Griffin not wanting to run read-option any more was brought up pretty often on the local radio after his big 2012 season, don't think it was really big news nationally. His dad was quoted on it as well. Seemed like the general narrative was that Griffin blamed his injuries on the offense (although his injuries weren't on designed runs) and his success as a rookie led to him thinking he could do a lot more. A lot of this comes from Mike Shanahan's side of the story so take it FWIW, but it definitely seems to me like Griffin got tired of being considered a "gimmick" qb.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/robert-griffin-iii-wants-play-pro-style-offense-204506917--nfl.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/robert-griffin-iiis-father-says-hed-like-to-see-a-lot-of-passing-in-redskins-offense/2013/05/22/7afcc6d8-c30f-11e2-914f-a7aba60512a7_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2015/02/18/mike-shanahan-blames-daniel-snyder-for-rgiiis-infatuation-with-being-an-aaron-rodgers-type-guy/
From Mike Shanahan:
"It was actually two days after the Super Bowl," Shanahan said. "He had asked to have a meeting and I really don't blame that on Robert. I mean, Robert to me, was a young player, he had a heck of a year, he had a serious injury at that time, and it's me that changed the perception of a person, because I know Dan [snyder] felt very strongly about Robert being a drop-back quarterback and did not want Robert to take shots ...
"Yeah, he did ask for a meeting. He did talk about, number one, he wanted change. He mentioned the Baltimore game and the Atlanta game, you know, his injuries. He talked about protection shortening his career ... He actually [mentioned] what plays were acceptable and unacceptable, and when he started talking about what plays were acceptable and unacceptable, and that he wasn't a rookie anymore and wanted to voice his opinion, the term unacceptable is used by Dan, the owner, quite often.
Would be interesting to hear the other side of that conversation. Shanahan has done nothing but paint himself a victim or some innocent bystander his whole tenure here. This despite him having final say on all football related decisions.
I remember hearing some sports talk about what really burned the bridge between Mike and Griffin. Supposedly they met before the Seattle playoff game and more or less they discussed how they weren't going to call as much read option because Griffin wasn't healthy. And well, you know the rest of the story. After that Griffin lost trust in the Shanahan's.
Yeah, don't get me wrong, I don't think Shanny's clean in all of this - he's just spoke on it some for the last few years while everyone else has tried to move on. Wish things could have worked out with Kyle Shanahan as OC, don't care that Mike is gone and you can see that his draft picks are mostly gone.
Griffin not wanting to run read-option any more was brought up pretty often on the local radio after his big 2012 season, don't think it was really big news nationally. His dad was quoted on it as well. Seemed like the general narrative was that Griffin blamed his injuries on the offense (although his injuries weren't on designed runs) and his success as a rookie led to him thinking he could do a lot more. A lot of this comes from Mike Shanahan's side of the story so take it FWIW, but it definitely seems to me like Griffin got tired of being considered a "gimmick" qb.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/robert-griffin-iii-wants-play-pro-style-offense-204506917--nfl.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/redskins/robert-griffin-iiis-father-says-hed-like-to-see-a-lot-of-passing-in-redskins-offense/2013/05/22/7afcc6d8-c30f-11e2-914f-a7aba60512a7_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dc-sports-bog/wp/2015/02/18/mike-shanahan-blames-daniel-snyder-for-rgiiis-infatuation-with-being-an-aaron-rodgers-type-guy/
From Mike Shanahan:
"It was actually two days after the Super Bowl," Shanahan said. "He had asked to have a meeting and I really don't blame that on Robert. I mean, Robert to me, was a young player, he had a heck of a year, he had a serious injury at that time, and it's me that changed the perception of a person, because I know Dan [snyder] felt very strongly about Robert being a drop-back quarterback and did not want Robert to take shots ...
"Yeah, he did ask for a meeting. He did talk about, number one, he wanted change. He mentioned the Baltimore game and the Atlanta game, you know, his injuries. He talked about protection shortening his career ... He actually [mentioned] what plays were acceptable and unacceptable, and when he started talking about what plays were acceptable and unacceptable, and that he wasn't a rookie anymore and wanted to voice his opinion, the term unacceptable is used by Dan, the owner, quite often.
Would be interesting to hear the other side of that conversation. Shanahan has done nothing but paint himself a victim or some innocent bystander his whole tenure here. This despite him having final say on all football related decisions.
I remember hearing some sports talk about what really burned the bridge between Mike and Griffin. Supposedly they met before the Seattle playoff game and more or less they discussed how they weren't going to call as much read option because Griffin wasn't healthy. And well, you know the rest of the story. After that Griffin lost trust in the Shanahan's.
I don't really understand the last line as the grammar doesn't make it readable. Is Shanny implying that RG had a conversation with Dan about it and Dan urged him to tell Shanny how "unacceptable" things were?
Yeah, I think I may have left out some context, sorry if I did - I think Shanny was trying to say that Snyder often refers to things as "unacceptable" so when RG3 was saying plays were "unacceptable" he assumed RG3 had spoken to Snyder about this and felt empowered by it.
Hmmm Interesting. Sounds like Shanny is definitely trying to throw the owner under the bus, but it doesn't sound like this story is something that could have been totally fabricated. I could see Dan telling RG about how unacceptable it all is and pushing RG to tell that to the coach.
We'll probably never know to what extent the mishandling of Robert Griffin was Skeletor's fault, Griffin's fault, or Little Danny's fault. However, either way -- however you ascribe blame -- certain facts remain the same:
1. Griffin excelled in the read option offense. Pretty much everyone says that he could not have done this extensively, as it would have negatively impacted his career.
2. Griffin has NOT excelled in a drop back pass offense. While it's true that Cousins has not solved his INT problem, and while it's true that Gruden seems to like Cousins better, none of this changes the fact that Griffin himself on the field was not showing mastery of the drop back game. WHen he was taking 4-5 sacks a game, we all blamed the offensive line and yet the other QBs are not taking that many sacks. So he didn't show the ability to quickly read the field or have the pocket presence to stay out of trouble.
So the proper offense for him was probably something hybrid where he could move out of the pocket, basically what Kyle designed for him. The Redskins claimed at the time that he was actually SAFER in this offense AS LONG AS HE PROTECTED HIMSELF FROM THE BIG HIT.
3. What caused Griffin's injury was NOT option play. Everyone brings up Baltimore. That hit did not result from read option. Griffin was to pass that play and he broke free on a scramble, trying to make a play to help his team win. We were behind and driving for a score in the fourth quarter. We needed the win to keep our playoff hopes alive. To Robert's credit, he tried to make a play. I DO NOT JUDGE HIM FOR THAT. He took one for the team at his own expense. It didn't work out for him.
4. What I blame Griffin for: I really don't believe read option put him in danger. I believe that his own failure to protect himself did. Redskins could have run an offense like Seattle with occasional runs but Griffin would have to get down and protect himself like Wilson. Griffin never showed the ability to do so. That's what got him vs. the Ravens...not read option.
5. What I blame Shanny for: playing Griffin vs. Seattle. I don't care if Griffin said he was good to go. I don't care if Snyder said put him in. I don't care if Dr. Andrews said he was fine. You are a coach and you knew he wasn't fine. Be a man and decide who is best man to go out and play. Every fan watching that game was screaming at the TV -- particularly after the Redskins were leading -- put Kirk in.
6. WHat I blame Danny for: I'm almost certain that Danny was the one who engineered the Griffin trade, for marketing purposes. His downfall here was that no one evaluated the talent sufficient to see if he could even play in a drop back mode. How can you give up 3 number ones on a complete guess? YOu did it only for marketing and in the process shafted the Redskins, Griffin, and the fans in one fell swoop.
Bottom line to me: Griffin is a remarkable talent who could have excelled if he was in a situation where they played hybrid offense with lots of movement, some read option, but also with Griffin ability to get down and protect himself. Neither the Redskins nor Griffin had the vision or patience to execute this, so the experiment was a failure. But Kyle Shanahan, in devising the offense, did have a hint of what to do. If they could have just tweaked the offense or Griffin's mentality to get him to keep himself save it COULD have worked. But jumping wildly from all read option to all drop back was just doomed for disaster, with a QB who didn't really have the skill set to make that transition immediately.