fruity pebbles
Footballguy
Wasn't a part of it but
Calvin Johnson and the 1.06 for Eddie Lacy and the 1.02
Calvin Johnson and the 1.06 for Eddie Lacy and the 1.02
I agree with this. The picks are only going to rise in value over the next few months. It's risky of course, but there's a lot of upside as well. 2 and 5 last year got you Mike Evans and somebody like Jordan Matthews/Carlos Hyde/Davante Adams/Kelvin Benjamin.it's an interesting deal and i can see both sides but personally prefer the #2 + #5. keep the 2 and draft Gurley or Gordon and can turn the #5 into a later 1st + future 1st.Jeffery for me but I guess if you are desperate for a RB and love Gordon or Gurley it might workAlshon Flipped 2x in last week or so.
Jeffery
for
1.02+1.05
PPR
Just too much value in the 2 and 5 to pass on the deal even if you want to trade the picks.
As Ghostguy posted you could probably turn those picks into 5 or so 1sts with some maneuvering and that's worth a lot more than Jeffery (or pretty much any player)
I have Calvin and Lacy dead even in my latest trade value rankings, so I definitely like the side getting the 1.02.Wasn't a part of it but
Calvin Johnson and the 1.06 for Eddie Lacy and the 1.02
Cobb by a lotRandall Cobb and Charles Clay
for
1.04, 2.08, 2016 1st (probably around 1.06-1.07)
Calivin/1.6Wasn't a part of it but
Calvin Johnson and the 1.06 for Eddie Lacy and the 1.02
This is pretty even for me. I would take Cobb if I was going for title and I would be happy with the picks if I was a year or to away. Surprised that 2 1st's is considered a good deal for Jeffery and not for Cobb.Randall Cobb and Charles Clay
for
1.04, 2.08, 2016 1st (probably around 1.06-1.07)
This deal is not equal to what was paid for jeffrey. "two 1sts" doesnt just mean any two 1sts.This is pretty even for me. I would take Cobb if I was going for title and I would be happy with the picks if I was a year or to away. Surprised that 2 1st's is considered a good deal for Jeffery and not for Cobb.Randall Cobb and Charles Clay
for
1.04, 2.08, 2016 1st (probably around 1.06-1.07)
I might take Witten and the pick here12 Team PPR
Team A gets: Jason Witten, rookie pick 2.02
Team B gets: Julius Thomas
So, it sounds pretty even then.AdamsFloyd12 team PPR
Michael Floyd
for
Devante Adams
Picks. If I am paying full price for Cobb I want to know for sure he is stayingRandall Cobb and Charles Clay
for
1.04, 2.08, 2016 1st (probably around 1.06-1.07)
CalvinWasn't a part of it but
Calvin Johnson and the 1.06 for Eddie Lacy and the 1.02
Based on recent ADP and rankings I'd say it's even, but I would think that Adams' value will take quite the drop as soon as Cobb re-signs.So, it sounds pretty even then.AdamsFloyd12 team PPR
Michael Floyd
for
Devante Adams![]()
Pick for me16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
Total score for Bell. Nice job16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
Just curious as to how the contender made out last year. If he was only a RB away from a good run, Joique Bell was the 4th best RB option from weeks 13-16. May have worked out nicely for both teams. I would certainly pay the 1.08 for a championship.16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
If it's the 1.8 looks like he lost 1st roundJust curious as to how the contender made out last year. If he was only a RB away from a good run, Joique Bell was the 4th best RB option from weeks 13-16. May have worked out nicely for both teams. I would certainly pay the 1.08 for a championship.16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
ETA- This is the exact reason I focus more on drafting WRs and trading for RBs. You can usually acquire a Joique Bell/Matt Asiata type at mid season for a late 1st or even a 2nd rounder. Better to build around WRs and "rent" RBs IMO. Unless a Lacy/Bell falls into your lap of course.
Assuming that 1st was his own, then yes, he did not fair well. That would indicate he needed more than a RB to make a strong run.If it's the 1.8 looks like he lost 1st roundJust curious as to how the contender made out last year. If he was only a RB away from a good run, Joique Bell was the 4th best RB option from weeks 13-16. May have worked out nicely for both teams. I would certainly pay the 1.08 for a championship.16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
ETA- This is the exact reason I focus more on drafting WRs and trading for RBs. You can usually acquire a Joique Bell/Matt Asiata type at mid season for a late 1st or even a 2nd rounder. Better to build around WRs and "rent" RBs IMO. Unless a Lacy/Bell falls into your lap of course.
AgreedAssuming that 1st was his own, then yes, he did not fair well. That would indicate he needed more than a RB to make a strong run.If it's the 1.8 looks like he lost 1st roundJust curious as to how the contender made out last year. If he was only a RB away from a good run, Joique Bell was the 4th best RB option from weeks 13-16. May have worked out nicely for both teams. I would certainly pay the 1.08 for a championship.16 team standard
J. Bell for 1.08
Trade made to a contender on trade deadline last season
ETA- This is the exact reason I focus more on drafting WRs and trading for RBs. You can usually acquire a Joique Bell/Matt Asiata type at mid season for a late 1st or even a 2nd rounder. Better to build around WRs and "rent" RBs IMO. Unless a Lacy/Bell falls into your lap of course.
Moncrief and pick. Very close for me. Would take Sammy alone over 1.212 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
Watkins for me12 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
Watkins pretty easily for me12 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
Right now would also take Watkins over 1.2 but Moncrief seals the deal and I'd rather have him and the pick.Moncrief and pick. Very close for me. Would take Sammy alone over 1.212 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
I have to go with Moncrief and the pick. Watkins is a stud, but 1.02 will be too, and Moncrief should have a huge opportunity in a perfect passing offense this season.12 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
In GB.....CobbStill thinking about trading Cobb off. 12 team, 0.5 PPR, by the way. This trade wouldn't go through until/unless Cobb re-signs in GB, so assume that that is the case.
Cobb
for
1.05 and 1.08
i absolutely hate watkins situation for the next few years, gimme a top pick and a blossoming wr with a young, stud qb12 Team PPR not involved
Watkins
For
Moncrief and 1.2
Both teams rebuilding
TEs can dominate in this format. I'd like to think Graham has 3-4 more dominating years. His 85 catches feel like 128 when you factor in 1.5PPR.That was a steal for Hopkins initially, then I think an overpay for Graham, especially since you already have Gronk. I haven't done a 1.5 PPR TE league though, so it might be worth it to lock up those two TEs. But I really like Hopkins, and if you're already thin at RB, I don't think I'd trade a good PPR back like Gio along with Hopkins, even for Graham.
Agree on all pointsThat was a steal for Hopkins initially, then I think an overpay for Graham, especially since you already have Gronk. I haven't done a 1.5 PPR TE league though, so it might be worth it to lock up those two TEs. But I really like Hopkins, and if you're already thin at RB, I don't think I'd trade a good PPR back like Gio along with Hopkins, even for Graham.
My backs are: Spiller, West, P. Thomas, and PierceThat was a steal for Hopkins initially, then I think an overpay for Graham, especially since you already have Gronk. I haven't done a 1.5 PPR TE league though, so it might be worth it to lock up those two TEs. But I really like Hopkins, and if you're already thin at RB, I don't think I'd trade a good PPR back like Gio along with Hopkins, even for Graham.
No TE required? If no, then I like Morris.12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/ 2 flex-rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Travis Kelce
Team B Gives Alfred Morris
Whoops. Sorry yes tight end required. FixedNo TE required? If no, then I like Morris.12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/ 2 flex-rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Travis Kelce
Team B Gives Alfred Morris
Kelce by quite a bit in a ppr12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/te 2 flex-rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Travis Kelce
Team B Gives Alfred Morris
At first glance Kelce. But depending on the rosters/team needs/league context, this may be fairly close, even though it is PPR.12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/te 2 flex-rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Travis Kelce
Team B Gives Alfred Morris
Another Moncrief trade 12 team PPR
Hopkins and 2.8
For
Floyd, Moncrief and 3.1
Hopkins for me at this pointAnother Moncrief trade 12 team PPR
Hopkins and 2.8
For
Floyd, Moncrief and 3.1
I think you did pretty well in TE premium to land Jimmy for that.pizzatyme said:I made 2 trades today in the FFPC 1.5PPR for TEs, 12 teams, 14 man cutdown on March 1st plus a K and DST.
I traded:
Crowell, Marquess Wilson and 2.6
for
Deandre Hopkins, Pierre Thomas, 4.11, 4.12, and 2016 3rd
Then I did a subsequent trade:
Gio and D. Hopkins
for Jimmy Graham.
This pairs Graham with Gronk on my team. I'm pretty excited but hope I didn't give up too much. My RBs are thin but I hope through the draft and FA to find a few serviceable ones to lead me to playoff success.
Thoughts?
Start 2 RB I might like Morris here depending on team makeup12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/te 2 flex-rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Travis Kelce
Team B Gives Alfred Morris
I guess I will be the other last remaining Floyd fan...I'll take the Floyd Moncrief side. Then likely flip Moncrief if I canAnother Moncrief trade 12 team PPR
Hopkins and 2.8
For
Floyd, Moncrief and 3.1
Probably not for youCan you make a case for Floyd that involves Fitzgerald signing an extension as expected?
I'm honestly asking. My concern with floyd isn't Fitz, it's Fitz, brown and brown, and Palmer or the qbotd plus the tough division and their excellent defense. I think most would agree. I'm willing to write off 2014 if there's a compelling reason, but I honestly don't watch the cards enough to know if that exists. You said you're a believer - is it short term, long term, just a believer in his talent?Probably not for youCan you make a case for Floyd that involves Fitzgerald signing an extension as expected?
Yeah not sure what to tell you except I love being able to buy him for almost half of what it cost last year.I'm honestly asking. My concern with floyd isn't Fitz, it's Fitz, brown and brown, and Palmer or the qbotd plus the tough division and their excellent defense. I think most would agree.I'm willing to write off 2014 if there's a compelling reason, but I honestly don't watch the cards enough to know if that exists. You said you're a believer - is it short term, long term, just a believer in his talent?Probably not for youCan you make a case for Floyd that involves Fitzgerald signing an extension as expected?