Staley will serve his purpose as the #3 RB. Hopefully he will only need to be used during bye weeks. I just think with Staley not being a "sexy" pick he had a good chance of falling to the next round. You kinda know what you're getting with staley. I would've gambled more on that pick. Hopefully it works out well for Purple.I don't like this pick either. I would have definitley gone RB here though.3.07 RB Staley, Pit
Yep, another RB. If Coles and Gonzo didn't already have health issues, I would have gone a different way here. This draft is taking place too early in the year for me to take on that kind of risk, so I needed to go in another direction. There were a few RB on the board that I felt were pretty much equal, including TJones.
Good picks!! Their went my boys.3.12 (Studs and Duds) Jones, Julius DAL RB4.01 (Studs and Duds) Jones, Kevin DET RBgutsiest move so far?
Looks like you could be right, as my guys just went off the board at 3.12/4.01. I really wanted to snag 3 safe/steady options before I "swing for the fences". It's still really early in the year for me to feel good about assuming that much risk with my 3rd rounder. But, either/both of the Jones boys could end up as solid second-rounders if their situations play out favorable in camp/exhibition action.I'm not too concerned about Bettis being much more then a goalline/short-yardage option at this time. I think it's clear that Staley is a much better back then Zereoue, and Amos was handed the starters' job on more then one occasion. Bettis had the role he did because of lack of viable options. That situation has changed, and I see Staley (along with Ward) being the primary focus of the Pitt offense.We probably are thinking of the same RB's but I would think Duce had a better chance of slipping into the next round before the other guys.Better to swing for the fences on your #3 RB than someone like Staley who I doubt will score that many TD's with Bettis around. JMHO tho.
I don't see this as a reach at all. I'm a strong believer in grabbing a surefire #1 WR in this format and Johnson was the best bet. You could go RB #2 by committee in rounds 3/4 and do just fine...This is actually the pattern I slip into almost every time in this format.Solid PickWell Chad Johnson might of been a bit of a reach but one of my great weakness last year was lack of a clear no 1 reciever. Maybe I am letting past experience colour my actions to much but we will see I guess.I debated between him and Owens. I think CJ's best seasons are ahead of him while I think Owens already had his.CheersInsurrectionSome of the WRs are going a bit earlier than I would have expected. Chad Johnson in the second -- not a bad pick, but earlier than I've seen in other drafts. Same with Derrick Mason in the third.Curtis Martin was someone I was targeting at 3.08. Hated to see him go at 3.05. There's one more RB I like. I'll either take him or someone else. (Does that give away too much?)
I'm not sure Staley will be the same back in Pittsburgh that he was in Philly, Philly's offense caters much more to staley's style IMO. Bottom line is that I'm not sold on Staley this year.Looks like you could be right, as my guys just went off the board at 3.12/4.01. I really wanted to snag 3 safe/steady options before I "swing for the fences". It's still really early in the year for me to feel good about assuming that much risk with my 3rd rounder. But, either/both of the Jones boys could end up as solid second-rounders if their situations play out favorable in camp/exhibition action.I'm not too concerned about Bettis being much more then a goalline/short-yardage option at this time. I think it's clear that Staley is a much better back then Zereoue, and Amos was handed the starters' job on more then one occasion. Bettis had the role he did because of lack of viable options. That situation has changed, and I see Staley (along with Ward) being the primary focus of the Pitt offense.We probably are thinking of the same RB's but I would think Duce had a better chance of slipping into the next round before the other guys.Better to swing for the fences on your #3 RB than someone like Staley who I doubt will score that many TD's with Bettis around. JMHO tho.
Teams seem to be way too loyal to guys like Eddie and Bettis. Throw in a RB that I've never been crazy about to begin with (staley) and it reeks of a RBBC to me. Hopefully you wont have to rely on staley on a regular basis. I do hope the pick works out for you. I would've gambled on the unknown of Julius or Kevin thinking they will get 20 carries a game and the goal line stuff.Looks like you could be right, as my guys just went off the board at 3.12/4.01. I really wanted to snag 3 safe/steady options before I "swing for the fences". It's still really early in the year for me to feel good about assuming that much risk with my 3rd rounder. But, either/both of the Jones boys could end up as solid second-rounders if their situations play out favorable in camp/exhibition action.I'm not too concerned about Bettis being much more then a goalline/short-yardage option at this time. I think it's clear that Staley is a much better back then Zereoue, and Amos was handed the starters' job on more then one occasion. Bettis had the role he did because of lack of viable options. That situation has changed, and I see Staley (along with Ward) being the primary focus of the Pitt offense.We probably are thinking of the same RB's but I would think Duce had a better chance of slipping into the next round before the other guys.Better to swing for the fences on your #3 RB than someone like Staley who I doubt will score that many TD's with Bettis around. JMHO tho.
Hey, I could easily be wrong here. It's has been known to happen on occasion.I'm not sure Staley will be the same back in Pittsburgh that he was in Philly, Philly's offense caters much more to staley's style IMO. Bottom line is that I'm not sold on Staley this year.
This could easily be a pick I end up regretting - and later in the summer I might go a different way - but I think I did the best I could with the info available at the time."It was obvious the Steelers really wanted Duce," said agent Derrick Harrison. "And it was pretty obvious, too, that Duce admires Jerome and wants to play with him. He thinks they'll make for a great twosome."Make no mistake about it, though -- the Steelers recruited Staley to be the starter. Not in three decades has the Pittsburgh ground attack been as pitiful as in 2003 and Staley will be counted upon to provide instant improvement. The Steelers traditionally have been a power running team and Staley's slashing style should make for a good fit.
The only problem with that pick is I would've loved to have gotten julius or kevin as my #3 RB with the hopes that they could challenge for the #2 RB spot eventually. I dont think with staley thats a reasonable expectation.Pitt needed someone to do the job better than Amos which I think he will do. I just dont see staley getting 20 carries a game like the Jones's.Hey, I could easily be wrong here. It's has been known to happen on occasion.I'm not sure Staley will be the same back in Pittsburgh that he was in Philly, Philly's offense caters much more to staley's style IMO. Bottom line is that I'm not sold on Staley this year.However, I just don't see why they would go out of their way to sign a RB that isn't a good mesh with their personnel/schemes. There were other options out there at that time, but they definately targeted Duce. I see Pitt modifying their philosophy somewhat to take advantage of what Staley brings to the table, especially if Roethlisberger gets significant time at QB. Staley could be huge as a safety valve, catching a lot of balls in the flat as a dump-off option.link
This could easily be a pick I end up regretting - and later in the summer I might go a different way - but I think I did the best I could with the info available at the time."It was obvious the Steelers really wanted Duce," said agent Derrick Harrison. "And it was pretty obvious, too, that Duce admires Jerome and wants to play with him. He thinks they'll make for a great twosome."Make no mistake about it, though -- the Steelers recruited Staley to be the starter. Not in three decades has the Pittsburgh ground attack been as pitiful as in 2003 and Staley will be counted upon to provide instant improvement. The Steelers traditionally have been a power running team and Staley's slashing style should make for a good fit.
That was a combination of differing strategy, as well as tactical failure on my behalf. As I mentioned above, I'd like to have 3 'safe' RB options before I go high-risk. My RB2 has a pretty significant downside, and coupling that with another risky/unproven back would have left me feeling too exposed, and feeling like I needed another RB in the next couple rounds to cover myself.The only problem with that pick is I would've loved to have gotten julius or kevin as my #3 RB with the hopes that they could challenge for the #2 RB spot eventually. I dont think with staley thats a reasonable expectation.
Pitt needed someone to do the job better than Amos which I think he will do. I just dont see staley getting 20 carries a game like the Jones's.
I guess Alot depends on how you feel about Henry. I think the guy is a proven workhorse that will play with a broken leg. I think he comes into this year with a huge chip on his shoulder and in GREAT shape. I dont see him handing that job to mcgahee, And I dont think willis is ready to take it. Not this year anyway. I like the Henry pick alot and would've considered Henry at 1.12 instead of DD to be honest.That was a combination of differing strategy, as well as tactical failure on my behalf. As I mentioned above, I'd like to have 3 'safe' RB options before I go high-risk. My RB2 has a pretty significant downside, and coupling that with another risky/unproven back would have left me feeling too exposed, and feeling like I needed another RB in the next couple rounds to cover myself.The only problem with that pick is I would've loved to have gotten julius or kevin as my #3 RB with the hopes that they could challenge for the #2 RB spot eventually. I dont think with staley thats a reasonable expectation.
Pitt needed someone to do the job better than Amos which I think he will do. I just dont see staley getting 20 carries a game like the Jones's.
Maybe I just need to learn how to play a little more free-and-loose and stop being so conservative up top.
In addition, I somehow thought there was a chance that one of the Jones boys might be there in the 4th. Not a great chance, but I figured better then the chance of Staley falling.
Believe me, it was a close call between the four (Staley and T/J/K Jones) and I went with the ol' gut, so I can't really justify taking who I did with anything more then that. I do agree that a consistent load of 20 carries a game is probably not realistic, but I can easily see 15 a game, plus 3-4 receptions. If it plays out that way, I'll be happy with Duce as my RB3.
Great discussion, everyone - I look forward to continuing on this level in subsequent rounds, when there really will be divergent opinions on many picks.
I agree for the first 3/4 of the season or so. But, IF (big if) McGahee looks good in limited action in the beginning and middle of the year - I can see Buff sharply increasing his workload the rest of the way. If conventional wisdom holds, and Buff wants to move Henry in the off-season, they will need to be sure Willis can handle the load, and the only way to do that is to feature him (at least to an extent) down the stretch. If the Bills can remain in the playoff hunt, I think all this goes out the window and they run Henry till he drops, but there is no assurance that the team will be that competitive this year.I guess Alot depends on how you feel about Henry. I think the guy is a proven workhorse that will play with a broken leg. I think he comes into this year with a huge chip on his shoulder and in GREAT shape. I dont see him handing that job to mcgahee, And I dont think willis is ready to take it. Not this year anyway. I like the Henry pick alot and would've considered Henry at 1.12 instead of DD to be honest.
I was as well. I am staying away from the Denver RB's this year. I got burnt way too many times in prior years.CheersThe Q Griffin pick is the biggest surprise so far to me.
Mark, just curious... How did you finish in the league last year after making those your first 2 picks?Not necessarily. I drafted at 1.12 last year and took Harrison and Owens. 11 backs were gone. You don't get value with the 12th rated back at 1.12.
It happens!! Their isn't a draft I've ever done where I didnt want a "do over" pick somewhere. :(In retrospect I should have taken Julius at 3.11 and picked up Horn at 4.2 where he surely would have been waiting for me. So I guess now we wait and see if Jones outperforms Griffin or if my stupidity, I mean drunkenness, pays off in the end.Oh well, I was happy for my first 2 picks, it can’t last forever, pass the beer.
I like the Horn pick but would have gone Garner or Dunn over Griffin.4.2 – GriffinI took an enormous reach here. Dear God, what have I done? I gambled on ‘the Denver Bronco’s starting RB’ and will now drink heavily and pore over every written word coming out of Denver’s training camp for the next 2 months while cursing Shanahan and his lying, deceiving mouth...After taking Horn I felt I needed a RB and with the Jones boys both going ahead of me (damn, 2 RBs?) I looked at my board and there was Quentin. I briefly considered a QB or another WR here because I was not sold on Griffin but the prospect of waiting 20 picks for a RB was too frightening to bear so I limbered up, got on my tip toes, stretched my fingers and reached. In retrospect I should have taken Julius at 3.11 and picked up Horn at 4.2 where he surely would have been waiting for me. So I guess now we wait and see if Jones outperforms Griffin or if my stupidity, I mean drunkenness, pays off in the end.Oh well, I was happy for my first 2 picks, it can’t last forever, pass the beer.
Yep - I can't access it either.Is the No Mercy board down?I can't get in.
![]()
Both solid picks IMO.Beer Guzzlers4.12 Eric MouldsIf he can stay healthy this year getting him at the end of the 4th round will be a good deal. Best value at the time.5.1 Marc BulgerI was thinking...qb or rb #3...qb or rb#3. After 10 minutes of hemming and hawing I decided to beat the run on the 2nd tier of QBs because there will be slim pickings when 6.12 rolls around.
Yep. Very nice.Both solid picks IMO.Beer Guzzlers4.12 Eric MouldsIf he can stay healthy this year getting him at the end of the 4th round will be a good deal. Best value at the time.5.1 Marc BulgerI was thinking...qb or rb #3...qb or rb#3. After 10 minutes of hemming and hawing I decided to beat the run on the 2nd tier of QBs because there will be slim pickings when 6.12 rolls around.
I agree too. Good value and a real nice starting line-up so far.Yep. Very nice.Both solid picks IMO.Beer Guzzlers4.12 Eric MouldsIf he can stay healthy this year getting him at the end of the 4th round will be a good deal. Best value at the time.5.1 Marc BulgerI was thinking...qb or rb #3...qb or rb#3. After 10 minutes of hemming and hawing I decided to beat the run on the 2nd tier of QBs because there will be slim pickings when 6.12 rolls around.
I had Smith all pre-drafted and everything and you stole him.I think I've had to switch gears every round since the first because my target went 1 or 2 picks ahead of me. It's made for a very interesting draft so far.Florida Beer Guzzlers4.7 Steve Smith Damn it seemed like forever between picks. I had Smith as the top WR (#12) left on my board and I was happy to get a solid ( not stud) #1 wr here. But I was disappointed to see McNabb and Vick go the 2 picks right before this, as the QBs drop way down after the top 4.
I like your picks. Especially Moulds who I was hoping would fall to me at 6.02, despite what I said in my prior post he was top WR on the board at that point.As a consolation prize I have Jimmy Smith. I guess the big questions mark here are his age and the play of his 2nd year QB.Still early but it seems Smith is in top shape, better than the last few years anyway. I think Leftwich will be average but that is perfectly acceptable as far as I am concerned.I am thinking 1100 yds and 6 TD's which makes him a solid #2.CheersBeer Guzzlers4.12 Eric MouldsIf he can stay healthy this year getting him at the end of the 4th round will be a good deal. Best value at the time.5.1 Marc BulgerI was thinking...qb or rb #3...qb or rb#3. After 10 minutes of hemming and hawing I decided to beat the run on the 2nd tier of QBs because there will be slim pickings when 6.12 rolls around.
so Ken, can I give you a ring next FEBRUARY when I'll be drafting my Misfits and Outlaws dynasty leagues---IV and V?we drafted Misfits-III this past Feb/March...when NOTHING was going on here...and got bumped to the Mock Draft Forumthere were somewhere around 6000 views on that thread--not like we weren't getting any trafficI'm all for leaving these threads in the Shark Pool in the off season, so that us FF junkies get our fix with real world dynasty drafts and the likeI'd just like some consistancy here, that's allThis is a tough one. I agree that there can be a lot of good discussion regarding drafts, at the same time, a dozen threads similar to this will show up in the next several weeks with only the rosters and "Who had the best draft?"As Rob said in a PM to me, he wouldn't post a random mock draft from Xpertsleagues, but to those not involved in No Mercy, it is the same thing.Rob,Get the Great White owners into this thread and give commentary on these picks and we can put it back in the Shark Pool.
I decided to beat the run on the 2nd tier of QBs because there will be slim pickings when 6.12 rolls around.
Ken,Get Some!!so Ken, can I give you a ring next FEBRUARY when I'll be drafting my Misfits and Outlaws dynasty leagues---IV and V?we drafted Misfits-III this past Feb/March...when NOTHING was going on here...and got bumped to the Mock Draft Forumthere were somewhere around 6000 views on that thread--not like we weren't getting any trafficI'm all for leaving these threads in the Shark Pool in the off season, so that us FF junkies get our fix with real world dynasty drafts and the likeI'd just like some consistancy here, that's allThis is a tough one. I agree that there can be a lot of good discussion regarding drafts, at the same time, a dozen threads similar to this will show up in the next several weeks with only the rosters and "Who had the best draft?"As Rob said in a PM to me, he wouldn't post a random mock draft from Xpertsleagues, but to those not involved in No Mercy, it is the same thing.Rob,Get the Great White owners into this thread and give commentary on these picks and we can put it back in the Shark Pool.
I have been locked out almost all day, since this thread went up.Yep - I can't access it either.Is the No Mercy board down?I can't get in.
![]()
That's the 2003 link.
The 2004 link is in the first post in this thread.That's the 2003 link.
:rotflmao:You F'er Rob! I wanted Shockey!!! :cX: I don't care what kind of foot problem he has. Give that metro his f'n foot manicure and tell him to #### and play some football. Nice pick bro, what a steal!![]()
Nice team MT1.08 RB Jamal Lewis
2.05 WR Torry Holt
3.08 RB Thomas Jones
4.05 QB Donovan McNabb
5.08 RB Charlie Garner
I wasn't really looking for another running back in round 5, but I couldn't pass on Garner at this point. Too much value.
Looks like I'm punting my week 5 and week 8 games.
Good pick, he definitly lasted too long1.08 RB Jamal Lewis
2.05 WR Torry Holt
3.08 RB Thomas Jones
4.05 QB Donovan McNabb
5.08 RB Charlie Garner
I wasn't really looking for another running back in round 5, but I couldn't pass on Garner at this point. Too much value.
Looks like I'm punting my week 5 and week 8 games.