What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

** Official 2014 Philadelphia Eagles Thread ** (1 Viewer)

By the way, good luck to you guys this year. I've been keeping up with this topic since our little back-and-forth trolling of each other's team topics awhile back and there's a lot of good information here.

So good luck except for weeks 3 and 16. :boxing:

And for heavens sake beat the Cowboys twice. And then we'll knock them out of the playoffs in week 17.

 
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)

2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) L (1-1)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (2-1)





4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (2-3)





5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams W (3-2)





6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (4-2)





7 - Bye Week




8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals W (5-2)




9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (6-2). ... at THIS point local stations explode with SB talk




10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) L (6-3) At this point local Radio Stations officially explode with FIRE CHIP talk



11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (6-4)



12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (7-4)



13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) L (7-5). Season starts looking rough



14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks W (8-5). Crush the hawks at home after long rest. Hawks don't play well on the east coast (yes i know about the superbowl)



15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (9-5). Redemption.



16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (9-6) Let down game with short rest and coming off big win against 'girls.



17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants Can't call this game at all. Either puts us at 9-7 and a TIE for div title, or 10-6 and div title wine.


 
By the way, good luck to you guys this year. I've been keeping up with this topic since our little back-and-forth trolling of each other's team topics awhile back and there's a lot of good information here.

So good luck except for weeks 3 and 16. :boxing:

And for heavens sake beat the Cowboys twice. And then we'll knock them out of the playoffs in week 17.
Right back at you, Fatness. You provide lots of good information in the Redskins thread. I hope the Redskins do really well this year as long as they finish behind the Eagles and Desean has two subpar games vs. the Eagles. Other than that, HTTR.

 
@GeoffMosherCSN: Just spoke to Jeremy Maclin. He said he's full go, fully recovered. If training camp started today, he could do everything, no limitations.

@GeoffMosherCSN: That being said, Maclin isn't 100 percent sure what the coaches will have him do at OTAs, but he expects to participate in some drills.

@GeoffMosherCSN: Maclin said he just got finished catching passes from Nick Foles, something they've been doing and will continue to do throughout offseason.

 
@EliotShorrParks: Cody Latimer's spider chart compared to Kelvin Benjamin's. One looks slightly more well rounded. #Eagles http://t.co/bs4LQCYmgq

@EliotShorrParks: Latimer's (6-2, 215 lbs) 40-time (4.44) was top 10 at Combine among WRs & he was tops in bench press. Big, fast, strong. Ideal for #Eagles

 
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) W (2-0)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (3-0!)
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (3-1)
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams W (4-1)
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (5-1)
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals W (6-1)
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (7-1)
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) W (8-1) At this point local Radio Stations officially explode with talk of SB
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (8-2)
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (9-2)
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) L (9-3)
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks L (9-4)
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (10-4)
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (10-5) Let down game with short rest and coming off big win against 'girls.
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants W (11-5)
hahah no chance we start 8-1. none. :P
Through 8 weeks of playing you predict the same record as me, plus one loss to Indy. No chance we beat Indy? None? I'd say both teams are pretty comparable on defense and Philly has the advantage on offense. Just saying, I think its very possible to hand Luck a loss in week 2.

I also think Carolina is going to regress. Big time. Carolina's offense was ranked 26th last year. Their starting WR's now are Tavarres King, Jerricho Crotchery Jason Avant.

8-1 baby.

 
ShaHBucks said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
ShaHBucks said:
Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.
He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.
42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or S
I only watched a little bit of Shazier but he seemed more like an ILB for our system to me. I actually thought he was a guy you'd get to replace Kendricks if that's what they wanted to do. The coverage skills I think are actually more important for the inside guys they way we seem to use our LBs as well. The OLBs tend to drop to the flat or they use Barwin to mug guys at the line. The ILBs cover man or over the middle.

If the Eagles thought the vertical was a substitute for height then Boykin would be playing outside. I like Shazier as a player, just don't think he's what the Eagles would target as an OLB.

ETA: I like the discussion though, keep it coming :)
I could see Shazer, and ShaBucks may have pointed this out in the Mock draft thread, being a replacement for DeMeco after next year. Usually when you draft your first round pick though you're expecting them to contribute right out of the shoot (unless maybe you're a QB).

 
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)



2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) W (2-0)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (3-0)





4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (3-1)





5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams L (3-2)





6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (4-2)





7 - Bye Week




8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals L (4-3)




9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (5-3)




10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) W (6-3)



11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (6-4)



12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (7-4)



13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) W (8-4)



14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks L (8-5)



15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (9-5)



16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (9-6) DeSean gets his.



17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants W (10-6)

I see another 10-6 season. Tougher schedule than it looks. I'm going to say they go 0-4 vs the NFC West. That division went from bottom of the barrel to a nightmare really quick. The Rams game is going to be a low scoring heart breaker with less than 3 point loss. They should beat the Cowboys soundly. Think DeSean will get his revenge late in the season. Still think it'll be enough to grab the division.

I'm assuming they'll get an NFC West or South opponent for a Wild Card matchup.


 


1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)

2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) W (2-0)

3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (3-0)

4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (3-1)

5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams L (3-2)

6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (4-2)

7 - Bye Week

8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals L (4-3)

9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (5-3)

10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) W (6-3)

11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (6-4)

12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (7-4)

13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) W (8-4)

14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks L (8-5)

15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (9-5)

16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (9-6) DeSean gets his.

17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants W (10-6)

I see another 10-6 season. Tougher schedule than it looks. I'm going to say they go 0-4 vs the NFC West. That division went from bottom of the barrel to a nightmare really quick. The Rams game is going to be a low scoring heart breaker with less than 3 point loss. They should beat the Cowboys soundly. Think DeSean will get his revenge late in the season. Still think it'll be enough to grab the division.

I'm assuming they'll get an NFC West or South opponent for a Wild Card matchup.
Good breakdown, I agree with this. Thought it wouldn't shock me if they won a game against one of STL/ARZ and go 11-5.

 
@EliotShorrParks: Cody Latimer's spider chart compared to Kelvin Benjamin's. One looks slightly more well rounded. #Eagles http://t.co/bs4LQCYmgq

@EliotShorrParks: Latimer's (6-2, 215 lbs) 40-time (4.44) was top 10 at Combine among WRs & he was tops in bench press. Big, fast, strong. Ideal for #Eagles
The more I watch outside the top group, the more I find players I like, like Latimer. I think Odell Beckham would be perfect for this offense, but if you're looking at Cooks or Lee I'm thinking I'd rather wait and take one of what seems to be a huge tier of guys not far below that.

 
ShaHBucks said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
ShaHBucks said:
Speaking of the Mock draft ShaBucks. Wasn't expecting Shazer at the 1st pick but I don't hate it. Was he more of a pass rusher at OSU? Why not take Roby or Fuller? Liked Lattimer in the 2nd as well. Was hoping Attaochu was going to be there.
Trust me, I wanted Roby. Shazier is just the best player in the draft. I wasn't kidding. 2nd most TFL in the NCAA proves he can get in the backfield. He's flawless as an OLB.
He'd have to be one, if not the, smallest 3-4 OLB in the league in height and weight.
42" vert. He can cover TE's in the league. He had 12 PD in 2012. Thats top cb numbers.He looks outsized on tape but when the ball is snapped he's everywhere. I thought about "big people beat up little people" but whatever. He's going to be a pro bowler at OLB or S
I only watched a little bit of Shazier but he seemed more like an ILB for our system to me. I actually thought he was a guy you'd get to replace Kendricks if that's what they wanted to do. The coverage skills I think are actually more important for the inside guys they way we seem to use our LBs as well. The OLBs tend to drop to the flat or they use Barwin to mug guys at the line. The ILBs cover man or over the middle.

If the Eagles thought the vertical was a substitute for height then Boykin would be playing outside. I like Shazier as a player, just don't think he's what the Eagles would target as an OLB.

ETA: I like the discussion though, keep it coming :)
I could see Shazer, and ShaBucks may have pointed this out in the Mock draft thread, being a replacement for DeMeco after next year. Usually when you draft your first round pick though you're expecting them to contribute right out of the shoot (unless maybe you're a QB).
I like him as an ILB, I watched more of him yesterday after that discussion. OSU just don't have him doing anything that shows he can be a 3-4 OLB so it becomes an exercise in projection which I admit I'm not that good at.

 
@GeoffMosherCSN: Jeremy Maclin isn't crying over DeSean Jackson's departure. "We'll be fine." My story: http://t.co/GxL0JUEce7

Chip Kelly still hasnt spoken publicly since he kicked three-time Pro Bowl wideout DeSean Jackson to the curb abruptly last month, a silence thats opened the door for all sorts of speculation about the reason he parted ways with one of the NFLs most dynamic weapons.

One popular theory is that Kelly needed to make an example for others who might be unwilling to buy into the coachs unique program.

Jeremy Maclin practically scoffed at that suggestion.

I dont think it was for that, the veteran receiver said Wednesday. I dont think you release a guy to send a message. Were not in high school anymore. I dont think you do it like that.

Maclin didnt have answers for why Jackson, at 27, had to have his bags packed coming off the best season of his career. And although he dismissed the idea that Kelly was looking to make a statement, Maclin admitted that theres a lesson to be learned.

Its all about doing the right thing at the end of the day, Maclin said. Thats what you do. You come up, you show up to work, do the right things, be positive, things are going to work out in your favor. It all comes down to doing the right things.

Maclin hardly seemed upset that his former teammate, who went over the 1,300-yard receiving mark last year and caught 82 passes, wont be adding to the offense this year, or that Jackson landed on his feet with the Eagles divisional rivals, the Redskins.

Asked how the Eagles would replace Jacksons top-end speed and vertical threat, Maclin said, Well be fine, man.

Because I have faith in the offense and I got faith in the guys we have in the locker room, he later added. Chip said it himself. The offense isnt built around one guy. We have multiple guys that can go out there and make plays. Im looking forward to seeing what we can do this year.

Maclin fielded several Jackson-related questions during his 13-minute session with reporters and bypassed several opportunities to say that his former teammate would be missed or express anything remotely supportive of Jackson.

Maclin declined to go into detail about his relationship with Jackson but said he hasnt spoken with the Redskins receiver since the Eagles cut ties.

Our relationship is our relationship, he said. It doesnt need to be shared with anybody else.

Sure sounded like they wont be exchanging Christmas cards over the holidays.

Asked if hed get tired of persistent Jackson questions, Maclin said, If you guys want to ask about him, hes in Washington now, so I suggest you all go to Washington and ask about him.

Maclin missed all of last year after tearing his ACL during the first week of training camp. He said his knee is fully recovered and hes excited about his role in the offense, which should be prominent given the departures of Jackson and veteran slot receiver Jason Avant.

Interestingly, Maclin admitted that NFL teams need two dynamic receivers to contend. Maclin and Jackson could have represented one of the leagues best receiver tandems, but Maclin suggested that the Eagles already have a dominant one-two punch, even without Jackson.

I think we have two, he said. I think we have more than two, but I think we have two definitely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
unckeyherb said:
Deamon said:
unckeyherb said:
1 - Sep 07 - 1:00 PM ET - Jaguars-W (1-0)
2 - Sep 15 - 8:30 PM ET - at Colts (Monday Night) W (2-0)
3 - Sep 21 - 1:00 PM ET - Redskins W (3-0!)
4 - Sep 28 - 4:25 PM ET - at 49ers L (3-1)
5 - Oct 05 - 1:00 PM ET - Rams W (4-1)
6 - Oct 12 - 8:30 PM ET - Giants (Sunday Night) W (5-1)
7 - Bye Week
8 - Oct 26 - 4:05 PM ET - at Cardinals W (6-1)
9 - Nov 02 - 1:00 PM ET - at Texans W (7-1)
10 - Nov 10 - 8:30 PM ET - Panthers (Monday Night) W (8-1) At this point local Radio Stations officially explode with talk of SB
11 - Nov 16 - 1:00 PM ET - at Packers L (8-2)
12 - Nov 23 - 1:00 PM ET - Titans W (9-2)
13 - Nov 27 - 4:30 PM ET - at Cowboys (Thanksgiving Afternoon) L (9-3)
14 - Dec 07 - 4:25 PM ET - Seahawks L (9-4)
15 - Dec 14 - 8:30 PM ET - Cowboys (Sunday Night) W (10-4)
16 - Dec 20 - 4:30 PM ET - at Redskins (Saturday Afternoon) L (10-5) Let down game with short rest and coming off big win against 'girls.
17 - Dec 28 - 1:00 PM ET - at Giants W (11-5)
hahah no chance we start 8-1. none. :P
Through 8 weeks of playing you predict the same record as me, plus one loss to Indy. No chance we beat Indy? None? I'd say both teams are pretty comparable on defense and Philly has the advantage on offense. Just saying, I think its very possible to hand Luck a loss in week 2.

I also think Carolina is going to regress. Big time. Carolina's offense was ranked 26th last year. Their starting WR's now are Tavarres King, Jerricho Crotchery Jason Avant.

8-1 baby.
I just dont see us rattling off a 3 game win streak, then a loss then another 5 wins in a row. 5 wins in a row is tough to do in the NFL, especially by a team that isn't in that clear elite class (I think we're on the brink, but not elite). We very well could beat Carolina like you predict.. but there's also a good chance we lose to the skins, giants, or cardinals. We don't typically start strong and it seems our endurance at the end of the season last year was great, and could be the same this year. I think we'll be a better team later in the year when our rookie WR develops and our youth/meal program?? gives us that advantage over the rest. Would be truly shocked at 8-1.

 
Without taking the positioning into consideration, I feel we go 2-2, 2-2, 1-1 against the NFCW, AFCS, and NFC extra. Theres always one game you win no one thought you would and one you lose. So that means how we do in division is what will determine our record. To me the height is 11-5 with 10-6 or 9-7 more likely.

 
Bigboy10182000 said:
@EliotShorrParks: Cody Latimer's spider chart compared to Kelvin Benjamin's. One looks slightly more well rounded. #Eagles http://t.co/bs4LQCYmgq

@EliotShorrParks: Latimer's (6-2, 215 lbs) 40-time (4.44) was top 10 at Combine among WRs & he was tops in bench press. Big, fast, strong. Ideal for #Eagles
I don't have a dog in the hunt but did Kelvin Benjamin really place that low in those drills or did he just not do them? Looking solely at the chart it seems like the 3 cone drill was a zero (so I guess he didn't perform that one) but his 10 and 20 yard speed appear to be in the lowest 10 percentile. If he actually ran those times, that would be a major red flag. (He looks relatively "slow" to me but I don't know if that's because he's a long-strider.)

 
Bigboy10182000 said:
@EliotShorrParks: Cody Latimer's spider chart compared to Kelvin Benjamin's. One looks slightly more well rounded. #Eagles http://t.co/bs4LQCYmgq

@EliotShorrParks: Latimer's (6-2, 215 lbs) 40-time (4.44) was top 10 at Combine among WRs & he was tops in bench press. Big, fast, strong. Ideal for #Eagles
I don't have a dog in the hunt but did Kelvin Benjamin really place that low in those drills or did he just not do them? Looking solely at the chart it seems like the 3 cone drill was a zero (so I guess he didn't perform that one) but his 10 and 20 yard speed appear to be in the lowest 10 percentile. If he actually ran those times, that would be a major red flag. (He looks relatively "slow" to me but I don't know if that's because he's a long-strider.)
We already have a superior version of Kelvin Benjamin on the roster, called Zach Ertz. Benjamin doesn't seem to offer much besides size. He has below average hands, he body catches and cradles the ball most of the time, rarely catches with his hands away from his body. As a result he doesn't have the catch radius you'd expect from a guy his size. He has limited ability to separate against outside coverage, only so-so speed. I don't call myself an expert by any means, but I'm not sure Benjamin is any better than Riley Cooper. There's at least 10 and maybe more WRs I'd rather the Eagles draft than Benjamin.

 
Watch Benjamin run his 40 at the combine, not only is he slow but he is heavy footed. Also looks to me that he will have weight issues with his frame. TE may be his eventuality but if so, he is a project undeserving to be selected in the first 2 rds. Way too much in the way of value at WR this year to take a chance on him.

 
If there is one player I do not want them taking at 22 it's Benjamin. Everything screams "overhyped" about him. I'd be happy if they took Lattimer over him at 22. Just hope this doesn't happen.

 
This tells you all that you need to know about Kelvin Benjamin's frame and athleticism. http://mockdraftable.com/player/4329/ He's a robot.
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against Benjamin.

From that page:

Similar Players (Lower score = more similar)

Jaison Williams (2009): 7.7877548020096 (73.6%)

Mike Evans (2014): 8.5822718898045 (72.6%)

Tori Gurley (2011): 9.6292129778361 (71.4%)

Brian Quick (2012): 9.673838881165 (71.3%)

Ramses Barden (2009): 11.069125584756 (69.9%)

Rodney Smith (2013): 11.271850863654 (69.7%)

Brandon Coleman (2014): 11.286661712288 (69.7%)

Marko Mitchell (2009): 12.087972248055 (69%)

Jeff Fuller (2012): 12.882492487124 (68.4%)

Aaron Mellette (2013): 13.243506261652 (68.1%)
 
Late225 said:
ShaHBucks said:
This tells you all that you need to know about Kelvin Benjamin's frame and athleticism. http://mockdraftable.com/player/4329/ He's a robot.
I can't tell if you're arguing for or against Benjamin.

From that page:

Similar Players (Lower score = more similar)

Jaison Williams (2009): 7.7877548020096 (73.6%)

Mike Evans (2014): 8.5822718898045 (72.6%)

Tori Gurley (2011): 9.6292129778361 (71.4%)

Brian Quick (2012): 9.673838881165 (71.3%)

Ramses Barden (2009): 11.069125584756 (69.9%)

Rodney Smith (2013): 11.271850863654 (69.7%)

Brandon Coleman (2014): 11.286661712288 (69.7%)

Marko Mitchell (2009): 12.087972248055 (69%)

Jeff Fuller (2012): 12.882492487124 (68.4%)

Aaron Mellette (2013): 13.243506261652 (68.1%)
Against. He has unbelievable size but he can't move well. He was the worse measured 'big WR' in the draft.
 
@lawlornfl: The #Eagles are showing a lot of interest in WR Cody Latimer. Let's take a quick look at the hot prospect. http://t.co/RDnCxXTZWZ
He's interesting. Think we have to take him at #22 to get him, I don't think he'll drop to the 2nd. If he's the BPA on their board, then sure.
Maybe if we trade back that will be who we're gong after. Don't love him at 22.

I still would likely rather go Defense in round 1 if someone great is still there which there should be. If we go wr in the first im fine with it but it would have to be someone that rea`lly stands out or slips down or if we trade back

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.

 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
I'd be very okay with this. But it would have to be a 3rd rounder as the team trading with us would already be giving us their 2nd round pick, and I'd rather the extra pick come this year rather then next year.

Report out that SF is wanting Evans and may move top 5 to get him. Hopefully those 2 going so early doesn't start the next wr's on the board going a bit too early too.

 
Deranged Hermit said:
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%

 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%
Unless Beckham is still on the board, then I'd take him. If it's Cooks/Lee and say Roby/Fuller still available then trading back would be a good move.

 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%
Unless Beckham is still on the board, then I'd take him. If it's Cooks/Lee and say Roby/Fuller still available then trading back would be a good move.
At what pick do the contracts change from 5 to 4 (or is is 4 to 3?)? Is it the entire first round?

 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%
Unless Beckham is still on the board, then I'd take him. If it's Cooks/Lee and say Roby/Fuller still available then trading back would be a good move.
I'm thinking about the chances of going Roby/Bucannon with the first two picks. That would be sweet.
 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%
Unless Beckham is still on the board, then I'd take him. If it's Cooks/Lee and say Roby/Fuller still available then trading back would be a good move.
At what pick do the contracts change from 5 to 4 (or is is 4 to 3?)? Is it the entire first round?
All 1st round picks have a 5th year option. 2nd rounds picks are only 4 years.

 
The more I look at things, the more I'd be ok if they even traded to the beginning of the second round from 22 if thet pick up an extra second or whatever. Lots of depth in this draft at their need positions.
If it's a WR they want I agree 100%
Unless Beckham is still on the board, then I'd take him. If it's Cooks/Lee and say Roby/Fuller still available then trading back would be a good move.
At what pick do the contracts change from 5 to 4 (or is is 4 to 3?)? Is it the entire first round?
All 1st round picks have a 5th year option. 2nd rounds picks are only 4 years.
Thanks for the info!

If they go back with intentions of taking a WR I'd like them to stay in round 1. Go from 22 to like 28, then from 28 to 32 and go from there :thumbup:

 
@Mfranknfl: #Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie said "became clear at the end of yr" that wanted to move on from DeSean. "Needed to reconfigure WR position."

 
@GeoffMosherCSN: Howie Roseman not beating economic drum re: DeSean. Says team building and future factored into decision.

@EliotShorrParks: #Eagles decision to move on from Jackson happened as soon as season ended. So Maclin/Cooper were re-signed knowing Jackson was gone.

 
@HubbuchNYP: Chip on no offers for DeSean: "The best cornerback in football (Revis) got released, too (because of salary). And he's a HELL of a player."

 
@Jeff_McLane: Jeffrey Lurie also made it clear that Chip Kelly spearheaded the decision to release DeSean Jackson.

@ZBerm: Jeffrey Lurie reiterated what Chip said -- this was a football decision based on what Chip wants from WRs. Said silence was out of respect

@GeoffMosherCSN: Lurie said he has faith in Chip, said the offense can be better in 2014. Said nobody believed last yr the offense would be better w/Fole ...

@HubbuchNYP: Jeff Lurie: "We're not afraid of any player going to a team in our division. Let's check back in three years and see where we're at."

@HubbuchNYP: Lurie on if the Eagles were concerned about DeSeans off-field behavior/associations: "We're concerned about every player's behavior."

@EliotShorrParks: If DeSean Jackson didn't fit the #Eagles mold at WR, that is a strong sign that both Beckham Jr. or Cooks don't either. #NFLDraft

@HubbuchNYP: Lurie said he signed off on the DeSean release because "Chip told me he wanted to attack the wide-receiver position differently."

@Jeff_McLane: Kelly said that he was confident the #Eagles would be able replace DeSean's 82 catches for 1,300 yds.

@AlbertBreer: Key point >> RT @Jeff_McLane Kelly said Eagles came back from owners meetings w/o any trade offers for DeSean, thus decided to release him.

@ZBerm: Chip said he never got in a shouting match with Jackson, had no issue with Jackson's work ethic

@HubbuchNYP: Chip Kelly on if he had a personality conflict with DeSean: "No. Not once. I have no idea where that came from."

@Tim_McManus: Chip basically said DeSean release was purely a football move, never had altercation or issues with him

@HubbuchNYP: Chip Kelly must have said 15 times in a 5-minute interview that DeSean was released for "purely football reasons." Got upset at questioning.

@GeoffMosherCSN: Chip said several times that he wouldn't go into exact details on why he cut DeSean. Said he doesn't detail why he cuts any player.

@ZBerm: He said the reason he has not commented on it is for same reason he didn't comment when Avant was cut, Chung was cut -- not what he does

@EliotShorrParks: #Eagles RT @MattLombardo975: Kelly: Am I worried he's in WASH? Am I worried? No.

@HubbuchNYP: Chip Kelly on the Eagles losing a 1,300-yard receiver: "We'll be all right."

@Jeff_McLane: Just because Chip Kelly said decision to release DeSean Jackson was "purely football" doesn't mean off-field behavior wasn't a factor ...

@Jeff_McLane: ... As one #Eagles coach told me when I repeated Chip's answer, "Aren't all decisons in the NFL 'purely football' decisions?"

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top