1) You're right, it's subjective. And you're right, one of the things he excels at is winning on contested balls. In the last page we've discussed that wentz may not throw contested balls as well, or may not throw into tight coverages. He has pretty good size and pretty good speed and good skills which might make him really successful with someone who makes use of them and only ok with someone who doesn't.
2) yes, target monster. In 2014 he was
6th in the NFL in targets. In 2013
he was 11th. In 2015 he had 94 targets in 9 games - pace for his career high. In 2016 he missed 4 games due to suspension, had a hamstring injury and he still was on pace for 127 targets - not far off his previous numbers. You might have wanted him to get even more targets, but on a new team there's no guarantee he gets 140+.
3) yes, Marshall was on the team in 2014, but that was the year he was hobbled and ended up with 61 receptions. The team then let him go and he rebounded to have a huge year next to decker. So he really played one year with a healthy Marshall. That was also Bennett's best year. The reason i mentioned it isn't because literally nobody else on the team got targets, but because Chicago may have drawn up plays just to get him open, or Cutler may have considered him the go to guy in certain situations - which may not translate on a new team. It may. We just don't know.
And that's my point. He's a good player. None of those things individually is a reason to drop him down boards, and you're right to say this one or that one isn't s big deal. It's the combination of all of them that makes him a risky acquisition - one I'd gladly make at the right price (a mid first and a minor player) but not at a stud price (two firsts, or the major piece in a trade for a true stud).
It's ok to disagree with me without saying "This is just so inaccurate". You made some fair points and I had to go back and look to respond and that's good for all of us. Appreciate the response.