I don't care how good they are at PR. Let all the Crhis Carters, Sally Jenkins, and Warren Sapps get their shots in while it is cheap. They were right to strip Zorn of play calling. He can't handle it and neither can Sherman Smith. It was the only way to salvage the season. What it looks like shouldn't be important. In fact, there would be a lot of criticism (and rightfully so) if Snyder didn;t do it because it wouldn't look good. Snyder has pointed himself into a can't win corner. Only thing to do is walk through the paint to the shoe store.
There was a good bit of agreement, amongst all of us and among others around the country who follow football, that Zorn was not doing a good job of playcalling. The way any effective organization handles something like this is to talk privately to the employee, explain why you want part of their job delegated to someone else, that it's a change you're requiring, and work out with the employee how to do it in a way that embarrasses them the least and visibly supports them
when they announce the change. You give them an opportunity to make it appear their idea, one they want to try for the benefit of the company.If you just make the change over their head, visibly, either you have no clue how to get the best out of people or you want the employee to be visibly undermined and to fail.
So which is it? Snyder wants to embarrass him and for him to fail? Or Snyder has no clue how to get the best out of people?