What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2012 MLB Regular Season Thread (2 Viewers)

I think this was the first attempted act of retribution by an opposing manager against Davey for his Joel Peralta stunt. Except Ozzie Ozzied it all up.
I haven't been following this. Can someone give me the Cliff's Notes?
Last month Davey got Tampa's Joel Peralta ejected from a game for having too much pine tar on his glove. Davey knew this because Peralta used to do the same thing when he played for the Nats. Most people thought it was kind of low class, and I agree, but Davey knows what he's doing and if he wants to be a heel, I'm OK with it. There were some words exchanged with Joe Maddon, blah blah blah, then it was over.But I was curious what kind of retaliation we might see, and whether a lot of managers might start checking various Nationals players. So I figure this must be what Ozzie was up to, at least at first. He came out when Harper came up to bat and complained about the amount of pine tar, so the umps had him swap it out.I also really think Ozzie thought Bryce was doing a Happy Gilmore **** pose with his new bat when he came back out, and that's why he flipped out. Of course if that's the case, Ozzie is the only person in the country who thought Harper was doing that.Sounds like he called Davey to talk about it and Davey told him to go #### himself
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think this was the first attempted act of retribution by an opposing manager against Davey for his Joel Peralta stunt. Except Ozzie Ozzied it all up.
I haven't been following this. Can someone give me the Cliff's Notes?
Last month Davey got Tampa's Joel Peralta ejected from a game for having too much pine tar on his glove. Davey knew this because Peralta used to do the same thing when he played for the Nats. Most people thought it was kind of low class, and I agree, but Davey knows what he's doing and if he wants to be a heel, I'm OK with it. There were some words exchanged with Joe Maddon, blah blah blah, then it was over.But I was curious what kind of retaliation we might see, and whether a lot of managers might start checking various Nationals players. So I figure this must be what Ozzie was up to, at least at first.I also really think Ozzie thought Bryce was doing a Happy Gilmore **** pose with his bat when he came back out, and that's why he flipped out. Of course Ozzie is the only person in the country who thought Harper was doing that.
The producers of The Franchise got in Ozzie's ear about making sure there was a reason to focus on Harper in an upcoming episode. /endofstory.
 
I think this was the first attempted act of retribution by an opposing manager against Davey for his Joel Peralta stunt. Except Ozzie Ozzied it all up.
I haven't been following this. Can someone give me the Cliff's Notes?
Last month Davey got Tampa's Joel Peralta ejected from a game for having too much pine tar on his glove. Davey knew this because Peralta used to do the same thing when he played for the Nats. Most people thought it was kind of low class, and I agree, but Davey knows what he's doing and if he wants to be a heel, I'm OK with it. There were some words exchanged with Joe Maddon, blah blah blah, then it was over.But I was curious what kind of retaliation we might see, and whether a lot of managers might start checking various Nationals players. So I figure this must be what Ozzie was up to, at least at first.I also really think Ozzie thought Bryce was doing a Happy Gilmore **** pose with his bat when he came back out, and that's why he flipped out. Of course Ozzie is the only person in the country who thought Harper was doing that.
The producers of The Franchise got in Ozzie's ear about making sure there was a reason to focus on Harper in an upcoming episode. /endofstory.
I don't know what that is, but I don't believe in conspiracies when something can easily be explained by stupidity
 
I think this was the first attempted act of retribution by an opposing manager against Davey for his Joel Peralta stunt. Except Ozzie Ozzied it all up.
I haven't been following this. Can someone give me the Cliff's Notes?
Last month Davey got Tampa's Joel Peralta ejected from a game for having too much pine tar on his glove. Davey knew this because Peralta used to do the same thing when he played for the Nats. Most people thought it was kind of low class, and I agree, but Davey knows what he's doing and if he wants to be a heel, I'm OK with it. There were some words exchanged with Joe Maddon, blah blah blah, then it was over.But I was curious what kind of retaliation we might see, and whether a lot of managers might start checking various Nationals players. So I figure this must be what Ozzie was up to, at least at first.I also really think Ozzie thought Bryce was doing a Happy Gilmore **** pose with his bat when he came back out, and that's why he flipped out. Of course Ozzie is the only person in the country who thought Harper was doing that.
The producers of The Franchise got in Ozzie's ear about making sure there was a reason to focus on Harper in an upcoming episode. /endofstory.
I don't know what that is, but I don't believe in conspiracies when something can easily be explained by stupidity
The Franchise is the Showtime series following the Marlins this year. Basically a baseball version of Hard Knocks.
 
The Franchise is the Showtime series following the Marlins this year. Basically a baseball version of Hard Knocks.
Oh I never watched that, is it as bad as it sounds? Do we get to watch LoMo send endless tweets instead of working on fundamental baseball skills?
 
The Franchise is the Showtime series following the Marlins this year. Basically a baseball version of Hard Knocks.
Oh I never watched that, is it as bad as it sounds? Do we get to watch LoMo send endless tweets instead of working on fundamental baseball skills?
Well ####, I have Showtime and never even knew about this. Any good Limpy?
meh - but keep in mind, I have no tolerance for Oswaldo with the way he left here. Classless, ungrateful POS as far as I'm concerned. Hoping his stint in Miami continues to be the epic failure that the first 3 1/2 months have been. First episode was pretty much Spring Training through the time they picked up C Lee and they jammed a bunch of stuff in there. New Stadium, new team, blah, blah, blah...They showed his opening day speech to the team. Loria sat there with a clicker/counter in his hand keeping a tally on the f bombs that Ozzie dropped. Think he said it was 90 something. Some charity run the team President did. Ran the equivalent of like 2 marathons, finishing up in the new stadium. Went through the whole 'I Love Castro' debacleA little bit on each of the new guysFocused on the Heath Bell struggles. Showed him back home in SD with his family. Greg Dobbs (I think it was him) wife is pretty hot. As long as the Marlins keep losing, I'll probably keep watching just to see Ozzie suffer.
 
'Limp Ditka said:
'Doctor Detroit said:
'JZilla said:
'Limp Ditka said:
The Franchise is the Showtime series following the Marlins this year. Basically a baseball version of Hard Knocks.
Oh I never watched that, is it as bad as it sounds? Do we get to watch LoMo send endless tweets instead of working on fundamental baseball skills?
Well ####, I have Showtime and never even knew about this. Any good Limpy?
meh - but keep in mind, I have no tolerance for Oswaldo with the way he left here. Classless, ungrateful POS as far as I'm concerned. Hoping his stint in Miami continues to be the epic failure that the first 3 1/2 months have been. First episode was pretty much Spring Training through the time they picked up C Lee and they jammed a bunch of stuff in there. New Stadium, new team, blah, blah, blah...They showed his opening day speech to the team. Loria sat there with a clicker/counter in his hand keeping a tally on the f bombs that Ozzie dropped. Think he said it was 90 something. Some charity run the team President did. Ran the equivalent of like 2 marathons, finishing up in the new stadium. Went through the whole 'I Love Castro' debacleA little bit on each of the new guysFocused on the Heath Bell struggles. Showed him back home in SD with his family. Greg Dobbs (I think it was him) wife is pretty hot. As long as the Marlins keep losing, I'll probably keep watching just to see Ozzie suffer.
Just watched the on demand version, pretty damn good.You know I hate the White Sox with a passion but I never said too much negative about Ozzie, because I've always kind of liked him. After watching this I like him even more, much better than the likes of Rex Ryan. Ozzie is little crazy and a lot crazy like a fox. I like when he said to the GM after asked if he was sticking with Bell, "no I'm not sticking with him because of his salary, that is your ####### fault." :lmao:
 
I couldn't hang with last year's series about the Giants and that was a team that I cared about. Let me know if anything happens more interesting than Greg Dobbs' hot wife. It's must see TV for me if Jeffrey Loria falls down a flight of stairs or chokes on a chicken bone.

 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
Buster says no dice. Boo!I just realized that this post is "TobiasFunke" replying to "Annyong" and citing "Buster." Excellent.

 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
Hanley gaining SS eligibility would be significant from a fantasy perspective.
 
Lawrie just took a huge tumble over the railing at the Yankee game. Almost made an insane catch but flipped over the railing and was limping badly.

Incredible effort too.

 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
Hanley gaining SS eligibility would be significant from a fantasy perspective.
GAINING? He had it from last year to start the season
 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
Hanley gaining SS eligibility would be significant from a fantasy perspective.
GAINING? He had it from last year to start the season
Fair point. It would be significant if you happened to have Ramirez in a simulation replay league where a player gets D-/D- fielding eligibility from one game at a position. Hypothetically speaking of course.
 
whoa, big rumor

According to Bob Nightengale of USA Today, the Red Sox and Marlins are discussing a deal that would send Carl Crawford and a prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

Well, that would be a doozy. The Red Sox insist that they are not shopping Crawford, but they don't deny that the Marlins and others have approached them. If it goes down, the deal would involve three contracts guaranteeing $239 million. Crawford, who recently returned from the disabled list and may eventually need Tommy John surgery on his elbow, is in the second year of an seven-year, $142 million deal. Ramirez, who was originally signed by Boston in 2000, is in the fourth year of a six-year, $70 million contract. Meanwhile, Bell has been a major disappointment in the first year of a three-year, $27 million deal. It's not clear if a deal is close, but Nightengale hears that Marlins vice president Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford. Jul 18 - 1:57 PM

Source: USA Today
Hanley gaining SS eligibility would be significant from a fantasy perspective.
GAINING? He had it from last year to start the season
Fair point. It would be significant if you happened to have Ramirez in a simulation replay league where a player gets D-/D- fielding eligibility from one game at a position. Hypothetically speaking of course.
Nothing to see here, apparently.
ESPN's Buster Olney reports that there are no current discussions between the Red Sox and Marlins about a deal that would send Carl Crawford to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.

That was fun while it lasted. According to Olney, the proposal was brought up briefly as a concept and died immediately. Move along, nothing to see here. Jul 18 - 2:12 PM

Source: Buster Olney on Twitter
 
'Cliff Clavin said:
'Michael Brown said:
Lawrie just took a huge tumble over the railing at the Yankee game. Almost made an insane catch but flipped over the railing and was limping badly.

Incredible effort too.
One of the dumbest plays I've ever witnessed :thumbup:
Freelesque
 
You know I hate the White Sox with a passion but I never said too much negative about Ozzie, because I've always kind of liked him. After watching this I like him even more, much better than the likes of Rex Ryan. Ozzie is little crazy and a lot crazy like a fox. I like when he said to the GM after asked if he was sticking with Bell, "no I'm not sticking with him because of his salary, that is your ####### fault." :lmao:
Best line of the show. No filter whatsoever between his brain (still only a rumor at this point) and his mouth.He also had the best line of the new episode last night, commenting on Logan Morrison's frequent tweeting.

[read the following in broken English]

"You tweeeing and you winning, all the tweets you have is fun. You tweeting and you losing, you a f--king ass!"

:lmao:

 
You know I hate the White Sox with a passion but I never said too much negative about Ozzie, because I've always kind of liked him. After watching this I like him even more, much better than the likes of Rex Ryan. Ozzie is little crazy and a lot crazy like a fox. I like when he said to the GM after asked if he was sticking with Bell, "no I'm not sticking with him because of his salary, that is your ####### fault." :lmao:
Best line of the show. No filter whatsoever between his brain (still only a rumor at this point) and his mouth.He also had the best line of the new episode last night, commenting on Logan Morrison's frequent tweeting.

[read the following in broken English]

"You tweeeing and you winning, all the tweets you have is fun. You tweeting and you losing, you a f--king ass!"

:lmao:
I think he's destructive, constructive, crazy, genius, unstable, grumpy, cheerful and one of a kind. Not sure I'd want him managing my team but I think the players like him because they always know where they stand with him, which is important.
 
You know I hate the White Sox with a passion but I never said too much negative about Ozzie, because I've always kind of liked him. After watching this I like him even more, much better than the likes of Rex Ryan. Ozzie is little crazy and a lot crazy like a fox. I like when he said to the GM after asked if he was sticking with Bell, "no I'm not sticking with him because of his salary, that is your ####### fault." :lmao:
Best line of the show. No filter whatsoever between his brain (still only a rumor at this point) and his mouth.He also had the best line of the new episode last night, commenting on Logan Morrison's frequent tweeting.

[read the following in broken English]

"You tweeeing and you winning, all the tweets you have is fun. You tweeting and you losing, you a f--king ass!"

:lmao:
I think he's destructive, constructive, crazy, genius, unstable, grumpy, cheerful and one of a kind. Not sure I'd want him managing my team but I think the players like him because they always know where they stand with him, which is important.
Bobby Jenks disagrees.This guy is the biggest attention whore in the Majors......and that's saying something.

 
Pretty crazy seeing the loose bodies they pulled out of Stantons knees. Its amazing those two little pieces caused all that discomfort.

 
From BaseballAmerica....

Changes to baseball's draft from the latest Collective Bargaining Agreement were evident last Friday as the signing deadline for 2012 picks came and went. But another modification, with potential ramifications for the looming July 31 non-waiver trade deadline, happened Wednesday.

Major League Baseball held its first competitive-balance lottery, with the Royals earning the first of six supplemental first-round draft picks.

“Every year it seems we pick 5 and 65,” Royals scouting director Lonnie Goldberg said. “We've always had to sit back and watch a lot of good players go by, so now this puts a lot of extra players in play.”

The first six lottery selections will follow the 31 first-round choices, as well as any free-agent compensation choices. Because the compensation rules will change dramatically this offseason, there will be fewer supplemental first-rounders than in years past and the lottery selections likely will come at the top of the supplemental round.

As of today, they would be picks Nos. 32-37, which had assigned values ranging from $1.55 million to $1,394,300 this year. Those choices are significantly valuable in terms of stretching teams' signing bonus pools, which averaged $6.3 million in 2012.

Adding to their value, the lottery selections are the first picks in draft history that can be traded. Clubs can deal them (and transfer their bonus-pool values) during this regular season and next, up until two hours before the 2013 draft. An individual lottery pick can't be traded more than once.

“My feeling is everybody’s being real conservative at this point because until today, nobody had anything,” Goldberg said. “It could be a chip once the system settles in. We’re all learning through the newness of the whole process.

"We’re going to learn how to put value on these picks. It’s easier to put a value on a player. I’m not sure what that value’s going to be. I’m not sure anybody is yet.”

Following the Royals with supplemental first-round lottery picks will be the Pirates, Diamondbacks, Orioles, Reds and Marlins. There will be six competitive-balance selections after the second round as well, and those went to the Padres, Indians, Rockies, Athletics, Brewers and Tigers. As of now, the second group of picks would be Nos. 68-73, which ranged in value from $757,900 to $701,700 this year.

The Cardinals and Rays were the only eligible clubs that didn't receive a lottery selection.

The 10 teams with the lowest revenues and the 10 in the smallest markets (with plenty of overlap) were eligible for the first six lottery picks. Clubs that didn't win a pick in that group and any other team that receives revenue-sharing payments (in this case, only the Tigers) were eligible for the second round of lottery choices. The clubs' chances were weighted based on their 2011 winning percentage.
I wasn't aware the lotto was based on previous season's winning percentage.
 
From BaseballAmerica....

Changes to baseball's draft from the latest Collective Bargaining Agreement were evident last Friday as the signing deadline for 2012 picks came and went. But another modification, with potential ramifications for the looming July 31 non-waiver trade deadline, happened Wednesday.

Major League Baseball held its first competitive-balance lottery, with the Royals earning the first of six supplemental first-round draft picks.

“Every year it seems we pick 5 and 65,” Royals scouting director Lonnie Goldberg said. “We've always had to sit back and watch a lot of good players go by, so now this puts a lot of extra players in play.”

The first six lottery selections will follow the 31 first-round choices, as well as any free-agent compensation choices. Because the compensation rules will change dramatically this offseason, there will be fewer supplemental first-rounders than in years past and the lottery selections likely will come at the top of the supplemental round.

As of today, they would be picks Nos. 32-37, which had assigned values ranging from $1.55 million to $1,394,300 this year. Those choices are significantly valuable in terms of stretching teams' signing bonus pools, which averaged $6.3 million in 2012.

Adding to their value, the lottery selections are the first picks in draft history that can be traded. Clubs can deal them (and transfer their bonus-pool values) during this regular season and next, up until two hours before the 2013 draft. An individual lottery pick can't be traded more than once.

“My feeling is everybody’s being real conservative at this point because until today, nobody had anything,” Goldberg said. “It could be a chip once the system settles in. We’re all learning through the newness of the whole process.

"We’re going to learn how to put value on these picks. It’s easier to put a value on a player. I’m not sure what that value’s going to be. I’m not sure anybody is yet.”

Following the Royals with supplemental first-round lottery picks will be the Pirates, Diamondbacks, Orioles, Reds and Marlins. There will be six competitive-balance selections after the second round as well, and those went to the Padres, Indians, Rockies, Athletics, Brewers and Tigers. As of now, the second group of picks would be Nos. 68-73, which ranged in value from $757,900 to $701,700 this year.

The Cardinals and Rays were the only eligible clubs that didn't receive a lottery selection.

The 10 teams with the lowest revenues and the 10 in the smallest markets (with plenty of overlap) were eligible for the first six lottery picks. Clubs that didn't win a pick in that group and any other team that receives revenue-sharing payments (in this case, only the Tigers) were eligible for the second round of lottery choices. The clubs' chances were weighted based on their 2011 winning percentage.
I wasn't aware the lotto was based on previous season's winning percentage.
The teams aren't but the drawing uses the same system with the ping-pong balls being drawn as the NBA does, so the team with the worst record (of those with lowest revenues and smallest markets) has more chances of getting a better pick
 
'Captain Hook said:
From BaseballAmerica....

Changes to baseball's draft from the latest Collective Bargaining Agreement were evident last Friday as the signing deadline for 2012 picks came and went. But another modification, with potential ramifications for the looming July 31 non-waiver trade deadline, happened Wednesday.

Major League Baseball held its first competitive-balance lottery, with the Royals earning the first of six supplemental first-round draft picks.

“Every year it seems we pick 5 and 65,” Royals scouting director Lonnie Goldberg said. “We've always had to sit back and watch a lot of good players go by, so now this puts a lot of extra players in play.”

The first six lottery selections will follow the 31 first-round choices, as well as any free-agent compensation choices. Because the compensation rules will change dramatically this offseason, there will be fewer supplemental first-rounders than in years past and the lottery selections likely will come at the top of the supplemental round.

As of today, they would be picks Nos. 32-37, which had assigned values ranging from $1.55 million to $1,394,300 this year. Those choices are significantly valuable in terms of stretching teams' signing bonus pools, which averaged $6.3 million in 2012.

Adding to their value, the lottery selections are the first picks in draft history that can be traded. Clubs can deal them (and transfer their bonus-pool values) during this regular season and next, up until two hours before the 2013 draft. An individual lottery pick can't be traded more than once.

“My feeling is everybody’s being real conservative at this point because until today, nobody had anything,” Goldberg said. “It could be a chip once the system settles in. We’re all learning through the newness of the whole process.

"We’re going to learn how to put value on these picks. It’s easier to put a value on a player. I’m not sure what that value’s going to be. I’m not sure anybody is yet.”

Following the Royals with supplemental first-round lottery picks will be the Pirates, Diamondbacks, Orioles, Reds and Marlins. There will be six competitive-balance selections after the second round as well, and those went to the Padres, Indians, Rockies, Athletics, Brewers and Tigers. As of now, the second group of picks would be Nos. 68-73, which ranged in value from $757,900 to $701,700 this year.

The Cardinals and Rays were the only eligible clubs that didn't receive a lottery selection.

The 10 teams with the lowest revenues and the 10 in the smallest markets (with plenty of overlap) were eligible for the first six lottery picks. Clubs that didn't win a pick in that group and any other team that receives revenue-sharing payments (in this case, only the Tigers) were eligible for the second round of lottery choices. The clubs' chances were weighted based on their 2011 winning percentage.
I wasn't aware the lotto was based on previous season's winning percentage.
The teams aren't but the drawing uses the same system with the ping-pong balls being drawn as the NBA does, so the team with the worst record (of those with lowest revenues and smallest markets) has more chances of getting a better pick
I was aware of that much. I just didn't know the drawing was weighted among the qualified teams. As a Cubs fan who is used to the Cardinals doing more with less, at least they are at a disadvantage to get an extra pick.
 
BREAKING NEWS- Phila. GM Ruben Amaro Jr. denies reports that the team is considering trading the Phanatic to free up room for Cole Hamels.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top