Archer
Footballguy
In my PPR dynasty league that's the 2.1 pick (Mason) for the last pick in the 3rd round...yikes.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Concept Coop
- Start date
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Wait, the guy traded Lattimore and got Ridley *AND* a better pick? It seems like those two picks should be on opposite sides of that deal. Or, better yet, like no pick at all should be on the Ridley side.
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
opensourcebeer
Footballguy
12 team ppr, start qrrwwwtfkd
Team A gave up: Joique Bell, Vernon Davis, 1.07
Team B gave up: Le'Veon Bell, Tyler Eifert
Team B gave up: Mark Ingram
Team C gave up: 3.04
Team B gave up: 1.05
Team D gave up: Jarrett Boykin, 1.09, 3.05
Team A gave up: Joique Bell, Vernon Davis, 1.07
Team B gave up: Le'Veon Bell, Tyler Eifert
Team B gave up: Mark Ingram
Team C gave up: 3.04
Team B gave up: 1.05
Team D gave up: Jarrett Boykin, 1.09, 3.05
Adam Harstad
Moderator
Adam Harstad
Moderator
No idea what Team B was thinking. That's really cheap for Bell, and he downgraded from 1.05 to 1.09 for a fistful of after-dinner mints.
Yeah he basically got 1.12 for Lynch. I think you could get that for Lynch if SEA cuts him next year.
Kendricks is a Wash with Allen and the rest of the picks.
Wilson and Turbin are a push
Bell and Eifert pretty easily for me
3.04 probably unless nonPPR then I might take a final stab at Ingram
1.05
One More Rep
Footballguy
Avery
Footballguy
12 team, PPR, contract league. Start QB / 1-2 RB / 2-3 WR / TE
Two trades today:
Trade 1:
Team A gives: 1.03, 1.07
Team B gives: Cameron, 1.11
Trade 2:
Team A gives: 1.01, 1.04, 2.07, Cameron, Patterson, Moreno
Team C gives: Megatron, Gronk
Notes:
- Due to contract issues, team C needed to trade or loose Megatron by the beginning of the 2015 season.
Two trades today:
Trade 1:
Team A gives: 1.03, 1.07
Team B gives: Cameron, 1.11
Trade 2:
Team A gives: 1.01, 1.04, 2.07, Cameron, Patterson, Moreno
Team C gives: Megatron, Gronk
Notes:
- Due to contract issues, team C needed to trade or loose Megatron by the beginning of the 2015 season.
Nucker101
Footballguy
cstu
Footballguy
Adam Harstad
Moderator
mlbnfl
Footballguy
Not sure this is the correct thread to ask this question and if its not this can be ignored. Im likely going into rebuild, own Peterson, and say the Alshon and Alfred Morris trades recently in this thread. Do people think that's around what I can expect value wise; am I crazy to think he still holds 2 1st round picks type value? Its a zealots league so the recent change to minimum 1RB I guess hurts his value.
Winning IS Everything
Footballguy
It never hurts to try. I had him since he was a rookie in my main league and had a tough time getting an offer of two firsts for him last year. I finally took an offer of DeMarco Murray and a first. I would not give two firsts for him now, but I am sure some will especially someone that feels they are just missing one piece.
Phenix
Footballguy
Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
I don't see a problem with Mason for Bortles...for either side.
Phenix
Footballguy
Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
That's why the trade makes so little sense. He could have just traded back at 1.12 and picked up some value in return instead of basically trading the 1.12 for the 3.05.
Coeur de Lion
Footballguy
In a typical 12 team 1 QB league viable bye week starters are usually pretty close to free, if not actually free on the WW. What a terrible reason to waste a 1st round pick.
From a strictly player evaluation standpoint, I don't have a problem with the trade. QB that goes #3 overall probably has higher expected VBD than 3rd round RB.
I mean I wouldn't make it myself and wouldn't recommend doing it, but not shocking it if works out for the Bortles owner.
That said, this is a really flimsy justification. If the Jaguars are to be believed, which might be a stretch, Bortles isn't going to be starting that week either. In that case I would like to see the RB that gets traded away just to cover the 1 week.
MattFancy
Footballguy
Yikes that is ugly. So basically he gave Harvin, a 3rd and a 2nd for Cooper, Sanders & Tate. I wouldn't even give Harvin for all 3 of those guys let alone Harvin and picks.
Skeletore Eh
Footballguy
marquess wilson
for
bernard pierce
for
bernard pierce
kutta
Footballguy
I am actually almost OK with the first deal, but I am higher on Colston than most. But the second deal is absolutely horrible.
cstu
Footballguy
So the Bears #3 for at least the next couple years for a RB who might be starting week 1...
MattFancy
Footballguy
I can live with the 1st one as well. Getting a solid WR and a 1st for Harvin isn't bad. But then trading that 1st plus Colston and 3 other picks for 3 WRs who at best will probably be WR3s, just makes zero sense to me.
cstu
Footballguy
Agree. Looks like a 1st and 2nd for Tate, Colston for Cooper, 2 4ths and a 3rd for Sanders. No one would do even one of those deals.
Last edited by a moderator:
Skeletore Eh
Footballguy
If it's a ppr league I don't see it as uneven. Pierce has been nothing short of mediocre in his career to date. While Wilson may never amount to anything, he's just 21 years old with some fairly positive reviews of his progress to date from teammates and coaches.
A 21 year old who put up better production at 18 than some 21 year old WRs considered NFL prospects. If he hadn't left school the way he did, he was a 2nd-3rd rd NFL draft talent, and would have been a 1st rounder in 2013 rookie drafts. He'll be 24 when Marshall's guaranteed money is out.
I'm all aboard the Marquess Wilson train.
Last edited by a moderator:
Skeletore Eh
Footballguy
Concept Coop
Footballguy
I think this is potentially dangerous. Wilson's 2nd-3rd round tag came from the pundits, not the NFL. The same people who ranked Wilson where they did, ranked Seastrunk as a top prospect, then adjusted once they realized that the NFL didn't agree.
Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Check his production by age. Compare him to every WR to come out in '13/14. He's at the top of the list. Has the height, and is young enough/has the frame to put on the muscle to be a top guy.
2nd/3rd round talent is my opinion, not 'the pundits'.
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Zealots trade, non-ppr
Team A Gave
Terrence Williams, WR DAL
2014 Pick 6.01
Team B Gave
Miles Austin, WR CLE
Don't get that one...
Team A Gave
Terrence Williams, WR DAL
2014 Pick 6.01
Team B Gave
Miles Austin, WR CLE
Don't get that one...
flc735
Footballguy
cstu
Footballguy
I figured that would be the case. I am the side getting Jeffery. I inherited an old, mediocre team, tore it down, and wanted to build around WRs. Now with Alshon, I also have Julio, Mike Evans, and Jordan Matthews. RB wise, I still have Le'Veon Bell (though I might move him). I sent this earlier today and it was accepted pretty quickly, so I figured I was probably losing market-wise. I think the addition of Hill takes some of the shine off Gio-still like him but IMO Gio no longer has that top-3 upside. I could be mistaken, of course.
cstu
Footballguy
If you're rebuilding then getting Jeffery makes sense. I don't like holding RB's during a rebuild either but I question whether you needed to make that move since Gio/Bell/Julio/Jeffery is a good starting lineup if you have a decent QB and TE.
ConnSKINS26
Footballguy
14 team PPR. Devy's.
Gave:
Duke Johnson
Got:
Josh Gordon
Dorial Green-Beckham
2015 1st (mid-late and devalued due to devys)
Gave:
Duke Johnson
Got:
Josh Gordon
Dorial Green-Beckham
2015 1st (mid-late and devalued due to devys)
