What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL 2008 Washington Redskins Thread**** (1 Viewer)

Bankerguy said:
Sorry I normally don't enjoy causing crap but........London Fletcher rips Pro Bowl votingAfter being named a Pro Bowl alternate for the eighth time, usually mild-mannered Redskins linebacker London Fletcher had some choice words about the selection process: "I don't know if it was because I wasn't a first-round draft pick, I don't do some kind of dance when I make a 10-yard tackle, I don't go out and get arrested. I believe in playing the game the way it's supposed to be played." He later added: "Because I'm not going out causing a lot of controversy, holding a private meeting with the coordinator saying this, this and this, causing a lot of strife on my team, I don't garner a lot of attention." I can't imagine which player he was referencing in that last part. (Washington Times)London, maybe like a Pro Bowl running back calling his coach a genius???
Portis didn't "hold a private meeting" with Zorn - Portis' noteworthy act was to go on the radio and run his mouth. Zorn met with him to smooth things out. The person whose meeting was noteworthy was TO's, along with his merry band of backups.
I was just trying to illistrate the irony in the statement.It's all good boys.
I was honestly reading that last part and thinking TO too. Makes sense to me.
 
Bankerguy said:
Sorry I normally don't enjoy causing crap but........London Fletcher rips Pro Bowl votingAfter being named a Pro Bowl alternate for the eighth time, usually mild-mannered Redskins linebacker London Fletcher had some choice words about the selection process: "I don't know if it was because I wasn't a first-round draft pick, I don't do some kind of dance when I make a 10-yard tackle, I don't go out and get arrested. I believe in playing the game the way it's supposed to be played." He later added: "Because I'm not going out causing a lot of controversy, holding a private meeting with the coordinator saying this, this and this, causing a lot of strife on my team, I don't garner a lot of attention." I can't imagine which player he was referencing in that last part. (Washington Times)London, maybe like a Pro Bowl running back calling his coach a genius???
Portis didn't "hold a private meeting" with Zorn - Portis' noteworthy act was to go on the radio and run his mouth. Zorn met with him to smooth things out. The person whose meeting was noteworthy was TO's, along with his merry band of backups.
I was just trying to illistrate the irony in the statement.It's all good boys.
I was honestly reading that last part and thinking TO too. Makes sense to me.
Yes, I realize he is referring to Owens. The irony is.....he is calling out people who do these things as a reason for not being a starter in the ProBowl. So again two things:-Portis fits the bill as being one of these players with his recent comments.-Oh...and TO didn't make the Probowl
 
Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend?

I'll hang up and listen...

 
Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...
I think it will depend on how the game starts. If they fall behind early, like the past two weeks, they'll lay down, especially since the weather Sunday in DC is supposed to be pretty bad (rain/cold). If they stay even or heaven forbid, get a lead, they'll hang in for a while. The laydown game will be the finale on the road in San Francisco, especailly if they get pasted by the Iggles.
 
cowboymouth said:
Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...
The offense will have one successful drive and the defense will play 3 solid quarters of football.
 
DCThunder said:
cowboymouth said:
Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...
I think it will depend on how the game starts. If they fall behind early, like the past two weeks, they'll lay down, especially since the weather Sunday in DC is supposed to be pretty bad (rain/cold). If they stay even or heaven forbid, get a lead, they'll hang in for a while. The laydown game will be the finale on the road in San Francisco, especailly if they get pasted by the Iggles.
I'll be at that SF game too. It's my brother's birthday and he lives in the area, so we're headed that way. Oh well, at least I'll enjoy time with my brother . . . :kicksrock:
 
So we're up to a possible $23 million in cap savings
WE'RE HEADED FOR SALARY CAP HELL!Seriously, though, that's more than I expected. If they can free up a ton of salary cap space, they may have what it takes to address part of their line problems in FA. They shouldn't try to address all the problems there and should still focus on drafting some young talent on the line, but this could accelerate the process of rebuilding things.I'm not sure who is a FA this year. But, if there's a relatively young stud DE, I'd say go for it.
We're headed to 49er type problems
The Redskins will NEVER be headed to 49ers type problems (financially speaking, not on the field :lmao: )
 
Interesting stuff from another point of view:

That night, the Zorn family hashed out, inside their own home, what would be hashed out all over the region all week. Joy Zorn joined 25-year-old Sarah, the middle of the Zorns' three daughters, and Isaac, the youngest Zorn, the only son. Jim Zorn is 55, has been a head coach for all of 10 months and was a rising star in the business all of two months prior, yet there was so much to digest.

The 20-13 loss to the pitiful Bengals was the freshest problem, the loss that meant the Redskins have almost no shot of making the playoffs even if they beat the Philadelphia Eagles this afternoon and San Francisco 49ers in their regular season finale next week. A stellar 6-2 start had dissolved into 7-7 mediocrity. The ramifications and possibilities rang through the Zorn family. At that point, Vinny Cerrato, the Redskins' executive vice president for football operations, had not yet gone on the radio and said the possibility of Zorn's dismissal had not been brought up, as he did Friday.

"Could this mean that we have to move again?" Isaac eventually asked his mother.

"Well, yes," Joy Zorn said. "That's the kind of career that Dad's in. It's very volatile."
Link
 
"It's almost a lack of confidence all the way around," Cooley said. "Someone has to say, 'Give me the ball, I'm going to make a play.' And Jason has to say, 'I'm throwing it in there.' "
 
Well that was all defense and Philly shooting themselves in the foot (not sure which was more important in determining the win). The offense is still "ugh" and can't sustain a drive for anything. They flash some decent plays every once in a while but they still can't string together a solid scoring drive.

I'm glad Atlanta won. That "glimmer of hope" would probably have ruined my Christmas if it were still alive.

 
posted this in another thread, but should have put it here.

For the record, I'm not a Jason hater, AT ALL. In fact, I don't hate on any skins player. I've loved this team since I first starting watching football in the late 70s. But Jason Campbell is clearly an average (and that's being kind) NFL QB. Each week, I continue to see other NFL QBs put up better numbers than Jason has this year.

In fact, take Jason's best statistical game this year-

23 for 28, 328 yards, 1 TD vs Lions

OR

231 Yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs vs Dallas.

Not overly impressive, no matter how much we love our QB.

Now here is a list of QBs who's best game this year surpasses Jason's best game-

Brees

Warner

Cutler

Peyton

Rivers

McNabb

Cassel

Garrard

Rodgers

Pennington

Ryan

Romo

Farve

Big Ben

Eli

Delhomme (one could argue a tie with Jason's best effort, but he had a few less yards but a 2 TD game effort)

Schaub

Collins

Orton

Flacco (again, I could argue he's tied with Jason's best effort)

Edwards

Thigpen

Garcia

Russell (ouch)

T.Jackson (ouch)

Shaun Hill (ouch)

D. Anderson

*I stopped looking after this one*

Now here's the list of starting QBs who haven't had a better game than Jason this year-

Bulger

Yep, that's it. Even Frerotte has had a superior game (300+ yards and 3 Tds in a game this year)

Tonight Jason will drop out of the top 15 in total passing yards this year. He's tied for 24th in total TDs throw. He's 14th in completion rate. He's also the 4th most sacked QB this year.

I believe the Skins HAVE to find a new starter next year. No matter how much we WANT Jason to succeed and take us to a world championship, its looking extremely unlikely that will ever happen.

I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.

Thoughts?

 
I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.

Thoughts?
If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.

 
Stats aren't everything. There are enough problems throughout this offense, particularly on the o-line, that Campbell should go into next year as the starter. You may be right about Campbell, but it's a bit impulsive to make such a decision based upon the information at hand, especially with a position with such a steep learning curve and such a long shelf-life.

The would-be "QB of the future" is already on the roster in Brennan if Campbell doesn't work out, but Brennan is VERY raw and needs another year on the bench anyway. Collins needs to be replaced by someone who can step in for Campbell next year and win in the West Coast Offense - Collins ' value really came from his familiarity with Saunders' system, so he should have followed Saunders to St. Louis.

 
I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.

Thoughts?
If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.
i am very interested to see what Brennan can do in the NFL. loved watching him at Hawaii.
 
I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.

Thoughts?
If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.
First of all, I think it is too early to give up on Campbell. It took Hasselback 3 years to master the West Coast offense. And Gibbs offense was nothing like a West Coast offense.If they think Colt has potential, they should let him battle for the back up qb spot next year. I personally have no confidence in Todd Collins outside of Saunders' system.

I heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.

With a lack of draft picks, they will probably stick with Collins and Brennan as the backups. If they had more picks and they like Brennan, I think they would take another shot at a qb late in the draft. If they don't like Brennan, they may sign another veteran/journeyman backup.

 
I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.

Thoughts?
If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.
i am very interested to see what Brennan can do in the NFL. loved watching him at Hawaii.
I think he needs 2 or 3 years at least on the bench. I loved him here as well, but you could see from the Sugar Bowl that the speed of the game in the WAC is way behind what the SEC, let alone the NFL is.
 
Am I right in thinking that the Redskins would control their own destiny now if they had beaten the Bengals.

Argh!

Though the same is true for the Eagles, I guess. Look at the Bengals shaking up the NFC playoffs.

 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.

The lines. The guts of every play on the field.

Fix this. The rest will be OK.

 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.
 
I hope they get a deal done w/ DeAngelo Hall sooner rather than later. Yesterday was also an impressive day for Landry.

As far as Campbell, I think he is part of the problem with scoring. He's not the only part, but he is definitely a part of it. I would rather they not re-sign him and let him play for the extension. If it turns into a romo situation, then so be it, I'm not feeling confident enough to want to lock in now.

 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.
I heard the talk between Riggo, Sheehan and Andy Poli on this topic this morning too. Thought some of the comments by Sheehan were interesting, as was Riggo. The bit about Campbell not having any "prescense" was most revealing and in retrospect, pretty true.They also ran through the available FA QBs this year. Nobody is a major upgrade over Campbell, so he'll be back next season. Anybody know what Matt Hasselbeck's contract status is?
 
I have no idea who to root against in the upcoming Eagles-Cowboys game. None.

Every time I think about it my head breaks.

 
I have no idea who to root against in the upcoming Eagles-Cowboys game. None.Every time I think about it my head breaks.
Same here. The Eagles are the Eagles, they're going to be unhappy with the outcome regardless. The Cowboys on the other hand...I don't know which would make for the better media circus, them not making the playoffs or them continuing their decade long drought of playoff wins.
 
Hopefully, the Bucs win their early game to eliminate the Eagles and then the Eagles beat the Cowboys to eliminate them.

If the Bucs lose and this becomes a play-in game, it's very hard to know who to cheer for.

 
Hopefully, the Bucs win their early game to eliminate the Eagles and then the Eagles beat the Cowboys to eliminate them.If the Bucs lose and this becomes a play-in game, it's very hard to know who to cheer for.
I didn't realize that there was a scenario where both could be eliminated. Interesting.
 
I can't believe what I'm reading here - questions about whether to root for the Cowpies? Especially given that this impacts the Skins not at all.

Shameful :kicksrock:

 
I hope they get a deal done w/ DeAngelo Hall sooner rather than later.
He's certainly been a solid CB, but they have to be careful about how much they give him. He'll want CB1 money and I'm not sure they should pay that given his problems in the past.
Yesterday was also an impressive day for Landry.
Yep. He had a Tayloresque game. He made his presence known over the middle a couple times and came out of nowhere to run some ball carriers down on a couple plays. I'm pretty sure Smoot would have kept that WR out of the endzone by himself, but it was still great to see Landry come flying in and add the knockout blow.
 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
I was in Cincy for the game and sat up high for the 1st quarter with my trusty Canon. Snapped wide-angle shots on just about every pass attempt - just like the coaches see. It was shocking to see actual evidence of what I have suspected all along: JC cannot process information on where to go with the ball. He just can't. So that causes him to hold the ball too long. I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.
 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.
This is a very good question. The Ravens waited for 5 years for Kyle Boller to "get it" and he never did. Meanwhile, Flacco has "gotten it" more in less than one season than Boller ever did.I like Campbell, but all the evidence -- including last year's playoff run -- points toward him not being the solution.

 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
I was in Cincy for the game and sat up high for the 1st quarter with my trusty Canon. Snapped wide-angle shots on just about every pass attempt - just like the coaches see. It was shocking to see actual evidence of what I have suspected all along: JC cannot process information on where to go with the ball. He just can't. So that causes him to hold the ball too long. I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.
Just off the top of my head, here are three: Dan Fouts; Rich Gannon; Vinnie Testaverde. It didn't take Drew Brees 40 starts, but he was pretty awful for his first two years (in the same system) and lots of people had written him off, including his own team which drafted Rivers. Eli, this time a year ago, had some questioning whether the Giants should go in another direction at QB. Kurt Warner's another one, though his 40 starts came in a mix of the NFL, NFL Europe and the Arena league.

There are plenty of other examples of QB's who showed modest promise early on and who matured over time into good and even very good QB's as well. Kerry Collins is such an example. So are Trent Green and Matt Hasselbeck.

I'm convinced that there is no more demanding position/occupation in professional sports than playing QB in the NFL. Perhaps individual skills are more challenging here and there, but the physical, mental and emotional burden on NFL QB's is not matched anywhere else IMHO. We seem to ignore that when we talk about QB "busts", because I think some QB's just take a little longer than others. Any other position, I grant you, and 40 starts is more than enough to say definitively whether a player "has it" or doesn't, but with the QB, it's different or can be. Unfortunately, the demands of the salary cap and the win-now attitude of fans rarely affords QB's the luxury of working all the way through their learning curves. Campbell is frustrating because we still can't say definitively that he's going to ultimately be known as a good, average or bad QB, but that goes with the territory.

The bottom line is that it's not like the team is one QB away from being a Super Bowl champion. I say address the other issues and see if those improvements don't help Campbell over the hump. I suspect we haven't seen his best football yet, though I don't know exactly what that means.

 
Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.

 
Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
You have to ask yourself if he is in a system that would allow this? I don't. I also certainly don't think Campbell is elite, however you guys have bigger problems then Campbell.
 
Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
That I can agree with, but as you said or at least implied that may have as much to do with teams "giving up" on the player as it does with the player's own capabilities. Unfortunately the windows of opportunity that teams provide for their young QB's all too often don't much match up with the realities of the development of that position. Yes, the obvious busts like Ryan Leaf, and the obvious studs like Peyton Manning are exceptions to that, but they're also relative rarities in this discussion. Campbell will go into next year starting, and Zorn will be coaching. That's as it should be. Hopefully the O-line will be upgraded and the young WR's will have developed, and Zorn's WCO will be fully installed such that we can no longer worry about Campbell's development or lack thereof being obscured by the static around him.
 
Mr Capicollo said:
TankRizzo said:
Marvelous said:
I heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.
Erasmus James :thumbdown:
7th rounder - who cares? The big thing was the Jason Taylor trade, but I just hope he's back and healthy next year - he showed today what he can do if that's the case.
I care about a 7th round pick. Sometimes a 7th round pick turns into a decent role player. Othertimes, he turns into a really good player. The more you have, the more likely you are to find a player.
 
Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
You have to ask yourself if he is in a system that would allow this? I don't. I also certainly don't think Campbell is elite, however you guys have bigger problems then Campbell.
I'm not sure a system can change most QBs from appearing to be in the bottom third to appearing to be in the top third of the league. I think systems can help a player and can be the difference between being the 7th best QB and the 4th best QB, for example, but I don't think they can completely change the results of most QBs. For the most part, they are who they are. I think surrounding talent is 10x more important than the system.
 
I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.
I think Campbell should be extended. One thing the Eagles do really well is they identify and commit to players very early, before they have their break out years. So the players are already locked in when they have their breakout season.
 
Mr Capicollo said:
TankRizzo said:
Marvelous said:
I heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.
Erasmus James :thumbdown:
7th rounder - who cares? The big thing was the Jason Taylor trade, but I just hope he's back and healthy next year - he showed today what he can do if that's the case.
I care about a 7th round pick. Sometimes a 7th round pick turns into a decent role player. Othertimes, he turns into a really good player. The more you have, the more likely you are to find a player.
Statistically, there are far more UDFA's who turn into starters than there are 7th rounders who do. Honestly, trading away that pick doesn't bother me much at all. I liked the Erasmus James gamble for the price, even though it didn't end up paying off. The Taylor trade is more worrisome, especially if he retires and doesn't return, in which case what little we got out of him this year would have not remotely been worth what we gave up to get him.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top