chet
Footballguy
Scroll down. Each to their own, I guess.That reminds me. He is married to one of the hottest gals I've ever seen.
Scroll down. Each to their own, I guess.That reminds me. He is married to one of the hottest gals I've ever seen.
no, they're near the top if not number oneWhile they're tops in Corsi, they're near the bottom in shooting percentage. Those may seem to be at odds with each other, but the shots never seem to come from the right spots. I'm pretty sure they're ranked near the bottom, if not right on it, in scoring opportunities as well. So is that the players not going to the "dirty" areas, or the system? Or do they go hand in hand?
not lazy guy doing the work for me. looks like they are still #1 in expected goals for percentage which factors in shot quality.Per http://www.corsica.hockey/teams/
Boston ranks 6th in expected Goals and 1st in Expected Goals For % (Percentage of all Expected Goals Scored by a Team)
Boston ranks 20th in Scoring Chances For and 5th in Scoring Chances For % (Percentage of all Scoring Chances For a Team) because they also rank 3rd in fewest scoring opportunities allowed.
They do rank dead last in CSh% (% of shot attempts that are goals) and 26th in CSv% (% of shots attempts allowed that are goals). Worst PDO in the league, and just a tiny fraction worse than Colorado.
Thanks for that. I was just digging around the web looking for some reliable rankings (as reliable as they can be, since "scoring chance" seems to be such a vague term and something that can vary from team to team).Per http://www.corsica.hockey/teams/
Boston ranks 6th in expected Goals and 1st in Expected Goals For % (Percentage of all Expected Goals Scored by a Team)
Boston ranks 20th in Scoring Chances For and 5th in Scoring Chances For % (Percentage of all Scoring Chances For a Team) because they also rank 3rd in fewest scoring opportunities allowed.
They do rank dead last in CSh% (% of shot attempts that are goals) and 26th in CSv% (% of shots attempts allowed that are goals). Worst PDO in the league, and just a tiny fraction worse than Colorado.
Definitely true but this brings it back to Claude. I do t think those guys could thrive under himmaybe a problem is not enough finish because they don't have guys like Kessel and Seguin because they are such ##### in the locker room or something?
Exactly. Particularly with Kessel. You simply can't criticize the Kessel saga and defend Julien at the same time, regardless of who was "right" or "wrong". That all happened under a completely different management group, save for the Jacobs family.HellToupee said:Definitely true but this brings it back to Claude. I do t think those guys could thrive under him
because guys like Pastrnak are going to win a Selke. goal scorers can play in a successful, structured system. happens everywhere.Tarasenko seemed to score in bunches playing for Hitchcock. Funny how that works.because guys like Pastrnak are going to win a Selke. goal scorers can play in a successful, structured system. happens everywhere.
Except it hasn't really been working for the past three seasons. If not for the miracle Game 7 comeback against the Fightin' Kessels in 2013, the B's would have one playoff series win and (most likely) three straight playoff misses since winning the Cup. And Julien, by all indications, would have been gone four years ago.I wouldn't have much of a problem with Oston's rebuild had they actually needed to rebuild anything in the first place. instead of some crappy GMs trying to put their "fingerprints" on something that was already working.
And yet Hitch got fired, as well, likely for reasons that could have been beyond his control. It happens, even to the good coaches. This is not the first time either of them has been fired. That's life in the NHL, or any pro sport.Tarasenko seemed to score in bunches playing for Hitchcock. Funny how that works.
not sure you can really equate the two. but even if you want to, Hitch is a guy who was already on his way out with a much better rooster that is underperforming by any measure. Julien is squeezing a young, one-line team with thin/weak defense that can't start a backup goalie into one of the top possession teams in the league. even if they see standings results under Butch Cassidy their play will undoubtedly regress. all to eek out an 8th seed and save a bad GM's job. good luck with that.And yet Hitch got fired, as well, likely for reasons that could have been beyond his control. It happens, even to the good coaches. This is not the first time either of them has been fired. That's life in the NHL, or any pro sport.
three seasons? I'm talking about the slow 5-year teardown of a once great team that should have been competing with LA and CHI for the past several years.Except it hasn't really been working for the past three seasons. If not for the miracle Game 7 comeback against the Fightin' Kessels in 2013, the B's would have one playoff series win and (most likely) three straight playoff misses since winning the Cup. And Julien, by all indications, would have been gone four years ago.
I don't disagree with you there. I don't want to eek out a playoff spot if it means another first round exit and treading water or, even worse, mortgaging the future to reach that means.not sure you can really equate the two. but even if you want to, Hitch is a guy who was already on his way out with a much better rooster that is underperforming by any measure. Julien is squeezing a young, one-line team with thin/weak defense that can't start a backup goalie into one of the top possession teams in the league. even if they see standings results under Butch Cassidy their play will undoubtedly regress. all to eek out an 8th seed and save a bad GM's job. good luck with that.
fair enough, good post.I don't disagree with you there. I don't want to eek out a playoff spot if it means another first round exit and treading water or, even worse, mortgaging the future to reach that means.
The B's have a lot of talent coming up through the pipeline. For as much as they were ripped for their approach to the draft two years ago, guys like Senyshyn, Zboril, and even DeBrusk appear to be good prospects. McAvoy is even better. Forsbacka Karlsson, who is having a great year at BU, is another one But Julien works best coaching a veteran team. I just couldn't see him as being the right guy with the team going forward in that regard. I just am not sure what the answer is at this point, or who would even want to come work for the clown show that the front office has become.
We'll never agree on the Kessel and Seguin trades (and remember, there is no Seguin or Hamilton without the former). You look at it from a pure talent standpoint, and that's fine. But I don't think it's a big secret how disliked Kessel really is. His comments after the WC and the reaction to it are proof of that. The Bruins did a great job in getting talent in return for Kessel. Seguin, not so much, even if I understand the reasons why he "had to go."
And I'm with you on the goaltending and defense. Rask is prone to letting up the bad goal at the worst time. Krug, for all of his offensive talent, is a liability in his own end. Which wouldn't be a problem if the rest of the D wasn't an over-the-hill Chara, McQuaid, four years of Kevan Miller :X and a revolving door. Hopefully the likes of McAvoy, Grzelcyk, etc. will be ready to take over sooner rather than later.
You clearly don't understand the Jacobs ownership. It's all about making the playoffs forall to eek out an 8th seed
. So if they do make it the year is a success to them.
Lou is a weird guyWhat I find bizarre is that Julien has now been fired three times ... all in mid-season, including in NJ when he had the second-best record in the conference. Aside from his very first season in Montreal, he's never had a losing record in any season.
I honestly don't know what that means, if anything. Just interesting.
Looking ahead this week, I see MN plays Chi on the back end of B2B games while Chicago will coming off a three day rest.![]()
Stand up play by Getz trying to make sure step didnt get trounced. #sticktapsDaughter at MSG. Let's go Ducks!
bfd, Wild have 10 with 10 with 2 less GP. and they do it 5 on 5 instead of on the PP, like real menCaps with 5+ goals for the 9th straight home game. Haven't been held below 5 in DC since New Year's Day.
10 guys with 10+ goals
COYLE!Coyle woke up tonight. 3 great assists on the 3 Wild goals so far.
Hmm, take out PPG and Caps have 9 with 10+ and 1 with 9bfd, Wild have 10 with 10 with 2 less GP. and they do it 5 on 5 instead of on the PP, like real men
Must be special since it is the ONLY game tonight.Looking ahead this week, I see MN plays Chi on the back end of B2B games while Chicago will coming off a three day rest.![]()
Way too early to say this I know, but its nearly a must win for the Hawks IMO. Should be a good one.Must be special since it is the ONLY game tonight.
Way too early to say this I know, but its nearly a must win for the Hawks IMO. Should be a good one.![]()
They drop back 8 points (while the Wild have 2 games in hand).![]()
what happens if they lose?
winning the division isn't that critical.They drop back 8 points (while the Wild have 2 games in hand).
Like I said, its a bit early, but not the kind of hole you want to get into.
Well, of course not. But I doubt a top level team like the Hawks are just hoping to make the playoffs.winning the division isn't that critical.
they are hoping to win a Cup. you don't need to win a division to do that, as we saw the last 3 years.Well, of course not. But I doubt a top level team like the Hawks are just hoping to make the playoffs.
Yea but how else will the Caps fill their rafters?winning the division isn't that critical.
Ok then. You trying way too hard to prove some point about a fairly innocuous comment.http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html
gives the Blackhawks a 1% chance of winning their division at this point. Wild are 99% likely to win the division.
This game is not that significant.
you could just admit you were wrongOk then. You trying way too hard to prove some point about a fairly innocuous comment.
Sure, I was wrong. The Hawks could lose ten straight and probably still make the playoffs. Tonight's game is meaningless.you could just admit you were wrong
“As of now it’s our biggest game of the year,” Blackhawks winger Patrick Kane said.http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html
gives the Blackhawks a 1% chance of winning their division at this point. Wild are 99% likely to win the division.
This game is not that significant. Probably more important for the Wild if they want to win the Presidents trophy.
THEY HAVE ARRIVED.Been watching Caps almost my entire life and I've never seen them play this well for this long of a stretch.Meaningless because it's regular season but it is a joy to watch this team click in every facet of the game from all 4 lines.
maybe so. I guess it's a "must win" in terms of having any chance to win the division, but that's not going to happen regardless imo.“As of now it’s our biggest game of the year,” Blackhawks winger Patrick Kane said.![]()
Lets hope it lasts for another night.maybe so. I guess it's a "must win" in terms of having any chance to win the division, but that's not going to happen regardless imo.
Blackhawks just aren't that good right now.