jonessed
Footballguy
That's absurd. The problem is the cost and the narrow risk pools. Medicare/Medicaid won't change that. If just shifts the burden to the taxpayer.Insurance companies purposely mis-pricing their plans from day one.
That's absurd. The problem is the cost and the narrow risk pools. Medicare/Medicaid won't change that. If just shifts the burden to the taxpayer.Insurance companies purposely mis-pricing their plans from day one.
stopInsurance companies purposely mis-pricing their plans from day one.
Very smart strategy if a loss in one line of business leads to this.Bahahahaha. Are you serious?! To the point of putting themselves out of business and losing hundreds of millions in the process? You can't be serious with this stuff.
Knock knock...
Boss: What is it Jenkins?
Actuary: I've got this great idea boss! Lets purposely under price our product in a brand new market we know next to nothing about. We'll lose hundreds of millions and we'll be out of jobs in 3 years.
Boss: Great idea, Jenkins! I'm going to promote you.
WHAT?Insurance companies purposely mis-pricing their plans from day one.
The article talks about Cigna and Humana. Maybe you missed the news. Both effectively left the exchanges since that article was written. Oh, and "Wellcare", who I'd not heard of, who only apparently do Medicare and Medicaid stuff - so they aren't part of the exchanges either. So company A, B and C are losing hundreds of millions and going out of business, but it's ok because company D and E are making a profit in a completely different market?Very smart strategy if a loss in one line of business leads to this.
Which health insurance companies have gone out of business?The article talks about Cigna and Humana. Maybe you missed the news. Both effectively left the exchanges since that article was written. Oh, and "Wellcare", who I'd not heard of, who only apparently do Medicare and Medicaid stuff - so they aren't part of the exchanges either. So company A, B and C are losing hundreds of millions and going out of business, but it's ok because company D and E are making a profit in a completely different market?
Again, you can't be serious with this.
17 of the original 23 Co-ops as well as Assurant health and other smaller carriers. Many, many other companies have cut all of their exchange based business, or greatly scaled it back due to losses. Blue Cross affiliates have simply walked away from markets altogether.Which health insurance companies have gone out of business?
Knew you would say that - now tell me which health insurance companies have gone out of business.17 of the original 23 Co-ops as well as Assurant health and other smaller carriers. Many, many other companies have cut all of their exchange based business, or greatly scaled it back due to losses. Blue Cross affiliates have simply walked away from markets altogether.
Good god man. You have more sense than that.Insurance companies purposely mis-pricing their plans from day one.
Literally the first sentence. Again - 17 of the original 23 Co-ops as well as Assurant health and other smaller carriers.Knew you would say that - now tell me which health insurance companies have gone out of business.
Good god man. You have more sense than that.
Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.When they set their initial rates for 2014, insurers (and the regulators reviewing rates) were not certain how many people would enroll, how long they would stay enrolled (“churn”), and what their health care needs would be. As a result, in many cases insurers used their small group insurance rates as a starting point, with various adjustments.
Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.
Am I missing something here? Didn't he answer this question?Literally the first sentence. Again - 17 of the original 23 Co-ops as well as Assurant health and other smaller carriers.
Not a thing. There were other carriers like Moda as well. And really, is there really any difference between a carrier going out of business (and no longer selling on the exchange) and a company simply pulling out (and no longer selling on the exchange)? I mean to the individual and the market, that's no different to them. And that list is much, much longer. I just saw a minute ago that the entire state of South Carolina is down to one carrier (and that carrier getting a 27% increase for 2017). That makes 5 entire states with only a single carrier offering plans next year.Am I missing something here? Didn't he answer this question?
Seriously. Is there something I'm missing?
Looks like Minnesota is going to increase rates 36-37%Not a thing. There were other carriers like Moda as well. And really, is there really any difference between a carrier going out of business (and no longer selling on the exchange) and a company simply pulling out (and no longer selling on the exchange)? I mean to the individual and the market, that's no different to them. And that list is much, much longer. I just saw a minute ago that the entire state of South Carolina is down to one carrier (and that carrier getting a 27% increase for 2017). That makes 5 entire states with only a single carrier offering plans next year.
Um, sorry to break it to you - it was higher than that. The weighted approved increase is 56.6%. What's even worse, is that carriers will literally be capping their enrollment next year in Minnesota. Yup, Medica said once they hit 50k enrolled, they are done. Ucare is done at 30k. You better get in line, as once those numbers are hit you're out of luck. That's a dumpster fire of an insurance pool.Looks like Minnesota is going to increase rates 36-37%
Thanks Obama
I already have insurance and my new rate in 2017 will be 600+ a month?Um, sorry to break it to you - it was higher than that. The weighted approved increase is 56.6%. What's even worse, is that carriers will literally be capping their enrollment next year in Minnesota. Yup, Medica said once they hit 50k enrolled, they are done. Ucare is done at 30k. You better get in line, as once those numbers are hit you're out of luck. That's a dumpster fire of an insurance pool.
That would cost extra as well. You understand this would only apply to those in the individual market, not those with group benefits through their employer, right?I already have insurance and my new rate in 2017 will be 600+ a month?
#### me!
Yes, I doThat would cost extra as well. You understand this would only apply to those in the individual market, not those with group benefits through their employer, right?
That "artificially low" initial premium was double the cost of the premium i was paying prior to the ACA going into effect with a deductible that is 150% higher than it was. Do you even know what you are talking about?Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.
Then yes, an average increase in your market of 56.6%. Are you eligible for subsidies?Yes, I do
My current employer does not give me benefits. Looks like I'm looking for a new job since this one pays #### anyway
Are you can buy non-compliant coverage which may actually be better, and far, far cheaper...and get hit with the 2.5% penalty. Your total out of pocket may actually be less.As one of the supposedly 5% of people self-insured in Minnesota, to keep the same level of coverage next year as I have this year will likely cost me at least $600/month MORE than I'm paying now.
![]()
Yes, you are. He named one health insurance company (Assurant). The parent company (Assurant, Inc.) decided to exit the health insurance business and sold off the current business and assets to another company for $14 million:Am I missing something here? Didn't he answer this question?
Seriously. Is there something I'm missing?
On October 1, 2015, Assurant Health’s parent company, Assurant, Inc., announced it had completed the sale of certain assets and business lines to National General Holdings Corporation. National General has acquired Assurant Health’s existing supplemental and self-funded business lines.
One of the dumbest things I have seen ever on this board!Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.
He didKnew you would say that - now tell me which health insurance companies have gone out of business.
you missed the 17 Co-ops. Assurant effectively went out of business. So did Moda. So did others. What's your point? They didn't purposefully lose billions of dollars on purpose.Yes, you are. He named one health insurance company (Assurant). The parent company (Assurant, Inc.) decided to exit the health insurance business and sold off the current business and assets to another company for $14 million:
I forget...Is it 2.5% of gross income? It's probably what I'll have to do.Are you can buy non-compliant coverage which may actually be better, and far, far cheaper...and get hit with the 2.5% penalty. Your total out of pocket may actually be less.
I'm not an accountant, but I believe it's 2.5% of your "MAGI", which is your modified, adjusted gross income. Remember, all they can do is "bill you" for that 2.5%, they don't have a way to enforce it. They can take it from your tax return (overpayment) if you have any, but that's about it.I forget...Is it 2.5% of gross income? It's probably what I'll have to do.
welcome to my world only the crapstorm of over double my previous premium hit me 2 years ago(triple deductible). I'm still fuming. And I thought government couldn't get much worse.As one of the supposedly 5% of people self-insured in Minnesota, to keep the same level of coverage next year as I have this year will likely cost me at least $600/month MORE than I'm paying now.
![]()
My health insurance will be significantly more than my mortgage.
So, just wondering, have we gotten war reparations out of Germany yet for bombing Pearl Harbor? I figure you're the guy to know this.cstu said:Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.
Andy have you looked at or have available any of the Medishare programs? If you are formally part of a church it may be an option. Very economical compared to other choices.Andy Dufresne said:As one of the supposedly 5% of people self-insured in Minnesota, to keep the same level of coverage next year as I have this year will likely cost me at least $600/month MORE than I'm paying now.
![]()
My health insurance will be significantly more than my mortgage.
1. That's more or less a pyramid. If they don't take in enough funds they don't pay.So, just wondering, have we gotten war reparations out of Germany yet for bombing Pearl Harbor? I figure you're the guy to know this.
Andy have you looked at or have available any of the Medishare programs? If you are formally part of a church it may be an option. Very economical compared to other choices.
1. They are indeed a cost share.1. That's more or less a pyramid. If they don't take in enough funds they don't pay.
2. Look at the pictures of the BODs and it will probably scare you.
3. They really don't cover much and exclude some weird stuff. Better hope your daughter does get pregnant.
eta - I don't know who managed to get them approved in ACA.
How long you going to stay willfully ignorant? You seriously can't be this obtuse.cstu said:Do you guys honestly believe health insurance companies are that stupid? They knew exactly what they were doing - setting artificially low initial premiums knowing they would be completely wrong and make Obamacare look like a failure.
The only people going to pay that will either be huge medical consumers or getting large subsidies. We are ####edOklahoma approved rate increases for next year are pretty easy to calculate, as the entire state only has one carrier - Blue Cross. They were approved for an average increase of 76%.
State insurance commissioner saying the exchange is "on life support".
Average ESI deductibles since the passage of ACA have risen slower than they did in the same number of yeasr immediately before the ACA. And based on what people select, average deductibles in the individual market have remained roughly in line with ESI. At least as of last year. However, I suspect that the reality is that deductibles in general continue to raise at about the same rates but with the caps on the maximum deductible being the limiting factor bending the curve down. Also higher growth in deductibles in the ten years or so prior to the ACA implementation are also skewed by the simple fact that high deductible plans linked to HSAs were brand new. Which also brings up one other point which Kaiser noted in the recent ESI survey being that for many employees higher deductibles are offset in part with employer contributions to the HSAs. Of course that doesn't help those that can't fund that HSA - which I think is mentioned in the linked interview about how the high deductible/HSA plans are great for the healthy affluent population but not so much for those that either struggle to make ends meet or would max out the deductibles in most years.BassNBrew said:Not from the article, but by BFS own admission, deductibles have been rising.
Since were talking about ACA I assumed it was about the individual market.Bottomfeeder Sports 411
- Footballguy
- Members
- 411
- 18,683 posts
- Gender:Male
- Location:Victory Villa, Md
Posted 1 hour ago · Report post
Average ESI deductibles since the passage of ACA have risen slower than they did in the same number of yeasr immediately before the ACA. And based on what people select, average deductibles in the individual market have remained roughly in line with ESI. At least as of last year. However, I suspect that the reality is that deductibles in general continue to raise at about the same rates but with the caps on the maximum deductible being the limiting factor bending the curve down. Also higher growth in deductibles in the ten years or so prior to the ACA implementation are also skewed by the simple fact that high deductible plans linked to HSAs were brand new. Which also brings up one other point which Kaiser noted in the recent ESI survey being that for many employees higher deductibles are offset in part with employer contributions to the HSAs. Of course that doesn't help those that can't fund that HSA - which I think is mentioned in the linked interview about how the high deductible/HSA plans are great for the healthy affluent population but not so much for those that either struggle to make ends meet or would max out the deductibles in most years.
Yep. Welcome to the club. First time in history you can have insurance without really having insurance - but you're paying premiums like you have THE BEST insurance ever.Yup - No more labs covered when you see the doctor. I'm sure that will help catch things early. Need to go to the ER, count on paying for it out of your pocket. Want to keep you doctor, sure thing at a 4X increase.
Maybe us self-employed and small business folks should band together and go steal some TVs.Yep. Welcome to the club. First time in history you can have insurance without really having insurance.
In all reality, Obamacare created the biggest pool of virtually uninsured (insured-but-not-really-insured) people ever.Maybe us self-employed and small business folks should band together and go steal some TVs.