What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

***Official*** BenJarvus Green-Ellis Bandwagon (2 Viewers)

One thing for sure is the Patriots will have to adress the RB position next year , either in the draft or on the FA market .

Maroney is nt the answer and they have zero prospect on their roster.

 
Gotta love the naive enthusiasm of fantasy addicts hoping to get the scoop on the latest stud-to-be. :no:

When a fifth-string running back actually has a 'bandwagon', you know it's slim pickens.

Maroney

Jordan

Morris

Faulk

Green-Ellis-Newton-John
tell it to '07 ryan grant owners.
 
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Sounds like someone who has never seen him play.
 
Did Jordan practice yesterday?
(Rotoworld) Lamont Jordan (calf) was unable to practice on Thursday.Analysis: Jordan seems to have a slightly better shot to play this week than Sammy Morris, but they aren't worth counting on. It's likely that neither will be listed as better than "questionable" on Friday's final injury report.(Rotoworld) Lamont Jordan (calf) is unlikely to be available against the Rams in Week 8, according to NFL.com's Adam Schefter.Analysis: It appears that even if Jordan is pronounced questionable Friday, that will just be the Pats playing games on the injury report. With Sammy Morris also very unlikely to play, New England will roll with a RBBC against the Rams.
 
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
We don't need your negative energy. If you want to bash on BJGE I'm sure it would be more appropriate in another thread, perhaps one that is not dedicated as a support thread for BJGE.
 
This seems to be the trend lately. Someone starts a "All aboard" thread for any scrub in the hopes he does well. I call it the "Switz syndrome" :lmao:
I'm in the vast minority but I see the Rams winning this game. I wouldn't be surprised if they blow out the Pats either. The Rams have been a COMPLETELY different team under Haslett. You can see the offense starting to gel (see all the waiver wire recommendations for Donnie Avery) and the defense has been making plays (7 sacks, 7 turnovers, 17 points and 14 allowed against the Redskins and Cowboys) under Haslett. Yes, the Cowboys lost Romo but they still had everyone else on offense. If the Rams can dominate a Cowboys team that currently has more talent on offense than the Pats, why can't they do the same against the Pats? On the Pats' side, they're down to Cassel and the 4th string practice squad RB no one had ever heard of until this week. I'd roll with the Rams D for a sneaky play and look for 3-5 sacks and a couple of turnovers this week.
Bulger a sneaky play this week?
 
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Sounds like someone who has never seen him play.
:pics:
 
Many are claiming that the Pats are back after their pounding of Denver on Monday. I have my doubts that all their issues are resolved based on Andre Hall dropping the ball like he stole it, but they did look like they are adjusting to their personnel.

That being said, Green-Ellis is a wildcard at best, but one that is worth looking at if you have spot on you bench to sit him. I cut Michael Bush and picked up GE as I see it as a pretty low-risk proposition. Sadly I think Benson in Cincy is just as viable of a pick-up if you have the space.

No one knows how it will all play out, but if GE shows something on a team with a solid offensive line and passing game he could really have value. You just have to decide if its worth cutting someone to get him.

 
my stable of RB's consists of: Addai (injured), LJ (susp), Lendale (starter), Jamaal Charles (meh), Rudi (even more meh). I am dropping Matt Jones and starting BJGE with little to no confidence, but he will most certainly outscore the craptastic options I have currently.

i missed out on the Ryan Grant bus last year, and this is the type of gamble that can win the league for you.

 
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Why not? There's been other players just as suspect as Green-Ellis that have had bandwagons. LeRon McClain comes to mind. The idea with bandwagons is to jump on early enough so you look like a genius if it pays off. Look at the Chris Johnson bandwagoners. The ones that jumped on early enough were rewarded handsomely. The ones who waited, were out of luck because the bandwagon was already full.Edit because I didn't look like a genius when I spelled genius wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Sounds like someone who has never seen him play.
Well, let's not forget the fact that, despite having a generally 'blah' set of running backs, the New England brass never considered him good enough to play until everyone else got hurt. (And I believe they saw him play)
 
I'm in the vast minority but I see the Rams winning this game. I wouldn't be surprised if they blow out the Pats either. The Rams have been a COMPLETELY different team under Haslett. You can see the offense starting to gel (see all the waiver wire recommendations for Donnie Avery) and the defense has been making plays (7 sacks, 7 turnovers, 17 points and 14 allowed against the Redskins and Cowboys) under Haslett. Yes, the Cowboys lost Romo but they still had everyone else on offense. If the Rams can dominate a Cowboys team that currently has more talent on offense than the Pats, why can't they do the same against the Pats? On the Pats' side, they're down to Cassel and the 4th string practice squad RB no one had ever heard of until this week. I'd roll with the Rams D for a sneaky play and look for 3-5 sacks and a couple of turnovers this week.
Not much of a stretch given the Rams last 2 games, but NE will try to take away SJAX, so it will be interesting. I expect the Patriots to put up a lot of points in this game; not sure that STL can keep up...
Again I'm in the minority here but I see things the other way around. Assuming SJax plays, I see the Rams putting up a lot of points and controlling the clock, with the Pats struggling to keep up and turning the ball over. In other words, a repeat of the Rams-Cowboys game.If you want to bet on a rookie breaking out in this game, I'd go with Donnie Avery.
 
Surprisingly, he wasn't even bid on in waivers this week in one of my leagues. Call me SCOOP Jackson on this free agent acquisition!

 
Well, let's not forget the fact that, despite having a generally 'blah' set of running backs, the New England brass never considered him good enough to play until everyone else got hurt. (And I believe they saw him play)
I don't think Green-Ellis is anything close to an impact rookie in the mold of Peterson or Chris Johnson.What he is is a durable back who's performed well in both the Big-10 and the SEC on teams with poor overall talent levels. When Maroney went down, he was the first player signing for depth.He's got a shot to play and very questionable players in front of him: Sammy Morris, Lamont Jordan, and Kevin Faulk to compete with. He's got what every rookie wants: a chance to earn some PT.He runs with good pad level and vision. He's got good short area quicks.I'm not sure why he can't claim his share of the carries long term if he performs well.He's got the skills and the opportunity for extended production. He's the kind of guy you take your chance with now or he's on someone else's roster shortly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Sounds like someone who has never seen him play.
Well, let's not forget the fact that, despite having a generally 'blah' set of running backs, the New England brass never considered him good enough to play until everyone else got hurt. (And I believe they saw him play)
Or that he is a rookie and so on.But saying a guy who looked good against a bad D last week...going up against another bad D this week does not deserve a bandwagon (given the hype on Torrain right now) is a bit out there IMO.Or they considered him a rookie who they trusted the other guys in front of him but did not just think he was not good enough to play in this league.
 
let's reign this in a little. Yes, its the Pats playing the Rams, but come on, unless you are really desperate this IS a 4th stringer we are talking about.

I do think he gets the majority of the carries, seeing as how he performed Monday night, but Faulk will get his as well.
we should've reigned it in this case too, and it happened about the same time of yearBrandon Jackson

DeShawn Wynn

Vernand Morency

Noah Herron

Ryan Grant

 
I'm in the vast minority but I see the Rams winning this game. I wouldn't be surprised if they blow out the Pats either. The Rams have been a COMPLETELY different team under Haslett. You can see the offense starting to gel (see all the waiver wire recommendations for Donnie Avery) and the defense has been making plays (7 sacks, 7 turnovers, 17 points and 14 allowed against the Redskins and Cowboys) under Haslett. Yes, the Cowboys lost Romo but they still had everyone else on offense. If the Rams can dominate a Cowboys team that currently has more talent on offense than the Pats, why can't they do the same against the Pats? On the Pats' side, they're down to Cassel and the 4th string practice squad RB no one had ever heard of until this week. I'd roll with the Rams D for a sneaky play and look for 3-5 sacks and a couple of turnovers this week.
Bulger a sneaky play this week?
I'd rather start Bulger when they play their NFC West divisional games, but if you also think the Rams can win or at least be competitive in this game, sure why not? The Pats' secondary can be exploited, especially if their gameplan is to shut down SJax. The guy I really like this week is Donnie Avery.
 
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
That statement may embarrass you by Sunday night.
 
let's reign this in a little. Yes, its the Pats playing the Rams, but come on, unless you are really desperate this IS a 4th stringer we are talking about.

I do think he gets the majority of the carries, seeing as how he performed Monday night, but Faulk will get his as well.
we should've reigned it in this case too, and it happened about the same time of yearBrandon Jackson

DeShawn Wynn

Vernand Morency

Noah Herron

Ryan Grant
:doh: Haven't we learned that anything is possible yet?

 
Despite the enthusiasm for Ben-Gurion, I could easily see Faulk getting a majority of the snaps since he's a proven guy and does all the little things well. It's not like it's Brady back there, so protection of Cassel will be key.BJGE will undoubtedly be in there on obvious running plays, but I think Faulk could very easily end up with more fantasy points - particularly in PPR leagues. What's to say that Evans doesn't get the goal line looks rather than BJGE?
Faulk plays on passing downs as it is . . . but doesn't get the ball much in the times he's in. That's why I don't see his role expanding all that much. Maybe a few more carries but not a ton more.As for BJGE not playing in the CFL, neither would Cassel. But yet here we are.
What i mean is please this is a ridiculous bandwagon post , theres a limit to who you can put on a bandwagon and Jarvis-Green dosent deserve a bandwagonl.
Everyone has a bandwagon. The question is whether or not we are smart enough to get on before it's gone.
 
Well, let's not forget the fact that, despite having a generally 'blah' set of running backs, the New England brass never considered him good enough to play until everyone else got hurt. (And I believe they saw him play)
I don't think Green-Ellis is anything close to an impact rookie in the mold of Peterson or Chris Johnson.What he is is a durable back who's performed well in both the Big-10 and the SEC on teams with poor overall talent levels. When Maroney went down, he was the first player signing for depth.He's got a shot to play and very questionable players in front of him: Sammy Morris, Lamont Jordan, and Kevin Faulk to compete with. He's got what every rookie wants: a chance to earn some PT.He runs with good pad level and vision. He's got good short area quicks.I'm not sure why he can't claim his share of the carries long term if he performs well.He's got the skills and the opportunity for extended production. He's the kind of guy you take your chance with now or he's on someone else's roster shortly.
:doh: This about sums it up.
 
Well, let's not forget the fact that, despite having a generally 'blah' set of running backs, the New England brass never considered him good enough to play until everyone else got hurt. (And I believe they saw him play)
That's a bit of a specious statement. BJGE was an UDFA who went into camp on a team with a #1 pick as the starter (Maroney), a recently signed vet who looked good last year and was the unquestioned #2 guy (Morris), a proven vet 3rd down back (Faulk), a new vet FA signed as injury insurance (Jordan) and a FB (Evans). Barring injury, him not making the 53 was hardly any sort of indictment of his talent.What speaks to his talent is that he was one of the first players they signed to the PS, and they didn't hesitate to activate him to the 53 the second Maroney's injury looked serious.As a Pats homer, I'm cautiously optimistic and just hope he is good enough to give the team a respectable ground game the next 2-3 weeks before Morris and/or Jordan return.For those looking to BJGE to be the Ryan Grant of 2008, I don't see it happening, unless Jordan AND Morris miss huge chunks of time. When those guys are healthy, they will be starting.Another thing to bear in mind, BJGE will surely only be a first & second down back with Faulk coming in on third, and certainly will be on the field for all passing downs.
 
let's reign this in a little. Yes, its the Pats playing the Rams, but come on, unless you are really desperate this IS a 4th stringer we are talking about.

I do think he gets the majority of the carries, seeing as how he performed Monday night, but Faulk will get his as well.
we should've reigned it in this case too, and it happened about the same time of yearBrandon Jackson

DeShawn Wynn

Vernand Morency

Noah Herron

Ryan Grant
It happens every year ... Earnest Graham, Aaron Stecker, and Justin Fargas had been buried on the depth charts for years before they got the opportunites to produce last year.Samkon Gado was buried on the depth chart

RB is easiest position in the NFL to step in as a rookie and produce

 
I'm an SEC fan but for the life of me I can't seem to remember if BJGE has good hands

I guess Coach Orgeron left a lot to be desired in watching Ole Miss play and I just never took the time to pay attention

any Rebel homers out here can give us a scouting report on his pass-catching ability

(note: yes i know Faulk is the 3rd down back)

 
As a Pats homer, I'm cautiously optimistic and just hope he is good enough to give the team a respectable ground game the next 2-3 weeks before Morris and/or Jordan return.For those looking to BJGE to be the Ryan Grant of 2008, I don't see it happening, unless Jordan AND Morris miss huge chunks of time. When those guys are healthy, they will be starting.Another thing to bear in mind, BJGE will surely only be a first & second down back with Faulk coming in on third, and certainly will be on the field for all passing downs.
:scared: I saw him play last week.He got the job done but I didn't think he looked like some great RB. He was a bit plodding.BGE and Matt Cassel, IMO, both had good days because of what their own team was doing AND what DEN wasn't doing.So, BGE may be in the right position at the right time to put up some decent stats for a week or two, but he isn't going to be the next great late round RB.It'll be interesting to see how the NE goal line package plays out. I suspect that both Evans and Faulk will get goal line work because they can catch well. And you may see more of the Vrable TE or Seymour FB if Evans is being used as a ball carrier/catcher.
 
Boston.com

Kaczur, Green, Alexander return

Email|Link|Comments (0) Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff October 24, 2008 12:50 PM

The Patriots are holding their afternoon practice on the upper fields behind Gillette Stadium, and Boston Globe colleague Christopher L. Gasper reports that DE Jarvis Green (right ankle), RT Nick Kaczur (right ankle) and LB Eric Alexander (hamstring) all were present for the media-access portion of practice.

All three players are on the team's injury report.

The practice is being held in shells (light shoulder pads) and sweatpants.

Playes not spotted at the media-access portion of the practice included:

# CB Lewis Sanders

# RB LaMont Jordan

# RB Sammy Morris

# LB Shawn Crable
 
I'm all in on BJGE in my blind bid deep dynasty league. I'm desperate for running back help and this will probably be my best opportunity all year to acquire an impact running back off the waiver wire. Fingers crossed that I get him and that he pans out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gotta love the naive enthusiasm of fantasy addicts hoping to get the scoop on the latest stud-to-be. :rolleyes:

When a fifth-string running back actually has a 'bandwagon', you know it's slim pickens.

Maroney

Jordan

Morris

Faulk

Green-Ellis-Newton-John
Earnest GrahamDomanick Davis

Willie Parker

Reuben Droughns

Terrell Davis

These things happen, usually at least once per year.

 
Saw this posted on CBS:

News: The Patriots listed RBs Sammy Morris and LaMont Jordan as doubtful for Week 8 vs. the Rams. That leaves Kevin Faulk, Benjarvus Green-Ellis and fullback Heath Evans as the only healthy running backs left on the roster.

Analysis: Starting any of these three rushers is a risky proposition since there's no rhyme or reason to how the Pats use their backs. That goes double when they're down to a third-down back in Faulk, a fullback in Evans and a scout team rusher in Green-Ellis. All three are low-end options, with Evans the worst of the bunch and Faulk the best, especially in leagues where receptions count. Obviously, Morris and Jordan need to remain benched in all leagues.

=====

I'm inclined to play BJGE over Turner, but I might even play both Stewart and D.Williams. Going with a Panther RB tandem might be my best option this week?

 
What about kevin faulk? anyone have any feelings??
I think he is the shark play the next few weeks. Probably 50-60 rushing, 30-40 receiving, and my guess is lots of red zone looks which gives him higher chance to score than normal weeks. Maybe 1-2 TDs over the next few games.
 
Here's a blurb from Josh McDaniels on BJGE. Several early comments from the Pats board took this is being a bit of a shot against Maroney and his running style, fwiw.

McDaniels checks inLink|Comments (0) Posted by Mike Reiss, Globe Staff October 24, 2008 04:59 PMPatriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels chatted with reporters today at Gillette Stadium, and here were a few items that stood out:# 1) Getting a feel for BenJarvus Green-Ellis. The rookie running back earned praise for not trying to be a player he isn't. "He has good vision and gets the ball downhill -- he knows what he is and he knows what he is not," McDaniels said. "I think that is really a tribute to him. He is a downhill guy that weighs 225 pounds. He is going to go ahead and duck his head and try and make some yards with his thighs and physicality. He is not a dancer and that is kind of what we like about him. He knows where the hole is at, he finds it, he hits it and he is not going to try to do much sideline-to-sideline running."
 
Many are claiming that the Pats are back after their pounding of Denver on Monday. I have my doubts that all their issues are resolved based on Andre Hall dropping the ball like he stole it, but they did look like they are adjusting to their personnel.That being said, Green-Ellis is a wildcard at best, but one that is worth looking at if you have spot on you bench to sit him. I cut Michael Bush and picked up GE as I see it as a pretty low-risk proposition. Sadly I think Benson in Cincy is just as viable of a pick-up if you have the space.No one knows how it will all play out, but if GE shows something on a team with a solid offensive line and passing game he could really have value. You just have to decide if its worth cutting someone to get him.
I strongly considered picking up and playing Benson, given my RB woes for this week (Jacobs vs PIT, LJ benched, Moore vs NYG, Pittman, Torain on bye, Ricky being, well, Ricky). However, having lived in Chicago back when he played there, I just can't get those nightmares out of my head. Plus, CIN will almost certainly be well behind AGAIN and take him out of the gameplan. I also considered Ahman Green, but someone else snatched him up. Besides, he gets hurt if you look at him too hard.I am willing to take a flyer on him and probably drop Ricky "gimme ganja" Williams. I just picked up Moore (for depth) and Torain (another flyer). Since Moore probably won't be very productive this week, I wouldn't need GE to burn the house down the rest of the way. If it turns out he does, I'll have him and, more importantly, no one else in my league will!Here's to hoping that "GE brings good things to light!" :lmao:
 
I'm really not that excited by taylor, although bjge will probably only get you a couple weeks production.

so, for at least the next week or 2 I would, then I'd probably find an alternative for both.

 
As a Larry and Sjax owner, I've acquire the service of the hyphenator for this week as a precaution. I fully expect this to blow up in my face.

 
I fully expect this to blow up in my face.
It's a shot in the dark. But it's a shot you've got to take this week or he's gone next if he produces.Could be nothing or could be the biggest acquisition of the season.He's certainly got the right situation.
 
The comparisons to Ryan Grant are certainly valid. Grant was an afterthought last season when the year began. He also benefited from an easy schedule, which Green-Ellis might.

 
The comparisons to Ryan Grant are certainly valid. Grant was an afterthought last season when the year began. He also benefited from an easy schedule, which Green-Ellis might.
A couple key differences:1. Grant had spent 2 seasons with the Giants before being traded (so he had quite a bit of experience, at least in practice)2. the main reason Grant was buried on the depth chart last year was because he was traded just before the season began.
 
This seems to be the trend lately. Someone starts a "All aboard" thread for any scrub in the hopes he does well. I call it the "Switz syndrome" :excited:
I'm in the vast minority but I see the Rams winning this game. I wouldn't be surprised if they blow out the Pats either. The Rams have been a COMPLETELY different team under Haslett. You can see the offense starting to gel (see all the waiver wire recommendations for Donnie Avery) and the defense has been making plays (7 sacks, 7 turnovers, 17 points and 14 allowed against the Redskins and Cowboys) under Haslett. Yes, the Cowboys lost Romo but they still had everyone else on offense. If the Rams can dominate a Cowboys team that currently has more talent on offense than the Pats, why can't they do the same against the Pats? On the Pats' side, they're down to Cassel and the 4th string practice squad RB no one had ever heard of until this week. I'd roll with the Rams D for a sneaky play and look for 3-5 sacks and a couple of turnovers this week.
Not much of a stretch given the Rams last 2 games, but NE will try to take away SJAX, so it will be interesting. I expect the Patriots to put up a lot of points in this game; not sure that STL can keep up...
Wow... one game & now the O is rolling again? I'm not convinced the Cassel led Pats are ready to put consistent points on the board, and for sure they won't rush for 150 in the 1st half. I'll be happy enough to see them score in the mid 20s.Hopefully, they'll stack the line, stuff SJax, and force Bulger to beat them. Make a play or 2 on D and win a close one.
 
The comparisons to Ryan Grant are certainly valid. Grant was an afterthought last season when the year began. He also benefited from an easy schedule, which Green-Ellis might.
A couple key differences:1. Grant had spent 2 seasons with the Giants before being traded (so he had quite a bit of experience, at least in practice)2. the main reason Grant was buried on the depth chart last year was because he was traded just before the season began.
uh....wasn't he buried on the depth chart in ny?
 
The comparisons to Ryan Grant are certainly valid. Grant was an afterthought last season when the year began. He also benefited from an easy schedule, which Green-Ellis might.
A couple key differences:1. Grant had spent 2 seasons with the Giants before being traded (so he had quite a bit of experience, at least in practice)2. the main reason Grant was buried on the depth chart last year was because he was traded just before the season began.
uh....wasn't he buried on the depth chart in ny?
The 4 guys who were ahead of Grant in NY (Brandon Jacobs, Reuben Droughns, Derrick Ward and Ahmad Bradshaw) were superior to the 3 guys ahead of Grant in Green Bay (Jackson, Wynn, Morency).Grant couldn't beat out Jacobs or Droughns in training camp, but he probably would have been able to beat out Jackson, Wynn and/or Morency if he'd been with the Packers since Day One.That's where Grant's situation is different from BJGE's situation. BJGE has been with the Patriots since May 1 but he was never able to beat out Maroney, Jordan, or Morris.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm really not that excited by taylor, although bjge will probably only get you a couple weeks production.so, for at least the next week or 2 I would, then I'd probably find an alternative for both.
If you get production out of BJGE, it means he did well with his opportunity - and that changes everything (Morris is not SJax or anything.) It's been FF hell for awhile in the NE backfield, but that's probably more due to the guys there than anything else. If there was ever a situation for someone to claim a RB job, this is it. I didn't hear much of him until last week - I got him in two leagues. In a few others, he was long gone. That tells me something right there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top