What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

** Official 2014 Philadelphia Eagles Thread ** (2 Viewers)

Mighty Mice said:
@RoobCSN: Most comp. of 50 yards or more in 2014: Rodgers (9), Foles (7), Stafford (7), Cousins (6). Foles in 8 games. And didn't get to face Eagles.
I didn't watch the game this week but get this... As of last week Sanchez threw 10 ints. 8 of them came from within 20 yards. This shows he struggles with a lot of throws.6 of Foles 10 ints were throws beyond 20+ yards. He's trying to get the ball downfield. He not confused with his decisions like a QB like Sanchez. You'll either get a long play, a flag, incompletion, or a pick. Those are good odds.

The picks will happen challenging defenses like he does. He like Andrew Luck minus the love affair. No one seems to get that.
This is too easily lost. While some of those long throws were certainly poor choices, throwing a pick 30 or 40 yards down field is hardly the worst thing that can happen to a team. And when those happen on third down or second and long....well, it's not such a big deal at all then.
I also think that was a part of his off season program of being more aggressive instead of taking sacks (which I still disagree with). He wasn't fully into a comfort zone yet with it. Had he played 6-8 more games this year, I think we would have seen his numbers move closer to his career mean. He'd have probably finished somewhere around 35 TDs, 17 ints.
Was banging the drum over the last month that Sanchez did not even attempt to stretch the field. Very limited to short/intermediate and nearly all his yardage came from RAC.

And sacks? Despite the *vastly* improved OLine over the last 1/2 of the season due to the return of several key starters, the numbers speak for themselves.

Foles: 311 attempts, 9 sacks

Sanchez: 309 attempts, 23 sacks
That's galling
 
Mighty Mice said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
Lost in the shuffle was a pretty damn good rookie year for Jordan Matthews as well.
Absolutely. 103 targets, 67 rec, 872 yards, 8 TD.

And a good contribution from the IND castoff rookie K they dropped Henery for: Parkey 34-38 FGs (4-4 on 50+...but 2 against WAS were killers!) and 54-54 on PATs.

Just think...Parkey goes 2-3 on week 16 and the Eagles are 11-5 and still playing football, and we'd be saying ran into a pair off buzzsaws in SEA and DAL but then won 2 in a row, on the road, versus division opponents...

The seasons can turn on the smallest things.
Ya he had a good year. Just totally overshadowed by the insane amount of rookie WR's putting up huge numbers this year though.

Might be a dropoff if it goes back to Foles, it was night and day the difference for Mathews with Foles/Sanchez.

Should be solid next year and hope he builds some chemistry with Foles this offseason. Need Mac back, would be satisfied with Maclin/Mathews/Cooper/Ertz

 
Mighty Mice said:
@RoobCSN: Most comp. of 50 yards or more in 2014: Rodgers (9), Foles (7), Stafford (7), Cousins (6). Foles in 8 games. And didn't get to face Eagles.
I didn't watch the game this week but get this... As of last week Sanchez threw 10 ints. 8 of them came from within 20 yards. This shows he struggles with a lot of throws.6 of Foles 10 ints were throws beyond 20+ yards. He's trying to get the ball downfield. He not confused with his decisions like a QB like Sanchez. You'll either get a long play, a flag, incompletion, or a pick. Those are good odds.

The picks will happen challenging defenses like he does. He like Andrew Luck minus the love affair. No one seems to get that.
This is too easily lost. While some of those long throws were certainly poor choices, throwing a pick 30 or 40 yards down field is hardly the worst thing that can happen to a team. And when those happen on third down or second and long....well, it's not such a big deal at all then.
I also think that was a part of his off season program of being more aggressive instead of taking sacks (which I still disagree with). He wasn't fully into a comfort zone yet with it. Had he played 6-8 more games this year, I think we would have seen his numbers move closer to his career mean. He'd have probably finished somewhere around 35 TDs, 17 ints.
Was banging the drum over the last month that Sanchez did not even attempt to stretch the field. Very limited to short/intermediate and nearly all his yardage came from RAC.

And sacks? Despite the *vastly* improved OLine over the last 1/2 of the season due to the return of several key starters, the numbers speak for themselves.

Foles: 311 attempts, 9 sacks

Sanchez: 309 attempts, 23 sacks
That's galling
My thoughts are for a QB that doesn't go deep and is exclusively short and intermediate, he should have had fewer... but by the 'eye test' he held onto the ball far too long and was indecisive.

 
Without Djax and with a year of tape on Kelly's offense the windows were clearly smaller. Neither QB showed sufficient decisiveness and accuracy in response but Sanchez was clearly worse.

 
Ted Lange as your Bartender said:
Mighty Mice said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
Lost in the shuffle was a pretty damn good rookie year for Jordan Matthews as well.
Absolutely. 103 targets, 67 rec, 872 yards, 8 TD.

And a good contribution from the IND castoff rookie K they dropped Henery for: Parkey 34-38 FGs (4-4 on 50+...but 2 against WAS were killers!) and 54-54 on PATs.

Just think...Parkey goes 2-3 on week 16 and the Eagles are 11-5 and still playing football, and we'd be saying ran into a pair off buzzsaws in SEA and DAL but then won 2 in a row, on the road, versus division opponents...

The seasons can turn on the smallest things.
Eagles still would have missed the playoffs since Dallas won their last two and Detroit beat Chicago in week 16.
Yep. 11-5 and out of the playoffs as opposed to 10-6 and out. Not much difference except I guess one feels a little better?

 
Another side note, notice how there isn't a major swell to change the playoffs because a 10-6 team was left out and a 7-8-1 team got in? Its because Eagle fans pretty much feel we didn't deserve to get into the playoffs the way we played down the stretch.

 
Ted Lange as your Bartender said:
Mighty Mice said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
Lost in the shuffle was a pretty damn good rookie year for Jordan Matthews as well.
Absolutely. 103 targets, 67 rec, 872 yards, 8 TD.

And a good contribution from the IND castoff rookie K they dropped Henery for: Parkey 34-38 FGs (4-4 on 50+...but 2 against WAS were killers!) and 54-54 on PATs.

Just think...Parkey goes 2-3 on week 16 and the Eagles are 11-5 and still playing football, and we'd be saying ran into a pair off buzzsaws in SEA and DAL but then won 2 in a row, on the road, versus division opponents...

The seasons can turn on the smallest things.
Eagles still would have missed the playoffs since Dallas won their last two and Detroit beat Chicago in week 16.
Yep. 11-5 and out of the playoffs as opposed to 10-6 and out. Not much difference except I guess one feels a little better?
Yes, we would still pick #20 and miss the playoffs at 11-5 (somehow I thought we had tiebreak over DET but was incorrect). But IMO maybe we do 'feel better' collectively and the media does garnish more attention on the fact a team was left out with 11 wins (and the 5 losses to SEA/GB/DAL/ARI/SF...4 playoff teams and a very good team in SF on the road before they collapsed down the stretch).

I know of many teams left out with 10 wins, but can't remember an 11 win team getting left out off the top of my head.

Suffice to say we lost to all the other playoff teams listed above and for that reason alone (not being able to 'compete' with that tier) no way did I feel PHI deserved a slot.

Just sayin'...Parkey was $$$ all year, had an inexplicably poor game vs. WAS. He makes either FG and we're 11-5. Changes perception, seeing an 11 win team left out. Also could be good for offseason momentum internally. Something they could 'point to' so to speak.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Free Agency

The following Eagles are unrestricted free agents: WR Jeremy Maclin, OLB Brandon Graham, S Nate Allen, CB Bradley Fletcher, QB Mark Sanchez, ILB Casey Matthews and WR Brad Smith.

Sooooo....Maclin and Graham if feasible?

Also reading Cole is willing to rework his contract. Wants to stay an Eagle.
 
Ted Lange as your Bartender said:
Mighty Mice said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
Lost in the shuffle was a pretty damn good rookie year for Jordan Matthews as well.
Absolutely. 103 targets, 67 rec, 872 yards, 8 TD.

And a good contribution from the IND castoff rookie K they dropped Henery for: Parkey 34-38 FGs (4-4 on 50+...but 2 against WAS were killers!) and 54-54 on PATs.

Just think...Parkey goes 2-3 on week 16 and the Eagles are 11-5 and still playing football, and we'd be saying ran into a pair off buzzsaws in SEA and DAL but then won 2 in a row, on the road, versus division opponents...

The seasons can turn on the smallest things.
Eagles still would have missed the playoffs since Dallas won their last two and Detroit beat Chicago in week 16.
Yep. 11-5 and out of the playoffs as opposed to 10-6 and out. Not much difference except I guess one feels a little better?
Yes, we would still pick #20 and miss the playoffs at 11-5 (somehow I thought we had tiebreak over DET but was incorrect). But IMO maybe we do 'feel better' collectively and the media does garnish more attention on the fact a team was left out with 11 wins (and the 5 losses to SEA/GB/DAL/ARI/SF...4 playoff teams and a very good team in SF on the road before they collapsed down the stretch).I know of many teams left out with 10 wins, but can't remember an 11 win team getting left out off the top of my head.

Suffice to say we lost to all the other playoff teams listed above and for that reason alone (not being able to 'compete' with that tier) no way did I feel PHI deserved a slot.

Just sayin'...Parkey was $$$ all year, had an inexplicably poor game vs. WAS. He makes either FG and we're 11-5. Changes perception, seeing an 11 win team left out. Also could be good for offseason momentum internally. Something they could 'point to' so to speak.
Matt Cassel Patriots were 11-5.

 
Free Agency

The following Eagles are unrestricted free agents: WR Jeremy Maclin, OLB Brandon Graham, S Nate Allen, CB Bradley Fletcher, QB Mark Sanchez, ILB Casey Matthews and WR Brad Smith.

Sooooo....Maclin and Graham if feasible?

Also reading Cole is willing to rework his contract. Wants to stay an Eagle.
I'd take Sanchez back if the price is right. He's an adequate backup but like most backups, if he has to play more than 5 games, we're in trouble.

 
Free Agency

The following Eagles are unrestricted free agents: WR Jeremy Maclin, OLB Brandon Graham, S Nate Allen, CB Bradley Fletcher, QB Mark Sanchez, ILB Casey Matthews and WR Brad Smith.

Sooooo....Maclin and Graham if feasible?

Also reading Cole is willing to rework his contract. Wants to stay an Eagle.
I'd take Sanchez back if the price is right. He's an adequate backup but like most backups, if he has to play more than 5 games, we're in trouble.
I agree. And I think Sanchez knows he's a backup too. Hopefully that means we get him at a good price.

 
Anyone see this? http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20141231_Boykin_deserves_a_shot_at_starting.html

Everyone of us who watched this team can see Boykin has the "it" factor. I just can't understand not trying him outside and having him on the field as much as possible. Letting Fletcher get burned reapeatedly and defending the decision until he's finally a healthy scratch makes me nervous about this regime. The blown first pick and passing on Buccanon and Roby unnerves me. Getting rid of Jackson unnerves me.

On the positive side: I'm bullish on Foles and hope they can use the money they save on him to shore up the weak spots. Do you realize he will be the 55th highest paid QB? Unreal! I don't think he's injury prone either. Freak stuff. Rodgers broke his collar bone last year and is now dealing with a calf injury but no one would say he's "injury prone."

Back to the negative: don't like the rumblings that their is a rift between Chip and Howey.

Year 3 will be everything for this team. The schedule looks easier but the division does not. Half of me wants so bad to trust in Chip and stay upbeat. The other half thinks he's a gimmick coach that won't be abke to handle this level especially in this town and he'll be back in college by 2017.

 
Guys I hope they target:

Byron Maxwell CB - 26, 6ints, 29 pass def,

Kareem Jackson CB - 26, 10ints, 50 pass def, 241 tackles

Devin McCourty S - 27, 17ints, 56 pds, 7 FF, 295 tackles

Justin Houston OLB - 25, 48.5 sacks, 198 tackles, 7 ff

 
Another side note, notice how there isn't a major swell to change the playoffs because a 10-6 team was left out and a 7-8-1 team got in? Its because Eagle fans pretty much feel we didn't deserve to get into the playoffs the way we played down the stretch.
I think it is time to revamp the playoffs. IMO we need 7 teams in the playoffs, 4 division winners and 3 wildcards. #1 seed is the only seed to get a bye plus home field advantage. Seeds #2 thru #7 play in the wildcard round.

Since the realignment I have never understood why they kept the same playoff structure. When it was only 3 divisions you have 3 division winners and 3 wildcards. Now you have 4 division winners and 2 wildcards. Why should the #2 seed get the same benefits as the #1 in the divisional round?

 
Another side note, notice how there isn't a major swell to change the playoffs because a 10-6 team was left out and a 7-8-1 team got in? Its because Eagle fans pretty much feel we didn't deserve to get into the playoffs the way we played down the stretch.
I think it is time to revamp the playoffs. IMO we need 7 teams in the playoffs, 4 division winners and 3 wildcards. #1 seed is the only seed to get a bye plus home field advantage. Seeds #2 thru #7 play in the wildcard round.

Since the realignment I have never understood why they kept the same playoff structure. When it was only 3 divisions you have 3 division winners and 3 wildcards. Now you have 4 division winners and 2 wildcards. Why should the #2 seed get the same benefits as the #1 in the divisional round?
Changes are afoot: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12026957/reseeding-likely-nfl-playoffs-expand

 
There are many potential explanations for Gamble's ouster. Scapegoat for the Marcus Smith pick? They got wind that he was in talks with other teams? A compromise between Howie and Chip?

The one that could be most unnerving is that Chip is consolidating power like Andy did before him. That turned out horribly, as Andy was spread too thin with his other duties and it hampered his coaching, and there was no strong alternative voice to dissuade him from doing things like hiring Washburn without a DC in place and promoting Castillo to DC.

 
There are many potential explanations for Gamble's ouster. Scapegoat for the Marcus Smith pick? They got wind that he was in talks with other teams? A compromise between Howie and Chip?

The one that could be most unnerving is that Chip is consolidating power like Andy did before him. That turned out horribly, as Andy was spread too thin with his other duties and it hampered his coaching, and there was no strong alternative voice to dissuade him from doing things like hiring Washburn without a DC in place and promoting Castillo to DC.
The prevailing theory so far seems to be that Gamble was Chip's "football" guy and this is a direct shot by Howie to say, "yea all I do is manage the cap eh?"

To me it seems like the Desean Jackson move was a season long bet. If the Eagles finish 12-4 and get a playoff win, Chip and Gamble win. If they don't, Howie wins. Howie signed Desean long term so he wasn't onboard with letting him go despite being the good soldier to the media. Jackson played good and the Eagles missed the playoffs. Someones head had to roll for the Desean move.

 
Tom Gamble is no longer a part of the Eagles’ front office.
Gamble was named the team’s vice president of player personnel during the 2013 offseason. He had previously spent eight seasons with the San Francisco 49ers as a respected talent evaluator.

The Eagles may try to spin this as the two sides parting ways, but that seems like a stretch.

Tim reported in November that the relationship between Chip Kelly and Howie Roseman had cooled, but Kelly and Gamble remained close.

"I think Tom does an outstanding job," Kelly said last week. "And if he has the opportunity to [be a GM somewhere else], then I would support him in anything. And if I can give him any help in that situation I would. But he's a heck of a football guy."

In the same press conference, Kelly said dealing with the cap and contracts is Roseman's strength. He did not say anything about Roseman as a talent evaluator and offered a one-word answer when asked to describe his relationship with the GM: "Good."

Kelly has been calling the shots since he was hired. He's had final say on the 53-man roster, and his fingerprints have been all over the draft. Just last year, two of the Eagles' first five draft picks were Oregon players whom Kelly had coached: Josh Huff and Taylor Hart.

The Eagles' 2014 draft class did not contribute much as rookies, aside from Jordan Matthews. It's easy to second-guess some of the other moves that have been Kelly's call, like releasing DeSean Jackson and giving Riley Cooper $10 million guaranteed to start.

Gamble's departure seems like a clear win for Roseman. Lurie was asked last week whether Roseman would be back as the GM.

"Is that a question?" Lurie responded. "Yes."

The one draft we know Roseman was in control of was 2012, and that's easily been the strongest in recent memory with Fletcher Cox, Mychal Kendricks, Nick Foles, Brandon Boykin, Vinny Curry and Bryce Brown.

Letting Gamble go could be an indication that Lurie is stripping Kelly of some of his control and handing it back over to Roseman.

Will the GM have final say during the 2015 draft? How might that fly with Kelly?

The Eagles' season officially ended just three days ago, but the offseason is already off to an eventful start

Read more at http://www.phillymag.com/birds247/2014/12/31/making-sense-gamble-move/#XrVCLQhAjfcawxor.99
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why does it always have to be all Desperate Housewives? I think I speak for all of us when I say we don't know dik about what Gamble does or even if he was good at his job. For all we know every guy he discussed or wanted probably blew. He probably got fired due to what many of us get fired for-- not doing our job up to our bosses standards.

 
I think I speak for all of us when I say we don't know dik about what Gamble does or even if he was good at his job.
It is true, but by all accounts, he was a key part of building up the 49ers.
And as you know that doesn't necessarily mean he did well here. I think too much is made of things like this. If he did well at his job, he would still be here IMHO.
Or he simply wants to be a GM and knew he wouldn't get the chance here, so they parted ways. That is the official line, parted ways, not fired. It was an "insider" that said fired. Totally agree with your points about the ridiculous drama.

 
The Desean move. Marcus Smith. The Oregon players drafted above their mark. Fletcher and Williams. There were a lot of questionable moves made. I guess someone had to take the fall for them.

 
Free Agency

The following Eagles are unrestricted free agents: WR Jeremy Maclin, OLB Brandon Graham, S Nate Allen, CB Bradley Fletcher, QB Mark Sanchez, ILB Casey Matthews and WR Brad Smith.

Sooooo....Maclin and Graham if feasible?

Also reading Cole is willing to rework his contract. Wants to stay an Eagle.
I'd take Sanchez back if the price is right. He's an adequate backup but like most backups, if he has to play more than 5 games, we're in trouble.
I agree. He a terrible starter but a very good backup.

 
Free Agency

The following Eagles are unrestricted free agents: WR Jeremy Maclin, OLB Brandon Graham, S Nate Allen, CB Bradley Fletcher, QB Mark Sanchez, ILB Casey Matthews and WR Brad Smith.

Sooooo....Maclin and Graham if feasible?

Also reading Cole is willing to rework his contract. Wants to stay an Eagle.
Free Brandon Graham!

 
Oh and Roseman is talking to the Jets about their GM opening.
Talk about a horrible career move.
I'm hoping this is mostly his agent leaking some stuff for contract / extension purposes.

If Howie is as smart as we've all seen then he must know that Lurie is 100x a better owner to work for than Woody Johnson.
Apparently it was just for permission to talk to some player personnel guy we have Mueller I think. Makes for good news though.

 
Mariota and Kelly are gonna make a great Qb/coach combo in the NFL. Its a shame thats gonna happen in Tampa.

 
Mariota and Kelly are gonna make a great Qb/coach combo in the NFL. Its a shame thats gonna happen in Tampa.
Yeah after these past few weeks, if TB comes calling with his own QB and more power, does he go? Heck 10 wins down there probably gets you a statue.
 
I think there are a lot of positives to take out of this season:

1. That defense isn't bad at all at the front seven. Very little needs to be done except minor tweaking. Definitely a bright spot.

2. The o-line is above average when healthy.

3. Maclin came into his own this year. Definitely a bright spot. Jordan Matthews is going to be a player.

4. Offense moved the ball. They scored a ton of points every game. Not many teams are going to win when the starter goes down for the season.

5. Special teams bordered on great all year.

6. Sproles was a STEAL this year. Helped at RB and Special Teams.

The negatives:

1. Some Div 1 colleges have better secondaries.

2. Cooper is absolutely terrible. Got no separation all year and was muscled around constantly.

3. McCoy wasn't good this year and I really think he won't be back next year. Make any excuses you want, he was mediocre.

4. I believe Foles regressed, but he's better than what many teams trot out there.

5. They need someone to stretch the field. No one respects the deep pass because they don't have anyone who can burn by you.

I'd burn 3-4 picks this year in the draft at CB/S. Maybe take a shot on that QB who drops (there's one every year). Need a replacement for DeMeco whose career is probably done.
DH it's too bad your guy isn't still working with the Eagles.....would love to hear the behind the scenes on the recent stories.

 
Mariota and Kelly are gonna make a great Qb/coach combo in the NFL. Its a shame thats gonna happen in Tampa.
Yeah after these past few weeks, if TB comes calling with his own QB and more power, does he go? Heck 10 wins down there probably gets you a statue.
This isnt college. He's under contract with the eagles till 2018. The eagles would have to "trade" him.

 
There are many potential explanations for Gamble's ouster. Scapegoat for the Marcus Smith pick? They got wind that he was in talks with other teams? A compromise between Howie and Chip?

The one that could be most unnerving is that Chip is consolidating power like Andy did before him. That turned out horribly, as Andy was spread too thin with his other duties and it hampered his coaching, and there was no strong alternative voice to dissuade him from doing things like hiring Washburn without a DC in place and promoting Castillo to DC.
The prevailing theory so far seems to be that Gamble was Chip's "football" guy and this is a direct shot by Howie to say, "yea all I do is manage the cap eh?"

To me it seems like the Desean Jackson move was a season long bet. If the Eagles finish 12-4 and get a playoff win, Chip and Gamble win. If they don't, Howie wins. Howie signed Desean long term so he wasn't onboard with letting him go despite being the good soldier to the media. Jackson played good and the Eagles missed the playoffs. Someones head had to roll for the Desean move.
The only reason Gamble took the job to be closer to his ailing father. His father died in January last year. The guy has a resume to be a GM in this league and the Eagles already had a GM. Seems like a logical separation for both sides at this point.

 
Snotbubbles said:
There are many potential explanations for Gamble's ouster. Scapegoat for the Marcus Smith pick? They got wind that he was in talks with other teams? A compromise between Howie and Chip?

The one that could be most unnerving is that Chip is consolidating power like Andy did before him. That turned out horribly, as Andy was spread too thin with his other duties and it hampered his coaching, and there was no strong alternative voice to dissuade him from doing things like hiring Washburn without a DC in place and promoting Castillo to DC.
The prevailing theory so far seems to be that Gamble was Chip's "football" guy and this is a direct shot by Howie to say, "yea all I do is manage the cap eh?"To me it seems like the Desean Jackson move was a season long bet. If the Eagles finish 12-4 and get a playoff win, Chip and Gamble win. If they don't, Howie wins. Howie signed Desean long term so he wasn't onboard with letting him go despite being the good soldier to the media. Jackson played good and the Eagles missed the playoffs. Someones head had to roll for the Desean move.
The only reason Gamble took the job to be closer to his ailing father. His father died in January last year. The guy has a resume to be a GM in this league and the Eagles already had a GM. Seems like a logical separation for both sides at this point.
Yea on the surface if this happens, you say that. But when guys likes Mort and Shefter are reporting he was fired, that's where the speculation comes from.

 
On 97.5 they are talking about Chip potentially being traded to the 49ers, Per a speculative tweet from Mike Florio.

What the fudge

 
No shot Chip goes. Maybe he gets a raise but he isn't going anywhere. Gamble leaves and Oregon goes to a championship game and now we're trading our coach :lmao: There's a better chance of him going to Washington and cutting Desean again.

 
La Canfora is a noted hack.

Tim McManus: My understanding is that there is a move forthcoming, but it doesn't involve the departure of either Kelly or Roseman.

 
Keep the coach, get rid of the nerd on the power trip. You don't bring Chip in and have the cap guy restrictions what he can do. Let him run his program for a few years and see if it works. After last year's draft it can only get better ha.

 
Keep the coach, get rid of the nerd on the power trip. You don't bring Chip in and have the cap guy restrictions what he can do. Let him run his program for a few years and see if it works. After last year's draft it can only get better ha.
Can it? Seems like he has room to draft more Oregon players and first round no shows. Then cut top WRs for no reason or reasonable compensation.

I like Chip the Coach but nothing he's done personnel wise has given me any confidence in his ability to be a GM.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top