What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official** 2015 Washington Redskins Thread YOU LIKE THAT! (1 Viewer)

Does anyone else have problem with the idea that RGIII isn't an NFL QB but Tryod Taylor is? Being from Virginia, I watched a ton of Taylor's college games. I'm really happy for him but I never saw him as a starter in the NFL. I don't know it's just hard to believe that he could be the QB of a potential playoff team but Griffin can't even start for a horrible team like the redskins.
I'm a VT grad. I watched Taylor in every game he played. I've always been a fan. If he was 6'3" he would have started in the NFL long ago. He was underrated as a passer because his OL and WR were really bad at VT. And while his accuracy isn't the best aspect of his game, it's good enough if he is smart with the ball.

What Taylor has that RG3 doesn't is:

1) football smarts - I don't know if he's book smart, but Taylor is a really bright football player. Processes what is going on very quickly. and knows how to take advantage of mismatches.

2) leadership by example - The players around him love him and will play hard for him. Nobody is ever going to think Taylor isn't laying it all on the line every single play or is costing them being successful.

3) a willingness to be coached - Taylor is willing to do whatever the coaches ask. He's always been like that, but I suspect even more so now that he's lived in a backup role in BAL. He is never going to question his coaches and risk his job. Whereas with RG3, even if Gruden designed a spread offense to utilize his skills, I don't think he'd be happy. He was given a starting role, screwed it up, and thinks everyone is to blame but himself.

ETA:

It's also worth noting Taylor was one of the top 3 ranked QBs coming out of High School. It's not like he went to VT and became draftable. He was recruited by the best programs in the country and just wanted to stay in state.

He's also only 26. That's younger than Kirk Cousins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IMO, what really hurt Griffin was not having that offseason in between 2012 and 2013. He spent all offseason rehabbing his knee to get back in time and wasn't able to refine his game. Think if he had a full offseason that year to work on his mechanics and studying defenses, I think he is a much better QB than he is today.
That's a big part of it but I think the biggest thing was losing trust in the coaching staff. I remember at the time the Nationals were doing everything they could to err on the side of caution with their young talented pitcher (Strasburg) and the Redskins were doing the exact opposite. While Griffin might not have suffered major injury running the read option, some games he did take quite a beating because he was trying to put the team on his back. I agree that a lot of the shots he took were because he didn't know how to slide or get out of bounds but that's why he's got coaches that should know better, right? Does anyone remember early in 2012 when the Skins played the Bengals? The Skins were running the effing option and he was getting killed. It was hard to watch but he was the only offense they had, so they just kept on riding him.

If RGIII was as raw as Shanahan thought he was as a rookie, why did he start him day one? IMO he started him because of his own ego. There was no time to groom him because super bowl winning coach Mike Shanahan was coming off back to back 10+ loss seasons. He cared more about his own legacy than he cared about the Griffin and the team's future. To me that's why him and RG3 had a meeting about what was no longer acceptable.
Shanny was the coach and definitely deserves his share of the blame.

Hopefully, this process has not destroyed Griffin and he can go on somewhere else and rebuild his career. I don't see him doing it with Gruden; that well has been poisoned.

But if Gruden can only get the team to 4 wins this year, I could totally see Griffin surviving Gruden and trying again with a new coach. That would be absolutely insane but it could absolutely happen.
Per Shanahan (so take it with a grain of salt), he had a long term plan to develop Griffin as a pocket passer. And it was going to take years. So the plan was to run read options and develop his skills as a pocket passer. During the 2012 season, Griffin came into Mike Shanahan's office and said he no longer wanted to run the read option. Shanahan immediately knew he was screwed. He also strongly suggested Griffin talked to Snyder and felt empowered.

Also big on the list for ruining Griffin: Griffin pushed so hard to get into every game even when injured. Griffin was pissed that he sat out the Cleveland game in 2012. He came back the following week and he sure did not look healed to me. In the Seattle game, he should have been taken out. I think that is the game where Griffin hid from the doctors so they could not examine him and told them everything was fine.
He definitely did not hide from the doctors in Seattle. Doesn't everyone remember that little shed behind the bench where he was examined?

It's hard for me to fault a 22 year old for wanting to play hurt but a 60+ year old coach and GM should know better. Sure you might have pissed off your star QB but at the end of the day I believe he'd end up respecting the decision because it was in his best interests. It's not the players job to take the long view of things, it's the organizations.

 
IMO, what really hurt Griffin was not having that offseason in between 2012 and 2013. He spent all offseason rehabbing his knee to get back in time and wasn't able to refine his game. Think if he had a full offseason that year to work on his mechanics and studying defenses, I think he is a much better QB than he is today.
That's a big part of it but I think the biggest thing was losing trust in the coaching staff. I remember at the time the Nationals were doing everything they could to err on the side of caution with their young talented pitcher (Strasburg) and the Redskins were doing the exact opposite. While Griffin might not have suffered major injury running the read option, some games he did take quite a beating because he was trying to put the team on his back. I agree that a lot of the shots he took were because he didn't know how to slide or get out of bounds but that's why he's got coaches that should know better, right? Does anyone remember early in 2012 when the Skins played the Bengals? The Skins were running the effing option and he was getting killed. It was hard to watch but he was the only offense they had, so they just kept on riding him.

If RGIII was as raw as Shanahan thought he was as a rookie, why did he start him day one? IMO he started him because of his own ego. There was no time to groom him because super bowl winning coach Mike Shanahan was coming off back to back 10+ loss seasons. He cared more about his own legacy than he cared about the Griffin and the team's future. To me that's why him and RG3 had a meeting about what was no longer acceptable.
Shanny was the coach and definitely deserves his share of the blame.

Hopefully, this process has not destroyed Griffin and he can go on somewhere else and rebuild his career. I don't see him doing it with Gruden; that well has been poisoned.

But if Gruden can only get the team to 4 wins this year, I could totally see Griffin surviving Gruden and trying again with a new coach. That would be absolutely insane but it could absolutely happen.
Per Shanahan (so take it with a grain of salt), he had a long term plan to develop Griffin as a pocket passer. And it was going to take years. So the plan was to run read options and develop his skills as a pocket passer. During the 2012 season, Griffin came into Mike Shanahan's office and said he no longer wanted to run the read option. Shanahan immediately knew he was screwed. He also strongly suggested Griffin talked to Snyder and felt empowered.

Also big on the list for ruining Griffin: Griffin pushed so hard to get into every game even when injured. Griffin was pissed that he sat out the Cleveland game in 2012. He came back the following week and he sure did not look healed to me. In the Seattle game, he should have been taken out. I think that is the game where Griffin hid from the doctors so they could not examine him and told them everything was fine.
He definitely did not hide from the doctors in Seattle. Doesn't everyone remember that little shed behind the bench where he was examined?

It's hard for me to fault a 22 year old for wanting to play hurt but a 60+ year old coach and GM should know better. Sure you might have pissed off your star QB but at the end of the day I believe he'd end up respecting the decision because it was in his best interests. It's not the players job to take the long view of things, it's the organizations.
The entire situation is a complete comedy of errors.

How does a 22 year old rookie feel emboldened enough to tell his coach "No I'm playing"? That can only come from thinking/knowing he's got support further up the food chain.

How does Mike Shannahan, who is supposed to be in charge, not tell Snyder/Allen/Griffin "Sorry you're hurt, you need to take care of yourself and this organization's future"?

How does everyone make the absolute worst decision for everyone involved? I don't think fans of other teams who use the term "dumpster fire" can really appreciate what a true cluster #### their team could be.

 
There is a great script brewing for a Redskins outright victory tonight. See the FFA Wagering Thread for my complete write-up on tonight's game.

Why is local sports radio obsessed with Shanahan? He'll be on Grant and Danny today.

For a coach who was 24-40 during his tenure here, you would think he won multiple Super Bowls here according to the local media.
Mike Shanahan has a legitimate shot at going to the Pro Football HOF as a Coach, who was hired here under false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him during year 3. If Snyder hadn't broken his word to not interfere with football operations, Griffin would never have been drafted, Shanahan would likely still be here, (with his rock star of an Offensive Coordinator son, Kyle), and the Redskins are likely a lot better than 7-25 over the last 2 seasons, and a few years into building something designed for long-term success. Grant and Danny are on 106.7 FM, the counterpunch to Snyder-Owned propaganda machine 980 AM. If I were the programming director, I'd have Shanahan on as often as he wanted to, as well as anyone else who's no longer with the Team, but spent some time here under the Snyder regime, and I'd offer everything I had in my power to offer to tell the inside story about what was going on behind the scenes with Snyder during his tenure here.
I'm sorry but this is a pathetic attempt at revisionist history and hypothetical BS.

Rug pulled out from under him during year 3??? 2012 was the only season Shanny didnt finish dead last in the division as the Skins HC, the only season Shanny won a division in his last 7 years as a coach, and the only time he's even made the playoffs in his last 7 years as a coach. And it was almost entirely due to an amazing season by a rookie QB named RG3 and his son, Kyle as a playcaller. He should have had the rug pulled out on him more often.

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions. This false pretenses, rug pulled out from him BS is just that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shanahan:

4 seasons in Denver with Elway, HOF Terrell Davis, Kubiak as OC: 47-17, 3 playoff appearances, 7-1 playoff record, 2 SB wins

7 seasons in Denver without Elway and HOF Terrell Davis, Kubiak still OC: 67-45, 4 playoff appearances, 1-4 playoff record

3 seasons in Denver without Elway, HOF Davis, and Kubiak: 24-24, 0 playoff appearances

4 seasons in Washington: 24-40, 1 Playoff appearance, 0-1 playoff record

So Shanahan was a great coach when he had a HOF QB, HOF RB, and a really good OC, he was a good coach when he still had a really good OC, and he was an average to bad coach without any of those. Except for Griffins rookie year when the OC did a great job with a rookie QB. I think Shanahan was great at orchestrating things when he had great pieces around him, but not so good at developing or getting the most out of lesser pieces.

 
Jay Gruden to @CSNMA on the first Cousins INT last week: "A great break by the defensive back and not so good of a route by our receiver."

:rolleyes:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a great script brewing for a Redskins outright victory tonight. See the FFA Wagering Thread for my complete write-up on tonight's game.

Why is local sports radio obsessed with Shanahan? He'll be on Grant and Danny today.

For a coach who was 24-40 during his tenure here, you would think he won multiple Super Bowls here according to the local media.
Mike Shanahan has a legitimate shot at going to the Pro Football HOF as a Coach, who was hired here under false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him during year 3. If Snyder hadn't broken his word to not interfere with football operations, Griffin would never have been drafted, Shanahan would likely still be here, (with his rock star of an Offensive Coordinator son, Kyle), and the Redskins are likely a lot better than 7-25 over the last 2 seasons, and a few years into building something designed for long-term success. Grant and Danny are on 106.7 FM, the counterpunch to Snyder-Owned propaganda machine 980 AM. If I were the programming director, I'd have Shanahan on as often as he wanted to, as well as anyone else who's no longer with the Team, but spent some time here under the Snyder regime, and I'd offer everything I had in my power to offer to tell the inside story about what was going on behind the scenes with Snyder during his tenure here.
I'm sorry but this is a pathetic attempt at revisionist history and hypothetical BS.

Rug pulled out from under him during year 3??? 2012 was the only season Shanny didnt finish dead last in the division as the Skins HC, the only season Shanny won a division in his last 7 years as a coach, and the only time he's even made the playoffs in his last 7 years as a coach. And it was almost entirely due to an amazing season by a rookie QB named RG3 and his son, Kyle as a playcaller. He should have had the rug pulled out on him more often.

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions. This false pretenses, rug pulled out from him BS is just that.
:goodposting:

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.

 
So Gruden at it again this week. Let's see, Week 1, he threw Jordan Reed under the bus for running a bad route, Week 3 it's Garcon's fault for a Cousins INT. I guess Kirk is free from any criticism from Gruden.

"I think, is unfair to Kirk. I think we’ve got to let him grow and see how he progresses from week to week.”

This seems totally different than what we heard from him after Griffin's performance against Tampa, when he talked about how Griffin's mechanics were flawed, etc.

Can we just fire this idiot already?

 
Is Chris Thompson getting any run here?

Looked visibly quicker and more effective than Morris and Jones when used the last game to me.

 
For fantasy purposes? No. He's tiny and is really just a receiving back. Skins will never use him as a primary weapon imo. He could have value if the skins start losing big every time, but that's not the desired game script.

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.

 
IMO, what really hurt Griffin was not having that offseason in between 2012 and 2013. He spent all offseason rehabbing his knee to get back in time and wasn't able to refine his game. Think if he had a full offseason that year to work on his mechanics and studying defenses, I think he is a much better QB than he is today.
That's a big part of it but I think the biggest thing was losing trust in the coaching staff. I remember at the time the Nationals were doing everything they could to err on the side of caution with their young talented pitcher (Strasburg) and the Redskins were doing the exact opposite. While Griffin might not have suffered major injury running the read option, some games he did take quite a beating because he was trying to put the team on his back. I agree that a lot of the shots he took were because he didn't know how to slide or get out of bounds but that's why he's got coaches that should know better, right? Does anyone remember early in 2012 when the Skins played the Bengals? The Skins were running the effing option and he was getting killed. It was hard to watch but he was the only offense they had, so they just kept on riding him.

If RGIII was as raw as Shanahan thought he was as a rookie, why did he start him day one? IMO he started him because of his own ego. There was no time to groom him because super bowl winning coach Mike Shanahan was coming off back to back 10+ loss seasons. He cared more about his own legacy than he cared about the Griffin and the team's future. To me that's why him and RG3 had a meeting about what was no longer acceptable.
Shanny was the coach and definitely deserves his share of the blame.

Hopefully, this process has not destroyed Griffin and he can go on somewhere else and rebuild his career. I don't see him doing it with Gruden; that well has been poisoned.

But if Gruden can only get the team to 4 wins this year, I could totally see Griffin surviving Gruden and trying again with a new coach. That would be absolutely insane but it could absolutely happen.
Per Shanahan (so take it with a grain of salt), he had a long term plan to develop Griffin as a pocket passer. And it was going to take years. So the plan was to run read options and develop his skills as a pocket passer. During the 2012 season, Griffin came into Mike Shanahan's office and said he no longer wanted to run the read option. Shanahan immediately knew he was screwed. He also strongly suggested Griffin talked to Snyder and felt empowered.

Also big on the list for ruining Griffin: Griffin pushed so hard to get into every game even when injured. Griffin was pissed that he sat out the Cleveland game in 2012. He came back the following week and he sure did not look healed to me. In the Seattle game, he should have been taken out. I think that is the game where Griffin hid from the doctors so they could not examine him and told them everything was fine.
He definitely did not hide from the doctors in Seattle. Doesn't everyone remember that little shed behind the bench where he was examined?

It's hard for me to fault a 22 year old for wanting to play hurt but a 60+ year old coach and GM should know better. Sure you might have pissed off your star QB but at the end of the day I believe he'd end up respecting the decision because it was in his best interests. It's not the players job to take the long view of things, it's the organizations.
The entire situation is a complete comedy of errors.

How does a 22 year old rookie feel emboldened enough to tell his coach "No I'm playing"? That can only come from thinking/knowing he's got support further up the food chain.

How does Mike Shannahan, who is supposed to be in charge, not tell Snyder/Allen/Griffin "Sorry you're hurt, you need to take care of yourself and this organization's future"?

How does everyone make the absolute worst decision for everyone involved? I don't think fans of other teams who use the term "dumpster fire" can really appreciate what a true cluster #### their team could be.
At least the Redskins excel at something. We are number 1.

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.
I was at that game, and there wasn't a person around me that wanted him to continue playing. Fans conceded the game and were looking towards the future. It was the coaches job to sit him, even if he wanted to play.
 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.
I was at that game, and there wasn't a person around me that wanted him to continue playing. Fans conceded the game and were looking towards the future. It was the coaches job to sit him, even if he wanted to play.
I remember a play in the second half when they ran the read option and Griffin ran the ball toward the sideline and got like 7 or 8 yards and his limp was ridiculous at that point. It was hard to watch. The rest of the half his was accuracy was completely gone because you could see that he couldn't really bear any weight on that leg. There isn't a person with two eyes and a brain that thought he should try to finish that game.

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.
I was at that game, and there wasn't a person around me that wanted him to continue playing. Fans conceded the game and were looking towards the future. It was the coaches job to sit him, even if he wanted to play.
I remember a play in the second half when they ran the read option and Griffin ran the ball toward the sideline and got like 7 or 8 yards and his limp was ridiculous at that point. It was hard to watch. The rest of the half his was accuracy was completely gone because you could see that he couldn't really bear any weight on that leg. There isn't a person with two eyes and a brain that thought he should try to finish that game.
yep, it was painful to watch.

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.
I was at that game, and there wasn't a person around me that wanted him to continue playing. Fans conceded the game and were looking towards the future. It was the coaches job to sit him, even if he wanted to play.
I remember a play in the second half when they ran the read option and Griffin ran the ball toward the sideline and got like 7 or 8 yards and his limp was ridiculous at that point. It was hard to watch. The rest of the half his was accuracy was completely gone because you could see that he couldn't really bear any weight on that leg. There isn't a person with two eyes and a brain that thought he should try to finish that game.
Yup remember that well. You could tell early in the game he wasn't right. It was on our 2nd drive in the 1st quarter where he came up limping after a run, IIRC. And after that, he could barely move. How we had a lead late in that game with no offense I still have no idea.

 
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
Holding the former HC accountable for bad decisions is not a cop out. The cop out here would be justifying those bad decisions because "the world wanted RG3 to play against Seattle". The world isnt getting $6 mil a year to make those decisions. There is a saying in coaching that if you make decisions based on listening to the fans then you will soon be sitting with them. And competitive players, especially young ones, usually do want to play when hurt. Its up to the coach to look at the bigger picture and make the best decision for the team and the player..

As far as playing injured its ridiculous to compare broken ribs to knee ligament damage. What Rivers did was amazing but he was an experienced pocket passer not a rookie QB who relied greatly on his athleticism. And if we accept your in depth analysis that "Griffin always sucked he was just fast" (paraphrasing) then shouldnt any coach, especially a HOF caliber one, recognized that he wasnt effective playing on one leg?

I can accept the decision to start Griffin against Seattle but as the came wore on it was clear he should not have continued playing. He was not effective and clearly was putting himself at risk for further injury. As others have stated thousands of people in the stands and millions more watching on TV were calling on Shanny to take him out of the game. The world wanted to see him come out. The end result was predictable and avoidable.

But I've talked about this enough at this point. There are several excellent posts above about what a comedy of errors this entire situation turned out to be. Sadly, its just another testament to the deeply embedded and systemic dysfunction of this franchise.

 
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.

 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.

 
So how do you guys see the game this week?

The Skins strength seems to be their running game, The Eagles strength is their run defense. The Eagles running game, although better last week, still has questions. I think this game comes down to which QB makes fewer mistakes, and which defense plays better. It really could go either way. As an Eagles fan, I would like to say that Bradford starts getting it together this week, and the Eagles win a tough game. But there is no certainty that that is going to happen.

 
So how do you guys see the game this week?

The Skins strength seems to be their running game, The Eagles strength is their run defense. The Eagles running game, although better last week, still has questions. I think this game comes down to which QB makes fewer mistakes, and which defense plays better. It really could go either way. As an Eagles fan, I would like to say that Bradford starts getting it together this week, and the Eagles win a tough game. But there is no certainty that that is going to happen.
I think the Skins have a decent chance this week. Eagles offense is still not clicking and the Skins D, especially the secondary, is playing vastly better than last year. The loss of Hall is much easier to overcome IMO than losing Culliver or Breeland who will both be on the field for just the 2nd time this week.

Cousins played really well in his lone game against Philly last year. Probably the best game of his career. I'd expect him to play well again, especially If D-Jax can indeed come back this week. I also think the Skins will be able to run the ball but the loss of Lavauo could affect them more than many think. He's not a world beater but apparently has been playing really well this year under Callahan and the Skins run game has been heavily skewed to the left through the first 3 games.

In the end I think it will be a close game that comes down to special teams. And that's usually not a good thing for the Skins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So how do you guys see the game this week?

The Skins strength seems to be their running game, The Eagles strength is their run defense. The Eagles running game, although better last week, still has questions. I think this game comes down to which QB makes fewer mistakes, and which defense plays better. It really could go either way. As an Eagles fan, I would like to say that Bradford starts getting it together this week, and the Eagles win a tough game. But there is no certainty that that is going to happen.
I think on paper it should be a close game; however, the Redskins are simply committing too many penalties and turnovers through the first three weeks. I see this being the difference and the Eagles taking the win.

I'm a Skins fan so I hope I'm wrong but I just think those mistakes kill you...

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldn’t even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

[SIZE=15.52px]-----[/SIZE]

[SIZE=15.52px]At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.[/SIZE]

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldn’t even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

[SIZE=15.52px]-----[/SIZE]

[SIZE=15.52px]At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.[/SIZE]
I'm sure there's something to it. Wouldn't surprise me. However, do we really need to rehash it every season? We know Snyder mingles and definitely did early in his tenure. And hoesntly, as bad as Spurrier was here, did it really make a difference then?

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldn’t even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

[SIZE=15.52px]-----[/SIZE]

[SIZE=15.52px]At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.[/SIZE]
I'm sure there's something to it. Wouldn't surprise me. However, do we really need to rehash it every season? We know Snyder mingles and definitely did early in his tenure. And hoesntly, as bad as Spurrier was here, did it really make a difference then?
In Spurriers first year he rolled out Danny Wuerrfel and Shane Matthews. Sounds like some meddling was in order. Spurrier was a dolt.

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldn’t even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

[SIZE=15.52px]-----[/SIZE]

[SIZE=15.52px]At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.[/SIZE]
I'm sure there's something to it. Wouldn't surprise me. However, do we really need to rehash it every season? We know Snyder mingles and definitely did early in his tenure. And hoesntly, as bad as Spurrier was here, did it really make a difference then?
In Spurriers first year he rolled out Danny Wuerrfel and Shane Matthews. Sounds like some meddling was in order. Spurrier was a dolt.
Yeah, exactly. I think he really is referring to Snyder and Vinny making him dump Wuerrfel. No joke.

 
Hang 10 said:
avoiding injuries said:
Marvelous said:
Rimez said:
its football and people play hurt all the time, rivers played with a torn acl, romo and mcnabb and vick always had broken ribs with bad backs, i wouldnt be surprised if ben puts on a brace and tries to take the field thursday night. rg3 wanted to play against seattle, the world wanted RG3 to play against seattle, and he had every right and reason to since he was the reason the skins were in that game in the first place. blaming shanahan is a cop out since NO ONE wanted to watch cousins play in that game. sitting rg3 wouldnt have changed history since rg3 always sucked we just never knew it because he was a step faster than everyone else, but the way he plays with reckless abandon it was a matter of "when" not "if" he would be severely injured and lose that step. at least he can hang his hat on it being in a playoff game after winning the division and rookie of the year, better to be a has-been than a never-was.
When you were watching the game, there should have been a point where you thought they should take Griffin out. I was surprised Griffin came out for the 2nd half. As far as I could see, there was little indication his knee would get better and his performance would improve as the game progressed.
I was at that game, and there wasn't a person around me that wanted him to continue playing. Fans conceded the game and were looking towards the future. It was the coaches job to sit him, even if he wanted to play.
I remember a play in the second half when they ran the read option and Griffin ran the ball toward the sideline and got like 7 or 8 yards and his limp was ridiculous at that point. It was hard to watch. The rest of the half his was accuracy was completely gone because you could see that he couldn't really bear any weight on that leg. There isn't a person with two eyes and a brain that thought he should try to finish that game.
That play was THE moment when I said 'pull him' the fact he got that many yards on that play looking like his like just got shot showed how much of an advantage the skins had on offense that day. Healthy rg3 was taking that ball like 30 yards plus. Sigh. Yet they see that and keep him out there

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldnt even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

-----

At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.
I'm sure there's something to it. Wouldn't surprise me. However, do we really need to rehash it every season? We know Snyder mingles and definitely did early in his tenure. And hoesntly, as bad as Spurrier was here, did it really make a difference then?
In Spurriers first year he rolled out Danny Wuerrfel and Shane Matthews. Sounds like some meddling was in order. Spurrier was a dolt.
Yeah, exactly. I think he really is referring to Snyder and Vinny making him dump Wuerrfel. No joke.
:lmao: The amount of crazy crap that's gone on here we could reminisce about.

 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it

 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it
Agree with you 100%. Gruden never set up RG3 to succeed when he came in. Not that RG3 necessarily helped himself, but Gruden never really seemed interested in tailoring his offense to do what worked best for RG3. When he goes somewhere else next year, I hope he plays well.

 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/30/steve-spurrier-snyder-wouldnt-let-me-pick-the-quarterback/

Former Washington coach Steve Spurrier says team owner Dan Snyder meddled in personnel decisions to the point where Spurrier couldn’t even pick the quarterback, even though the whole reason Spurrier was hired was that his passing offense had been so successful at Florida.

[SIZE=15.52px]-----[/SIZE]

[SIZE=15.52px]At a certain point, you have to wonder if these are ALL just disgruntled former coaches, or if there is really something to their claims about Snyder's interference.[/SIZE]
I'm sure there's something to it. Wouldn't surprise me. However, do we really need to rehash it every season? We know Snyder mingles and definitely did early in his tenure. And hoesntly, as bad as Spurrier was here, did it really make a difference then?
In Spurriers first year he rolled out Danny Wuerrfel and Shane Matthews. Sounds like some meddling was in order. Spurrier was a dolt.
Yeah, exactly. I think he really is referring to Snyder and Vinny making him dump Wuerrfel. No joke.
There is no secret here. Vinny Cerato was the GM, who was Snyder's lap dog. Cerato cut Wuerrfel (and Kenny Watson). Spurrier, who wore his emotions on his sleeve, was clearly unhappy about it.

Later in the season, Spurrier was asked about back up QB Rob Johnson. Spurrier proceeded bash and destroy Johnson's abilities on the radio. Johnson was cut the next day.

 
So how do you guys see the game this week?
Bold prediction: Hurricane blows through, floods the stadium, and the game gets moved to Philly. A satisfying rout ensues. Philly 52, Redskins 18. Philly D and ST both score.

Oh, and Griffin replaces Cousins at some point in the 3rd quarter.

 
So how do you guys see the game this week?

The Skins strength seems to be their running game, The Eagles strength is their run defense. The Eagles running game, although better last week, still has questions. I think this game comes down to which QB makes fewer mistakes, and which defense plays better. It really could go either way. As an Eagles fan, I would like to say that Bradford starts getting it together this week, and the Eagles win a tough game. But there is no certainty that that is going to happen.
Redskins Offense will play well enough to win, I actually think Cousins will have a pretty good game. The Defense will put a hurting on Bradford and If you're in an IDP league Kerrigan will have a great game. But a couple Special Teams miscues and Gruden inexplicably abondoning the rush attack will end up with The Eagles on top.
 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it
The only reason I disagree that he can be a very productive QB with someone else is that I think the only way he does that is if he learns to be a pocket passer. And I think he is far enough behind in learning how to be a pocket passer that it will be hard for him to acheive a level better than average. I think a good comparison is Michael Vick who never learned how to read a defense because he relied on his running ability for so long. He had two good QB coaches in Reid and Kelly who did the best they could with him but he just never was very comfortable in the pocket, and never had good pocket awareness. Now Griffin is Younger than Vick was when Vick decided to try to learn how to be a QB, so Griffin does have a chance to develop. I think he is going to have to end up with just the right coach who knows just the right buttons to push to get him to be a very productive QB.

 
You guys just crushed the rest of my likes....

Philly is going down. Morris statement game. Defense back on trackWe're going to punch some Iggles in the mouth. Mark it, dude.

 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it
Agree with you 100%. Gruden never set up RG3 to succeed when he came in. Not that RG3 necessarily helped himself, but Gruden never really seemed interested in tailoring his offense to do what worked best for RG3. When he goes somewhere else next year, I hope he plays well.
I don't think any NFL coaches are going to totally tailor their offense to one guy. A few changes, sure. But a whole playbook? They just aren't that sophisticated. They have playbooks hundreds of pages long, most inherited from the coaches they worked with or played for over the last 20+ years. They have a staff that understands that playbook and how to coach to it. They don't suddenly reinvent it, nor do they necessarily have the ability to coach well for that new system. Heck, Chip Kelly has created the opposite problem. He has a pocket QB running a system that doesn't work very well for a pocket QB. I don't see him redesigning his playbook.

I think everyone gives coaches too much credit for being smart. They are football players that needed something to do after their careers ended, with an interest in the Xs and Os, and most importantly with the connections to get the job. That's all. They probably aren't much better at it than a Dad coaching a youth soccer team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it
Agree with you 100%. Gruden never set up RG3 to succeed when he came in. Not that RG3 necessarily helped himself, but Gruden never really seemed interested in tailoring his offense to do what worked best for RG3. When he goes somewhere else next year, I hope he plays well.
I don't think any NFL coaches are going to totally tailor their offense to one guy. A few changes, sure. But a whole playbook? They just aren't that sophisticated. They have playbooks hundreds of pages long, most inherited from the coaches they worked with or played for over the last 20+ years. They have a staff that understands that playbook and how to coach to it. They don't suddenly reinvent it, nor do they necessarily have the ability to coach well for that new system. Heck, Chip Kelly has created the opposite problem. He has a pocket QB running a system that doesn't work very well for a pocket QB. I don't see him redesigning his playbook.

I think everyone gives coaches too much credit for being smart. They are football players that needed something to do after their careers ended, with an interest in the Xs and Os, and most importantly with the connections to get the job. That's all. They probably aren't much better at it than a Dad coaching a youth soccer team.
Oh I'm not saying Gruden should have scrapped everything he wants to do and do whatever RG3 wants. Just saying that maybe there should have been more Shotgun, roll-outs and play action plays called for Griffin. Those seemed to be where he succeed more than the other stuff.

 
Zdravko said:
That was such a grotesque moment....no wonder everyone remembers it. Can't possibly argue that your franchise QB, at age 22, should have been in the game and running at this point. But a good reminder how people felt about RG3, his upside and intangibles back then. He will find a good home and be quite a productive QB for someone next year.
What leads you to believe this? Just curious of the thought process that goes on behind this comment.
I think similarly. The environment is too poisoned here for him to succeed. Not many of us would succeed at our job if our manager hated us and set us up for failure. Would it humble me and motivate me at my new job? Hell yes. He might never turn into an all pro, but I think he can be a solid starter. I'll root for him wherever he ends up, unless it's to the NFC East. Unlike some Skins fans who seem to find it necessary to bash on the guy any time they can. I don't see that here, but another board I frequent they love to pass on rg3. I dont get it
Agree with you 100%. Gruden never set up RG3 to succeed when he came in. Not that RG3 necessarily helped himself, but Gruden never really seemed interested in tailoring his offense to do what worked best for RG3. When he goes somewhere else next year, I hope he plays well.
I don't think any NFL coaches are going to totally tailor their offense to one guy. A few changes, sure. But a whole playbook? They just aren't that sophisticated. They have playbooks hundreds of pages long, most inherited from the coaches they worked with or played for over the last 20+ years. They have a staff that understands that playbook and how to coach to it. They don't suddenly reinvent it, nor do they necessarily have the ability to coach well for that new system. Heck, Chip Kelly has created the opposite problem. He has a pocket QB running a system that doesn't work very well for a pocket QB. I don't see him redesigning his playbook.

I think everyone gives coaches too much credit for being smart. They are football players that needed something to do after their careers ended, with an interest in the Xs and Os, and most importantly with the connections to get the job. That's all. They probably aren't much better at it than a Dad coaching a youth soccer team.
Oh I'm not saying Gruden should have scrapped everything he wants to do and do whatever RG3 wants. Just saying that maybe there should have been more Shotgun, roll-outs and play action plays called for Griffin. Those seemed to be where he succeed more than the other stuff.
Overall I think it's more than Griffin. I don't think I ever see Gruden put ANY player in a position to really succeed.

 
There is a great script brewing for a Redskins outright victory tonight. See the FFA Wagering Thread for my complete write-up on tonight's game.

Why is local sports radio obsessed with Shanahan? He'll be on Grant and Danny today.

For a coach who was 24-40 during his tenure here, you would think he won multiple Super Bowls here according to the local media.
Mike Shanahan has a legitimate shot at going to the Pro Football HOF as a Coach, who was hired here under false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him during year 3. If Snyder hadn't broken his word to not interfere with football operations, Griffin would never have been drafted, Shanahan would likely still be here, (with his rock star of an Offensive Coordinator son, Kyle), and the Redskins are likely a lot better than 7-25 over the last 2 seasons, and a few years into building something designed for long-term success. Grant and Danny are on 106.7 FM, the counterpunch to Snyder-Owned propaganda machine 980 AM. If I were the programming director, I'd have Shanahan on as often as he wanted to, as well as anyone else who's no longer with the Team, but spent some time here under the Snyder regime, and I'd offer everything I had in my power to offer to tell the inside story about what was going on behind the scenes with Snyder during his tenure here.
I'm sorry but this is a pathetic attempt at revisionist history and hypothetical BS.

Rug pulled out from under him during year 3??? 2012 was the only season Shanny didnt finish dead last in the division as the Skins HC, the only season Shanny won a division in his last 7 years as a coach, and the only time he's even made the playoffs in his last 7 years as a coach. And it was almost entirely due to an amazing season by a rookie QB named RG3 and his son, Kyle as a playcaller. He should have had the rug pulled out on him more often.

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions. This false pretenses, rug pulled out from him BS is just that.
:goodposting:
:no: No, definitely not good posting, especially not the bolded. VaTerp, you're a relatively recent addition to the Forums (2009). I honestly don't know how long you've populated, read or posted in the Yearly Team Threads, so you just might not know that when I make the time to post here, most of the time I'm bringing much more than my opinion to the discussion - instead, I bring facts/informed opinions coming from non-traditional sources: people I know to varying degrees, (some friends, some acquaintances), who either have worked for, or are currently working for, the Redskins, both on the Team/Locker Room side and the Office/Management side. Primarily stuff I've discreetly overheard or conversations I've participated in while attending both formal and informal private social functions with said people, none of whom are Snyderbots, and definitely when the cameras and mikes aren't present. Now, my access is neither as close, nor as prevalent as it once was, as my close friend (a member of the Coaching Staff during most of the 1st decade of the 2000's), who was my point of access is no longer directly employed by the Team...but he's still local and works in an unofficial capacity with the Team, and independently with several current and former players, many of which he's good friends with. Every now and then, including recently, I'm invited to private social events where I'm exposed to and/or engaged in off-the-record conversations these people would never have with the media, stuff that the general public is never supposed to know or hear.

Time and time again, over the years, I've posted information here, as a favor, to enlighten the folks who inhabit the Thread as to the reality behind all the stuff they are fed by conventional media channels, and the crap being spewed by the Team's PR machine, usually with the caveat that 'You all aren't going to believe this' or 'truth is stranger than fiction' or some similar lead in, and time and time again, many of the things I've posted have come to pass, or rung true to various degrees, much to the (unpleasant) shock and surprise of the majority of folks here. I've always left it up to the readers to believe what I post, or not, because, for obvious reasons, I cannot come forward with the who, where, etc. details of the conversations I've either overheard or participated in. There are plenty of Thread Regulars who can attest to this.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you just don't know any better, but regardless, your belligerent tone is really poor form, and completely unnecessary. One thing the world really needs less of is internetbrashguy. Also, it's generally a good idea, when embarking on a course to impugn the integrity of an individual, or denigrating the information he brings to the table, one does their homework on their target. I've put in the time and effort to see that mine is established, verified and unimpeachable, and if anyone takes a shot at me, I'm going to fire back, hence this post. When I have the time, if you'd like, I'll gladly post at length for you what I learned first-hand from conversations with folks on both sides of the fence (managment and team), about how the relationship between Snyder and Shanahan began devolving as early as June of 2010, when, less than 4 months after he'd been hired (under the impression that he had complete control of all player personnel decisions), Snyder, with Allen, stepped in and orchestrated that abysmal trade for McNabb (which, parallel to the drafting of both Jason Campbell and Griffin, had something to do with McNabb being black, as much as anything else - this goes back to the deep impression it made on the young marketing genius, growing up locally during the era, how much of a positive financial impact it had on the Team when the Doug Williams-led Team won the Super Bowl), when we could have signed Shanahan's choice, Marc Bulger, as a street free-agent for no compensation, in the few days after the trade, when Bulger was released outright by the Rams. You'd have thought Snyder would have learned his lesson after that massive flop, but the darn fool and his greedy nature can't get out of his own way, and when the opportunity to draft another potential superstar black quarterback presented itself, with all the potential trappings to go along with it, he just couldn't say no, and he absolutely, positively overrode Shanahan, and made that decision unilaterally, and after that, the rift couldn't be healed, and it was only a matter of time before the wheels fell off the bus for the umpteenth time, about the umpteenth thing, during the Snyder tenure. If you want to update the fallout tally of Snyder's meddling in this, you can add the 4th-rounder spent on Cousins in 2012, because that pick was made in response to Snyder orchestrating the trade and dictating the pick, usurping the authority he had given Shanahan yet again, and for the second time, squandering valuable draft picks in the process.

Aside: Does anyone think, for a minute, what the 'Griffin era' might have been like if Mike/Kyle had not been here in 2012 and Snyder had drafted Griffin with a less innovative pair of offensive minds? I know it's not the popular opinion, and it stings mightily (the truth often does) to the willfully ignorant faithful, but objective, qualified professional personnel men from all over have reached a general consensus that Griffin, while undeniably an athletically gifted and successful college QB, has neither the burning desire, nor the football IQ to translate all that college success to the NFL-caliber QB stage, especially now that from the waist down, he's no longer anything unique and special, and from the neck up, he's been exposed as never having been. There's plenty of information to be found that supports that assertion. The fall from grace might have been faster, and uglier, and (hey look! now here's a conjecture on my part!) the 2012 Season might not have played out the way it did. Just where did boy genius Kyle learn the foundation of the knowledge base he employed so deftly and ingeniously to craft an offense that would allow a supreme athlete to look the part of an NFL QB despite being deficient in many critical areas? His Dad, Mike, that's who - who was a seasoned NFL Offensive mind for decades before Griffin came along, from a different branch of the same tree that Joe Jackson Gibbs developed his own unique concepts from: Air Coryell (vertical) evolving and intermingling with West Coast (horizontal), and evolving yet again, and who is largely credited among his peers for modernizing and developing the zone blocking 'zone stretch' approach that's now a staple of the modern-day NFL lexicon? Those principles, developed by Shanahan and Alex Gibbs based on stuff Sam Wyche started tinkering with during his time with the 49'ers before he left to Coach the Bengals, were the basis on which the offense designed to maximize Griffin in his rookie year. Principles which Mike Shanahan is the undisputed modern-day architect. Although both Kyle and Gary Kubiak are considered present-day innovative coaches, they achieved their success under the tutelege of Mike - Kubiak was the QB Coach of the 49'ers when Mike Shanahan's skills as an Offensive Coordinator landed him the Broncos job, and he brought his disciple Kubiak with him, and promoted him to OC.

You want some 'Good Posting'? Go back and read Mike Apf's post #392 back on page 8, including point 6 - I'm sorry if you don't like it, or disagree VaTerp, or Sebowski (surprised with you), or Hang 10 or Matt Fancy, or Zdravko or whoever else liked the inappropriate disparaging comment directed towards my post, but that's the closest brush to reality that this Thread has had in the last 2 pages, much of which are filled with commentary that seems to be very misinformed about what really has gone on, and continues to go on, around our Team, and which sounds like it's coming from either the mainstream media or the ***official*** Organization-sponsered Team hype machine, or just opinions not grounded in fact. Well, what folks with an emotional investment would like things to be, seldom jives with 'what is'. Again, I'm sorry about my lack of time I can dedicate to responding to some of that stuff is sporadic at best, but it's the nature of my career...but I intend to address several of those posts and posters individually when I have the time to try and bring some perspective directly from the information I have access to.

Truth is stranger, and uglier than fiction...and Daniel Snyder is one of the strangest, ugliest people I've ever encountered - and in my capacity as a Chef, I have encountered him personally, and I've also known various incarnations of his and Tanya's personal chef, personal trainer, and hair stylist over the last several years...and as he lived reasonably close to me, and attended a rival high school in roughly the same era as I did, I also happen to know people who have known him since he was boy. I ask a lot of questions, and I listen to the responses for common themes. Anyone is welcome to dislike or not believe anything I bring to the table, but bring your response in a courteous manner and respectful tone, if you please, and I'll be happy to engage when I can. I'm not one of the people who can post here seemingly all day and night long, at a moment's notice. When I take the time to post, I have to decide not to do something else more important, in order to do it - so I don't bring anything pathetic, revisionist or hypothetical to the Forum - I just don't have that kind of time to waste. I bring the strange and ugly truth as best I can determine it to be, for your enjoyment and, I hope, your enlightenment, from sources you'd otherwise not be exposed to, much the same as Cecil Lammey does for the Broncos, and David Yudkin for the Patriots. The revelations are rarely pleasant, and some are downright unbelievable, but the truth always seems to come out, if given enough time...

Things are rarely as they seem on the surface, especially when dealing with an individual as convoluted as our very own Danny-boy. We all ought to know that by now. There's 15+ years worth of material to work with/evidence to go by. In regards to Mike Shanahan in particular, he was indeed hired on false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him (undermined by Snyder in both the McNabb and the Griffin decisions after being hired under the condition that he'd have complete authority and final say on all personnel decisions - both stocking the fridge and cooking dinner), and those actions by Snyder, and the ripple-effect emanating from them have done significant harm to the organization, and by association, to us, the fans.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top