going, love the live updates especially when I may or may not be speeding on I95!
But to be honest that would have been funny to hear an announcer say that. I totally understand and agree with what you are saying, but Rodgers has the numbers to back up the way people are talking about his play, although Ryan does as well.
I can't say that the history of the NFL has many pages devoted to the Falcons. There should definitely be more talk about the 77 Falcons defense. They pitched a shutout in one game, allowed single digit points in 5 others, and exactly 10 points in two games. That's 8 games with 10 or fewer points allowed. They allowed only 9.2 ppg on the season, which I believe is the lowest per game total in modern football.
Just like the stories on Monday morning after a long weekend of drinking and partying. They were never skanks, they were always uber attractive super models and pin up girls that were 9.5's and 10's.
oopps! I was going by this website and forgot that it was referencing Atlanta's W, not GB
Yes, well, we Patriots fans are saving up money to buy ourselves a $200 pair (for the top and the bottom) of TB12 pajamas.
"TB12 technology reflects Far Infrared, which helps your body recover faster, promote better sleep, reduce inflammation & regulate cell metabolism"
Nobody can predict the score or winner of any game. Doing so and thinking you know better than anyone else is just arrogant.
The Patriots have a culture of cheating. I don't know why you wouldn't include the Steelers when talking about football and culture.
he says someone will have to score 40+, so I said that I disagreed and I thought the score would be about 10 points difference and winner in the mid 30s.Rhythmdoctor said:
Steelers have a more rich culture than new england. it's certainly more positive as wellmeanjoegreen said:
meanjoegreen said:
Always brothaAnarchy99 said:
Like Greek yogurt?Team Smokin' said:
They held Freeman to 3.2 YPC and only gave up 90 total rushing yards
Now you've called down the thunder.
IF those end up being the ending stats for ATL, I think we can all say that Green Bay safely wins this game by 10+. That's a big 'IF' however...
