I was honestly reading that last part and thinking TO too. Makes sense to me.I was just trying to illistrate the irony in the statement.It's all good boys.Portis didn't "hold a private meeting" with Zorn - Portis' noteworthy act was to go on the radio and run his mouth. Zorn met with him to smooth things out. The person whose meeting was noteworthy was TO's, along with his merry band of backups.Bankerguy said:Sorry I normally don't enjoy causing crap but........London Fletcher rips Pro Bowl votingAfter being named a Pro Bowl alternate for the eighth time, usually mild-mannered Redskins linebacker London Fletcher had some choice words about the selection process: "I don't know if it was because I wasn't a first-round draft pick, I don't do some kind of dance when I make a 10-yard tackle, I don't go out and get arrested. I believe in playing the game the way it's supposed to be played." He later added: "Because I'm not going out causing a lot of controversy, holding a private meeting with the coordinator saying this, this and this, causing a lot of strife on my team, I don't garner a lot of attention." I can't imagine which player he was referencing in that last part. (Washington Times)London, maybe like a Pro Bowl running back calling his coach a genius???
Yes, I realize he is referring to Owens. The irony is.....he is calling out people who do these things as a reason for not being a starter in the ProBowl. So again two thingsI was honestly reading that last part and thinking TO too. Makes sense to me.I was just trying to illistrate the irony in the statement.It's all good boys.Portis didn't "hold a private meeting" with Zorn - Portis' noteworthy act was to go on the radio and run his mouth. Zorn met with him to smooth things out. The person whose meeting was noteworthy was TO's, along with his merry band of backups.Bankerguy said:Sorry I normally don't enjoy causing crap but........London Fletcher rips Pro Bowl votingAfter being named a Pro Bowl alternate for the eighth time, usually mild-mannered Redskins linebacker London Fletcher had some choice words about the selection process: "I don't know if it was because I wasn't a first-round draft pick, I don't do some kind of dance when I make a 10-yard tackle, I don't go out and get arrested. I believe in playing the game the way it's supposed to be played." He later added: "Because I'm not going out causing a lot of controversy, holding a private meeting with the coordinator saying this, this and this, causing a lot of strife on my team, I don't garner a lot of attention." I can't imagine which player he was referencing in that last part. (Washington Times)London, maybe like a Pro Bowl running back calling his coach a genius???
How could they possibly lose this week.Do it for Sammy!Sammy Baugh has died. He was 94.

I think it will depend on how the game starts. If they fall behind early, like the past two weeks, they'll lay down, especially since the weather Sunday in DC is supposed to be pretty bad (rain/cold). If they stay even or heaven forbid, get a lead, they'll hang in for a while. The laydown game will be the finale on the road in San Francisco, especailly if they get pasted by the Iggles.Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...
The offense will have one successful drive and the defense will play 3 solid quarters of football.cowboymouth said:Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...
I'll be at that SF game too. It's my brother's birthday and he lives in the area, so we're headed that way. Oh well, at least I'll enjoy time with my brother . . .DCThunder said:I think it will depend on how the game starts. If they fall behind early, like the past two weeks, they'll lay down, especially since the weather Sunday in DC is supposed to be pretty bad (rain/cold). If they stay even or heaven forbid, get a lead, they'll hang in for a while. The laydown game will be the finale on the road in San Francisco, especailly if they get pasted by the Iggles.cowboymouth said:Are the Skins mailing it in now that they are out of the playoffs, or will they show up to play the Eagles this weekend? I'll hang up and listen...

The Redskins will NEVER be headed to 49ers type problems (financially speaking, not on the fieldWe're headed to 49er type problemsWE'RE HEADED FOR SALARY CAP HELL!Seriously, though, that's more than I expected. If they can free up a ton of salary cap space, they may have what it takes to address part of their line problems in FA. They shouldn't try to address all the problems there and should still focus on drafting some young talent on the line, but this could accelerate the process of rebuilding things.I'm not sure who is a FA this year. But, if there's a relatively young stud DE, I'd say go for it.So we're up to a possible $23 million in cap savings
)LinkThat night, the Zorn family hashed out, inside their own home, what would be hashed out all over the region all week. Joy Zorn joined 25-year-old Sarah, the middle of the Zorns' three daughters, and Isaac, the youngest Zorn, the only son. Jim Zorn is 55, has been a head coach for all of 10 months and was a rising star in the business all of two months prior, yet there was so much to digest.
The 20-13 loss to the pitiful Bengals was the freshest problem, the loss that meant the Redskins have almost no shot of making the playoffs even if they beat the Philadelphia Eagles this afternoon and San Francisco 49ers in their regular season finale next week. A stellar 6-2 start had dissolved into 7-7 mediocrity. The ramifications and possibilities rang through the Zorn family. At that point, Vinny Cerrato, the Redskins' executive vice president for football operations, had not yet gone on the radio and said the possibility of Zorn's dismissal had not been brought up, as he did Friday.
"Could this mean that we have to move again?" Isaac eventually asked his mother.
"Well, yes," Joy Zorn said. "That's the kind of career that Dad's in. It's very volatile."
"It's almost a lack of confidence all the way around," Cooley said. "Someone has to say, 'Give me the ball, I'm going to make a play.' And Jason has to say, 'I'm throwing it in there.' "
If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.
Thoughts?
i am very interested to see what Brennan can do in the NFL. loved watching him at Hawaii.If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.
Thoughts?
First of all, I think it is too early to give up on Campbell. It took Hasselback 3 years to master the West Coast offense. And Gibbs offense was nothing like a West Coast offense.If they think Colt has potential, they should let him battle for the back up qb spot next year. I personally have no confidence in Todd Collins outside of Saunders' system.If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.
Thoughts?
Erasmus JamesI heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.

7th rounder - who cares? The big thing was the Jason Taylor trade, but I just hope he's back and healthy next year - he showed today what he can do if that's the case.Erasmus JamesI heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.![]()
I think he needs 2 or 3 years at least on the bench. I loved him here as well, but you could see from the Sugar Bowl that the speed of the game in the WAC is way behind what the SEC, let alone the NFL is.i am very interested to see what Brennan can do in the NFL. loved watching him at Hawaii.If they decide to go in a different direction at QB (and, at the moment, I don't think they will) I don't think they should waste a draft pick on a QB (unless it's another late round, 2nd day pick).I say have a training camp battle between Brennan and a FA veteran to see if Brennan is ready to step up.I hope we draft another QB next year, give Colt a shot, and perhaps pickup a FA QB that isn't 30+ years old.
Thoughts?
Actually, I think that game was irrelevant to Dallas' chances. Either way, it will come down to next week's game.Bankerguy said:Thanks for the help today.....nice win.
LOL, that was one of the uglier wins ever seen.Bankerguy said:Thanks for the help today.....nice win.
Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
I heard the talk between Riggo, Sheehan and Andy Poli on this topic this morning too. Thought some of the comments by Sheehan were interesting, as was Riggo. The bit about Campbell not having any "prescense" was most revealing and in retrospect, pretty true.They also ran through the available FA QBs this year. Nobody is a major upgrade over Campbell, so he'll be back next season. Anybody know what Matt Hasselbeck's contract status is?Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
Same here. The Eagles are the Eagles, they're going to be unhappy with the outcome regardless. The Cowboys on the other hand...I don't know which would make for the better media circus, them not making the playoffs or them continuing their decade long drought of playoff wins.I have no idea who to root against in the upcoming Eagles-Cowboys game. None.Every time I think about it my head breaks.
I didn't realize that there was a scenario where both could be eliminated. Interesting.Hopefully, the Bucs win their early game to eliminate the Eagles and then the Eagles beat the Cowboys to eliminate them.If the Bucs lose and this becomes a play-in game, it's very hard to know who to cheer for.
He's certainly been a solid CB, but they have to be careful about how much they give him. He'll want CB1 money and I'm not sure they should pay that given his problems in the past.I hope they get a deal done w/ DeAngelo Hall sooner rather than later.
Yep. He had a Tayloresque game. He made his presence known over the middle a couple times and came out of nowhere to run some ball carriers down on a couple plays. I'm pretty sure Smoot would have kept that WR out of the endzone by himself, but it was still great to see Landry come flying in and add the knockout blow.Yesterday was also an impressive day for Landry.
I can't believe what I'm reading here - questions about whether to root for the Cowpies? Especially given that this impacts the Skins not at all.Shameful![]()
I'll definitely root for Philly.The Bears and Vikings also play into this.I didn't realize that there was a scenario where both could be eliminated. Interesting.Hopefully, the Bucs win their early game to eliminate the Eagles and then the Eagles beat the Cowboys to eliminate them.If the Bucs lose and this becomes a play-in game, it's very hard to know who to cheer for.
I was in Cincy for the game and sat up high for the 1st quarter with my trusty Canon. Snapped wide-angle shots on just about every pass attempt - just like the coaches see. It was shocking to see actual evidence of what I have suspected all along: JC cannot process information on where to go with the ball. He just can't. So that causes him to hold the ball too long. I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
This is a very good question. The Ravens waited for 5 years for Kyle Boller to "get it" and he never did. Meanwhile, Flacco has "gotten it" more in less than one season than Boller ever did.I like Campbell, but all the evidence -- including last year's playoff run -- points toward him not being the solution.I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
Just off the top of my head, here are three: Dan Fouts; Rich Gannon; Vinnie Testaverde. It didn't take Drew Brees 40 starts, but he was pretty awful for his first two years (in the same system) and lots of people had written him off, including his own team which drafted Rivers. Eli, this time a year ago, had some questioning whether the Giants should go in another direction at QB. Kurt Warner's another one, though his 40 starts came in a mix of the NFL, NFL Europe and the Arena league.I was in Cincy for the game and sat up high for the 1st quarter with my trusty Canon. Snapped wide-angle shots on just about every pass attempt - just like the coaches see. It was shocking to see actual evidence of what I have suspected all along: JC cannot process information on where to go with the ball. He just can't. So that causes him to hold the ball too long. I think it's delusional to believe he is not a problem. Look, he's had what? 40 starts? At what point do you think he'll "get it?" I defy you to show me a QB who has found success after showing so little for such an extended period of time.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems.
He's gotta be around here somewhere.T Bell? Where did this guy go? New alias?

Got it....I thought so.He's gotta be around here somewhere.T Bell? Where did this guy go? New alias?![]()
You have to ask yourself if he is in a system that would allow this? I don't. I also certainly don't think Campbell is elite, however you guys have bigger problems then Campbell.Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
That I can agree with, but as you said or at least implied that may have as much to do with teams "giving up" on the player as it does with the player's own capabilities. Unfortunately the windows of opportunity that teams provide for their young QB's all too often don't much match up with the realities of the development of that position. Yes, the obvious busts like Ryan Leaf, and the obvious studs like Peyton Manning are exceptions to that, but they're also relative rarities in this discussion. Campbell will go into next year starting, and Zorn will be coaching. That's as it should be. Hopefully the O-line will be upgraded and the young WR's will have developed, and Zorn's WCO will be fully installed such that we can no longer worry about Campbell's development or lack thereof being obscured by the static around him.Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
I care about a 7th round pick. Sometimes a 7th round pick turns into a decent role player. Othertimes, he turns into a really good player. The more you have, the more likely you are to find a player.Mr Capicollo said:7th rounder - who cares? The big thing was the Jason Taylor trade, but I just hope he's back and healthy next year - he showed today what he can do if that's the case.TankRizzo said:Erasmus JamesMarvelous said:I heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.![]()
I'm not sure a system can change most QBs from appearing to be in the bottom third to appearing to be in the top third of the league. I think systems can help a player and can be the difference between being the 7th best QB and the 4th best QB, for example, but I don't think they can completely change the results of most QBs. For the most part, they are who they are. I think surrounding talent is 10x more important than the system.You have to ask yourself if he is in a system that would allow this? I don't. I also certainly don't think Campbell is elite, however you guys have bigger problems then Campbell.Not that fantasy points is the best measure of "getting it", but if a QB doesn't have a top 10 fantasy season by his third season in the league, he won't have one. I believe it's something like 70% of the QBs who have at least one top 10 season do so by their third year. Again, that may say little about how good of an NFL QB he can be, but I would assume the odds are against someone being a top NFL QB if they haven't established themselves by their 4th year. The reason being is that teams generally move on to someone else by then. As we discussed, his contract has one more year. The Redskins will move on from him if he doesn't take the next step (or two) next year. Then he'll go somewhere else to likely compete for a job and eventually fade away.
I think Campbell should be extended. One thing the Eagles do really well is they identify and commit to players very early, before they have their break out years. So the players are already locked in when they have their breakout season.Agree. Go with Campbell. Don't go with Campbell. Doesn't really matter until the OL is built back up. But, I will say yesterday I think they did a nice job in pass protection. I didn't keep track, but it seemed like most of the pressure came from Campbell holding on too long or the Eagles sending the house. Campbell did a nice job on some plays getting out of the pocket and avoiding a sack. But, on other plays, he pumped and double-clutched and didn't throw the ball and was sacked. I'd say 75% of the time Campbell double-clutches, something bad happens. I thought Heyer played well on Cole. Most of Cole's pressure was when Campbell didn't get rid of the ball quickly enough or nobody was open.A lot of talk today on the radio about Campbell's future. Next year is the last year of his rookie contract. So, they asked whether he should be extended this offseason or not. Everyone said not to extend him, see what happens next year, then maybe let him walk in FA. But, I wonder if that's the right move. IF they can extend him right now for a modest salary, it might be worth it so they don't find themselves needing to make a big offer to someone next offseason. I'm not sure Campbell and his agent would do that, though. I'm sure they'll ask for a big extension now or play it out and hope for a big year next year.I think it's pretty delusional to believe Campbell is a large part of the Redskins' problems. That's the same mistake the front office makes every offseason --- try to deal with problems by paying attention to skill players. The skill players on this team are not the problem, Campbell included. The lines are the problem.The lines. The guts of every play on the field.Fix this. The rest will be OK.
Statistically, there are far more UDFA's who turn into starters than there are 7th rounders who do. Honestly, trading away that pick doesn't bother me much at all. I liked the Erasmus James gamble for the price, even though it didn't end up paying off. The Taylor trade is more worrisome, especially if he retires and doesn't return, in which case what little we got out of him this year would have not remotely been worth what we gave up to get him.I care about a 7th round pick. Sometimes a 7th round pick turns into a decent role player. Othertimes, he turns into a really good player. The more you have, the more likely you are to find a player.Mr Capicollo said:7th rounder - who cares? The big thing was the Jason Taylor trade, but I just hope he's back and healthy next year - he showed today what he can do if that's the case.TankRizzo said:Erasmus JamesMarvelous said:I heard on the radio the Redskins only have 4 draft picks next year. I know they traded their 2nd for Taylor, but I don't recall where the others went.![]()
If that's correct, then it's perfectly clear who to root for: Bucs, then EaglesHopefully, the Bucs win their early game to eliminate the Eagles and then the Eagles beat the Cowboys to eliminate them.
