It baffles me how many people are against celebrations. Look, acting like an imbecile after making a first down catch when your team is down 21 points is assinine, no question about that. But, if you do that sort of thing you can bet your own teammates are going to police that in a hurry. So what we're really talking about here are whether spontaneity can be quantified.
There's no question that pulling out a cellphone or a sharpie is a premeditated situation and one that probably falls under the current taunting guidelines. But doing some dancing? Playing to the crowd?
I don't understand how fans of this sport, a sport so much born out of emotion and intensity, can really be upset when guys celebrate and showboat? They go hand in hand.
Have you actually looked at the proposal? From NFL.com:
"Players can still spike the ball in the end zone, spin it on the ground, and dunk it over the goal post if they like (and are able to). They also can dance and even leap into the stands."
"The players' association was unanimous in wanting to get this under control," said Tennessee Titans coach Jeff Fisher, who is co-chairman of the competition committee along with Atlanta Falcons general manager Rich McKay.
I don't see a problem here.
Me either.As to this sport being born out of emotion and intensity, those are two things that don't play into these ridiculous displays.
If the choices are no celebration, or over the top antics, I choose the second.
But there are other options, like allowing a player to express emotion, without breaking into Riverdance.
AS to the other point, about turning players off, I am quite sure more fans are turned off by those celebrations, than are entertained by them.