LOL, you still don't get it. They were ranked closely. I went based on my gut that I didn't think Thomas would have a great game or score a TD. I was right on both calls. Also, you still don't get the fact that many sites (including this one, whose rankings I use to make decide between what I think are close calls) had them ranked closely, which by definition means it wasn't a terrible/horrible call. Everyone in this thread was really excited about Coleman's prospects. Now, after Thursday night, you act like he sucks and everyone knew he was bad. They are both rookie WRs and you act like Thomas is some sort of god and Coleman is terrible.
It's easy to say it's a terrible call when Coleman had already played and Thomas hadn't. It's not even worth trying to debate the stuff you were completely wrong on. You said Thomas had monster games at home because of the turf when I proved you were wrong that his two monster games were one the road. I showed you the 14 WR TDs to 2 WR TDs for Baltimore versus Cleveland and not a peep. Now, that I was right about Thomas having a sub par game, you say no one could predict Thomas fumbling. Well, no one could predict Hue switching to McCown and him having 3/almost 4 turnovers and just blowing great garbage time chances. If Kessler stayed in Coleman would have outscored Thomas IMHO, so no not a terrible call.
They both score 4 points in my league and only one had a QB change in game when the game was still winnable. No environmental changes for Thomas, so I was 100% right on worrying that Thomas wouldn't have a good game. I was just wrong that I thought Coleman would have a good game. I wish I went with Eli Rogers, but I picked up Coleman for the rest of the season.
Oh well, you stick to your guns even though you have provided no actual detail into why it was a horrible call that was actually correct and not debunked. Adios muchacho, I'm done here.