Pretty even if you ask me. I would take either side depending on team needs.Marqise Lee for Tyler Eifer
I got a little to inquisitive in a thread.... anyway I drafted in my 2 QB league tonight.... Got Bridgewater, Hyde, Ebron, Cooks, Robinson, and Moncrief. Pretty stoked. Crowell went undrafted, as did Martavis Bryant.Lol what got you sent to the penalty box?I'm so jacked today. I'm back from fbg timeout and my draft is tonight.I have the 5, 9, 11, 12 and 29.
How many rounds? I'm surprised Bryant didn't go.I got a little to inquisitive in a thread.... anyway I drafted in my 2 QB league tonight.... Got Bridgewater, Hyde, Ebron, Cooks, Robinson, and Moncrief. Pretty stoked. Crowell went undrafted, as did Martavis Bryant.Lol what got you sent to the penalty box?I'm so jacked today. I'm back from fbg timeout and my draft is tonight.I have the 5, 9, 11, 12 and 29.
it went 6 rounds but it's only 10 teams and 24 spots. Also it's 2qb so everyone had 4 or 5 Qbs. Mettenberger and Logan Thomas both got drafted.How many rounds? I'm surprised Bryant didn't go.I got a little to inquisitive in a thread.... anyway I drafted in my 2 QB league tonight.... Got Bridgewater, Hyde, Ebron, Cooks, Robinson, and Moncrief. Pretty stoked. Crowell went undrafted, as did Martavis Bryant.Lol what got you sent to the penalty box?I'm so jacked today. I'm back from fbg timeout and my draft is tonight.I have the 5, 9, 11, 12 and 29.
Unless that's 2 QB, Patterson by quite a bit. And I'm no Patterson fanboy.Team A:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
1 QB and start 3-4WR Full PPR. I was Team A and proposed the trade expecting to get turned down but he accepted. Figured I'd post here and see if I was missing something. Leaves me not so hot with QB's, but I think I can get by with what I have. I'm not the biggest Patterson supporter either but he does have more upside than just about any WR in the league right now, so hopefully they get creative and use him correctly like they did at the end of last year.Unless that's 2 QB, Patterson by quite a bit. And I'm no Patterson fanboy.Team A:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
Aren't 5th round picks pretty much toss up's anyway? Seems like a decent roll of the dice to me.Zealots 12 team non-ppr, IDP
Gave 5.1
Got David Wilson
Too much?
Arguably, not enough for the other guy. He is long shot, but in that RB heavy league, getting guy with a puncher's chance of being a starting NFL RB in the 5th round is excellent from your standpoint.Zealots 12 team non-ppr, IDP
Gave 5.1
Got David Wilson
Too much?
I'm sure you left some serious talent on the board at 5.01...Zealots 12 team non-ppr, IDP
Gave 5.1
Got David Wilson
Too much?
Allen for me.Team A: Charles Sims RB Tampa Bay
Team B: Dwayne Allen TE Colts
1/1/2/1/1/1 (2 flex RB/WR/TE) PPR .5 WR/RB, 1 TE
I really like this for you, not only for Patterson, but I am probably higher than most on Manuel. I think he will surprise people this year.1 QB and start 3-4WR Full PPR. I was Team A and proposed the trade expecting to get turned down but he accepted. Figured I'd post here and see if I was missing something. Leaves me not so hot with QB's, but I think I can get by with what I have. I'm not the biggest Patterson supporter either but he does have more upside than just about any WR in the league right now, so hopefully they get creative and use him correctly like they did at the end of last year.Unless that's 2 QB, Patterson by quite a bit. And I'm no Patterson fanboy.Team A:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
I hope you're right about Manuel. I'm only in 2 dynasty leagues and now own him in both. It's not because I'm that high on him either, that's just the way the chips seem to be falling.I really like this for you, not only for Patterson, but I am probably higher than most on Manuel. I think he will surprise people this year.1 QB and start 3-4WR Full PPR. I was Team A and proposed the trade expecting to get turned down but he accepted. Figured I'd post here and see if I was missing something. Leaves me not so hot with QB's, but I think I can get by with what I have. I'm not the biggest Patterson supporter either but he does have more upside than just about any WR in the league right now, so hopefully they get creative and use him correctly like they did at the end of last year.Unless that's 2 QB, Patterson by quite a bit. And I'm no Patterson fanboy.Team A:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
You've probably got at least one league-mate fuming over that trade, and can parlay Patterson to them for much more than you just paid for him.steveski said:1 QB and start 3-4WR Full PPR. I was Team A and proposed the trade expecting to get turned down but he accepted. Figured I'd post here and see if I was missing something. Leaves me not so hot with QB's, but I think I can get by with what I have. I'm not the biggest Patterson supporter either but he does have more upside than just about any WR in the league right now, so hopefully they get creative and use him correctly like they did at the end of last year.Coeur de Lion said:Unless that's 2 QB, Patterson by quite a bit. And I'm no Patterson fanboy.steveski said:Team A:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
Well...he didn't.Trade that just went down in a 12 team, NonPPR, IDP league
Team A traded: Marquess Wilson
Jared Allen
1.12(12th)
5.12(60th) in 2014
2nd in 2015(likely somewhere between 19-24th overall)
Team B Traded: Marshawn Lynch
Robert Turbin
Mychal Kendricks
Team B currently owns: RB's Murray, Gio and Tate and LB's Kuechly, Cushing, Washington, Trevathan, A Brown, S Moore and R Mathis.
Team B claims he wanted to get something for Lynch before the value dried up?
Thoughts.
So how does he plan on doing that now that he's traded him away for peanuts?Team B claims he wanted to get something for Lynch before the value dried up?
If that 2015 1st is projected top 3, I'll take thatTeam A Gave:
Spiller
Ben Tate
TY Hilton
Team B Gave:
Alfred Morris
Rashad Jennings
Riley Cooper
2015 1st Rounder (last 3 years pick has been 2, 1, 2 overall)
PPR?Team A Gave:
Spiller
Ben Tate
TY Hilton
Team B Gave:
Alfred Morris
Rashad Jennings
Riley Cooper
2015 1st Rounder (last 3 years pick has been 2, 1, 2 overall)
No PPR, Start 1 QB 2 RB 2 WR 1 TE 1 FlexPPR?Team A Gave:
Spiller
Ben Tate
TY Hilton
Team B Gave:
Alfred Morris
Rashad Jennings
Riley Cooper
2015 1st Rounder (last 3 years pick has been 2, 1, 2 overall)
I'd rather have what team A got.No PPR, Start 1 QB 2 RB 2 WR 1 TE 1 FlexPPR?Team A Gave:
Spiller
Ben Tate
TY Hilton
Team B Gave:
Alfred Morris
Rashad Jennings
Riley Cooper
2015 1st Rounder (last 3 years pick has been 2, 1, 2 overall)
This is a close one for me as I still have hope for Richardson, but I would take Hopkins I think.12 team ppr .5 for RB 1 for WR
Gave : Trent Richardson
Got: Deandre Hopkins
That was my line of thinking. We start 2-3 RBs. I have Foster, Vereen, Pierre, McCluster, and Ballard. I also have picks 10, 13, 14, and 22 in the rookie draft. Hopkins becomes my WR4 behind Megatron, Demerius, and Crabtree. I think it's a good move for me.This is a close one for me as I still have hope for Richardson, but I would take Hopkins I think.12 team ppr .5 for RB 1 for WR
Gave : Trent Richardson
Got: Deandre Hopkins
This time next year, it would not surprise me whatsoever for Tate, Jennings and Cooper to be considered worthless, and for Morris' value to have dropped significantly. So this becomes Spiller and Hilton for Morris and a projected early first. Give me the Spiller/Hilton side unless the team is so bad that I'm really likely to get the #1 overall pick.Team A Gave:
Spiller
Ben Tate
TY Hilton
Team B Gave:
Alfred Morris
Rashad Jennings
Riley Cooper
2015 1st Rounder (last 3 years pick has been 2, 1, 2 overall)
I'll agree with taking Hopkins. With Houston not having RB depth behind Foster, its up to Johnson and Hopkins to take the pressure off the run game so we don't end up Foster-less later in the season.That was my line of thinking. We start 2-3 RBs. I have Foster, Vereen, Pierre, McCluster, and Ballard. I also have picks 10, 13, 14, and 22 in the rookie draft. Hopkins becomes my WR4 behind Megatron, Demerius, and Crabtree. I think it's a good move for me.This is a close one for me as I still have hope for Richardson, but I would take Hopkins I think.12 team ppr .5 for RB 1 for WR
Gave : Trent Richardson
Got: Deandre Hopkins
That's an interesting one. I take Jeffery. But I can see a rebuilding team thinking "Evans is going to be Jeffery in two years, I'll take the extra first and know that I won't accidentally win any games with Jeffery".Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
I don't know about that one.Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
I like this one for both sides. I prefer Reed to Davis. But prefer Hunter to Maclin due to potential. SJax isn't enough to sway me. It's a good deal for both of you though.14-team Devy PPR TE Premium
Give: Justin Hunter & Vernon Davis
Receive: Jordan Reed, Jeremy Maclin, Steven Jackson
mid to late 1stThat's an interesting one. I take Jeffery. But I can see a rebuilding team thinking "Evans is going to be Jeffery in two years, I'll take the extra first and know that I won't accidentally win any games with Jeffery".Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
Where's the 1st projected?
I'd give that for Jeffery every single day and twice on Sundays.mid to late 1stThat's an interesting one. I take Jeffery. But I can see a rebuilding team thinking "Evans is going to be Jeffery in two years, I'll take the extra first and know that I won't accidentally win any games with Jeffery".Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
Where's the 1st projected?
Definitely prefer Jeffery. Evans owners can only hope he's as good as Jeffery and that 1st is a good price to pay for the proven player.mid to late 1stThat's an interesting one. I take Jeffery. But I can see a rebuilding team thinking "Evans is going to be Jeffery in two years, I'll take the extra first and know that I won't accidentally win any games with Jeffery".Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
Where's the 1st projected?
Would probably need to see both teams. But in a vacuum I like side getting Bridgewater significantly more.Just went down in Zealots
Chargers gave up Evans, Mike TBB WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 4.02
Jaguars gave up Bridgewater, Teddy MIN QB;Jones, Marvin CIN WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 5.05;
Year 2015 Round 1 Draft Pick from Jacksonville Jaguars;
Year 2015 Round 3 Draft Pick from Jacksonville Jaguars
I think I'd rather have Evans but not sure.
Patterson.steveski said:Team A gives:
Russell Wilson
Markus Wheaton
Team B gives:
EJ Manuel
Cordarrelle Patterson
Thoughts?
That is a great buy lowZealots 12 team non-ppr, IDP
Gave 5.1
Got David Wilson
Too much?
I think I would defer to Allen but I like Sims alot so I could see that side as wellTeam A: Charles Sims RB Tampa Bay
Team B: Dwayne Allen TE Colts
1/1/2/1/1/1 (2 flex RB/WR/TE) PPR .5 WR/RB, 1 TE
The 2 picks next year prob put the Bridgewater side over the top.I would expect the 1st to be mid-late. Still don't know if I wouldn't rather have Evans though.Would probably need to see both teams. But in a vacuum I like side getting Bridgewater significantly more.Just went down in Zealots
Chargers gave up Evans, Mike TBB WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 4.02
Jaguars gave up Bridgewater, Teddy MIN QB;Jones, Marvin CIN WR; Year 2014 Draft Pick 5.05;
Year 2015 Round 1 Draft Pick from Jacksonville Jaguars;
Year 2015 Round 3 Draft Pick from Jacksonville Jaguars
I think I'd rather have Evans but not sure.
+1Definitely prefer Jeffery. Evans owners can only hope he's as good as Jeffery and that 1st is a good price to pay for the proven player.mid to late 1stThat's an interesting one. I take Jeffery. But I can see a rebuilding team thinking "Evans is going to be Jeffery in two years, I'll take the extra first and know that I won't accidentally win any games with Jeffery".Gave: 1.02 + 2015 1st
Got: Alshon Jeffery
Where's the 1st projected?
It's not an assumption. It's simply a belief/expectation. And that's one of the differences in FFB playing styles. Some people can stomach ambiguity, others prefer more of the known quantity. It's not a right or wrong thing.+1
No idea why there is an assumption Evans will be as good as Jeffery
Sounds like a good way to lose all your money as well as double itIn a vacuum, I'd take Jeffery over Evans and the 1st. I think the gap is bigger than a mid-late 1st between the 2 guys. (Maybe an early to mid-1st type of gap?)
But in specific situations, I could see where I'd make the trade for Evans.
A poker analogy: First hand of the game, you don't want to go all in pre-flop on a pair of fives. You also don't want to go all in on a pair of fives if you are one of the guys at the table with the most chips. However, it is probably a smart gamble to go all in on a pair of fives if you are the short stack and getting desperate.
Similarly, if you have a strong dynasty roster, it doesn't make sense to risk moving Jeffery for Evans if you are only getting paid a mid-late 1st for the gamble. However, if there are some loaded teams in your league and you don't have a great roster, then you have to make some bold, risky moves if you ever want to catch up. If not, you probably aren't going to be a contender to win it all. This is a pretty reasonable gamble if you have to make something happen because there's a decent enough chance that you come out ahead that the downside is worth it.