What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NFL Officials (1 Viewer)

It has been this way, but it's only getting worse. They find any pointless reason to throw a flag over a completely insignificant penalty, slowing down the flow of the game and making the game nearly unwatchable. Then, they always blow the super easy blatant foul right in front of the officials that alters the game completely. They were probably too busy trying to see if a lineman accidentally tripped 2 feet too far upfield to see the QB getting his head completely torn off right in front of them. And I'm definitely no Vikings fan. However, it certainly ruins the viewing experience.
 
There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.

I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.
 
There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.

I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.

Agreed, they should do away with the concept of any play or call being "unreviewable." If the eye in the sky determines the on-field refs made a mistake, they quickly call down and have them correct it. The face mask last night is such an obvious example.

The pitfall is that some plays will still be judgment calls, e.g. whether or not something was pass interference can be subject to interpretation, and if it's close then let the on-field ref's determination stand. But if the video assistant sees something - anything - that the refs obviously got wrong, just buzz down and fix it.
 
There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.

I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.

Agreed, they should do away with the concept of any play or call being "unreviewable." If the eye in the sky determines the on-field refs made a mistake, they quickly call down and have them correct it. The face mask last night is such an obvious example.

The pitfall is that some plays will still be judgment calls, e.g. whether or not something was pass interference can be subject to interpretation, and if it's close then let the on-field ref's determination stand. But if the video assistant sees something - anything - that the refs obviously got wrong, just buzz down and fix it.
There's an instant replay after dang near every play, so it should be easy for some Eye in the Sky or review official to quickly buzz the head ref between snaps and say "hey man that should have been a facemask" or "he definitely stepped out of bounds" or "he's short, not a first down" or whatever. I'm NOT in favor of them being able to call down and say "you missed a holding call on #92" because that could happen after almost every single play though. Finding some middle ground is something I'd be in favor of.
 
There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.

I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.

Agreed, they should do away with the concept of any play or call being "unreviewable." If the eye in the sky determines the on-field refs made a mistake, they quickly call down and have them correct it. The face mask last night is such an obvious example.

The pitfall is that some plays will still be judgment calls, e.g. whether or not something was pass interference can be subject to interpretation, and if it's close then let the on-field ref's determination stand. But if the video assistant sees something - anything - that the refs obviously got wrong, just buzz down and fix it.
actually one of the biggest pitfalls is...."timing"...and stopping a running clock....
 
Week 9 assignments - Cowboys at Eagles — Tra Blake. I wonder what having Tra Blake ref effects the scoring line for the home team. I would adjust your bets accordingly.
 
There should be common sense review assistant upgrades. This isn't complicated, and wouldn't have any negative impact on the game.
 
There should be common sense review assistant upgrades. This isn't complicated, and wouldn't have any negative impact on the game.

I don't know why people don't like the idea of just one more official, up in the booth, watching the game on TV and calling out the obvious stuff. I don't get the argument against this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top