What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official** 2015 Washington Redskins Thread YOU LIKE THAT! (2 Viewers)

Nittany, my tone was not belligerent in the least. Nor was it a personal attack on you. I thought your OPINIONs were, again, pathetic attempts at revisionist history and stand by that. I don't believe I posted anything that was inappropriate or disparaging. Sorry if you feel that way. I don't take any offense to your post despite its condescending and self-important tone.

I've been here for 6 years and read or skimmed (as they tend to be WAY too long for my liking) many of your posts over that time period. Despite whatever inside info you claim to have, I tend to disagree with a lot of what you say. Which is fine. We all have OPINIONS, which at the end of the day, is what you are sharing here despite whatever connections you may have from 10 plus years ago or whenever.

I used to have in office in Ashburn and know a handful of people who have worked at Redskins Park or done business with the team or Snyder in various capacities as well. So sorry, I don't buy that you bring any special insight or "enlightment" to the table here. If you have specific examples that counter that then I'd love to see them and be proven wrong.

Bottom line is that we are all offering our opinions here and are free to share them, disagree, and discuss further as we'd like.

Cheers!

 
There is a great script brewing for a Redskins outright victory tonight. See the FFA Wagering Thread for my complete write-up on tonight's game.

Why is local sports radio obsessed with Shanahan? He'll be on Grant and Danny today.

For a coach who was 24-40 during his tenure here, you would think he won multiple Super Bowls here according to the local media.
Mike Shanahan has a legitimate shot at going to the Pro Football HOF as a Coach, who was hired here under false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him during year 3. If Snyder hadn't broken his word to not interfere with football operations, Griffin would never have been drafted, Shanahan would likely still be here, (with his rock star of an Offensive Coordinator son, Kyle), and the Redskins are likely a lot better than 7-25 over the last 2 seasons, and a few years into building something designed for long-term success. Grant and Danny are on 106.7 FM, the counterpunch to Snyder-Owned propaganda machine 980 AM. If I were the programming director, I'd have Shanahan on as often as he wanted to, as well as anyone else who's no longer with the Team, but spent some time here under the Snyder regime, and I'd offer everything I had in my power to offer to tell the inside story about what was going on behind the scenes with Snyder during his tenure here.
I'm sorry but this is a pathetic attempt at revisionist history and hypothetical BS.

Rug pulled out from under him during year 3??? 2012 was the only season Shanny didnt finish dead last in the division as the Skins HC, the only season Shanny won a division in his last 7 years as a coach, and the only time he's even made the playoffs in his last 7 years as a coach. And it was almost entirely due to an amazing season by a rookie QB named RG3 and his son, Kyle as a playcaller. He should have had the rug pulled out on him more often.

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions. This false pretenses, rug pulled out from him BS is just that.
:goodposting:
:no: No, definitely not good posting...
Agree to disagree. Maybe it's my annoyance for people who always have excuses and everything is always someone else's fault, but I don't buy any of the Mike Shanahan victim narrative. With his name and that contract he should have put his foot down if he didn't agree with decisions. I have no sympathy for someone who lays along and then cries victim after something does't work out. Nitt, I bet you don't like working with people like that either. And it gets worse once they start kicking when everyone else is down and try shoe-horning "I told ya so's" everywhere someone will listen. So Mike Shanahan can go #### himself as for as I'm concerned.

I'll quote the meat of VATerp's post here again. I agree 100% with this:

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions.
 
Not to be optimistic or anything, but does the bad weather actually help the Redskins in this game? If we want to center our game around the two headed ground beast of Morris-Jones, then maybe sloppy conditions are not so bad. I'll take a low scoring game against the Eagles any day, because the WORST case scenario is that we get behind and Cousins has to press. If it can be kept close we can ground and pound.

Still not predicting victory, but this is good, right?

 
I mentioned before that I have almost zero emotional investment in the Skins this season.

But I REALLY want to win this game this week. Something about Chip Kelly's subtle arrogance and a number of other factors have caused my disdain of the Eagles to grow considerably over the last 2 years to the point that its temporarily above my disdain for that team in Texas.

And I just don't think they are that good. If the Skins can eliminate mistakes, which is a huge if for this team, then I think this matchup is in their favor. Establish the run early, get a lead, and force Bradford to beat you.

Should be a great test on one of McCloughans stated goals. Seeing whether or not this team has truly established some sort of identity as a physical football team that can impose its will on opponents.

 
Not to be optimistic or anything, but does the bad weather actually help the Redskins in this game? If we want to center our game around the two headed ground beast of Morris-Jones, then maybe sloppy conditions are not so bad. I'll take a low scoring game against the Eagles any day, because the WORST case scenario is that we get behind and Cousins has to press. If it can be kept close we can ground and pound.

Still not predicting victory, but this is good, right?
Sounds like weather is going to less of a factor than before. But with FedEx, the field could still be crap, which you're right, would probably help us more.

 
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.

I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.

 
I mentioned before that I have almost zero emotional investment in the Skins this season.

But I REALLY want to win this game this week. Something about Chip Kelly's subtle arrogance and a number of other factors have caused my disdain of the Eagles to grow considerably over the last 2 years to the point that its temporarily above my disdain for that team in Texas.

And I just don't think they are that good. If the Skins can eliminate mistakes, which is a huge if for this team, then I think this matchup is in their favor. Establish the run early, get a lead, and force Bradford to beat you.

Should be a great test on one of McCloughans stated goals. Seeing whether or not this team has truly established some sort of identity as a physical football team that can impose its will on opponents.
Regarding the bolded, the offense has obviously been playing like crap. Whether that is Bradford, Kelly, other teams knowing the Eagles plays, I don't know, but they have been the weak link right now. The defense has played well and has a good amount of talent. People torched them for what Atlanta did against them, but look what Julio Jones did to the Giants and the Cowboys. The defense kept them in the game against Dallas and really they, along with the special teams, won them the game against the Jets. So 2/3's of the Eagles are pretty good right now (defense and special teams). If Kelly gets the offense woes figured out, the Eagles will be a tough team to beat.

 
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.

I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.
You're on ES too? I'm there by the same name

 
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.

I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.
The experience at FedEx field is pretty abysmal. No where near the experience that you get at Nats Park or the Verizon Center. With the Wizards and Caps being decent I think that' going to play more of a factor.

 
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.

I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.
They sound like good seats! I will have to look your way if I'm ever in a position to go in the near future. Right now, finances don't allow.

It's cool you look to sell to Skins fans, but in the end, you got to do what you can to recoup your costs for sure...no shame in that at all...

 
Would any of this change if they moved back in to DC?
I would love them to move back into DC. I work right in the city so I'm biased.

I think there may be some hurdles with the local politicians to cross before they ever did that again, but I do think it would be great.

I think in theory they could draw good crowds at Fed Ex if they a.) won every now and then and b.) didn't try to empoverish anyone coming to the game via tickets, consessions, parking, etc.

We just don't really know how much FEd Ex coudl draw because they've never been really good there for any length of time.

That said, I'd love for them to move back to DC

 
Would any of this change if they moved back in to DC?
I would love them to move back into DC. I work right in the city so I'm biased.

I think there may be some hurdles with the local politicians to cross before they ever did that again, but I do think it would be great.

I think in theory they could draw good crowds at Fed Ex if they a.) won every now and then and b.) didn't try to empoverish anyone coming to the game via tickets, consessions, parking, etc.

We just don't really know how much FEd Ex coudl draw because they've never been really good there for any length of time.

That said, I'd love for them to move back to DC
It's all about winning. That's it. RFK is/was a dump. But they won. A lot. Any stadium can provide a good experience if the team's winning.

Pretty sure Redskins prices (tickets, concessions, parking, etc.) are fairly average NFL prices.

 
MattFancy said:
The latest ESPN the Mag ranked all 122 teams by owner. Skins came in 120th of 122. Good job Danny!
Wow. Who was 121 and 122? I'm hard pressed to think of who is worse...

 
MattFancy said:
The latest ESPN the Mag ranked all 122 teams by owner. Skins came in 120th of 122. Good job Danny!
He's young too. I literally don't see us ever being competitive in my lifetime. When I die Danny will still own the Skins.

 
MattFancy said:
dgreen said:
MikeApf said:
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.
You're on ES too? I'm there by the same name
i quit going there once snyder bought the website, last thing you want to do is give a kingpin telemarketer your contact information.

 
MattFancy said:
dgreen said:
MikeApf said:
Sad true story: overheard two co-workers talking about the game this Sunday. One is visiting from out west and is stoked to go to the game. Other co-worker is local and says, "oh we're playing Philadelphia." Go to the game but don't wear Redskins colors. Wear something neutral.

What's sad is that there is some truth to this. We have such a crappy home field "advantage" that we have to be intimidated by fans of other teams IN OUR OWN STADIUM.

I miss the days where we won enough that the fans cared and the entire stadium was Redskins fans and WE intimidated the other team. Yeah, I'm old enough to remember going to RFK, where we would rock the bleachers and were known as "the craziest fans in the NFL."

I don't blame the fans today. Tickets are too expensive...heck, I can't go that often. And the team has not been consistently competitive since the 80s. So I don't blame anyone. It just makes me sad.
Yep. I've posted my tickets here and on Extremeskins to try to sell to a Redskins fan. Not much interest. I'm about to post on Craigslist to try to have some control over who gets them and then they'll go to something like stubhub where I have no control. People ask: Why are there so many opposing fans in our stadium? Answer: Because there aren't enough Redskins fans interested in going.I'm willing to give a good deal to any Skins fans here, if anyone's interested. As I've mentioned, seats are under cover which should be great for Sunday.
You're on ES too? I'm there by the same name
i quit going there once snyder bought the website, last thing you want to do is give a kingpin telemarketer your contact information.
You could sign up with an email you never use again. I signed up with my college email address (which I can no longer access) and never got a single questionable email.

 
Only thing I miss about ES is the mma thread and the beer thread. Even those fell off greatly after they B&G spilt though. Actually, probably well before. Those were good times though...

 
ES used to be really good. Now, it's useless for Skins info. There's much better discussion here with the few of us than all the idiots over there.

 
MattFancy said:
ES used to be really good. Now, it's useless for Skins info. There's much better discussion here with the few of us than all the idiots over there.
Only thing I mis about that place is the MMA and the Beer thread, but they ended up banning have the people I liked to chat with there in those threads anyway, so I haven't logged in in years.

 
There is a great script brewing for a Redskins outright victory tonight. See the FFA Wagering Thread for my complete write-up on tonight's game.

Why is local sports radio obsessed with Shanahan? He'll be on Grant and Danny today.

For a coach who was 24-40 during his tenure here, you would think he won multiple Super Bowls here according to the local media.
Mike Shanahan has a legitimate shot at going to the Pro Football HOF as a Coach, who was hired here under false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him during year 3. If Snyder hadn't broken his word to not interfere with football operations, Griffin would never have been drafted, Shanahan would likely still be here, (with his rock star of an Offensive Coordinator son, Kyle), and the Redskins are likely a lot better than 7-25 over the last 2 seasons, and a few years into building something designed for long-term success. Grant and Danny are on 106.7 FM, the counterpunch to Snyder-Owned propaganda machine 980 AM. If I were the programming director, I'd have Shanahan on as often as he wanted to, as well as anyone else who's no longer with the Team, but spent some time here under the Snyder regime, and I'd offer everything I had in my power to offer to tell the inside story about what was going on behind the scenes with Snyder during his tenure here.
I'm sorry but this is a pathetic attempt at revisionist history and hypothetical BS.

Rug pulled out from under him during year 3??? 2012 was the only season Shanny didnt finish dead last in the division as the Skins HC, the only season Shanny won a division in his last 7 years as a coach, and the only time he's even made the playoffs in his last 7 years as a coach. And it was almost entirely due to an amazing season by a rookie QB named RG3 and his son, Kyle as a playcaller. He should have had the rug pulled out on him more often.

Let's not forget that this is the same man who said he would stake his reputation on Rex Grossman and John Beck working out as QBs. "Put my reputation on that these guys can play." Funnny how this never gets mentioned when he is offering his opinion on the future of current NFL QBs.

Bottom line is the guy has a great resume and was a good coach at one time. He was, overall, most certainly not a good coach with the Skins or the unwilling victim that he, and apparently others, now want to make him out to be. He should have never played Griffin against Seattle or at the beginning of 2013. I don't care what the owner, a 22 year old, or a marketing campagin were pushing for. YOU are the Head Coach. YOU have a guaranteed contract worth good money to make those decisions. This false pretenses, rug pulled out from him BS is just that.
:goodposting:
:no: No, definitely not good posting, especially not the bolded. VaTerp, you're a relatively recent addition to the Forums (2009). I honestly don't know how long you've populated, read or posted in the Yearly Team Threads, so you just might not know that when I make the time to post here, most of the time I'm bringing much more than my opinion to the discussion - instead, I bring facts/informed opinions coming from non-traditional sources: people I know to varying degrees, (some friends, some acquaintances), who either have worked for, or are currently working for, the Redskins, both on the Team/Locker Room side and the Office/Management side. Primarily stuff I've discreetly overheard or conversations I've participated in while attending both formal and informal private social functions with said people, none of whom are Snyderbots, and definitely when the cameras and mikes aren't present. Now, my access is neither as close, nor as prevalent as it once was, as my close friend (a member of the Coaching Staff during most of the 1st decade of the 2000's), who was my point of access is no longer directly employed by the Team...but he's still local and works in an unofficial capacity with the Team, and independently with several current and former players, many of which he's good friends with. Every now and then, including recently, I'm invited to private social events where I'm exposed to and/or engaged in off-the-record conversations these people would never have with the media, stuff that the general public is never supposed to know or hear.

Time and time again, over the years, I've posted information here, as a favor, to enlighten the folks who inhabit the Thread as to the reality behind all the stuff they are fed by conventional media channels, and the crap being spewed by the Team's PR machine, usually with the caveat that 'You all aren't going to believe this' or 'truth is stranger than fiction' or some similar lead in, and time and time again, many of the things I've posted have come to pass, or rung true to various degrees, much to the (unpleasant) shock and surprise of the majority of folks here. I've always left it up to the readers to believe what I post, or not, because, for obvious reasons, I cannot come forward with the who, where, etc. details of the conversations I've either overheard or participated in. There are plenty of Thread Regulars who can attest to this.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you just don't know any better, but regardless, your belligerent tone is really poor form, and completely unnecessary. One thing the world really needs less of is internetbrashguy. Also, it's generally a good idea, when embarking on a course to impugn the integrity of an individual, or denigrating the information he brings to the table, one does their homework on their target. I've put in the time and effort to see that mine is established, verified and unimpeachable, and if anyone takes a shot at me, I'm going to fire back, hence this post. When I have the time, if you'd like, I'll gladly post at length for you what I learned first-hand from conversations with folks on both sides of the fence (managment and team), about how the relationship between Snyder and Shanahan began devolving as early as June of 2010, when, less than 4 months after he'd been hired (under the impression that he had complete control of all player personnel decisions), Snyder, with Allen, stepped in and orchestrated that abysmal trade for McNabb (which, parallel to the drafting of both Jason Campbell and Griffin, had something to do with McNabb being black, as much as anything else - this goes back to the deep impression it made on the young marketing genius, growing up locally during the era, how much of a positive financial impact it had on the Team when the Doug Williams-led Team won the Super Bowl), when we could have signed Shanahan's choice, Marc Bulger, as a street free-agent for no compensation, in the few days after the trade, when Bulger was released outright by the Rams. You'd have thought Snyder would have learned his lesson after that massive flop, but the darn fool and his greedy nature can't get out of his own way, and when the opportunity to draft another potential superstar black quarterback presented itself, with all the potential trappings to go along with it, he just couldn't say no, and he absolutely, positively overrode Shanahan, and made that decision unilaterally, and after that, the rift couldn't be healed, and it was only a matter of time before the wheels fell off the bus for the umpteenth time, about the umpteenth thing, during the Snyder tenure. If you want to update the fallout tally of Snyder's meddling in this, you can add the 4th-rounder spent on Cousins in 2012, because that pick was made in response to Snyder orchestrating the trade and dictating the pick, usurping the authority he had given Shanahan yet again, and for the second time, squandering valuable draft picks in the process.

Aside: Does anyone think, for a minute, what the 'Griffin era' might have been like if Mike/Kyle had not been here in 2012 and Snyder had drafted Griffin with a less innovative pair of offensive minds? I know it's not the popular opinion, and it stings mightily (the truth often does) to the willfully ignorant faithful, but objective, qualified professional personnel men from all over have reached a general consensus that Griffin, while undeniably an athletically gifted and successful college QB, has neither the burning desire, nor the football IQ to translate all that college success to the NFL-caliber QB stage, especially now that from the waist down, he's no longer anything unique and special, and from the neck up, he's been exposed as never having been. There's plenty of information to be found that supports that assertion. The fall from grace might have been faster, and uglier, and (hey look! now here's a conjecture on my part!) the 2012 Season might not have played out the way it did. Just where did boy genius Kyle learn the foundation of the knowledge base he employed so deftly and ingeniously to craft an offense that would allow a supreme athlete to look the part of an NFL QB despite being deficient in many critical areas? His Dad, Mike, that's who - who was a seasoned NFL Offensive mind for decades before Griffin came along, from a different branch of the same tree that Joe Jackson Gibbs developed his own unique concepts from: Air Coryell (vertical) evolving and intermingling with West Coast (horizontal), and evolving yet again, and who is largely credited among his peers for modernizing and developing the zone blocking 'zone stretch' approach that's now a staple of the modern-day NFL lexicon? Those principles, developed by Shanahan and Alex Gibbs based on stuff Sam Wyche started tinkering with during his time with the 49'ers before he left to Coach the Bengals, were the basis on which the offense designed to maximize Griffin in his rookie year. Principles which Mike Shanahan is the undisputed modern-day architect. Although both Kyle and Gary Kubiak are considered present-day innovative coaches, they achieved their success under the tutelege of Mike - Kubiak was the QB Coach of the 49'ers when Mike Shanahan's skills as an Offensive Coordinator landed him the Broncos job, and he brought his disciple Kubiak with him, and promoted him to OC.

You want some 'Good Posting'? Go back and read Mike Apf's post #392 back on page 8, including point 6 - I'm sorry if you don't like it, or disagree VaTerp, or Sebowski (surprised with you), or Hang 10 or Matt Fancy, or Zdravko or whoever else liked the inappropriate disparaging comment directed towards my post, but that's the closest brush to reality that this Thread has had in the last 2 pages, much of which are filled with commentary that seems to be very misinformed about what really has gone on, and continues to go on, around our Team, and which sounds like it's coming from either the mainstream media or the ***official*** Organization-sponsered Team hype machine, or just opinions not grounded in fact. Well, what folks with an emotional investment would like things to be, seldom jives with 'what is'. Again, I'm sorry about my lack of time I can dedicate to responding to some of that stuff is sporadic at best, but it's the nature of my career...but I intend to address several of those posts and posters individually when I have the time to try and bring some perspective directly from the information I have access to.

Truth is stranger, and uglier than fiction...and Daniel Snyder is one of the strangest, ugliest people I've ever encountered - and in my capacity as a Chef, I have encountered him personally, and I've also known various incarnations of his and Tanya's personal chef, personal trainer, and hair stylist over the last several years...and as he lived reasonably close to me, and attended a rival high school in roughly the same era as I did, I also happen to know people who have known him since he was boy. I ask a lot of questions, and I listen to the responses for common themes. Anyone is welcome to dislike or not believe anything I bring to the table, but bring your response in a courteous manner and respectful tone, if you please, and I'll be happy to engage when I can. I'm not one of the people who can post here seemingly all day and night long, at a moment's notice. When I take the time to post, I have to decide not to do something else more important, in order to do it - so I don't bring anything pathetic, revisionist or hypothetical to the Forum - I just don't have that kind of time to waste. I bring the strange and ugly truth as best I can determine it to be, for your enjoyment and, I hope, your enlightenment, from sources you'd otherwise not be exposed to, much the same as Cecil Lammey does for the Broncos, and David Yudkin for the Patriots. The revelations are rarely pleasant, and some are downright unbelievable, but the truth always seems to come out, if given enough time...

Things are rarely as they seem on the surface, especially when dealing with an individual as convoluted as our very own Danny-boy. We all ought to know that by now. There's 15+ years worth of material to work with/evidence to go by. In regards to Mike Shanahan in particular, he was indeed hired on false pretenses and had the rug pulled out from under him (undermined by Snyder in both the McNabb and the Griffin decisions after being hired under the condition that he'd have complete authority and final say on all personnel decisions - both stocking the fridge and cooking dinner), and those actions by Snyder, and the ripple-effect emanating from them have done significant harm to the organization, and by association, to us, the fans.
Whoa.

 
I mentioned before that I have almost zero emotional investment in the Skins this season.

But I REALLY want to win this game this week. Something about Chip Kelly's subtle arrogance and a number of other factors have caused my disdain of the Eagles to grow considerably over the last 2 years to the point that its temporarily above my disdain for that team in Texas.

And I just don't think they are that good. If the Skins can eliminate mistakes, which is a huge if for this team, then I think this matchup is in their favor. Establish the run early, get a lead, and force Bradford to beat you.

Should be a great test on one of McCloughans stated goals. Seeing whether or not this team has truly established some sort of identity as a physical football team that can impose its will on opponents.
Regarding the bolded, the offense has obviously been playing like crap. Whether that is Bradford, Kelly, other teams knowing the Eagles plays, I don't know, but they have been the weak link right now. The defense has played well and has a good amount of talent. People torched them for what Atlanta did against them, but look what Julio Jones did to the Giants and the Cowboys. The defense kept them in the game against Dallas and really they, along with the special teams, won them the game against the Jets. So 2/3's of the Eagles are pretty good right now (defense and special teams). If Kelly gets the offense woes figured out, the Eagles will be a tough team to beat.
Overall I still dont think Philly is that good of a team. They are ok but there are a lot of holes on that team. Its all relative as I don't think there is ALL that much of a difference talent wise separating good and bad teams when you look at whole rosters in today's NFL.

Its obviously early , the division is weak, and they will play better on offense as they can't be much worse. But I never bought into the preseason hype that a lot of people did that Philly had a legit shot at the Super Bowl. Its year 3 of Kelly and I think teams are better prepared to deal with their tempo. FF wise I'm interested in Agholor's development but I think a big problem on that offense, besides how awful Bradford has been, is that they don't really have a vertical or outside threat that defenses have to respect right now.

Anyways, this is a win I want today for the Skins. Philly is not playing that well right now and I'd love to see the Skins be more physical and impose their will on the Birds. So we'll see but that's about as enthusiastic as I can get right now.

 
Gruden: "It was a total team effort in the loss....no one played good enough to win."

Um, what about Keenan Robinson? He played great.

Why throw everyone under the bus like that?

Well, he did spare someone.

"No. No. Kirk was fine. We've got to play better around him. There is no quarterback controversy whatsoever."
Did he really say Cousins was fine? Why does he feel so much more comfortable losing with Kirk?
Yes, he did.

And I don't know.

 
Kyle Shanahan is looking more like a legit good Offensive Coordinator all the time.
Atlanta's offense has been surprisingly good this year. But they've been playing NFC East competition so it's hard to tell if they're actually good, you know? Their defense is vastly improved as well.

 
In other news Forbath is trying out for The Eagles today.
With the track record of our castoff kickers, I'd totally expect Forbath to nail a 50 yarder against us this week.
And I bet all of his kickoffs will be touchbacks.
If he even kicks one touchback, I'd hope he gets smashed on a kick return by the likes of Spaight.
That would be awesome, especially considering Spaight is on IR.
And if Jim Ross was announcing.

"And the Eagles' kicker has just been tackled by a man in an iron lung! Things are really breaking down here!"

 
No, definitely not good posting, especially not the bolded. VaTerp, you're a relatively recent addition to the Forums (2009). I honestly don't know how long you've populated, read or posted in the Yearly Team Threads, so you just might not know that when I make the time to post here, most of the time I'm bringing much more than my opinion to the discussion - instead, I bring facts/informed opinions coming from non-traditional sources: people I know to varying degrees, (some friends, some acquaintances), who either have worked for, or are currently working for, the Redskins, both on the Team/Locker Room side and the Office/Management side.

Time and time again, over the years, I've posted information here, as a favor, to enlighten the folks

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, that you just don't know any better, but regardless, your belligerent tone is really poor form, and completely unnecessary.
Dude, your patronizing attitude wore thin a year or more ago. You claim to be an inside, to know big things and important people, and all you ever do is repeat the same 2 things:

Dan Snyder is horrible.

Mike Shanhan was great.

Each year you're here less and less, while the people discussing actual gameplay and actual players and coaches on the field provide the real information and heart of this yearly thread. You just pop in once in awhile to talk down to the actual people who make this thread worthwhile. You're a lot less important to this thread than they are.

In past years people used to thank you for your "insight". But every year there's nothing new from you, just the same SnyderBad and ShanahanGood stuff, and each year your sense of your own importance differs more and more widely from the value of what you posts. You've added nothing for a couple years now.

And stop talking down to people in this topic who actually do have a lot to add.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reading the last 15-20 posts is so depressing and shows you what a dysfunctional mess this organization is.
Hey, if you think that was depressing, think about this: Our hopes today depend primarily on Spencer Long and Kirk Cousins! :)

Go Skins.

 
Watching Jets/Dolphins, I still don't mind the Shereff pick since we've been so starved for Olinemen, but Leonard Williams looks like he can be a real special player.

 
Daggone it, I just got home and wouldn't you know it, the one game I miss and they pull out the win!

Can someone give me the 30 second run down of how we did it? Who lead the way -- running attack. passing, defense? I quickly looked at the box score and noted that Cousins had zero INTs. In our 2 wins, he's had no INTs; in our 2 losses, he had multiple.

Looks like there was no margin for error in this game either.

Glad you guys got to see a W...thanks in advance for any recaps in here!

 
That was a really sweet comeback. Unexpected, contributions from a lot of different players throughout the game. Still looked like the usual second half fade-into-loss routine until that last drive. Truly enjoyed that game, bad as it was.

Crowder belongs on the field. He constantly gets open.

 
That was a really sweet comeback. Unexpected, contributions from a lot of different players throughout the game. Still looked like the usual second half fade-into-loss routine until that last drive. Truly enjoyed that game, bad as it was.

Crowder belongs on the field. He constantly gets open.
Was gonna say the same thing about Crowder. Has anyone else noticed the rookies seem to be flashing more and more each week?

 
Daggone it, I just got home and wouldn't you know it, the one game I miss and they pull out the win!

Can someone give me the 30 second run down of how we did it? Who lead the way -- running attack. passing, defense? I quickly looked at the box score and noted that Cousins had zero INTs. In our 2 wins, he's had no INTs; in our 2 losses, he had multiple.

Looks like there was no margin for error in this game either.

Glad you guys got to see a W...thanks in advance for any recaps in here!
1st half redskins dominated on both sides of the ball. Surprisingly they started with a lot of Thompson in the backfield and he excelled. Moved the ball but settled for FGs mostly. Not shockingly, special teams gave Sproles a huge run back before halftime which gave the eagles some points. 2nd half the same old redskins stuff. Seemed like Chip made adjustments and started airing it out and we stopped bringing pressure and the Eagles took the lead. Redskins started pounding the rock and Cousins dinked a lot but started pushing the ball down field more. Garcon looked like men among boys. Cousins marched down the field and won the game.

On a side note, an Eagles receiver caught the ball and trucked the Redskins safety I believe and they called a hitting a defenseless receiver penalty. I've never seen anything like that in my life of watching football.

 
Great game. I wouldn't say this game gave me any more hope for this team but at least it's nice to know the eagles suck.

 
Daggone it, I just got home and wouldn't you know it, the one game I miss and they pull out the win!

Can someone give me the 30 second run down of how we did it? Who lead the way -- running attack. passing, defense? I quickly looked at the box score and noted that Cousins had zero INTs. In our 2 wins, he's had no INTs; in our 2 losses, he had multiple.

Looks like there was no margin for error in this game either.

Glad you guys got to see a W...thanks in advance for any recaps in here!
1st half redskins dominated on both sides of the ball. Surprisingly they started with a lot of Thompson in the backfield and he excelled. Moved the ball but settled for FGs mostly. Not shockingly, special teams gave Sproles a huge run back before halftime which gave the eagles some points. 2nd half the same old redskins stuff. Seemed like Chip made adjustments and started airing it out and we stopped bringing pressure and the Eagles took the lead. Redskins started pounding the rock and Cousins dinked a lot but started pushing the ball down field more. Garcon looked like men among boys. Cousins marched down the field and won the game.

On a side note, an Eagles receiver caught the ball and trucked the Redskins safety I believe and they called a hitting a defenseless receiver penalty. I've never seen anything like that in my life of watching football.
Dude, thanks for the recap. Seems like a lot of common threads...getting lead early, but letting teams back in for instance.

Still, at 2-2, not a bad start to the season for the Skins. This is a team a lot of folks had pegged for 4 wins this year. To have 2 wins after 4 games then -- that's at least hanging tough!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top