Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
**Official 2015 Off-Season Dynasty Completed Trades Thread** (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Dr. Octopus
- Start date
cstu
Footballguy
msudaisy26
Footballguy
Unless you can flip him for more this season it will set you back a couple years. This team is probably a borderline playoff team. You do realize that HALF of your running backs aren't even on an NFL team, but some how found their way onto your fantasy team.
cstu
Footballguy
Heep
Footballguy
Great trade. The only way I could see making that deal for Rodgers is if your lineup is absolutely loaded already and you are putting a few more PPG in your lineup.
Last edited by a moderator:
1 of 5 is "HALF"? Wat?
FBG overall dynasty rankings have mega ranked higher than cooper. What am I missing here? Are you a member of a counter FBG movement?
jeaton6
Footballguy
Pretty sure she's saying that this team likely won't be a contender so buying an older player like Calvin is counterproductive. His value is declining while the 1.2 and the player going there is likely to increase in value. If you can't really compete better to have young potential stud than older stud for numerous reasons.ETA: This team looks to me like it should be in rebuild mode.
Last edited by a moderator:
msudaisy26
Footballguy
I was a little off. I thought Rainey and Grice were cut. They are still irrelevant. Those rankings don't take into account the state of your team. This trade hurts you in more than one way. You gave up a player that is going to be producing long after Calvin is gone and your team needs a small miracle to win it this year, odds are the rookie you would have drafted at 1.02 is going to be inconsistent and cost you wins, if Calvin is healthy he will help you win games and give you a worse draft pick.
blardorg
Footballguy
One More Rep
Footballguy
One More Rep
Footballguy
12 Team PPR qb/rb/rb/wr/wr/te/ 2 flex rb/wr/te
Team A Gives Michael Floyd/Martellus Bennett/Lamar Miller/Jarvis Landry/Justin Hunter
Team B Gives DeVante Parker/Brandon Marshall/Matt Jones/ David Cobb/ Nick Toon
Team getting rookies won title last year and other team missed playoffs
Team A Gives Michael Floyd/Martellus Bennett/Lamar Miller/Jarvis Landry/Justin Hunter
Team B Gives DeVante Parker/Brandon Marshall/Matt Jones/ David Cobb/ Nick Toon
Team getting rookies won title last year and other team missed playoffs
Sabertooth
Footballguy
Super flex
Bortles
For
Kelce
Bishop Sankey
2016 1st
Bortles
For
Kelce
Bishop Sankey
2016 1st
CR69
Footballguy
About ten minutes later, same trade partner:
Gave:
Williams, Terrance DAL WR
Year 2015 Draft Pick 4.07
Year 2015 Draft Pick 5.06
Year 2015 Draft Pick 5.09
Received:
2016 2nd (hoping it's top 3, probably anywhere from 1-6)
With all of the draft picks I had I really needed to consolidate some depth and later picks or I'd be cutting them.
cstu
Footballguy
One More Rep
Footballguy
blardorg
Footballguy
Yeah, the fact that he was able to get Dez without forking over even one of the 1.01, 1.03, or 1.04 is crazy. Can't believe his trade partner was like, "well, you've got those premium top 4 picks, but I'll go ahead and settle for the 1.07 and 1.08." I'd understand it better if the 1.07 and 1.08 were the only picks he had to give. But I just don't understand selling Dez to someone with the 1.01, 1.03, AND 1.04 and not holding out for at least 1 and probably 2 of them, along with 1.07 or 1.08.
kutta
Footballguy
Not even close for me. I'd take the first rounder alone for Bortles, even in a super flex.
msudaisy26
Footballguy
I pretty much agree with this unless it was pretty much assured it would be a late first then I would take Bortles over just the first.
Valuewise yes it's the 1st side but if you're caught in a Superflex with one or no QBs sometimes you have to pay through the nose, it's ugly trying to be competitive in a Superflex without 2 QBs!
cstu
Footballguy
I think the 1.01 is going to be Cooper, but I would probably have traded Nelson for Gurley straight up if I had to
blardorg
Footballguy
Super easy accept for me as well. I think Keenan will bounce back a bit this year, but easily take Cobb over him, and by a good bit more than trading back from 7th to 14th rookie pick.
One More Rep
Footballguy
ChuckLiddell
Footballguy
12 team non PPR:
Traded 2.5, 2.8. 2.10, 3.6, 2016 2nd, Davonte Freeman
Received T.Y. Hilton and Ryan Matthews (Cuff for Murray)
Traded 2.5, 2.8. 2.10, 3.6, 2016 2nd, Davonte Freeman
Received T.Y. Hilton and Ryan Matthews (Cuff for Murray)
One More Rep
Footballguy
blardorg
Footballguy
Agreed. However, if it's deep rosters (so all those picks can be rostered) and Hilton leaves Indy in 2016, I could easily see the other side coming out ahead from then on; I expect at least one of those 2nds or Freeman will hit as a quality WR2 or low end RB1/high end RB2, and not sure that Hilton will be as valuable (WR2 or better) if he leaves Luck.
ChuckLiddell
Footballguy
24 man rosters, so the picks can be used. T.Y. owner was definitely concerned that Hilton was leaving Indi in 16.
Zyphros
Footballguy
10 team 2QB 3WR 3RB 2TE 1Flex .5ppr 30 man rosters
Team A traded: Hyde, Jordan Matthews, Ridley 1.04, 1.07
Team B traded: Tannehill, 1.10, 2.04
A has an up and coming team with OBJ, Evans, Bell, 1.02, CJ Anderson, Tannehill, as the main pieces. Along with 1.10 and 2.04 now.
B is blowing up their team a bit.
Not sure what to think here.
Team A traded: Hyde, Jordan Matthews, Ridley 1.04, 1.07
Team B traded: Tannehill, 1.10, 2.04
A has an up and coming team with OBJ, Evans, Bell, 1.02, CJ Anderson, Tannehill, as the main pieces. Along with 1.10 and 2.04 now.
B is blowing up their team a bit.
Not sure what to think here.
fruity pebbles
Footballguy
Like the 1.09 and 1.12 but I wouldn't have taken Strong there so that makes it closer for me.
Run It Up
Footballguy
Well, I probably wouldn't have traded the 4 for the 9 and 12, but I definitely wouldn't have traded Parker for Perriman and Strong.
blardorg
Footballguy
Hmm, I think that's a decent trade for both. Hyde, Matthews, 1.04 (probably Winston or Mariota?) and 1.07 (probably Parker or anyone besides the top 5 + 2 QBs) is a good haul for Tannehill, 1.10 (DGB? Perriman? Agholor), and 2.04. Not sure I'd give up Tannehill, but I'm relatively low on Winston and Mariota. If either can be at least a long term NFL starter and ~top 20ish QB, I can see the appeal of giving up Tannehill.
One More Rep
Footballguy
cstu
Footballguy
slackjawedyokel
Footballguy
What do you guys think of his trade without considering the players picked? 1.04 for the 1.09 and 1.12 generally seems cheap for the 1.04.
Run It Up
Footballguy
Dan Hindery
Moderator
Same. Would have gone Dorsett and would have taken that deal unless my team was loaded and didn't need the depth.
There are a lot of people who don't like Dorsett though and if so, then there's kind of a drop off after 1.11. Feel like after 11 (or 12 w/ Dorsett), there's a pretty big tier of guys pretty close, so I can definitely see why the other side would happily give that to move up.
bostonfred
Footballguy
he gave up the equivalent of four first round picks for tannehill. You don't give up four first round picks for a player unless he's legitimately elite already. Massive overpay.
For me it always depends on the draft class. This class, for me, boasts 2 really great players at the top, but then is relatively flat. 1.09 and 1.12 for 1.04 in this particular year I think is fair, even if it is on the cheap side historically.
This depends on your team goals. I am a huge contender and I have no doublt that for the next 2 years Nelson outscores Cooper and helps me win a championship. Cooper not as much and I never seei Cooper having the big seasons that Nelson can have in Oakland during his career. So this one is team dependent. I can see doing this if you are not a contender. No one I trade Nelson for this in my home league. Even if it is Gurley. I only need 1 RB though in PPR.
Similar threads
