What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL 2009 NFL DRAFT*** (2 Viewers)

Love the pick. I think Jason Smith is going to be a very good NFL left tackle.

Physical specimen who plays with a mean streak and isn't a dum-dum like Andre Smith. I love it!

 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.

 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
Nope. Matter of fact Bradford wont be the best QB in next years class either.
 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
This is what we were talking about earlier. They are almost certainly going to have a top 5 pick next year too. QBs take longer to develop then OT. So why not take the QB now and the OT next year? There's no reason Stafford has to play this year.And I think Stafford is a better NFL prospect than Bradford.
 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
Culpepper will probably be the QB in Detroit taking the hits behind that line this year (until he gets hurt).
 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
Nope. Matter of fact Bradford wont be the best QB in next years class either.
I'm not saying that Bradford will be the best QB next year, but he IS BETTER THAN STAFFORD!!! It makes more sense to draft Jason Smith this year, and if you're right and someone else is better than Bradford next year, well, that makes it even more likely to get a QB better than Stafford next year if there is two of them ;) ETA: I'm a firm believer in building the OL and DL before the QB. How many good QBs have been ruined by a bad OL and no weapons? and no defense?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
Nope. Matter of fact Bradford wont be the best QB in next years class either.
I'm not saying that Bradford will be the best QB next year, but he IS BETTER THAN STAFFORD!!!
No, he isn't and Stafford would be the best QB in next years draft too.
 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
This is what we were talking about earlier. They are almost certainly going to have a top 5 pick next year too. QBs take longer to develop then OT. So why not take the QB now and the OT next year? There's no reason Stafford has to play this year.And I think Stafford is a better NFL prospect than Bradford.
well, the quality of OTs seems to be better this year than next. I think Stafford is as good as any QB coming out next year but QBs have a higher bust rate and the Lions can't afford any wasted picks at this point.
 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
This is what we were talking about earlier. They are almost certainly going to have a top 5 pick next year too. QBs take longer to develop then OT. So why not take the QB now and the OT next year? There's no reason Stafford has to play this year.And I think Stafford is a better NFL prospect than Bradford.
13 Mil to sit - sweet!
 
Alright. Now things will start to get interesting. KC's pick really sets the table for how things will start to play out now.

No surprise though with the pick of Tyson Jackson since word was they love the guy.

 
Talk about a meteoric rise. I got Jackson for the 6-time Champion Steelers in a 32-man mock a few months ago, and now he goes #3. I think the pick sucks. A 5-technique in a 3-4 is not worthy of the #3 overall pick. You can find a guy who can play that spot well in round 2 or later.

 
I feel Detroit would have been beter off taking Jason Smith #1 overall, then build on that with #20, then worry about QB later. The worst thing a team can do is ruin their QB with no help at OL. You know that Detroit will be top 10 next year as well, and probably top 3. I don't know about you but I would rather have Bradford over Stafford.
Nope. Matter of fact Bradford wont be the best QB in next years class either.
I'm not saying that Bradford will be the best QB next year, but he IS BETTER THAN STAFFORD!!! It makes more sense to draft Jason Smith this year, and if you're right and someone else is better than Bradford next year, well, that makes it even more likely to get a QB better than Stafford next year if there is two of them ;) ETA: I'm a firm believer in building the OL and DL before the QB. How many good QBs have been ruined by a bad OL and no weapons? and no defense?
sorry for bumping my own post, but I added some stuff I think is important. At least Stafford has C Johnson.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Talk about a meteoric rise. I got Jackson for the 6-time Champion Steelers in a 32-man mock a few months ago, and now he goes #3. I think the pick sucks. A 5-technique in a 3-4 is not worthy of the #3 overall pick. You can find a guy who can play that spot well in round 2 or later.
Completely agree...I hate that pick.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top