your guy Crawford gave up a cookie short side from a mile out. his chest protector was fantastic though last light.If Crawford plays that way, the Hawks probably win 6 of 7. Sure, MN had better opportunities, but you also need to consider the Hawks goalie as well. Bottom line to me, 2 of our 3 goals shouldn't have counted. To me, that makes it fair to say we were lucky to get the point we did.
Crawford is hardly my guy, but OK.your guy Crawford gave up a cookie short side from a mile out. his chest protector was fantastic though last light.
I guess since it was a must win game for Chicago then bounces in a single game were important.
Hawks were lucky to get any points in that game. they weren't as good, clearly.
lol, yeah Wild really benefited from momentum of a 15 min game delay there. later when they zamboni'd was another huge advantage. home cookin'don't act like it didn't matter. That game played 100 times without those calls would be vastly different. Momentum plays a huge part of the game flow, that goal gets called back and the game changes. And you can't say with certainty that either team would win the majority of them.
obviously. as with everything else. which is the point.That game played 100 times without those calls would be vastly different.
no way Boudrrau wins game 7 there.why would which specific shot that went in matter? they had the better of the play. they play that game 7 times they probably win 6. what do you know, that actually happened in the last 7.
You don't want the season to end the way it did for the B's that year. :dryden:Caps join 70-71 Bruins as 2nd team in NHL history to score 5+ goals in 10 straight home games
From the NHL Rule Book ...
Too bad he never got the baseball championship he craved so much, but he ressurected The Dead Things into one of the model franchises in the league and did more than his share to revitalize Detroit. RIP.RIP Mike Ilitch
I've always believed Lambert is a tool, for a variety of reasons. For instance, how can you write that Neely is "the real decision-maker for this club" and then put most of the blame on Sweeney, in the exact same paragraph? And then two graphs later note that, "The Bruins’ problems obviously predate Sweeney’s ascension to the job."
I have never met him, but I know several people who know him. He definitely is an instigator on Twitter (as well as a Lowell fan, which I admit, might be helping to shape my opinion of him).Lambert posts a lot of stuff to instigate and get a reaction. But he also makes some really good points and has good insight imo. Just have to take it most with a grain of salt as he overstates things for effect.
No doubt intent to injure. I don't care if "he's not that kind of player." Then why did he do that? Lucky he didn't take out Spurgeon's eye. Ref needs to toss him there. None of this "he failed to control his stick" bs.Nyquist should have been ejected IMO.
Now, now ... it's only been three games. Remember, this team overachieved under Claude. Who wants to watch exciting, creative hockey?B's are on a roll
You think? Should get 10 games minimum.Nyquist has been invited to meet with the league. Suspension nearly impossible to avoid IMO.
Well, he should have been ejected immediately and he wasn't. I'd be surprised at 10. Duncan Keith got six games last year for High-sticking Charlie Coyle, which seems like a close comparison.You think? Should get 10 games minimum.
he'll probably need an injury to Crosby and McDavid.Wooderson said:Sharks needed that win.
Burns is going to lead the league in points you just watch.
But today, thanks to shot location data you can get from NHL game sheets, we can also factor in shot quality in every situation, and use that to determine how many goals a netminder has prevented in comparison with what an average goalie would have stopped facing the same workload in terms of both volume and difficulty. That is synthesized into one stat: Corsica’s “goals saved above average.”
And when you look at GSAA, a slightly different picture of who has been the best goaltender in the league starts to emerge. Of the 37 goaltenders to play at least 1,000 minutes at 5-on-5 this season (goalies we can safely say are starters, in 1a/1b tandems, or working through injury situations), one goalie has a not-insignificant lead on the competition, and it’s not one of the three Vezina candidates discussed above.
It’s actually Cam Talbot.
from Lambert:Dickie Dunn said:Now, now ... it's only been three games. Remember, this team overachieved under Claude. Who wants to watch exciting, creative hockey?
Boston Bruins: Man, this is why Julien had to go: The Bruins are scoring more because Bruce Cassidy said “shoot like 16 percent.” Claude was telling them to only shoot 7.5 percent. What a dope!
this would be pretty awesomefalguy said:Habs are a mess. There's a couple decent French speaking options available, maybe Bergevin will pull the trigger. Oh, God, I hope so.
Montreal Canadiens: Here’s an idea: Fire Therrien, hire Julien. What a thumb in the eye to the Bruins.
Why didn't they just keep him the first time they had him?this would be pretty awesome
I've watched most Oilers games this year. Talbot has been otherworldly. Lately not quite as good and the Oilers are in a skid. As Talbot goes, so go the Oilers. If he comes back to earth through the rest of the season (after a monster workload so far) they may find themselves in a wildcard race...
I think you'd need to ask Bob Gainey this question, but not sure he reads the FFA.Why didn't they just keep him the first time they had him?