This could be a real value pick this late - nice.Pick 14.10:Relentless Assault selected Rice, Jerry OAK WRHard to pass him up this late. If Gannon gets hurt he has a decent backup instead of Mirer.
Yea, and just imagine his value if Dillon re-injures that fragile groin of hisI like the Kevin Faulk pick, especially this late. If you're going for a 3rd down back as an emergency back-up, this guy has to top the list.
I think Insurrection has increased their average time slighty, though I am not much better. Since Commish predrafted the timer can go back on, ya know.I am proud of my team, but I am equally proud of my average draft time of two minutes per pick. (It would have been less, but I entered a pick a couple mornings ago, then took a shower, then checked back on the draft to find out that my pick hadn't gone through. That's 15 wasted minutes right there.)
I obviously like Moss, after that you have a lot of question marks.Maybe you don't like Randy Moss and Charles Rogers - it's okay, but I think you'll find yourself in a minority.
I can understand your conservative approach, but I've been successful with this format before. You can usually grab a surprise performer early on anyway in this format, f you're willing to spend the auction dollars. WRs will be a lot cheaper than RBs or QBs.I obviously like Moss, after that you have a lot of question marks.Maybe you don't like Randy Moss and Charles Rogers - it's okay, but I think you'll find yourself in a minority.
I think the absence of John Shoop and Kordell Stewart will make them better this year.And you think that a new coach and TJ will make them a better offense this year?
Touché. But it will still take time to get comfortable with the new offense, Grossman has little experience, Desmond has been bounced around like a pinball, and TJ wasn' good enough to hang on in Tampa Bay. I'd be nervous having that many Bears.Heck, I'm nervous having just 2 Lions.I think the absence of John Shoop and Kordell Stewart will make them better this year.And you think that a new coach and TJ will make them a better offense this year?
I wasn't sure what the rules said either with the No Mercy site down. If I do then I really f'd this draft up. If not then we'll probably see "The Kleck Amendment" rule for next year. I'm sure no other fool would have drafted Hambrick or Zereoue so they could be safe to drop now.I'll have to check when I get home, but I think you are required to draft a starting lineup.
You are correct. I called my brother up and he has the rules saved and he said that it is stated that you must draft a starting lineup. I did have them saved on my old computer but I don't have it anymore. Juice contacted me and he has it all worked out. It would have been a good plan had it not have been illegal.I wasn't sure what the rules said either with the No Mercy site down. If I do then I really f'd this draft up. If not then we'll probably see "The Kleck Amendment" rule for next year. I'm sure no other fool would have drafted Hambrick or Zereoue so they could be safe to drop now.I'll have to check when I get home, but I think you are required to draft a starting lineup.
Correct. It upsets me greatly every year, so I remember it.I'll have to check when I get home, but I think you are required to draft a starting lineup.
At least I'm not the only one who would rather not have that rule then. I'll have to bring it up next spring and see if others would actually join in on a possible rule change. It probably wouldn't fly, but it would definitely add some more drafting strategies.Correct. It upsets me greatly every year, so I remember it.I'll have to check when I get home, but I think you are required to draft a starting lineup.
I'm pretty sure I proposed it as a rule change last year, but got shot down. I remember writing something on the message board like "If the Raiders don't have to draft a kicker, I shouldn't either. I hate it when the Raiders can get away with stuff I can't."At least I'm not the only one who would rather not have that rule then. I'll have to bring it up next spring and see if others would actually join in on a possible rule change. It probably wouldn't fly, but it would definitely add some more drafting strategies.
I voted against it and will do so again if it's brought forward.As for my team.Delhomme, Jake CAR QB - 3 13.02 Hasselbeck, Matt SEA QB - 4 4.11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bennett, Michael MIN RB - 4 3.02 Bettis, Jerome PIT RB - 7 10.11 Holmes, Priest KCC RB - 5 1.02 Smith, Onterrio MIN RB - 4 8.11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brown, Troy NEP WR - 3 14.11 Driver, Donald GBP WR - 9 9.02 Johnson, Chad CIN WR - 5 2.11 McCardell, Keenan TBB WR - 8 7.02 Morton, Johnnie KCC WR - 5 18.11 Smith, Jimmy JAC WR - 9 5.02 Taylor, Travis BAL WR - 6 17.02 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Winslow, Kellen CLE TE - 8 6.11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andersen, Morten KCC PK - 5 16.11 Vinatieri, Adam NEP PK - 3 12.11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cowboys, Dallas DAL DT - 4 11.02 Jaguars, Jacksonville JAC DT Well I am pretty happy with my QB's. Obviously Hasselbeck will have most of the starts but Delhomme will spell him once in a while. I had debated taking Bledsoe instead of Delhomme but on Seattle's bye week Buffalo plays New England which swayed the decision in picking Delhomme.As for the RB I am estatic with my starting line up but depth is defnitely a big concern here. Each time I targeted a RB past round 1 and 3 someone invariably snapped him up a couple picks before. I am basically one injury away from having a very ordinary RB situationWR my top 2 slots are solid but I can see that the 3rd starter will be diffrenet from week to week. I just need one of them to "step up" to really have a pretty solid group here. I think I took McCardel a bit to high and he might be the blunder of my draft. As for TE I am pretty happy with KW 2 although my expections are not as high as the FBG board. The defences are both solid but matchups will determine who'll start.Can't say I am overly enthusiastic with my team but it's no slouch either. I guess we will find out quickly enough if its any good.CheersI'm pretty sure I proposed it as a rule change last year, but got shot down. I remember writing something on the message board like "If the Raiders don't have to draft a kicker, I shouldn't either. I hate it when the Raiders can get away with stuff I can't."At least I'm not the only one who would rather not have that rule then. I'll have to bring it up next spring and see if others would actually join in on a possible rule change. It probably wouldn't fly, but it would definitely add some more drafting strategies.
I guess the addition of different drafting strategies does scare some people.I voted against it and will do so again if it's brought forward.I'm pretty sure I proposed it as a rule change last year, but got shot down. I remember writing something on the message board like "If the Raiders don't have to draft a kicker, I shouldn't either. I hate it when the Raiders can get away with stuff I can't."At least I'm not the only one who would rather not have that rule then. I'll have to bring it up next spring and see if others would actually join in on a possible rule change. It probably wouldn't fly, but it would definitely add some more drafting strategies.
QB - Three guys with a ton of upside - as well as a ton of risk. More then likely one of these three will flame out, but as long as it's just one, I can roll with the punches here. If all three of them hit, I'll have some nice trade bait later when a couple teams are really hurting for a QB. Only thing I might have done differently would be to draft a 'safe' option as my QB2 - a BJohnson, Bledsoe, Garcia type. But, that's only a 'might', and I'm pretty happy with what I did here.RB - At this point, I'd feel comfortable starting Henry, Edge or Staley on any given week. Moe is a boom/bust guy week-to-week, which I like for an emergency bye/injury fill. Give me a guy who's got a chance to score 2 TDs in this spot, over a NFL backup or a guy with a limited role who may be more consistent, but at a much lower level. Rhodes is a handcuff in case Edge has some injury flare-ups that cause him to miss time. Again, I like what I have here, and unless McGahee sees significant action, this should be one of the top RB corps in the league.WR - Every team has a weak spot, and WR is definately mine. Waiting until the 6th to draft my first can do that. Don't get me wrong; there is a lot of upside with guys like Walker, Warrick, Galloway and Jenkins - but I do wish I'd have been able to snag a more-studly WR1. Good thing is that WR is traditionally a pretty easy spot to upgrade via the WW. I'll need some things to go right here, but if I do catch a break or two with ths group, look out - I'll be tough to beat with my overall strength elsewhere. But, if I selected a stable of 2004 underachievers, this will be my Achilles heel and could hurt me week in, week out.TE - Taking Shockey opened me up to a lot of risk, so I made sure to cover myself with Gates. Either way, I should be at least above-average here. If Shockey heals quickly, I'll be near the top of the league.K - I'm very happy with Brown and Kasay, especially where they were drafted. I almost thought about veering away from my strategy of waiting on K, as I watched many others draft one earlier that I'd want to. I got a good one - and one with an early bye, so I won't have to carry a backup for long.DEF - Eh. Tennessee is generally pretty good, and should be at least ok this year. If not, there are plenty of options on the WW, and some of those should be pleasant surprises. A good chouce for where I drafted them, but not necessarily a good choice overall. Average or maybe a little below in comparison to the others.Overall, if I get some help at WR and avoid crippling injuries elsewhere, I should be right there contending for a playoff spot, and a return to GWS in 2005 is virtually guaranteed.Detroit BreakdownsOwner: Rob Militzer Player Bye Drafted Grossman, Rex CHI QB - 5 13.07 McCown, Josh ARI QB - 6 9.07 Vick, Michael ATL QB - 9 4.06 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Henry, Travis BUF RB - 3 2.06 James, Edgerrin IND RB - 6 1.07 Rhodes, Dominic IND RB - 6 14.06 Staley, Duce PIT RB - 7 3.07 Williams, Moe MIN RB - 4 11.07 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Galloway, Joey TBB WR - 8 10.06 Jenkins, Michael ATL WR - 9 15.07 Smith, Rod DEN WR - 10 7.07 Walker, Javon GBP WR - 9 6.06 Warrick, Peter CIN WR - 5 8.06 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gates, Antonio SDC TE - 10 12.06 Shockey, Jeremy NYG TE - 6 5.07 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brown, Josh SEA PK - 4 16.06 Kasay, John CAR PK - 3 18.06 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Titans, Tennessee TEN DT - 9 17.07 18 Total Players
I find it amusing, that in the toughest division with the greatest player "No Mercy" has ever seen, that you are guaranteeing a victory. I was gonna just let this year ride by without raising any real hell, but now I think I will unload on this division. Never ever wake a sleeping giant.Jersey Jugheads:
Collins, Kerry OAK QB - 10 17.04
McNair, Steve TEN QB - 9 5.04
Plummer, Jake DEN QB - 10 9.04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Davis, Stephen CAR RB - 3 2.09
Dunn, Warrick ATL RB - 9 6.09
Faulk, Kevin NEP RB - 3 14.09
Foster, De'shaun CAR RB - 3 7.04
McAllister, Deuce NOS RB - 8 1.04
Stecker, Aaron NOS RB - 8 18.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gardner, Rod WAS WR - 7 10.09
Givens, David NEP WR - 3 11.04
Jackson, Darrell SEA WR - 4 4.09
Mason, Derrick TEN WR - 9 3.04
Muhammad, Muhsin CAR WR - 3 13.04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollard, Marcus IND TE - 6 15.04
Williams, Boo NOS TE - 8 8.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feely, Jay ATL PK - 9 16.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dolphins, Miami MIA DT - 10 12.09
Unlike most of the league, I chose to grab solid reliable starters all across the board. No weaknesses at all.
As pointed out by LHUCKS, McNair and Plummer will put up great numbers depending on matchups. Sometimes what appears to be a good matchup turns out the opposite so this my be difficult to determine week in and week out. Like week # 1(Plummer @ home vs. KC and McNair @ Miami) the odds say Plummer. See, I am already torn on this one.
I dont see the point of Oak bringing in Collins to sit on the bench but if that is what happens, he will get cut for a BU DT or PK.
Both RB, WR and TE squads are very strong and will probably need no waiver wire help all year.
If Vick doesnt get hurt again this year, Feeley will be a Top 5 kick scorer.
All in all the Jersey Jugheads will not only be competitive but will win the East.
Big Rat, note that VCL had to replace 2 of his picks because he didn't draft a starting lineup, so he has 1 PK and 1 DT.Interesting to see the variance. I would have tried for one fewer QBs and another RB or WR if I didn't draft the miami dubious dou as a sleeper. I likely will not enter the first game of the season with 4 QBs.Sometimes how many is based on who. If you have Manning as your QB1 (or Favre), you're just covering the bye week because those guys are iron men, so you take 2. If you waited and got a hospital case, you're probably drafting 3.If you were a Great White Shark, how many of each position would you draft?Q R W T K D 4 4 5 2 2 1 Studs and Duds3 7 5 1 0 0 Vatican City Lutherans3 6 5 2 1 1 Jersey Jugheads3 5 7 1 1 1 Margarita Rocks3 5 6 2 1 1 Drunk, Not Stupid3 5 5 2 1 2 Florida Beer Guzzlers3 5 5 2 2 1 Detroit Breakdowns2 6 7 1 1 1 Commish Commandos2 6 6 2 1 1 Powellsville Monkey Spankers 2 5 7 1 1 2 Go Blue2 4 7 1 2 2 Insurrection2 4 6 2 2 2 Relentless Assault