fantasycurse42
Footballguy Jr.
UCLA/UK prob the game I'm looking forward to the most.
Interesting. I mean, I'm happy it's a close line as I sincerely hope that's the second game on Thursday and they play like six overtimes. What do you think gives? Michigan is hot and Oregon doesn't have Boucher?Michigan -1/-1.5 right now.![]()
Heard on the radio today that a guy in Vegas (casino owner I think) has $12,500 on Michigan to win it all at 80-1 to win $1 mil.Michigan -1/-1.5 right now.![]()
No idea how Michigan barely made the tourney from what we've seen the past two weeks. Maybe it took time for them to gel, no idea. But they are really good and they basically throw four guards at you, two of them are Wagner and DJ Wilson. They are quite good and they just beat a team that was a tough match-up for them.Interesting. I mean, I'm happy it's a close line as I sincerely hope that's the second game on Thursday and they play like six overtimes. What do you think gives? Michigan is hot and Oregon doesn't have Boucher?
Hmm, KenPom had this one as pretty much a pick'em going into today, so I guess it's the analytics talking...
Don't know about the others, but there are a lot of Gators in NYC.Ticket brokers in NY are gonna lost a lot of $$$
Because of the proximity of Riker's Island?Don't know about the others, but there are a lot of Gators in NYC.Ticket brokers in NY are gonna lost a lot of $$$
Don't buy that at all. Teams like Kentucky, Kansas, UCLA, and Michigan are huge draws. Not sure what east coast team would draw more. Still have North Carolina for all the ACC weinies. Add in teams like Arizona, Florida, and even Oregon and throw in Baylor for the Texas folks. Seems like ratings could be very good across the country.Not that I care, but ratings will be terrible this year with relatively few East Coast teams.
Typically does. The ACC has been morphing into a ticky tack league for some time. It shows during the ACC/B1G challenge quite often. Haven't watched all the ACC games in this tourney, but the ones I have, physical play has been a factor in each (like the Duke game for example)Coach K says South Carolina was the most physical team they played all year. Maybe that is what has bothered the ACC teams in this tourney![]()
I know I'm done watching.Not that I care, but ratings will be terrible this year with relatively few East Coast teams.
Started that way but now we have funneled it down to just hating on Duke so the rest are off the hook.Hey guys. We doing the "ACC is totally overrated even though it had like 6 teams in the Sweet 16 last year, and also bragging/crapping on college conferences is somehow relevant and interesting now" shtick?
South Carolina's state motto = "While I breathe, I hope"So there's a chance?
That was Purdue's title until Robbie Hummel left his knee in Minnesota.I have zero memory of the duke title in 2010. Did that really happen or is it an alternative fact?.
No, we're doing the:Hey guys. We doing the "ACC is totally overrated even though it had like 6 teams in the Sweet 16 last year, and also bragging/crapping on college conferences is somehow relevant and interesting now" shtick?
No, we're doing the:
if-we-got-one-*minute*-of-coverage-of-how-bad-the-ACC-actually-performed-for-each-*hour*-ESPN-and-sports-radio-has-told-us-the-ACC-is-the-best- conference-ever, then-we'd-be-here-all-day routine.
Most overrated all-time and it's not even close.
You seem really angry about this. I don't think I've seen one person defend their tournament performance.ACC guys> we get your point, but you're being a little hyper sensitive here. I mean a good chunk of your teams are not just losing, but underperforming in spectacular fashion. ND barely beats Princeton then was never in the game against WVU. FSU gets hate-f###ed by the 7th place team in the Big East. Virginia scores like it's the jump-ball-after-every-made-basket era. Duke gives up 88 to an offensively challenged SEC team (for comparison it took SC 4 OT's to score 86 against Bammer). No your conference doesn't suck, but they are performing suckily.
You seem really angry about this. I don't think I've seen one person defend their tournament performance.
Why can't people reconcile the fact that the ACC was both very likely the best conference in the regular season and also having an awful tournament? Do the gears just not grind that way?
Cool?The problem is the hype. Every time you turned around you heard hyperbole about the ACC. And the fact is they not only shat the bed in the NCCAT even if UNC wins it all, but they have shat the bed in in spectacular fashion; as Capella points out. Further, the ACC's 7 wins have been against 16, 15, 15, 14, 12, 12, and 8 seeds--ouch.
You can try to build a case that the conference still had a nice season (however flawed that case may be), but the hype was so out of proportion with the performance; and that is why the rest of the country wants to spend the rest of March reminding ACC people (ESPN and the sports radio world that takes cues from ESPN, et al) not that the ACC is the worst conference ever, but how embarrassingly wrong they were that the ACC was the "best conference ever"
Too bad his dad is such a wank.Ball is spectacular, and I don't think that's hyperbole.
I would have loved to sit back and enjoy my team's performance (my team is an ACC team btw), but AGAIN--- every time we tried to do that we were interrupted with a chorus of crapolla about how the ACC was the best conference ever. I'm not trying to make the case that the ACC was the best or worst anything on the floor. The problem is in the monumental gap between the hype and the performance.Cool?
Why not just enjoy your team's performance and not be so bitter about a perceived bias. The ACC was the best conference in the regular season. The big 10 was pretty mediocre. Nothing that happened this weekend changes that. It just means the big 10 is having a far better tourney.
You seem angry. That NIT Round 2 loss to Ole Miss really has you reeling, huh? Usually your Syracuse team waits until they're forced to leave upstate NY before they fall flat on their face.No, we're doing the:
if-we-got-one-*minute*-of-coverage-of-how-bad-the-ACC-actually-performed-for-each-*hour*-ESPN-and-sports-radio-has-told-us-the-ACC-is-the-best- conference-ever, then-we'd-be-here-all-day routine.
Most overrated all-time and it's not even close.
Or let's spin it the other way. Why not say, the ACC had a better regular season, but the Big 10 was the best conference in the tourney? The ACC was below mediocre.Cool?
Why not just enjoy your team's performance and not be so bitter about a perceived bias. The ACC was the best conference in the regular season. The big 10 was pretty mediocre. Nothing that happened this weekend changes that. It just means the big 10 is having a far better tourney.
Who has defended the ACC? They have sucked. Plenty have said it. Not sure what your point is.ACC guys> we get your point, but you're being a little hyper sensitive here. I mean a good chunk of your teams are not just losing, but underperforming in spectacular fashion. ND barely beats Princeton then was never in the game against WVU. FSU gets hate-f###ed by the 7th place team in the Big East. Virginia scores like it's the jump-ball-after-every-made-basket era. Duke gives up 88 to an offensively challenged SEC team (for comparison it took SC 4 OT's to score 86 against Bammer). No your conference doesn't suck, but they are performing suckily.
PAC-12 having a good tournament. #### so is the SEC.Or let's spin it the other way. Why not say, the ACC had a better regular season, but the Big 10 was the best conference in the tourney? The ACC was below mediocre.
I don't care at all. I guess I don't consume that much media. Doesn't affect me even in the slightest.If I were you guys as ACC-partisans I'd be thrilled that many are willing to concede the season-long performance-on-the-floor discussion as arguable.
The complaint is on the nauseating over-hype. Do you really disagree with that point? Just curious.
Isn't that literally what I said?Or let's spin it the other way. Why not say, the ACC had a better regular season, but the Big 10 was the best conference in the tourney? The ACC was below mediocre.
Huh? That's exactly what I said.You seem really angry about this. I don't think I've seen one person defend their tournament performance.
Why can't people reconcile the fact that the ACC was both very likely the best conference in the regular season and also having an awful tournament? Do the gears just not grind that way?
You said nothing of the sort in the quote I posted.Huh? That's exactly what I said.
I have this thing I do where it there's something I find nauseating on the TV or radio, I change the channel.If I were you guys as ACC-partisans I'd be thrilled that many are willing to concede the season-long performance-on-the-floor discussion as arguable.
The complaint is on the nauseating over-hype. Do you really disagree with that point? Just curious.
You said nothing of the sort in the quote I posted.
your conference doesn't suck, but they are performing suckily
The facts do not conflict. I was just noticing the spin.Isn't that literally what I said?
no it's just y'all getting worked up when people poke a little fun at the conference for their performance.You seem really angry about this. I don't think I've seen one person defend their tournament performance.
yes it isok
ps arguing about conferences is dumb.
Not as dumb as generalizing strength after a handful of games, but still dumb.