And I still have a problem with some of Gruden's decisions to end halves.
Against Miami, up 10-7 with the ball at the 20, 27 seconds, and 1 timeout. Now, I'm not saying I expect any points in that situation, but I was not a fan of taking a knee. The obvious move there is to run a safe play and just see what happens. Who knows, maybe you get a 20 yard run and can then legitimately think about getting in FG position.
Against the Rams, up 17-0 with the ball at the 18, 1:44 on the clock, and 2 timeouts. Play calling was run, run, run and that final run was on a 3rd and 7 after the Rams took a timeout. They basically just gave the ball back to St. Louis, who was luckily unable to move the ball to attempt a FG.
And this week, against the Eagles, the defense makes a tackle with 31 seconds on the clock to force a 4th down up 13-0. I think we had all three timeouts and should have called a timeout. That either gives you a shot at a kickoff return (with a guy who returned one for a TD a week ago) or in the event of a missed FG (which is what happened) the ball is at the 23. Again, similar to Miami, not some great situation where you expect to get points out of it, but having the ball with 25 seconds and two timeouts would at least lead most teams to try something.
I think it mostly comes down to not trusting Cousins in that situation, which I guess is understandable. But, you can do some pretty safe things there like draws or screens or a 1 route play and just throw it away if it's not there. Maybe after the game-winning drive yesterday, Gruden put a little more trust in Cousins to have some aggressiveness on offense. I'm all for our main identity being running (and I LOVED that they still ran on the last drive yesterday), but I'm never a fan of "Let's play it extra safe; we have enough points right now" so early in a game.