What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nick Foles Landing Spot/Contract Size (Jags, reportedly 4/88 50 guaranteed) (3 Viewers)

I think it's fair to say the Eagles enabled him to resurrect his career. 
I don't know - if Wentz did not get hurt where would he be? And he did just as much, if not more, for the Eagles as they did for him - at the very least it was a mutually beneficial experience.

 
I'd like to say, contrary to my last statement, that I believe any entity that trades for him is going to act with some good faith and extend him to a Cousins-esque deal. I think that's what will happen. But really, I think Philly lets him walk.  

 
In what situation do you think you could negotiate the highest annual salary?

1. You have a  highly coveted skill set and can go to any company that wants you.

2. You can only go to one company that paid for exclusive negotiating rights with you.

Sure you can argue he's likely to make a boatload either way but to say there's no difference is just not true. 
He wants to go somewhere specific. They'll probably work it out at the meetings later this month. He's not going to the highest bidder. You're treating this like it's Bell. Not even close.

 
He wants to go somewhere specific. They'll probably work it out at the meetings later this month. He's not going to the highest bidder. You're treating this like it's Bell. Not even close.
What if he wants to go play with Saquon and Odell, right up in the NFC East? 

I think this is an argument that should end, and I don't say that tersely. He didn't pay two large to get out of his option because he wants a trade to a specific place.

How do you know these claims you're making are true? 

 
I mean, if this was so amicable, they wouldn't have picked up the option in the first place. Or if they had a trade worked out to a place he wanted to go, he would have stayed with the option and re-negotiated with the franchise when he got there. They want picks, he wants free agency. Actions speak louder than behind-the-scenes hopes. I think you're being a bit of a rose-colored homer on this one. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He wants to go somewhere specific. They'll probably work it out at the meetings later this month. He's not going to the highest bidder. You're treating this like it's Bell. Not even close.
....and you're treating it like Foles will do whatever is best for the Eagles because he owes it to them....

I suspect like most things the truth is somewhere in the middle.

I mean the magnanimous Eagles who Foles owes so much to just took $2MM out of his pocket just because they could.*

* I'm not saying they did the wrong thing they are a business after all - but since they acted like a business and not as a family maybe that should signal this isn't as amicable as you think. 

 
This is so funny. I heard, from PFT and others, that he wired that money five days early and immediately after. That's funny.  

 
* I'm not saying they did the wrong thing they are a business after all - but since they acted like a business and not as a family maybe that should signal this isn't as amicable as you think. 
It's likely being treated as a management and labor issue, and we know how those go in the NFL.  

 
They also paid him the million he didn't quite earn. Who does that? 

Anyway I'm out, we're all just guessing and I don't really care if I'm dead wrong. I kinda wish he stayed so I hope he gets what he wants.

 
We still beat them and their oline needs help. And as good as OBJ is, I don't think that's a welcoming body.
Yeah, I know. Just playing. My brother is a Giants fan. 

They need to address the line, traded away some good defensive players, etc. 

Just teasing you. Peace. 

 
I'd like to say, contrary to my last statement, that I believe any entity that trades for him is going to act with some good faith and extend him to a Cousins-esque deal. I think that's what will happen. But really, I think Philly lets him walk.  
I would be absolutely shocked if he gets an offer like Cousins got.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would be absolutely shocked if he gets an offered like Cousins got.
Oh, you're from the Philly thread so I can ask you, maybe. What do you think his value on the open market is? And I was more thinking Cousins's years at about 5-10 million less, but I should have clarified that.  

 
But Cousins doesn't ever make more than 29.5 million in a year. Foles's franchise tag alone makes him worth 25. Surely somebody signs him to a near-record given the franchise tag. 

eta* Cousins's money is fully guaranteed, no small thing.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, you're from the Philly thread so I can ask you, maybe. What do you think his value on the open market is? And I was more thinking Cousins's years at about 5-10 million less, but I should have clarified that.  
Keenum got 2 years 36 million. Or 18mil/per.  I see Foles around 3 years 60 million.  20mil/per.  

 
Okay. Thanks.  
Just to clarify, this is my personal opinion/guess. It doesn't represent Philly fans in general. Some think he'll get much more that. Others even think that Philly should keep him and deal Wentz. It's definitely a hot-button topic in Philly. I think he'll get 20 million per year, but hopes he gets 25 and 4 years. He may have passed Rocky Balboa as a Philly sports hero.

 
Slider said:
They also paid him the million he didn't quite earn. Who does that? 

Anyway I'm out, we're all just guessing and I don't really care if I'm dead wrong. I kinda wish he stayed so I hope he gets what he wants.
Anyone that understands PR. It would've been an awful look to not give him that money after what he did for them, again. 

They also got to recoup $2mm when they picked up an option they knew he was going to buy out of. 

 
I really hope he goes to a competitor. But not in direct competition with the birds. I think he’d be a nice fit with the Giants but that goes against both my prerequisites. 

 
This is a very real situation, that the Eagles cannot ignore.

October 17, 2015: Wentz broke a bone in his throwing wrist that required surgery. He missed eight weeks, returned to practice in December and was cleared to play in the national championship game for North Dakota State.

August 11, 2016: Wentz suffered a hairline fracture in his ribs against Tampa Bay. He missed the entire preseason, but played all 16 regular season games.

December 10, 2017: Wentz suffered a Grade 3 tear of the ACL and LCL and missed the remainder of the 2017 regular season and postseason. He also missed the first two games of the 2018 season.

December 12, 2018: Wentz has back spasms that may force him to miss the rest of the 2018 season

That would scare me.

 
This is a very real situation, that the Eagles cannot ignore.

October 17, 2015: Wentz broke a bone in his throwing wrist that required surgery. He missed eight weeks, returned to practice in December and was cleared to play in the national championship game for North Dakota State.

August 11, 2016: Wentz suffered a hairline fracture in his ribs against Tampa Bay. He missed the entire preseason, but played all 16 regular season games.

December 10, 2017: Wentz suffered a Grade 3 tear of the ACL and LCL and missed the remainder of the 2017 regular season and postseason. He also missed the first two games of the 2018 season.

December 12, 2018: Wentz has back spasms that may force him to miss the rest of the 2018 season

That would scare me.
But it's already decided they're not keeping Foles.  So what does this have to do with anything?

 
Dr. Octopus said:
I mean the magnanimous Eagles who Foles owes so much to just took $2MM out of his pocket just because they could.*


They also got to recoup $2mm when they picked up an option they knew he was going to buy out of. 
There's talk that they only get their compensatory pick if they picked up the option.  Not sure the rules on this but if so, it wasn't exactly doing Nick any wrong by doing so.  I still think this ends up in a friendly win-win situation.

 
But it's already decided they're not keeping Foles.  So what does this have to do with anything?
Since you asked...

When Wentz goes down "again" I want to everybody to know I thought they made a huge mistake in playing it like they did. 

Yep...

See I told ya so.

 
There's talk that they only get their compensatory pick if they picked up the option. 
Not sure, but that wouldn't make sense since teams get compensatory picks based on the free agents they lose (versus ones they sign) and that happens where no options exists.

Like I said, the Eagles did nothing wrong by doing so though.

 
Since you asked...

When Wentz goes down "again" I want to everybody to know I thought they made a huge mistake in playing it like they did. 

Yep...

See I told ya so.
Ya, your "I told you so" obsession has been called out before and is getting tired.  But glad you're cheering for the guy to get hurt so you can win a 'who was right more' point on message board.

Has nothing to do with Nick's contract though, he's gone.

 
Not sure, but that wouldn't make sense since teams get compensatory picks based on the free agents they lose (versus ones they sign) and that happens where no options exists.

Like I said, the Eagles did nothing wrong by doing so though.
Ya there's talk of that though.  Maybe someone can find out the answer on that.  Maybe since we had the option to pick him up, it's not really "losing him to free agency"?  Not sure on the verbiage of the rule.

 
Ya there's talk of that though.  Maybe someone can find out the answer on that.  Maybe since we had the option to pick him up, it's not really "losing him to free agency"?  Not sure on the verbiage of the rule.
That could be the case. The bolded makes sense.

 
Since you asked...

When Wentz goes down "again" I want to everybody to know I thought they made a huge mistake in playing it like they did. 

Yep...

See I told ya so.
Well, you are one of the biggest trolls on the site, so no one has any doubt that you'll both be rooting for an injury, and ready to post your I told you so's if it happens.   Just make sure you do the same if other oft-injured guys like Aaron Rodgers, Ben Roethlisberger, and Deshon Watson get hurt. Their teams are also choosing to keep the elite talent and take their chances.

 
Since you asked...

When Wentz goes down "again" I want to everybody to know I thought they made a huge mistake in playing it like they did. 

Yep...

See I told ya so.
They have another backup whom they seem to love. Certainly not a SB MVP, but a QB they believe can be very good.  If they aren't comfortable with Sudfeld, I'm sure they'll look at FA's. 

 
There's talk that they only get their compensatory pick if they picked up the option.  Not sure the rules on this but if so, it wasn't exactly doing Nick any wrong by doing so.  I still think this ends up in a friendly win-win situation
What would be a win/win? 

A win for Foles is being able to negotiate on the open market, a win for the Eagles is getting something in return. How do both of those things happen?

 
What would be a win/win? 

A win for Foles is being able to negotiate on the open market, a win for the Eagles is getting something in return. How do both of those things happen?
I believe there is a very select number of teams that Foles wants to go.  Lets say he wants the Jags... win/win would be Eagles tagging him and trading him to the Jags.

 
I believe there is a very select number of teams that Foles wants to go.  Lets say he wants the Jags... win/win would be Eagles tagging him and trading him to the Jags.
If he’s going to lead a team, how does that team losing a pick benefit him? 

Furthermore, you can’t say someone is better off negotiating in a tag/trade scenario than as a free agent.

If he walks with his freedom, that’s a win for Foles, if he is tagged and traded, that’ll be a win for Philly.

 
What would be a win/win? 

A win for Foles is being able to negotiate on the open market, a win for the Eagles is getting something in return. How do both of those things happen?
Agreed, I just don't see while Foles would want to play along with this and cause his new team to lose a draft pick. 

 
Man this thread got WAY off topic.  We don't really need a Wentz/Foles debate for 57 pages....

On Foles landing spot - I think Jags most likely. Miami the #2.

Giants most likely going to draft a young guy to sit behind Eli for a year ala Mahomes.  Oakland - I don't see the point of moving on from Carr for Foles, unless they're just completely out on him.  It's not like Foles would be cheaper.

Any contract is going to have an easy out after a year just in case he reverts to Rams Foles. Probably in the 20-23 mil a year range.

 
This is a very real situation, that the Eagles cannot ignore.

October 17, 2015: Wentz broke a bone in his throwing wrist that required surgery. He missed eight weeks, returned to practice in December and was cleared to play in the national championship game for North Dakota State.

August 11, 2016: Wentz suffered a hairline fracture in his ribs against Tampa Bay. He missed the entire preseason, but played all 16 regular season games.

December 10, 2017: Wentz suffered a Grade 3 tear of the ACL and LCL and missed the remainder of the 2017 regular season and postseason. He also missed the first two games of the 2018 season.

December 12, 2018: Wentz has back spasms that may force him to miss the rest of the 2018 season

That would scare me.
It's not like Nick is the picture of health. He's had as many season ending injuries as Wentz. Plus Wentz has started almost as many games as Nick in his career (40 for Wentz vs 44 for Nick out of 54 game appearances).  Difference being Carson has only played 3 seasons while Nick has played 7.

Football players get injured. QBs get injured.  You can't say one QB is injury prone while the other is not because all it takes is one hit and they're out.

 
Man this thread got WAY off topic.  We don't really need a Wentz/Foles debate for 57 pages....

On Foles landing spot - I think Jags most likely. Miami the #2.

Giants most likely going to draft a young guy to sit behind Eli for a year ala Mahomes.  Oakland - I don't see the point of moving on from Carr for Foles, unless they're just completely out on him.  It's not like Foles would be cheaper.

Any contract is going to have an easy out after a year just in case he reverts to Rams Foles. Probably in the 20-23 mil a year range.
From everything I have read Miami is quite content to tank this year in order to try and land Tua in 2020 draft so I'm not sure they go after Foles.

The more I think about it, it may be a limited market for Foles as I also agree with you on the NYG (although imo they should go after Foles) and Oakland.

Which other teams need a QB:

Jacksonville - they will go hard after Foles

Denver - they have too much money tied up in Keenum for this season but otherwise they likely would have been all in on Foles.  

Washington - I don't think they can afford him with what they are paying Smith to not play this season - I think they will tank this year as well

Cincinnati - They likely stick with Dalton and draft a young guy

Maybe Foles won't be getting big money as JAX may just be bidding against themselves.

 
Maybe Foles won't be getting big money as JAX may just be bidding against themselves.
This is the same argument I made pages back. In addition to that you also don’t know where they stand on guys like Flacco or Bridgewater and they’re high enough in the draft to go get a rookie QB. 

 
This is the same argument I made pages back. In addition to that you also don’t know where they stand on guys like Flacco or Bridgewater and they’re high enough in the draft to go get a rookie QB. 
I was one that thought he'd end up closer to Cousins than Keenum on the salary scale (and he still may) but after looking at the landscape I may be wrong.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been in the 4/80 camp from the start with about half guaranteed. Think he'll get that. 

I also think the NYG would be doing a disservice to their fans to not go after him. 

 
Flacco to Denver today makes your point more likely. 
Yep:
 

NFL Network's Mike Garafolo reports Nick Foles and the Jaguars have "mutual interest."

Surprisingly few teams enter this offseason with a real need at quarterback, and one of those, the Broncos, seemingly made their move by trading for Joe Flacco on Wednesday. That leaves the Jaguars as the best and most likely landing spot for the former Super Bowl MVP. Jacksonville does not have any cap space right now, but they can create room with a few expected cuts.

 
Foles to the Giants makes too much sense, so it'll never happen. 

Who would you rather have as your weapons? Barkley, Beckham, and Shepard, and Engram or Fournette, Westbrook, Cole, and whoever they're trotting out at tight end. 

Right. It almost answers itself.  

 
Foles to the Giants makes too much sense, so it'll never happen. 

Who would you rather have as your weapons? Barkley, Beckham, and Shepard, and Engram or Fournette, Westbrook, Cole, and whoever they're trotting out at tight end. 

Right. It almost answers itself.  
Sure, except they won't admit that Eli is no longer a franchise QB

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top