What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL 2009 Off Season Washington Redskins Thread**** (1 Viewer)

Nothing this franchise does surprises me anymore. I'll always be a fan, but its getting harder and harder to get excited about the next season. I'm learning to accept it will just be more of the same. :shock:
:unsure:
Things can turn around quickly in the NFL. Look at Miami and Atlanta last year.Of course, it always seems like that is what happens to other teams. I think the bottom line is the Redskins need draft picks, undrafted free agents, and maybe a few low tier free agents to make an impact this year to have a big turn around. If Thomas, Kelley, Davis, and Reinhart make significant contributions, that would be a good start.
 
Nothing this franchise does surprises me anymore. I'll always be a fan, but its getting harder and harder to get excited about the next season. I'm learning to accept it will just be more of the same. :kicksrock:
:rolleyes:
Things can turn around quickly in the NFL. Look at Miami and Atlanta last year.Of course, it always seems like that is what happens to other teams. I think the bottom line is the Redskins need draft picks, undrafted free agents, and maybe a few low tier free agents to make an impact this year to have a big turn around. If Thomas, Kelley, Davis, and Reinhart make significant contributions, that would be a good start.
The thing about teams like Miami and Atlanta is that they hadn't mortgaged their future to achieve a present mediocrity going into last year, and Atlanta had years of focusing upon the correct types of players in the draft while you knew with Parcells that Miami would from there on out likewise know how to rebuild. Yes, a snapshot of our team right now has us no worse off than those two teams a year ago, but this team wears its aging, mediocre talent like a weight around its neck and I have little confidence in its ability to shed that weight and swim any time soon. It's very frustrating. How many times do you go "double or nothing" and lose before you give up?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T Bell said:
Marvelous said:
T Bell said:
Nothing this franchise does surprises me anymore. I'll always be a fan, but its getting harder and harder to get excited about the next season. I'm learning to accept it will just be more of the same. :thumbup:
:wub:
Things can turn around quickly in the NFL. Look at Miami and Atlanta last year.Of course, it always seems like that is what happens to other teams. I think the bottom line is the Redskins need draft picks, undrafted free agents, and maybe a few low tier free agents to make an impact this year to have a big turn around. If Thomas, Kelley, Davis, and Reinhart make significant contributions, that would be a good start.
The thing about teams like Miami and Atlanta is that they hadn't mortgaged their future to achieve a present mediocrity going into last year, and Atlanta had years of focusing upon the correct types of players in the draft while you knew with Parcells that Miami would from there on out likewise know how to rebuild. Yes, a snapshot of our team right now has us no worse off than those two teams a year ago, but this team wears its aging, mediocre talent like a weight around its neck and I have little confidence in its ability to shed that weight and swim any time soon. It's very frustrating. How many times do you go "double or nothing" and lose before you give up?
I agree with you whole heartedly. This week, a lot of veteran players have been released. Although not good in most employment situations, in pro sports with limited roster sizes, you need to keep bringing in and developing new talent and saying good bye to the veterans that have lost a step. The Redskins hold onto their veterans until it is obvious to everyone that they cannot perform anymore. And I have not seen anyone of signifcance cut from the Redskins yet. It would be alarming if Marcus Washington got another year with the team. Of course, the Redskins don't have young players ready to step in. They need young players to step up fast. And if they are not ready, we are in for some long seasons.
 
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year.

business as usual

 
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
With the perpetual restructuring of contracts, the Redskins have so little roster flexibiltiy. The feel they have to keep players because they are too expensive to cut.
 
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
Golston and Evans are indeed bargains. I'm not going to pile on Carter. He's an above average DE but he can't create sacks by himself. He's like Marco Coleman or Greg Ellis. If you have him opposite someone talented he'll put up numbers. If not, he's just another undersized speed-rushing DE. The problems with Carter aren't Carter, they come from the state of the DL as a whole.
 
T Bell said:
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
Golston and Evans are indeed bargains. I'm not going to pile on Carter. He's an above average DE but he can't create sacks by himself. He's like Marco Coleman or Greg Ellis. If you have him opposite someone talented he'll put up numbers. If not, he's just another undersized speed-rushing DE. The problems with Carter aren't Carter, they come from the state of the DL as a whole.
above average? c'mon man, he is "average" at best. 16 games, 4 sacks, 23 tackles, 14 assists, and 1 pass defense. no fumbles forced or recovered. he was just about invisible!
 
T Bell said:
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
Golston and Evans are indeed bargains. I'm not going to pile on Carter. He's an above average DE but he can't create sacks by himself. He's like Marco Coleman or Greg Ellis. If you have him opposite someone talented he'll put up numbers. If not, he's just another undersized speed-rushing DE. The problems with Carter aren't Carter, they come from the state of the DL as a whole.
In your opinion, what is the problem on the DL? The starters are Taylor, Golston, Griffin, and Carter. If it's not a talent issue, then we don't necessarily need to look at each player.I think they need a big playmaker, whihc will make the whole like look better and be more productive. If Taylor has a chance to be that person, I guess they should give him another year. I could also be a scheme issue.
 
T Bell said:
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
Golston and Evans are indeed bargains. I'm not going to pile on Carter. He's an above average DE but he can't create sacks by himself. He's like Marco Coleman or Greg Ellis. If you have him opposite someone talented he'll put up numbers. If not, he's just another undersized speed-rushing DE. The problems with Carter aren't Carter, they come from the state of the DL as a whole.
In your opinion, what is the problem on the DL? The starters are Taylor, Golston, Griffin, and Carter. If it's not a talent issue, then we don't necessarily need to look at each player.I think they need a big playmaker, whihc will make the whole like look better and be more productive. If Taylor has a chance to be that person, I guess they should give him another year. I could also be a scheme issue.
It's a talent issue. Griffin remains the most talented DL they have (when healthy of course - a pretty freakin' big caveat nowadays), and he no longer can be counted on for more than 20-30 snaps per game, and probably fewer if you want to keep him healthy. For five years he's been THE critical guy on the DL, the one who makes plays possible for everyone, and they signed him back then as a four-year vet and have since failed to put any significant draft resources into the line to augment anything. Everyone else is either a role player or an average guy. I don't think it's a scheme problem. Blache, who of course was the former DL coach under Williams, has been if anything a miracle worker given the lack of talent he's had at his disposal. As I've said repeatedly, they've not drafted a DL of any sort of note since Charles Mann. That's a quarter century and counting.
 
T Bell said:
Marvelous said:
SportingNews.com has listed both Kendrick Golston and Demetric Evans as "bargains" at DT and DE, respectively. Meantime, we're dropping $4m cash money to Carter, who had fewer sacks than #92 last year. business as usual
Golston and Evans are indeed bargains. I'm not going to pile on Carter. He's an above average DE but he can't create sacks by himself. He's like Marco Coleman or Greg Ellis. If you have him opposite someone talented he'll put up numbers. If not, he's just another undersized speed-rushing DE. The problems with Carter aren't Carter, they come from the state of the DL as a whole.
In your opinion, what is the problem on the DL? The starters are Taylor, Golston, Griffin, and Carter. If it's not a talent issue, then we don't necessarily need to look at each player.I think they need a big playmaker, whihc will make the whole like look better and be more productive. If Taylor has a chance to be that person, I guess they should give him another year. I could also be a scheme issue.
It's a talent issue. Griffin remains the most talented DL they have (when healthy of course - a pretty freakin' big caveat nowadays), and he no longer can be counted on for more than 20-30 snaps per game, and probably fewer if you want to keep him healthy. For five years he's been THE critical guy on the DL, the one who makes plays possible for everyone, and they signed him back then as a four-year vet and have since failed to put any significant draft resources into the line to augment anything. Everyone else is either a role player or an average guy. I don't think it's a scheme problem. Blache, who of course was the former DL coach under Williams, has been if anything a miracle worker given the lack of talent he's had at his disposal. As I've said repeatedly, they've not drafted a DL of any sort of note since Charles Mann. That's a quarter century and counting.
while I think Griff has fallen off (as we all do as we age and suffer ailments), it is a miracle what Blatche has done with his charges. The off-season priority for the DL is to resign #92 Evans. He's the type who will play a long time in the NFL. He's fresh, since he's never been a starter, and productive when he plays. And we've probably not seen his best yet, either. Go ahead and sound the gaydar if you must, but I've got a slight man-crush on him.
 
Cooley, you are talented. You aint no Witten though.

Witten averaged 11.8/rec and had a long of 42 yards

Cooley averaged 10.2/rec and had a long of 28 yards

==================================================================

Cooley: 'I'm better' than Witten

Redskins 360 (View Blog)

Washington Times

February 18 2009 1:53 PM BY David Elfin

I'm just back from Chris Cooley's scholarship announcement at Blair High School in Silver Spring. Asked by a member of the wildly enthusiastic senior class (one of whom will win a $25,000 scholarship thanks to the Redskins' standout) if he was better than Dallas' Jason Witten, his fellow NFC Pro Bowl tight end the past two years.

Cooley hesitated, smiled and said, "I think I'm better. ... He doesn't run after the catch very well."

In response to another question, Cooley said he didn't think the Redskins should trade inconsistent quarterback Jason Campbell, who's heading into his third full season as their starter.

Cooley said he had no advance warning that Rennie Simmons was going to retire when he decided to take his position coach to this month's Pro Bowl.

"I was glad to spend the time with him," Cooley said. "We played golf together. It was a good time."

Cooley, of course, is also excited that Simmons' replacement, Scott Wachenheim, coached at Utah State where the tight end played from 2000-03.

"It's pretty cool," Cooley said. "Anyone he mentions from Utah State, I know. I grew up there [in Logan, Utah]. I watched the games he coached. He seems like a great guy. He's super-ambitious. I think he'll be a hard worker and really be prepared for what we're going to do."

Other than the Pro Bowl and some vacation time in Hawaii and Las Vegas, Cooley said he has spent part of the offseason creating the paintings (shown here on his Web site) that will be among more than 20 of his works of art that will be auctioned in May. That auction will raise the $200,000 needed to provide the scholarships for a Blair student as well as a senior at each of seven other area high schools

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Cornelius Griffin is done. A team can't keep paying multi-millions to a player for a combination of 100-150 snaps a year plus memories of how good he used to be. I like the guy, I wish he could do what he did before. But frankly if he walked on now, wasn't an established player, he'd have trouble making the team due to injuries and declining performance. Time to go.

Same with Marcus Washington.

At some point you can't keep holding guys based on past glory and hope, because it ties up too many dollars that prevent you from signing newer guys who may end up being able to fill the voids. And the voids are already there.

Remember the year Griffin and Salavea did so well? That is what the team needs --- 2 strong DT's who collapse the line on every play. Salavea is gone and Griffin can no longer do that. You can get by with average DE's if your DT's disrupt plays. But not the other way around.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redskin free agent status report by LaCanfora

We're now about 10 days away from the start of free agency, and I've touched based with the Skins' top free agents or people very close to them. Other than cornerback DeAngelo Hall (and longsnapper Ehtan Albright, who was re-signed last week), none knows where he stands.

There has been virtually no contact between the Redskins and the agents for these players, aside from Hall's camp. I reported weeks ago that the Skins were making re-signing the corner a priority, and the sides will meet at the scouting combine, which will be held in Indianapolis this weekend, to see if a deal can be struck before the start of free agency, according to league sources.

The rest of this group is in the dark. At their exit meetings in January, the Redskins' potential free agents said they were given no indication of whether the club wanted them back.
Cornerback DeAngelo Hall

The priority guy, he will be a focus of the combine. The Redskins have expressed their desire to keep him from hitting free agency, but Hall won't come cheap. I continue to suspect it would take something in the range of $15 million guaranteed to get a deal done.
Guard Pete Kendall

His knees and age are a concern, and the Skins are in no rush to tie him up.
spending $1-million-to-$1.5 million on Kendall for a short-term deal might be in order. The Skins badly need help at guard and right tackle, and it's doubtful they could fill all three spots with outside free agents.

They need to draft offensive linemen like crazy, but have just four picks. They have relied on stopgaps for far too long, but keeping Kendall, who could play center and right guard in a pinch, makes some sense.
Defensive end Demetric Evans

The Skins plan to meet with Evens' agent, Drew Rosenhaus, at the combine, and could still get something done before the start of free agency, although there has been no thrust in that direction to this point. Evans was the team's best defensive end last season, excels playing tackle in the nickel package, and is very versatileLinebacker Khary Campbell

There has been no contact at all, according to sources, despite all of the stud performances he's made on special teams over the years. The Skins appear content to let Campbell sit on the market for a while
That's pretty much it for the regulars. The rest of the bunch will likely be sitting out there a while, and if they did return we're talking vet minimum deals with very little or no guaranteed money. Trying to squeeze another year out of offensive lineman Jason Fabini might not be smart. Safety Mike Green and linebacker Alfred Fincher worked out well and seem like guys who merit a shot during training camp. Defensive lineman Ryan Boschetti is the ultimate all-effort guy, but this may be the end of the line for him.
 
fatness said:
Cornerback DeAngelo HallThe priority guy, he will be a focus of the combine. The Redskins have expressed their desire to keep him from hitting free agency, but Hall won't come cheap. I continue to suspect it would take something in the range of $15 million guaranteed to get a deal done.
where is that vomit emoticon when I need it? :goodposting: never mind. I just puked on my keyboard
 
Cooley, you are talented. You aint no Witten though.Witten averaged 11.8/rec and had a long of 42 yards Cooley averaged 10.2/rec and had a long of 28 yards==================================================================Cooley: 'I'm better' than WittenRedskins 360 (View Blog) Washington TimesFebruary 18 2009 1:53 PM BY David Elfin I'm just back from Chris Cooley's scholarship announcement at Blair High School in Silver Spring. Asked by a member of the wildly enthusiastic senior class (one of whom will win a $25,000 scholarship thanks to the Redskins' standout) if he was better than Dallas' Jason Witten, his fellow NFC Pro Bowl tight end the past two years.Cooley hesitated, smiled and said, "I think I'm better. ... He doesn't run after the catch very well."In response to another question, Cooley said he didn't think the Redskins should trade inconsistent quarterback Jason Campbell, who's heading into his third full season as their starter.Cooley said he had no advance warning that Rennie Simmons was going to retire when he decided to take his position coach to this month's Pro Bowl."I was glad to spend the time with him," Cooley said. "We played golf together. It was a good time."Cooley, of course, is also excited that Simmons' replacement, Scott Wachenheim, coached at Utah State where the tight end played from 2000-03."It's pretty cool," Cooley said. "Anyone he mentions from Utah State, I know. I grew up there [in Logan, Utah]. I watched the games he coached. He seems like a great guy. He's super-ambitious. I think he'll be a hard worker and really be prepared for what we're going to do."Other than the Pro Bowl and some vacation time in Hawaii and Las Vegas, Cooley said he has spent part of the offseason creating the paintings (shown here on his Web site) that will be among more than 20 of his works of art that will be auctioned in May. That auction will raise the $200,000 needed to provide the scholarships for a Blair student as well as a senior at each of seven other area high schools
Cooley gets nowhere making claims like this, but in fairness to him I honestly don't see much difference between the two guys and in fact a good argument can be made that he's better than Witten. Cooley's never had a passing game to work in like Witten has had, particularly with guys with the capabilities around him that TO and Romo have. That's a huge advantage that has nothing to do with either guy's talents. That alone would explain the discrepancy in receiving numbers.Cooley is also the best TE in the NFL with the ball in his hands, and it's really not close. He runs like a FB in the open field, bounces off of hits and can make moves and even run away from a lot of tacklers. Witten is not as good as Cooley in this regard. Witten's hands and Cooley's hands are equivalent IMHO; ditto route-running. I've paid less attention to blocking by both, but both are considered good blockers and are again comparable. :D
 
I think Cornelius Griffin is done. A team can't keep paying multi-millions to a player for a combination of 100-150 snaps a year plus memories of how good he used to be. I like the guy, I wish he could do what he did before. But frankly if he walked on now, wasn't an established player, he'd have trouble making the team due to injuries and declining performance. Time to go.Same with Marcus Washington.At some point you can't keep holding guys based on past glory and hope, because it ties up too many dollars that prevent you from signing newer guys who may end up being able to fill the voids. And the voids are already there. Remember the year Griffin and Salavea did so well? That is what the team needs --- 2 strong DT's who collapse the line on every play. Salavea is gone and Griffin can no longer do that. You can get by with average DE's if your DT's disrupt plays. But not the other way around.
Griffin should be restricted to playing in passing situations, and likely not all passing downs either. 2nd and long and 3rd and medium-to-long. That's it. Monty is an excellent run-stopper, and Golston is young and can take the pounding better. I'd only add that unlike Marcus Washington whose legs look shot, Griff still can make some plays, but he just wears down fast and gets injured. That's why I'm saying that if they're going to keep him, they need to have him playing a VERY limited role.
 
If he was playing for the vet minimum or slightly more I would agree with you. But he's tying up enough salary that it's interfering with finding his replacement.

 
If he was playing for the vet minimum or slightly more I would agree with you. But he's tying up enough salary that it's interfering with finding his replacement.
I don't necessarily disagree. I was commenting on talent and durability, irrespective of price.
 
Cooley gets nowhere making claims like this...
He also doesn't really hurt anything.He was asked a specific question by a kid and he answered it. I assume he answered it in sort of a joking manner, too, since that's the kind of guy he is and the article said he "hesitated" and "smiled" before giving his answer. It's not like he created an opportunity to slam Witten.To me, this is a non-story other than just being a fun little offseason tidbit. MAYBE if this happened two days before a game against Dallas, it would mean something.
 
Should be some absolutely GREAT listening to be had on 980 today. Kevin Sheehan interviewed The Vin-man via phone from the Combine yesterday, and The Vin-man once again absolutely embarrassed himself without even trying. He spent the first segment as a back-patting session a concerning last year's draft and the players he chose, and then waffled all over himself when questioned about the Salary Cap and Jason Taylor's future with the Team. No matter how bad a day I'm having, it's a guarantee I'm always going to get a laugh or two at Vinnie's expense. Pollan and Czaban absolutely excoriated Vinny on the afternoon show. Now, for my own local reasons I pretty much can't stand Andy Pollan, but for the life of me, I don't understand why some of you have issues with Czaban. Between Doc Walker, Czaban, Sally Jenkins and LaCanfora, you're getting the ugly, uncensored truth about what's going on with the Redskins. You may not like what you're hearing, but based on the folks I know within both the Management and Coaching Staff heirarchy, it's all valid. Outside of the Raiders, there's no organization in football that folks want to work for LESS than our Washington Redskins.

I hung out with some of my contacts within the organization last night. Doc Walker was fighting the flu, or he would have joined us, as well.

There was a lot of bemused head-shaking going on - does it surprise any of you that while the entire Athletic Training Staffs of the other 31 Teams are at the combine, the Redskins' own are not? So, not only are they not getting a chance to see and work with the rookie class invitees, they are missing out on valuable networking opportunities - one of the most beneficial sidelights of the combine are all the Training Staffs getting together and comparing notes about what approaches they are using, what's working and not working, new and innovative techniques in Strength and Conditioning, etc...and our guys are sitting home. Lovely.

For the record, in NFL circles, Jerry Gray is regarded as not only one of the best Secondary Coaches in the NFL, he's potentially got a very bright future as a Head Coach, and if the Redskins didn't put the ki-bosh on the first interview he was offered, apparently several other Teams would have brought him in for a chat. It's my understanding that when Blache steps down, if Gray is willing to stay with the Team, he'll be the next D-Coord / Asst Head Coach-Defense or some other such Title.

Thomas, Kelly, Davis, Rinehardt, Tryon, Moore, Jackson and Brennan - don't count on any of them making a noticeable impact anytime soon, Redskin fans...

...that's all I've got.

 
Thanks for the info, nittany. The Gibbs years are looking more and more like chrome wheels slapped onto a jalopy.

The only thing I'd say in response about Czaban is that he's a one-trick pony, all bile and negativity all the time. It's his good fortune that the team is poorly run and deserving of criticism right now, but rather than lauding him for his insight I tend to attribute it more to the luck of the clock which is broken but still right twice per day.

 
Just saw on PFT that Marcus Washington has been cut.

Also, Zorn says that the team will be active in free agency, and that they're looking to resign DeAngelo and Kendall.

 
Dexter Manley said:
Just saw on PFT that Marcus Washington has been cut.
Thanks for the good years Marcus, but it's definitely time to part ways.
Also, Zorn says that the team will be active in free agency, and that they're looking to resign DeAngelo and Kendall.
I don't see how Kendall is worth anything more than 1 year at the vet minimum right now.
 
Dexter Manley said:
Just saw on PFT that Marcus Washington has been cut.
Thanks for the good years Marcus, but it's definitely time to part ways.
Also, Zorn says that the team will be active in free agency, and that they're looking to resign DeAngelo and Kendall.
I don't see how Kendall is worth anything more than 1 year at the vet minimum right now.
I agree wrt Kendall. From what I've read, they're talking about bringing him back for 1 - 1.5 million. While he's obviously a 1 year stop gap at this point, I don't think they're going to be able to find a better replacement at this price for next season, unless they draft a G high in the draft and the rookie pans out.
 
Also, I'll go ahead and start this rumor, with the draft about 2 months away. I could easily see Danny and Vinny doing something this dumb.

The Redskins could be looking to trade up to the top of the 1st round, parting with their 2010 1st rounder and other picks, so they can select WR, Texas Tech, Michael Crabtree.

 
Also, I'll go ahead and start this rumor, with the draft about 2 months away. I could easily see Danny and Vinny doing something this dumb.The Redskins could be looking to trade up to the top of the 1st round, parting with their 2010 1st rounder and other picks, so they can select WR, Texas Tech, Michael Crabtree.
That would be pretty dumb.The Redskins have been obsessed with wide receivers for so long. Lavernius Cole, Santana Moss, Antwan Randle El, Brandon Lloyd, David Patten, Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly. They also flirted with Chad Johnson and talked about drafting Ginn. With all this attention, it hard to imagine it's a team weakness every year.I doubt they will trade up, but I could definately see them taking a WR later in the draft because they just have to have him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dexter Manley said:
Just saw on PFT that Marcus Washington has been cut.
Thanks for the good years Marcus, but it's definitely time to part ways.
Also, Zorn says that the team will be active in free agency, and that they're looking to resign DeAngelo and Kendall.
I don't see how Kendall is worth anything more than 1 year at the vet minimum right now.
Kendall isn't worth a ham sandwich at this point. He can not stay in shape for a full season anymore. He would be a fine backup, but that is it. If he wants the minimum, fine. Just make sure there is competition at that spot. Now that I think about, you can buy a lot of ham sandwiches for the vet minimum.
 
Also, I'll go ahead and start this rumor, with the draft about 2 months away. I could easily see Danny and Vinny doing something this dumb.

The Redskins could be looking to trade up to the top of the 1st round, parting with their 2010 1st rounder and other picks, so they can select WR, Texas Tech, Michael Crabtree.
I don't see this happening at all. That would be worse than any move Al Davis or Snyder have ever made.Here is Zorn on the WRs

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9021903025.html

"I like who we have," Zorn said of his current group of wide receivers. "I could feel comfortable in that. Some of it is trying to go on potential. But we're optimistic about that potential. You can't ask for more than what Santana [Moss] did. We could probably try to get the ball more to Antwaan [Randle El] or whatever. But, gosh, the guys that are going to be coming on are going to be Devin and Malcolm. We have to hope that they do well."
 
Also, I'll go ahead and start this rumor, with the draft about 2 months away. I could easily see Danny and Vinny doing something this dumb.

The Redskins could be looking to trade up to the top of the 1st round, parting with their 2010 1st rounder and other picks, so they can select WR, Texas Tech, Michael Crabtree.
I don't see this happening at all. That would be worse than any move Al Davis or Snyder have ever made.Here is Zorn on the WRs

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9021903025.html

"I like who we have," Zorn said of his current group of wide receivers. "I could feel comfortable in that. Some of it is trying to go on potential. But we're optimistic about that potential. You can't ask for more than what Santana [Moss] did. We could probably try to get the ball more to Antwaan [Randle El] or whatever. But, gosh, the guys that are going to be coming on are going to be Devin and Malcolm. We have to hope that they do well."
I hope to god it doesn't happen. It wouldn't be quite as bad as the nixed Ocho trade last year, but it would be close.

 
nittanylion said:
Now, for my own local reasons I pretty much can't stand Andy Pollan, but for the life of me, I don't understand why some of you have issues with Czaban.
First of all I really appreciate all the information in your post. :mellow: As for why I have issues with Czaban (and I don't with Andy Polian):

He talks over top everyone else, repeatedly. He interrupts Andy, interrupts the local sports updates, and has held up and derailed too many ongoing radio topics to ever count. He's no more informed than the others on the show but he just barges in and monopolizes topics.

He treats his spur-of-the-moment opinions as just as airworthy as current sports topics. He gets some off-the-wall thought in his head, barges into the talk with it, and monopolizes as much discussion as he can with it.

He grills others about their opinions yet often won't support his own opinions.

He injects his political and social views into the show too often. Especially his derogatory opinions of female athletes and journalists. And along with this is his strange and very repeated obsession with Michelle Wie. There's something weird going on with that..............

Other than that he's great. :lmao:

He did ratchet down a bit about a month after 980 ####canned his morning Fox show and his ego got over it, and has been doing a better job maintaining a friendly flow of sports-related conversation with Andy.

 
nittanylion said:
Now, for my own local reasons I pretty much can't stand Andy Pollan, but for the life of me, I don't understand why some of you have issues with Czaban.
First of all I really appreciate all the information in your post. :thumbup: As for why I have issues with Czaban (and I don't with Andy Polian):

He talks over top everyone else, repeatedly. He interrupts Andy, interrupts the local sports updates, and has held up and derailed too many ongoing radio topics to ever count. He's no more informed than the others on the show but he just barges in and monopolizes topics.

He treats his spur-of-the-moment opinions as just as airworthy as current sports topics. He gets some off-the-wall thought in his head, barges into the talk with it, and monopolizes as much discussion as he can with it.

He grills others about their opinions yet often won't support his own opinions.

He injects his political and social views into the show too often. Especially his derogatory opinions of female athletes and journalists. And along with this is his strange and very repeated obsession with Michelle Wie. There's something weird going on with that..............

Other than that he's great. :D

He did ratchet down a bit about a month after 980 ####canned his morning Fox show and his ego got over it, and has been doing a better job maintaining a friendly flow of sports-related conversation with Andy.
count me in as a big Czabe fan. one-trick pony? Tinker, bile and negativity are 2 tricks, officially...add in his creative takes and edgy sense of humor, and you've got a legit radio personality. Fox Radio thinks so. Andy is a good foil. he's often full of it, but his knowledge of the skins is savant-like.
 
nittanylion said:
- does it surprise any of you that while the entire Athletic Training Staffs of the other 31 Teams are at the combine, the Redskins' own are not? So, not only are they not getting a chance to see and work with the rookie class invitees, they are missing out on valuable networking opportunities - one of the most beneficial sidelights of the combine are all the Training Staffs getting together and comparing notes about what approaches they are using, what's working and not working, new and innovative techniques in Strength and Conditioning, etc...and our guys are sitting home. Lovely.
why am I not :thumbup: ?
 
(If the Skins don't get Hall, and opt to cut Shawn Springs to save $6 million in cap space, recently cut corners Drayton Florence, Dre Bly and Leigh Bodden are all names that have come up in past personnel meetings at Redskins Park, according to team sources, and are players who could interest the team if the price is right (i.e. cheap).
DE Phillip Daniels, meantime, has a contract for the next two years, but it voids automatically prior to the start of free agency, meaning the veteran will in fact be an unresticted free agent when the market opens on Thursday. Daniels is coming off of season-negating surgery and the Skins have displayed an interest in re-signing him, according to sources, but signing him now is not a priority and he will get a chance to see if other teams have interest.

When Daniels contract voids the Skins will get roughly $2 million in cap relief, though with just two NFL proven DEs under contract right now (Andre Carter and Jason Taylor), and Taylor a candidate to be a cap cut himself, the team will surely have to find an end or two, and that salary will eat back into that $2-million savings.
Link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nittanylion said:
Now, for my own local reasons I pretty much can't stand Andy Pollan, but for the life of me, I don't understand why some of you have issues with Czaban.
First of all I really appreciate all the information in your post. :thumbup: As for why I have issues with Czaban (and I don't with Andy Polian):

He talks over top everyone else, repeatedly. He interrupts Andy, interrupts the local sports updates, and has held up and derailed too many ongoing radio topics to ever count. He's no more informed than the others on the show but he just barges in and monopolizes topics.

He treats his spur-of-the-moment opinions as just as airworthy as current sports topics. He gets some off-the-wall thought in his head, barges into the talk with it, and monopolizes as much discussion as he can with it.

He grills others about their opinions yet often won't support his own opinions.

He injects his political and social views into the show too often. Especially his derogatory opinions of female athletes and journalists. And along with this is his strange and very repeated obsession with Michelle Wie. There's something weird going on with that..............

Other than that he's great. :D

He did ratchet down a bit about a month after 980 ####canned his morning Fox show and his ego got over it, and has been doing a better job maintaining a friendly flow of sports-related conversation with Andy.
count me in as a big Czabe fan. one-trick pony? Tinker, bile and negativity are 2 tricks, officially...add in his creative takes and edgy sense of humor, and you've got a legit radio personality. Fox Radio thinks so. Andy is a good foil. he's often full of it, but his knowledge of the skins is savant-like.
Put me down as a hater. He comes off as a total blow-hard to me. I'd compare him to Cowherd, but at least Cowherd can be funny sometimes. I hate that a local station picked up his fox show. At least I have 4 other sports stations in San Diego to flip to.

 
I met nittanylion last August at a Balt/Wash FBG auction draft. I can report that he is NOT Steve Czaban, but he IS an excellent chef. He mixed up some fantastic shrimp salad.

(By the way, we're hoping to expand that league from 10 to 14 teams. Check it out near the bottom of the page in LFL)

 
New Pre-Draft blog at the Washington Post (good idea)

That article is about the top 5 OT's in the draft. I read this, from Michael Other, and kind of stopped in my tracks. Sometimes it's easy to overlook how lucky you are in life.

What He Said: "I grew up poor, and was homeless a lot growing up. I just worked hard and came through a lot of adversity. I just kept working. I was taken in by a family that helped me get to college and pushed me. That's why I think I'm here today at this level."
 
The Redskins likely will have to find Washington's replacement in free agency. Baltimore's Bart Scott, Alexandria native Eric Barton of the New York Jets, Buffalo's Angelo Crowell and Miami's Channing Crowder are possible replacements. So is Jacksonville's Mike Peterson, although he turns 33 this season. Atlanta's Keith Brooking will be 34, so teammate Michael Boley - who will turn 27 in August - might make more sense, especially with Redskins middle linebacker London Fletcher turning 34 in May.

The draft is also a possibility, but the Redskins figure to use their top pick on a lineman and have only one other choice until the fifth round. Blades said he believes the job should be his.
David Elfin at the Washington Times
 
Orakpo meets with Redskins

Texas defensive end/linebacker/play maker Brian Orakpo was just at the podium here in Indianapolis and he said he met with the Redskins last night.

The Redskins told him they envision him as a strong-side linebacker in their base 4-3 defense and then as a pass rusher on throwing downs.

He measured 6-foot-3 and 263 pounds and will do defensive line and linebacker workouts later this week.
O'Halloran at the Times
 
Peter King was speculating in MMQB that the only team in contention for Albert Haynesworth's services besides Tennessee is Washington.

Don't know how much stock, if any, is to be put into this. It didn't seem like he had a firm source or anything. Keep in mind a few years back King speculated that Danny Wuerfell would blow up as a fantasy qb.

 
The Redskins are pretty much always rumored to be involved with almost every big $ FA. I don't think it's really the media going off any info from an actual source, just them being lazy and assuming the Redskins will try and sign everyone.

 
New Pre-Draft blog at the Washington Post (good idea)

That article is about the top 5 OT's in the draft. I read this, from Michael Other, and kind of stopped in my tracks. Sometimes it's easy to overlook how lucky you are in life.

What He Said: "I grew up poor, and was homeless a lot growing up. I just worked hard and came through a lot of adversity. I just kept working. I was taken in by a family that helped me get to college and pushed me. That's why I think I'm here today at this level."
You need to read The Blind Side, half of which is about Oher's story. It's an amazing story.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top