WiDDoW_MaKeR
Footballguy
How can they possibly be so bad? The ability of them to miss calls at the point of contact is astonishing.
There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.
I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.
A solution
Full time officials
They had a small number of full-time officials a few years back, but the NFL discontinued that.A solution
Full time officials
i thought they already have this?
Nope, the Ref union doesn't want it and the public didn't support the NFLs attempt to make it happen.A solution
Full time officials
i thought they already have this?
Fixed.they are just doing what theWWENFLVEGAS tells them to do,
Fixedthey are just doing what theWWENFLPatty Mahomes tells them to do,
Fixedthey are just doing what theWWENFLPatty Mahomes tells them to do,
Nope, the Ref union doesn't want it and the public didn't support the NFLs attempt to make it happen.A solution
Full time officials
i thought they already have this?
There's an instant replay after dang near every play, so it should be easy for some Eye in the Sky or review official to quickly buzz the head ref between snaps and say "hey man that should have been a facemask" or "he definitely stepped out of bounds" or "he's short, not a first down" or whatever. I'm NOT in favor of them being able to call down and say "you missed a holding call on #92" because that could happen after almost every single play though. Finding some middle ground is something I'd be in favor of.There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.
I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.
Agreed, they should do away with the concept of any play or call being "unreviewable." If the eye in the sky determines the on-field refs made a mistake, they quickly call down and have them correct it. The face mask last night is such an obvious example.
The pitfall is that some plays will still be judgment calls, e.g. whether or not something was pass interference can be subject to interpretation, and if it's close then let the on-field ref's determination stand. But if the video assistant sees something - anything - that the refs obviously got wrong, just buzz down and fix it.
actually one of the biggest pitfalls is...."timing"...and stopping a running clock....There needs to be some non-negotiable, instant video assistant decision making taken out the hands of the on field guys I think.
I'm sure there are some potential pitfalls with it, but if you take the subjective calls out of the equation, stuff like that facemask on Darnold last night, that shouldn't and doesn't need to be happening unpenalized. It will have taken fewer than 10 seconds for a video assistant official to see what had happened and sent the call down for the on field guys to enforce. It is an objective error that doesn't need to exist.
Agreed, they should do away with the concept of any play or call being "unreviewable." If the eye in the sky determines the on-field refs made a mistake, they quickly call down and have them correct it. The face mask last night is such an obvious example.
The pitfall is that some plays will still be judgment calls, e.g. whether or not something was pass interference can be subject to interpretation, and if it's close then let the on-field ref's determination stand. But if the video assistant sees something - anything - that the refs obviously got wrong, just buzz down and fix it.
The reason?They had a small number of full-time officials a few years back, but the NFL discontinued that.A solution
Full time officials
i thought they already have this?
your weakass crybaby dedication to the cause is admirable......Mahomes must win at any cost.
Nope, the Ref union doesn't want it and the public didn't support the NFLs attempt to make it happen.A solution
Full time officials
i thought they already have this?
your weakass crybaby dedication to the cause is admirable......Mahomes must win at any cost.
There should be common sense review assistant upgrades. This isn't complicated, and wouldn't have any negative impact on the game.